English Ms
English Ms
com
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of
the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not
indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began,
which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner
Report for Teachers.
Cambridge will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2013 series for most IGCSE,
GCE Advanced Level and Advanced Subsidiary Level components and some Ordinary Level
components.
www.dynamicpapers.com
Page 2 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper
IGCSE – October/November 2013 0510 21
AO1: Reading
R1 understand and respond to information presented in a variety of forms
R2 select and organise material relevant to specific purposes
R3 recognise, understand and distinguish between facts, ideas and opinions
R4 infer information from texts
AO2: Writing
W1 communicate clearly, accurately and appropriately
W2 convey information and express opinions effectively
W3 employ and control a variety of grammatical structures
W4 demonstrate knowledge and understanding of a range of appropriate vocabulary
W5 observe conventions of paragraphing, punctuation and spelling
W6 employ appropriate register/style
90
(f) all permits sold in a minute / all permits sold quickly / permits sold out quickly [1]
(h) traffic
going uphill
BOTH REQUIRED FOR ONE MARK [1]
(j) show how ting-ting made / demonstration / demonstrate / demonstration area [1]
Note: correct spelling is essential throughout the form-filling exercise. Upper case letters required at
the start of proper nouns. The conventions of form-filling (i.e. instructions to tick, circle, delete and
underline) must be observed with total accuracy.
The sentence must be written from the point of view of Neoklis. The sentence does not need to refer
to both modernising equipment and making courses cheaper. A correct sentence suggesting either of
these alternatives is acceptable. Sentences containing these suggestions but also any incorrect
suggestions should receive ZERO marks
Example sentences:
I think the council should modernise the equipment and offer cheaper courses for young people
instead of providing free transport.
Council funds should be used to make courses for young people cheaper.
2 marks: no fewer than 12 and no more than 20 words; proper sentence construction; correct
spelling, punctuation and grammar; relevant to context.
1 mark: no fewer than 12 and no more than 20 words; proper sentence construction; 1–3 errors of
punctuation / spelling / grammar that do not obscure meaning; relevant to context.
0 marks: more than 3 errors of punctuation / spelling / grammar; and/or irrelevant to context, and/or
not a proper sentence; and/or fewer than 12 words or more than 20 words.
Exercise 4
Technical features of the radio telescope (max 3 marks for this heading)
1. 3000 radio dishes and antennae / radio dishes and antennae linked
2. much more sensitive / thousands of times more sensitive
3. much more data than the internet / 100 times more data than internet
Rules for the construction site (max 3 marks for this heading)
8. southern hemisphere
9. free from radio interference
10. no masts for 50 years
[Max total: 9 marks]
Please note the points outlined below indicate the ideas required, and credit should be given
when candidates attempt to express these in their own words.
The second item 5(L) is the mark awarded (out of 5) for Language according to the guidelines below.
Count words and indicate when the 120 word limit has been reached with the slash (/) annotation tool.
If a candidate exceeds 120 words then a maximum of 4 marks can be awarded for language.
Do not award language marks if there is no content to reward.
0 marks: no understanding of the task / no relevant content / meaning completely obscure due to
serious language inaccuracies
2 marks: heavy reliance on language from the text with no attempt to organise and sequence points
cohesively / limited language expression making meaning at times unclear
3 marks: some reliance on language from the text, but with an attempt to organise and sequence
points cohesively / language satisfactory, but with some inaccuracies
4 marks: good attempt to use own words and to organise and sequence points cohesively/generally
good control of language
5 marks: good, concise summary style / very good attempt to use own words and to organise and
sequence points cohesively.
[Max total: 11 marks]
The following general instructions, and table of marking criteria, apply to both exercises.
1. Award the answer a mark for content (C) [out of 10] and a mark for language (L) [out of 9] in
accordance with the General Criteria table that follows.
2. Content covers relevance (i.e. whether the piece fulfils the task and the awareness of
purpose/audience/register) and the development of ideas (i.e. the detail/explanation provided
and how enjoyable it is to read).
3. Language covers style (i.e. complexity of vocabulary and sentence structure) and accuracy
(of grammar, spelling, punctuation and use of paragraphs).
4. When deciding on a mark for content or language, first of all decide which mark band is most
appropriate. There will not necessarily be an exact fit. Then decide between 2 marks within
that mark band. Use the lower mark if it only just makes it into the band and the upper mark if
it fulfils all the requirements of the band but doesn’t quite make it into the band above.
5. When deciding on a mark for content, look at both relevance and development of ideas.
First ask yourself whether the writing fulfils the task, in terms of points to be covered and the
length. If it does, it will be in at least the 4–5 mark band.
6. When deciding on a mark for language, look at both the style and the accuracy of the
language. A useful starting point would be first to determine whether errors intrude. If they do
not, it will be in at least the 4–5 mark band.
7. The use of paragraphs should not be the primary basis of deciding which mark band the
work is in. Look first at the language used and once you have decided on the appropriate mark
band, you can use the paragraphing as a factor in helping you to decide whether the work
warrants the upper or lower mark in the mark band.
8. If the essay is considerably shorter than the stated word length, it should be put in mark
band 2–3 for content or lower for not fulfilling the task. The language mark is likely to be
affected and is unlikely to be more than one band higher than the content mark.
9. If the essay is totally irrelevant and has nothing to do with the question asked, it should be
given 0 marks for Content and Language, even if it is enjoyable to read and fluent.
10. If the essay is partly relevant and therefore in mark band 2–3, the full range of marks for
language is available.
[Max total for exercise 6: 19 marks]
[Max total for exercise 7: 19 marks]
Effective: Competent:
6–7 6–7
Relevance: Style:
Fulfils the task, with appropriate register Sentences show variety of structure and
and a good sense of purpose and length. Attempt at sophisticated
audience. vocabulary and idiom. Award 7 marks.
Award 7 marks. Sentences show some style and
ambitious language. However, there
Fulfils the task, with appropriate register
may be some awkwardness making
and some sense of purpose and
reading less enjoyable. Award 6 marks.
audience.
Accuracy:
Award 6 marks.
Mostly accurate apart from minor errors
Development of ideas:
which may include infrequent spelling
Ideas are developed at appropriate errors. Good use of paragraphing and
length. Engages reader’s interest. linking words. Award 7 marks.
Generally accurate with frustrating
errors. Appropriate use of paragraphing.
Award 6 marks.