Transportation System Sustainability Issues in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Economies: Case Studies From Georgia
Transportation System Sustainability Issues in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Economies: Case Studies From Georgia
Transportation System Sustainability Issues in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Economies: Case Studies From Georgia
Abstract: While there is no standard definition for sustainable transportation, several adopted definitions reflect that a sustainable
transportation system should be effective and efficient in providing safe and equitable access to basic economic and social services,
promote economic development and support environmental integrity. Critical priorities, standards, and constraints for attaining sustainable
transportation may be different, however, in different countries depending on prevailing socioeconomic conditions and political and
administrative institutions. This study develops four case studies to characterize some of the major transportation system sustainability
issues in developed and developing economies. The cases demonstrate that while transportation sustainability issues revolve around
similar issues, the actual process of identifying and addressing pertinent issues to promote transportation system sustainability may
involve widely different priorities and constraints that should influence how standards are developed to promote successful movement
toward sustainability in the international community.
DOI: 10.1061/共ASCE兲0733-9488共2006兲132:3共172兲
CE Database subject headings: Sustainable development; Economic factors; Transportation systems; Georgia; Korea; Colombia;
Africa.
Introduction access to basic social and economic services, should promote eco-
nomic development, and not be harmful to the environment—and
indicator systems being developed and used reflect this consensus
Background
共Jeon and Amekudzi 2005兲. Major organizations such as the
The fact that sustainability is an increasingly important issue in World Bank, the Organization for Cooperation and Economic De-
transportation system and services provision is evident in con- velopment 共OECD兲, and Transport Canada have adopted defini-
gested metropolitan highway systems, declining air quality and tions for sustainable transportation. The OECD, for example,
respiratory health, the need for improved and more equitable ac- defines sustainable transportation as transportation that does not
cess to basic social and economic services in several areas around endanger public health or ecosystems and meets the needs for
the world, and a growing number of initiatives to address sustain- access consistent with (a) the use of renewable resources at or
ability considerations in transportation planning. Sustainable de- below their rates of regeneration, and (b) the use of nonrenew-
velopment is most commonly defined as development that meets able resources below the rates of development of renewable sub-
the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future stitutes 共OECD 1999兲. Table 1 shows several working definitions
generations to meet their own needs 共WCED 1987兲. While there of sustainable transportation and sustainability. In the United
is no standard definition for a sustainable transportation system, States, the mission statements of over 14 state departments of
there is emerging consensus that such a system should be effec- transportation 共DOTs兲 now include sustainability either explicitly
tive and efficient in providing its users with equitable and safe or implicitly 共Jeon and Amekudzi 2005兲. In addition, a growing
number of organizations around the world have begun to develop
1 and use indicator systems to measure their progress toward trans-
Graduate Research Assistant, School of Civil and Environmental
portation system sustainability.
Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0355.
E-mail: [email protected]
2
Associate Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Motivation
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0355. E-mail:
[email protected] While sustainable transportation is a policy objective or issue of
3
Associate Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, concern in high-, middle-, and low-income countries, critical fac-
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0355. E-mail: tors influencing the attainment of a sustainable transportation/land
[email protected] use system, the relative priorities accorded various sustainability
Note. Discussion open until February 1, 2007. Separate discussions objectives, and the constraints to be encountered in moving trans-
must be submitted for individual papers. To extend the closing date by
portation systems toward sustainability, may be different in these
one month, a written request must be filed with the ASCE Managing
Editor. The manuscript for this paper was submitted for review and pos- different environments. Discussions on sustainable transportation
sible publication on March 18, 2005; approved on November 17, 2005. that remain at a relatively general level may not shed adequate
This paper is part of the Journal of Urban Planning and Development, light on unique issues and priorities that must be addressed rela-
Vol. 132, No. 3, September 1, 2006. ©ASCE, ISSN 0733-9488/2006/3- tive to attaining sustainable transportation in different socioeco-
172–186/$25.00. nomic contexts. More-detailed assessments are necessary to
renewable or inexhaustible energy sources 共such as solar power in the long run兲; and recycle
natural resources used in vehicles and infrastructure 共such as steel, plastic, etc.兲.
