Scribd
Upload
125 views1 page

Debate Scoring Sheet: Levels of Performance Criteria 1. Organization and Clarity

This document provides a scoring rubric for debates with 5 criteria: 1) organization and clarity, 2) use of arguments, 3) use of examples and facts, 4) use of rebuttal, and 5) presentation style. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being the highest level of performance. Scores for each criterion are multiplied by 5 and summed to calculate a total score.

Uploaded by

Inigo Joseph
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
125 views1 page

Debate Scoring Sheet: Levels of Performance Criteria 1. Organization and Clarity

This document provides a scoring rubric for debates with 5 criteria: 1) organization and clarity, 2) use of arguments, 3) use of examples and facts, 4) use of rebuttal, and 5) presentation style. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being the highest level of performance. Scores for each criterion are multiplied by 5 and summed to calculate a total score.

Uploaded by

Inigo Joseph
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Debate Scoring Sheet

Debate Topic: ____________________________________              

Date: _______________         Pro or Con  (circle one)

Participant Name:

_______________________________       

DEBATE RUBRIC
  Levels of Performance

Criteria 1 2 3 4

1. Organization Unclear in Clear in some Mostly clear Completely clear


and Clarity: most parts parts but not and orderly in and orderly
viewpoints and over all all parts presentation
responses are
outlined both clearly
and orderly.

2. Use of Few or no Some relevant Many reasons Most relevant


Arguments: relevant reasons given given: fairly reasons given in
reasons are given to reasons given relevant support
support viewpoint.

3. Use of Examples Few or no Some relevant Many Most relevant


and Facts: relevant examples/facts examples/facts supporting
examples and facts supporting given given: fairly examples and
are given to support examples/facts relevant facts given
reasons, with
references

4. Use of Rebuttal: No effective Few effective Some effective Many effective


arguments made by counter- counter- counter- counter-
the other teams are arguments arguments arguments arguments made
responded to and made made made
dealt with effectively.

5. Presentation Few style Few style All style All style features
Style: features were features were features were were used
tone of voice, use of used; not used but they used, most convincingly
gestures, and level convincingly were used convincingly
of enthusiasm are convincingly
convincing to
audience.
 
  Total: ______ Score = Total x 5 = ________
 

You might also like