Reflection
Reflection
Summer Burns
English 419
20 April 2020
When developing the plans for my Romeo and Juliet lesson plan, I found it difficult to
create primarily because of my lack of interest within Shakespeare. However, once I got into the
lesson and the possible activities that could go with it, I found myself enjoying the possibility of
potentially teaching this one day. Most of my ideas for my lesson revolved around the
understanding of the play itself. My activity on day one where I had it set aside for vocabulary,
derived from an activity I had chosen from the “Teaching Shakespeare to Young Adults” text. I
loved the idea, but I felt as though it needed to be more than just a vocabulary activity they look
at once. So, in order to make the vocabulary more inclusive, I made sure that students had to
actively read each day to find the vocabulary words, and that they would be working towards
something with those words: a test. There were also two other activities that came from this same
text which was my sound story on day 4, and the film review on day 5. For both of these
activities, I tried to maintain their integrity since they are both activities in which I have no
personal experience teaching. As for the other activities used throughout, most of them came
from my English 402 methods class, and my Shakespeare class. I felt that they were appropriate
tools to reflect back on as they implemented activities which I never would have considered.
The objectives I chose to teach were somewhat all over the place while also being
reasonable in the play learning process as they covered a range of auditory, presentation, writing,
and reading objective. For starters, I believe that to understand a play, you have to understand the
Burns 2
terminology that goes along with it. Having the first day include a standard and objectives that
revolve around vocabulary was the most reasonable beginning to this unit to ensure student
success in the following days. I then transitioned into character recognition and a standard about
how a character is impacted by a work because this play revolved around the characters. It is not
like a novel where it could revolve around the setting, or a mysterious object. It is a play that
must revolve around the characters if it wants to be lengthy and maintain interest. The days in
which I asked students to act out Act 4, and the sound story day were centered around the idea
that students would recognize what all goes into a play when taken out of the literary format. I
needed students to understand how important it is to have cues that tell you there is music, or that
someone is leaving because if not, readers will question the gap that was left open.
I think the only reason I find teaching Shakespeare important is because it exposes
students to plays, and a new range of vocabulary they would otherwise not come into contact
with. I am not a fan of Shakespeare simply because I get aggravated with the not understanding
of certain phrases or the gaps that are throughout his works; however, I would never neglect
teaching it to students because it is important for them to comprehend a classic artist who
remains relevant in today’s society. As far as improvements to my lesson go, I would try to make
better differentiated instruction notes that would be more realistic to the classroom I would have.
Another area I would change is that I would try to find some different reading strategies. I tried
to keep things different because it is easy for students to become bored; however, I didn’t want to
begin throwing crazy ideas all over the place out of fear that they would draw away the attention