共2兲 In society: provide equity of access for people and their goods, in this generation and in all
future generations; enhance human health; help support the highest quality of life compatible
with available wealth; facilitate urban development at the human scale; limit noise intrusion
below levels accepted by communities; and be safe for people and their property.
共3兲 In the economy: be financially affordable in each generation; be designed and operated to
maximize economic efficiency and minimize economic costs; and help support a strong,
vibrant and diverse economy.
Victoria Transport Policy Institute 2003 共Canada兲 Providing for a secure and satisfying material future for everyone, in a society that is
equitable, caring, and attentive to basic human needs.
The Center for Sustainable Transportation 2002 共1兲 Allows the basic access needs of individuals and societies to be met safely and in a
共Canada兲 manner consistent with human and ecosystem health, and with equity within and between
generations.
共2兲 Is affordable, operates efficiently, offers choice of transport mode, and supports a vibrant
economy.
共3兲 Limits emissions and waste within the planet ability to absorb them, minimizes
consumption of non-renewable resources, reuses and recycles its components, and minimizes
the use of land and the production of noise.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Environmentally sustainable transportation is defined as:
Development 1999
“Transportation that does not endanger public health or ecosystems and that meets needs for
access consistent with 共a兲 use of renewable resources at below their rates of regeneration, and
共b兲 use of nonrenewable resources below the rates of development of renewable substitutes.”
World Bank General operational principles for physically sustainable societies 共not especially for the
transport sector兲 is defined as:
“Their rates of use of renewable resources do not exceed their rates of regeneration. Their
rates of use of nonrenewable resources do not exceed the rate at which substitutes are
developed. Their rates of pollution do not exceed the assimilative capacity of the
environment.”
Procedures for Recommending Optimal A sustainable urban transport and land use system: 共1兲 provides access to goods and services
Sustainable Planning of European City Transport in an efficient way for all inhabitants of the urban area; 共2兲 protects the environment, cultural
Systems 2003 heritage and ecosystems for the present generation, and 共3兲 does not endanger the opportunities
of future generations to reach at least the same welfare level as those living now, including the
welfare they derive from their natural environment and cultural heritage.
Department of Sustainable Development 2003 Sustainable development is about ensuring a better quality of life for everyone, now and for
共United Kingdom兲 generations to come. This requires meeting four key objectives at the same time in the U.K.
and the world as a whole: 共1兲 social progress which recognizes the needs of everyone; 共2兲
effective protection of the environment; 共3兲 prudent use of natural resources, and 共4兲
maintenance of high and stable levels of economic growth and employment.
Note: Adapted from Jeon and Amekudzi 共2005兲.
