Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 120 views

    Immam Vs COMELEC

    Uploaded by

    Allan Cj Sangkate
    The COMELEC had jurisdiction to order the petitioner to cease and desist from taking his oath of office as mayor. Fourteen precincts with over 2,000 registered voters failed to hold elections due to violence and threats. While petitions to count the ballots from these precincts and hold special elections were pending, the municipal board of canvassers proclaimed the petitioner mayor based on an incomplete canvass that did not include these precincts. The COMELEC was correct to suspend the proclamation until all ballots were counted since the missing votes could affect the result, and the board of canvassers lacked authorization from the COMELEC to proclaim a winner given the pending petitions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Immam Vs COMELEC

    Uploaded by

    Allan Cj Sangkate
    120 views2 pages
    The COMELEC had jurisdiction to order the petitioner to cease and desist from taking his oath of office as mayor. Fourteen precincts with over 2,000 registered voters failed to hold elections due to violence and threats. While petitions to count the ballots from these precincts and hold special elections were pending, the municipal board of canvassers proclaimed the petitioner mayor based on an incomplete canvass that did not include these precincts. The COMELEC was correct to suspend the proclamation until all ballots were counted since the missing votes could affect the result, and the board of canvassers lacked authorization from the COMELEC to proclaim a winner given the pending petitions.

    Original Title

    Immam vs COMELEC

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The COMELEC had jurisdiction to order the petitioner to cease and desist from taking his oath of office as mayor. Fourteen precincts with over 2,000 registered voters failed to hold elections due to violence and threats. While petitions to count the ballots from these precincts and hold special elections were pending, the municipal board of canvassers proclaimed the petitioner mayor based on an incomplete canvass that did not include these precincts. The COMELEC was correct to suspend the proclamation until all ballots were counted since the missing votes could affect the result, and the board of canvassers lacked authorization from the COMELEC to proclaim a winner given the pending petitions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    120 views2 pages

    Immam Vs COMELEC

    Uploaded by

    Allan Cj Sangkate
    The COMELEC had jurisdiction to order the petitioner to cease and desist from taking his oath of office as mayor. Fourteen precincts with over 2,000 registered voters failed to hold elections due to violence and threats. While petitions to count the ballots from these precincts and hold special elections were pending, the municipal board of canvassers proclaimed the petitioner mayor based on an incomplete canvass that did not include these precincts. The COMELEC was correct to suspend the proclamation until all ballots were counted since the missing votes could affect the result, and the board of canvassers lacked authorization from the COMELEC to proclaim a winner given the pending petitions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Immam v. COMELEC, 322 SCRA 866.

    G.R. No. 134167. January 20, 2000.

    FACTS

    On election day, fifty-five (55) precincts, manned by their respective board of election
    inspector were opened in the municipality.2

    On May 16, 1998 the COMELEC (Office of the Election Officer, Matanog, Maguindanao)
    issued a certification that only the votes cast in forty-one (41) out of the fifty-five (55)
    precincts were counted. The COMELEC certified that fourteen (14) ballot boxes consisting of
    2,398 registered voters failed to function. Seven (7) of the fourteen (14) ballot boxes were
    deposited in the office of the provincial election supervisor, Cotabato City, while the other
    seven (7) were deposited for safe-keeping with the 1506th (405) Provincial Mobile Group
    Parang, Maguindanao.3

    On May 22, 1998 private respondent filed with the COMELEC, a "Petition to Count the
    Ballots Cast on May 11, 19984 and for Holding of Special Elections5 . . . with Urgent Prayer for
    Issuance of Temporary Restraining Order and/or Writ of Preliminary Injunction" 6 which was
    docketed as SPA Case No. 98-348. The petition alleged that the election inspectors of fourteen
    (14) precincts left the polling places due to "violence, terrorism, and armed threats perpetrated
    by armed men, hence the continuation of voting did not take place."7

    On May 29, 1998, while the petition was still pending with the COMELEC, the Municipal
    Board of Canvassers of Matanog issued a Certificate of Canvass of Votes and proclaimed
    petitioner as the duly elected mayor garnering a total of one thousand six hundred twenty four
    (1,624) votes.8

    On June 3, 1998, private respondent again filed a petition with the COMELEC docketed as
    SPC Case No. 98-223, praying that the proclamation of petitioner be declared void and that all
    acts emanating from the said proclamation also be voided.10

    Despite the pendency of the aforesaid petitions, petitioner took his oath of office on June 25,
    1998.1
    ISSUE:

    WON
    the COMELEC had no jurisdiction to order petitioner to "cease and desist" from taking his oath of
    office as Mayor of Matanog considering that there was no pending pre-proclamation issue.
    HELD

    Records show that on May 16, 1998 a certification was issued by the Office of the Election Officer,
    Matanog, Maguindanao, stating:24

    Considering the number of voters whose precincts failed to function will materially
    affect the total results of elections, NO proclamation will be made until such time
    proper and legal to do so.

    Despite the certification, the municipal board of canvassers proceeded to proclaim petitioner as
    the mayoral winner.

    At the time the proclamation was made, the COMELEC had not yet resolved the Petition for
    Canvassing of Votes and Petition for Special Elections filed on May 22, 1998. Pursuant to
    Sections 24525 and 23826 of the Omnibus Election Code, the Board of Canvassers should not
    have proclaimed any candidate absent the authorization from the COMELEC. Any
    proclamation made under such circumstances is void ab initio.27

    An incomplete canvass of votes is illegal and cannot be the basis of a subsequent


    proclamation.28 A canvass cannot be reflective of the true vote of the electorate unless all
    returns are considered and none is omitted. 29 This is true when the election returns missing or
    not counted will affect the results of the election.30

    We note that the votes of petitioner totaled one thousand nine hundred and sixty one (1,961)
    while private respondent garnered a total of one thousand nine hundred thirty (1,930) votes.
    The difference was only thirty-one (31) votes. There were fourteen (14) precincts 31
    unaccounted for whose total number of registered voters are two thousand three hundred and
    forty eight (2,348).32 Surely, these votes will affect the result of the election. Consequently, the
    non-inclusion of the 14 precincts in the counting disenfranchised the voters.

    We therefore find that COMELEC had sufficient reason to suspend the proclamation of
    petitioner.

    You might also like