understand the drivers of existing transportation systems better, as income economies. This is done through the development of four
well as priorities and constraints for attaining sustainable trans- case studies for selected countries/states with a range of economic
portation across the range of socioeconomic conditions in the conditions: Georgia 共United States, high-income status兲, South
global community. Korea 共East Asia, recently moved from middle- to high-income
status兲, Colombia 共South America, middle-income status兲, and
Objective and Outline Ghana 共West Africa, low-income status兲. The purpose is three-
The objective of this study is to characterize some of the major fold. First, it is to demonstrate that while definitions of sustain-
issues in transportation sustainability in high-, middle-, and low- able transportation seem to revolve around system effectiveness
mundsson emphasizes this need to link indicator systems with Georgia is a state in the southern United States 共U.S.兲, the world’s
actual policies based on a study that evaluates six sustainability fourth largest nation in land area 共after Russia, Canada, and
indicator systems 共Gudmundsson 2003兲. Given the widely differ- China兲, extending from the Atlantic coast to the Pacific Ocean and
ent pressures, socioeconomic conditions, and institutional con- sharing land borders with Canada in the north and Mexico in the
straints that exist in different contexts, adopting visions and south 共About 2004兲. The country has 50 locally autonomous
indicators without explicitly identifying, implementing, and states with a total population of 290 million 共2004兲, and a per
monitoring realistic policies to promote movement toward these capita GNI of U.S.$33,684 共2003兲 共Nationmaster.com 2004兲. It
visions would at best have limited effectiveness. has the second largest 共after the European Union兲 and most tech-
The next section presents four case studies for countries/states nologically advanced economy in the world. U.S. firms are at or
with very different socioeconomic, political, and institutional con- near the forefront in technological advances, especially in com-
texts to characterize major issues relative to achieving transporta- puter, medical, aerospace, and military equipment. Although the
tion sustainability, and the local contexts in which progress country has rich mineral resources and various agricultural prod-
toward sustainability must occur. The discussion that follows ucts, the biggest sector is service industries, employing about
highlights the importance of developing specific priorities, poli- 75% of U.S. residents.
cies, and standards to address transportation sustainability based With a land area of 57,906 sq mi 共149,976 km2兲, Georgia is
on a system-level understanding of the socioeconomic, political, the largest state east of the Mississippi River 共24th overall兲. At-
and institutional contexts of the country or other jurisdiction lanta, the state’s capital, is the largest city followed by Savannah,
under consideration. one of the busiest ports in the United States. Based on the 2000
census, the population of Georgia was just over 8 million, making
it the 10th most populous state. Nearly half of the state’s popula-
Transportation Issues in Georgia „United States…, tion lives in the Atlanta metropolitan area, which has experienced
South Korea, Colombia, and Ghana phenomenal growth in the past decade. From 1990–2000, Geor-
gia’s population grew by over 20%, as shown in Table 2. Geor-
Because the quality of transportation affects and is affected by the gia’s 1999 total gross state product of $275 billion placed it at
economy, priorities, standards, and constraints for sustainable 10th in the nation, and its per capita personal income of $28,145
transportation may differ, sometimes significantly, depending on placed it at 23rd in the nation in 2000. Service sector employment
the level of socioeconomic development in a country. The World accounted for about 26% of the state’s jobs, followed by retail
Bank classifies countries as high, middle, or low income based on with about 18%, and government with about 15%. The state’s
their gross national income 共GNI兲 per capita. GNI 共formerly, industrial outputs are textiles and apparel, transportation equip-
gross national product or GNP兲 is the sum of the value added by ment, food processing, paper products, chemical products, electric
all resident producers plus any product taxes 共less subsidies兲 not equipment, and tourism. Agriculture also plays a major role in the
included in the valuation of output plus net receipts of primary state’s economy, contributing about five billion dollars annually
income 共Nationmaster.com 2004兲. According to the World Bank 共Wikipedia 2004兲.
Classification 共The World Bank Group 2002兲, low-income econo-
mies are defined as those having a per capita GNI of less than Transportation System
$735; lower- to middle-income countries: $736–$2,935; upper-to-
middle-income: $2,936–$9,075; and high-income countries: more General Characteristics. As in several metropolitan areas
than $9,076 per capita. Low- and middle-income economies are around the world, the automobile is the dominant mode of trans-
sometimes referred to as developing economies, while high- portation in the Atlanta Metropolitan Area. In 2002, the Atlanta
income economies are referred to as developed economies. While Regional Commission 共ARC兲, the region’s Metropolitan Planning
the GNI, a broad measure, is considered to be the best single Organization, recorded a mode share of home-based work trips at
indicator of economic capacity and progress, it is recognized that 91.78%, with single occupancy vehicle share at 80.72%, carpool
the GNI does not by itself constitute or measure welfare or suc- share at 11.06%, and public transit share at 8.22% 共ARC 2002兲.
cess in development 共The World Bank Group 2002兲. Highways are thus the predominant infrastructure for transporta-
Below, four case studies highlight the status of transportation tion. In 2002, Georgia’s transportation system encompassed
in various economies: the state of Georgia 共United States兲, high 113,655 mi 共182,910 km兲 of public roads, 4,853 mi 共7,810 km兲
income; South Korea 共East Asia兲, high-income/recently middle of railroad, 103 publicly owned airports, and four shipping ports.
income; Colombia 共South America兲, middle income; and Ghana Georgia is also served by 12 urban transit systems including the
共West Africa兲, low income. These cases were selected to cover the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, which serves At-
range of economic categories given by the World Bank Classifi- lanta, and 82 rural transit systems 共GDOT 2002兲.
cation. The writers’ backgrounds were also relevant in selecting Like several metropolitan areas around the world, Metro At-
five times the population of Georgia, making it the third-most Infrastructure. The irregular terrain of Colombia makes the
populous country in Latin America, after Brazil and Mexico. The construction of roads and railroads costly. Urban and rural road
country has experienced significant population growth in the past conditions and maintenance are considered poor 共Onursal and
few decades, as depicted by Table 11. The per capita GNI was Guatam 1997; U.S. Department of State Bureau and Consular
U.S.$1,820 in 2002. About 20 million people are considered to Affairs 2004兲. Basic infrastructure is deteriorating in most major
live in poverty and 10 million in extreme poverty. Movement cities in Colombia, and the numerous construction projects initi-
from rural to urban areas has been heavy as has been the growth ated to improve this situation contribute significantly to conges-
in automobiles as shown in Table 12. The urban population in- tion 共World Resources Institute 2004兲.
creased from 57% of the total population in 1951 to about 74% in
1994. Bogotá, the capital city of Colombia, is one of the densest Safety. Traffic laws are sporadically followed and rarely en-
cities in the world, with 7.7 million people living on 35,000 ha forced, and a traffic accident is estimated to occur every ten min-
共350 sq km兲. Ethnic diversity in Colombia is a result of the inter- utes in Colombia 共U.S. Department of State Bureau and Consular
mingling of indigenous Indians, Spanish colonists, and Africans. Affairs 2004兲. Road traffic fatalities are ranked as the second
Colombia is a free market economy with major commercial and leading cause of morbidity and mortality from external causes,
investment ties to the United States. The country is poised for exceeded only by homicides. Approximately 20.2% 共34,547兲 of
moderate growth in the next several years, after recovering from a all deaths recorded between 1995 and 1999 were due to road
severe recession in 1999 when the gross domestic product 共the traffic injuries. Pedestrians constitute the largest category of these
GDP the total market value of all goods and services produced traffic-related casualties accounting for close to 32% of all inju-
within the borders of a nation during a specified period兲 fell by ries and 40% of the deaths from traffic crashes. The problem of
about 5%. The economy suffered from weak domestic demand, road traffic crashes has existed predominantly in the urban areas
austere government budgets, and a difficult security situation. The of Bogotá, Medellin, and Cali. In these main urban centers, pe-
current government faces economic challenges ranging from pen- destrians constituted nearly 68% of road traffic crash victims. As
sion reform to reduction of unemployment that reached a record shown in Table 13, over 200,000 road traffic crashes were re-
20% in 1999 and may remain high, contributing to extreme in- ported in 2000, representing a fourfold increase from the crashes
equalities in income distribution. In 1999, the share of agricultural reported in 1986. Injuries increased fourfold from the mid-
industries stood at 19% in the overall industrial structure; manu- 13,000s in 1986 to the mid-51,000s in 2000, while fatalities al-
facturing industries stood at 26%; and service industries at 55%. most doubled from 3,535 in 1986 to 6,551 in 2000. This corre-
Two of Colombia’s leading exports, oil and coffee, face an uncer- sponds to one person dying every 80 min and a mortality rate of
tain future; new exploration is needed to offset declining oil pro-
duction, while coffee harvests and prices are depressed. Besides,
the lack of public security is a key concern for investors who are Table 13. Trends on Road Traffic Crashes, Fatalities, and Injuries
calling for progress in the government’s peace negotiations with 共Colombia, 1986–2000兲
insurgent groups 共The World Bank Group 2002; Wikipedia 2004兲.
Year Fatalities Injuries Crashes
Transportation System 1986 3,535 13,449 64,289
1987 3,833 15,008 91,723
General Characteristics. Transportation mode share data in- 1988 5,039 19,772 117,933
dicates that about half of all trips 共46%兲 are made by bus, 16% by 1989 4,032 18,085 108,506
taxi, 15% by automobile, 8% by pedestrian, 8% by bicycle, and 1990 3,704 16,086 122,112
7% by motorcycle 共TGI Colombia 2004兲. Colombia’s transporta- 1991 4,119 18,182 111,462
tion inventory shows that the railway system of the country 1992 4,620 21,280 130,304
spanned 3,340 operational km in 2002, and highway system tra- 1993 5,628 33,083 149,940
versed 110,000 km 共including paved and unpaved roadways兲 in
1994 6,989 45,940 164,202
2000. Trains serve the densely populated areas of Colombia al-
1995 7,874 52,547 179,820
though service is undependable. Buses provide service between
1996 7,445 50,630 187,966
cities on the major routes while taxis offer the most reliable pub-
lic transportation in cities. The country has 1,050 airports 共includ- 1997 7,607 49,312 195,442
ing airports with paved and unpaved runways兲; the main 1998 7,595 52,965 206,283
international airports are El Dorado Airport 共Bogotá兲 and Rafael 1999 7,026 52,346 220,225
Nunez Airport. A ferry and a boat service operate between some 2000 6,551 51,458 231,974
of the ports and cays in Colombia 共World Resources Institute Total 85,597 510,143 2,282,181
2004兲. Note: Data adapted from Rodriguez et al. 共2003兲.
Note: Data adapted from Afukaar et al. 共2003兲. kaar et al. 2003兲.
Improve safety measures Minimize inter-regional disparities Improve infrastructure condition Implement effective public
especially on rural two-lane roads in accessibility and mobility transportation system
Enforce traffic and environmental
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Universidad Militar Nueva Granada on 02/19/20. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
Integrate land use and Implement more advanced laws more adequately Improve road accessibility
transportation planning better in environmental policy pertaining to especially for agricultural
metro Atlanta air noise pollution incentives
ment behavioral-related policies that improve the quality of the achieving transportation sustainability within the international
transportation environment. It also indicates that the drivers for community. First, the data available on different aspects of trans-
congestion and associated air quality issues in metropolitan areas portation systems vary widely in adequacy and completeness. No
共e.g., high population growth rates, rapid urbanization, and pres- data were found for any of the cases capturing the relative levels
sures to relocate to areas with booming economies兲 do not auto- of accessibility that the population had to basic services and
matically disappear with successful economic growth, and must amenities, indicating that it would be difficult to measure gains in
be proactively managed simultaneously as economic growth is accessibility that occur without improvements in mobility, which
pursued, in order to preserve regional quality-of-life gains. is a major area of opportunity for progress toward sustainability.
Colombia’s example with the Transmilenio Project in Bogotá The data on the adequacy of the transportation system were
is demonstrating the feasibility of transforming a city from an largely mobility focused. In addition, metrics for data on particu-
auto-centered to a pedestrian-oriented city and the importance of lar attributes, e.g., safety, were different for the different cases.
effective public transportation systems for addressing some of the For example, while crash fatalities were being measured as a
congestion and air quality problems in metropolitan areas, par- function of vehicle kilometers traveled in Georgia they were
ticularly in areas with adequate population densities to support being measured as a function of the number of vehicles in South
effective public transportation. As rapid urbanization occurs in Korea, in Ghana as the total number of injuries or fatalities per a
developing countries, and rapid metropolitan population growth standard number of people, and in Colombia by the total number
continues to occur in developed economies, both of which con- of fatalities or injuries per year. Thus, safety gains or losses would
tinue to create increased population densities to support public be more difficult to capture using the data of the low/medium-
transportation, the development of effective public transportation income countries. Data standards to facilitate comparability
共less-developed economies兲 and improvement of the convenience would support progress toward sustainability.
of existing public transportation systems 共more-developed econo- The widely different socioeconomic conditions represented by
mies兲 grow to be more feasible options for transforming neigh- the four case studies indicate why it would be difficult to develop
borhoods from auto-centered to public transportation-centered uniform standards for attaining sustainability within the interna-
systems. tional community and seem to suggest that “movement toward
All four cases indicate that there is a serious need to consider sustainability” may be a more realistic objective than “achieving
taking formal steps to integrate the transportation and land deci- sustainability.” In practice, therefore, the fact that there are few
sion making processes better, in order to address more effectively widely accepted standards for what would constitute sustainabil-
such issues as sprawl 共Atlanta, Accra兲, disorderly development ity should not be a major obstacle for entities interested in taking
共Seoul兲, and the effective organization of highly populated urban steps to move toward sustainability because different policy, plan,
areas 共Bogotá兲. Rapid population growth in the Atlanta and Seoul program and project actions can be classified objectively as sus-
metropolitan areas, and rapid urbanization in Bogotá and Accra, tainability gains or losses along the lines of the commonly ac-
as well as the increasing rate of vehicle ownership in these areas, cepted criteria for sustainability 共e.g., effective/efficient/safe
all point to an urgent need for institutions or institutional mecha- access, economic growth, environmental, and social equity, for
nisms that are better equipped to plan more comprehensively in- transportation兲. At the same time, the commitment of various en-
cluding using land use controls to gain a better handle on a tities 共local jurisdictions, states, countries, nations, and the global
broader range of influences on metropolitan quality of life. community兲 to sustainability is partially dependent on the com-
mitment of their neighboring entities to move toward sustainabil-
ity, because of the existing threat of “tragedy of the commons”
Implications and Conclusions inclinations.
First, this would seem to suggest that certain groupings of
The findings of this study have important implications for the entities may provide better forums for achieving consensus on
development of priorities and standards for progress toward standards to move toward sustainability: entities that have similar
points in time. A plausible objective may be to move “regions of toward sustainability. Particularly important are the effects of
similar status and constraints” toward sustainability through population densities on achieving and measuring transportation
consensus-based interim targets that are subject to change over sustainability 共in particular, megacities such as Seoul, Los Ange-
time. The term region is used in this context to capture entities les, and Lagos may offer a unique set of challenges for the devel-
with similar existing socioeconomic conditions with respect to opment of sustainable transportation systems兲; understanding
achieving sustainability in a particular domain, e.g., transporta- causes and drivers of sustainability and nonsustainability in trans-
tion. Thus, such regions may be geographically contiguous but portation systems, understanding the relationships between imple-
not necessarily so. For example, entities with vehicle fatalities on mented economic/infrastructure policies and the resulting system
the rise are natural members of a region that would be interested outcomes 共e.g., safety, congestion, air quality兲; and appropriate
in reversing trends in roadway fatalities. Thus, the levels of com- indicator sets for measuring progress toward sustainability at vari-
parability among a particular group of entities would have a direct ous levels of socioeconomic development.
impact on their ability to reach consensus on particular targets for
sustainability in agreed-upon time frames.
These ideas suggest potential differences in the types of fo- Acknowledgments
rums that could be successfully adopted to develop intra-regional
standards in contradistinction with inter-regional standards. It This material is based upon work supported by the National Sci-
would seem that the successful development of intra-regional ence Foundation under Grant No. 0219607. Any opinions, find-
standards 共interim targets兲 would need to be more sensitive to the ings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this
needs of members of a particular region. Inter-regional agree- material are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the
ments, on the other hand, could be negotiated among regional views of the National Science Foundation. The writers are grate-
representatives on issues or “bundles of issues” that are not nec- ful for contributions made by Alexandria McBride and Craig
essarily similar but offer opportunities for give-and-take, taking Miller 共NASA SHARP apprentices兲 to the case studies.
into consideration the different needs and interim goals of the
participating regions. Under such a framework, standards that cut
across regions would not necessarily be similar for all regional
References
entities involved, but rather acceptable based on a mindset of
tradeoffs brought to the negotiation table and an understanding AAA and Georgia Regional Transportation Authority. 共2002兲. “2002 an-
that the prevailing conditions in different regions can be signifi- nual air quality report.” Georgia Regional Transportation Authority,
cantly different. Ga.
One may also argue that some sustainability issues have Abane, A. M. 共1993兲. “Tackling traffic congestion in Accra: A road user’s
farther-reaching influence than others, and that in developing perspective.” J. Adv. Transp., 27共2兲.
standards, the former would be more important across regions About. 共2004兲. 具geography.about.com典 共accessed June 2004兲, About, Inc.
than within regions. For example, vehicle emissions may be con- Afukaar, F. K., Antwi, P., and Ofosu-Amaah, S. 共2003兲. “Pattern of road
sidered farther-reaching than crash fatalities in the quest for ac- traffic injuries in Ghana: Implications for control.” Inj. Control Safety
Promotion, 10共1–2兲, 69–76.
ceptable across-the-board standards, because the impacts of the
ASCE. 共2003兲. “2003 ASCE report card on Georgia infrastructure.”
former on neighboring entities are potentially more significant
具www.ascega.org/reportcard/07-final-Transit_Brief.pdf典.
than the latter. Distinguishing among indicators that have intra- ASCE. 共2004兲. 具www.asce.org典 共accessed May, 2004兲.
regional versus inter-regional implications could be helpful for Ardila, A., and Menckhoff, G. 共2002兲. “Transportation policies in Bogotá,
understanding how much of a driver regional commonalities Colombia: Building a transportation system for the people.” Transpor-
would be in the successful development of standards for sustain- tation Research Record. 1817, Paper No. 02–3858, Transportation Re-
ability, and thus for crafting issues or “bundles of issues” that are search Board, Washington, D.C.
more likely to gain consensus at appropriate levels 共local, na- Atlanta Regional Commission 共ARC兲. 共2002兲. “Transportation solution
tional, regional, global兲 of decision making, while temporarily for a new century: Model documentation 共draft兲.” Appendix 4, ARC,
managing at more disaggregate level issues that are less likely to Atlanta, Ga.
gain across-the-board consensus. Department of National Statistics. 共2004兲. 具www.dane.gov.co典 共accessed
May, 2004兲.
These ideas are intended to offer food for thought to the
Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 共2004兲. 具www.britannica.com/eb/article-
broader community interested in finding more successful models 55176典 共accessed June, 2004兲.
to develop standards for promoting movement toward sustainabil- Earth Trends. 共2004兲. “The environmental information portal.” 具earth-
ity in the international community. Perhaps different regionally- trends.wri.org典 共accessed June, 2004兲.
based standards that are perceived as equitable across regions Georgia Department of Community Affairs. 共2004兲.
stand more of a chance of being adopted than across-the-board 具www.dca.state.ga.us/index.asp典 共accessed June, 2004兲.
.ga.us典 共accessed May, 2004兲. Target Group Index 共TGI兲. 共2004兲. 具www.zonalatina.com/Zldata98.htm典
Georgia Governor Sonny Perdue. 共2004兲. 具www.gov.state.ga.us/ 共accessed July 2004兲, TGI, IBOPE Colombia.
issues_gov/index.shtml典 共accessed June 2004兲, Atlanta, Ga. Texas Transport Institute 共TTI兲. 共2004兲. 具tti.tamu.edu典 共accessed May
Ghana Statistical Service. 共2004兲. Accra: National Accident Data, Build- 2004兲.
ing and Road Research Institute 具www.csir.org.gh/brri.html典 共accessed The Intermodal Transportation Database. 共2000兲. 具www.transtats.bts.gov典
July, 2004兲. 共accessed June 2004兲, Bureau of Transportation Statistics.
Governor’s Office of Highway Safety. 共2004兲. 具www.gohs.state.ga.us.典 The Official Ghana Education Homepage. 共2004兲. 具http://
共accessed June 2004兲. www.ghana.edu.gh/prospects/vision.html.典 共accessed July 2004兲.
Graduate School of Architecture and Preservation. 共2004兲. Columbia The OPEC Fund for International Development. 共2004兲.
Univ. 具www.arch.columbia.edu/Studio/Spring2003/UP/Accra/html/ 具www.opecfund.org/new/press/2004/pr04009.htm典 共accessed July
history.html典 共accessed July 2004兲. 2004兲.
Gudmundsson, H. 共2003兲. “Making concepts matter: Sustainable mobility The World Bank Group. 共2002兲. 具www.worldbank.org/data/countryclass/
and indicator systems in transport policy.” Int. Soc. Sci. J., 55共2兲, classgroups.htm典 共accessed June 2004兲.
199–217. United Nations Habitat. 共2004兲. 具www.unhabitat.org/habrdd/conditions/
IndexMundi. 共2004兲. 具www.indexmundi.com典 共accessed July 2004兲. wafrica/ghana.htm典 共accessed June 2004兲.
International Road Federation. 共2004兲. World Road Statistics, U.S. Census Bureau. 共2000兲. “U.S. Census 2000.” 具www.census.gov/
具econ.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/ main/www/cen2000.html典 共accessed June 2004兲.
EXTRESEARCH/0,,contentMDK:20699572~pagePK:64214825 U.S. Department of State Bureau and Consular Affairs. 共2004兲.
~piPK:64214943~theSitePK:469382,00.html典 共accessed July 2004兲. 具travel.state.gov/colombia.html典 共accessed June 2004兲.
Jeon, C. M., and Amekudzi, A. 共2005兲. “Addressing sustainability in U.S. Department of State. 共2004兲. 具www.state.gov典 共accessed June 2004兲.
transportation systems: definitions, indicators, and metrics.” J. Infra- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 共USEPA兲. 共2000兲. “National air
struct. Syst., 11共1兲, 31–50. pollutant emission trends, 1900–1998.” EPA-454/R-00-002, Office of
Korea. net. 共2004兲. 具www.korea.net典 共accessed May 2004兲. Air Quality, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
Ministry of Construction and Transportation. 共2004兲. South Korea, 具ww- Wikipedia. 共2004兲. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., 具en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
w.moct.go.kr典 共accessed May 2004兲. United_States典 共accessed June 2004兲.
Ministry of Construction and Transportation. 共1999兲. “Comprehensive na- World Commission on Environment and Development 共WCED兲. 共1987兲.
tional territorial plan: 2000–2020.” South Korea. Our common future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
Ministry of Environment. 共2003兲. “Annual Report of Ambient air quality World Resources Institute. 共2004兲. 具climate.wri.org/
in Korea 2002.” Annual Rep., Kwachon, South Korea. topic_keyissues_text.cfm?cid⫽1014典 共accessed June 2004兲.
National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy 共NRTEE兲. Yang, B. M., and Kim, J. 共2003兲. “Road traffic accidents and policy
共2004兲. “Prospectus for a Canadian sustainable cities interventions in Korea.” Inj. Control Safety Promotion, 10共1–2兲, 89–
initiatives in Accra, Ghana.” 具www.nrtee-trnee.ca/eng/programs/ 94.