Development of Temperature Process Control Method Using Smith Predictor
Development of Temperature Process Control Method Using Smith Predictor
Development of Temperature Process Control Method Using Smith Predictor
1051/e3sconf/2019111060 16
CLIMA 2019
Abstract. The analysis of a problem of development of control systems for objects with big time delay is
carried out in this work. For such objects it is difficult to provide high-quality control, because the control is
carried on the last status of object’s output. The main setup methods of PID regulators have been examined.
Based on this analysis the technique of complete synthesis of the regulator of higher level is given in order
to regulate building’s heating system. This work offers a new method of object’s control with distributed
delay. As the test bed for the offered structure of control the valve of hot water supply in a heat-node is
used. Using the test bed the stability of the system with time delay have been studied, which is controlled by
the PID-regulator assisted by Smith Predictor used to compensate the dead time.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
E3S Web of Conferences 111, 0 6016 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/2019111060 16
CLIMA 2019
of advantage of this method is Smith Predictor time through PID regulator [6]. Described AHU are found on
delay is effective taken outside the control loop in the outdated HVAC systems and also in specialized systems
transfer function relating the process output to setpoint. of production, professional kitchens, etc.
This method introduces extreme instability into the In a commonly used shunt group scheme the
variable control system. circulation pump (4) is operating constantly, ensuring
The Smith Predictor is a popular and effective long freeze prevention and a steady water temperature
compensator for stable processes. One of advantage of regulation with control valve (3). See in Figure 1.
this method is Smith Predictor time delay is effective In a commonly used shunt group scheme circulation
taken outside the control loop in the transfer function pump (4) is operating constantly, ensuring freeze
relating the process output to setpoint. This method protection and a steady water temperature regulation
introduces extreme instability into the variable control with control valve (3), see in Figure 1.
system. Where:
1 - Shut off valve; 2 – Strainer; 3 - Three-way valve with
actuator; 4 - Circulation Pump; 5,6 - Check valves; 7 –
2 Related works Thermometer; 8 – Manometer; 9 - Water/Air Heat
Basnayake in his work offers to replace PLC controllers exchanger; 10,13 - Balancing valves.
of building’s automatics with new controllers designed By launching such system, in order not to overcool
based on artificial intelligence. These controllers use inlet air, the triple running valve is usually completely
intellectual identification of users [1]. opened, providing the maximum flow of heat carrier g
Amit Badlani’s work describes smart home and respectively the heat power Q.
systems that decrease energy consumption by studying The problem is that inlet air temperature undergoes
human behaviour pattern [2]. strong fluctuations while the PID regulator finds the
Roengruen proposed in paper simulation methods necessary valve position for heating the air from outside
for the temperature control systems. Work results shown temperature to the one that is set. It negatively reflects
success usability of test model to use this regulation on thermal comfort of people indoors and also it can
method in PLC controller for temperature control in influence technological processes.
buildings [3].
Wolfgang book author describes regulation
principles of process control and regulation methods in
variable processes in building heating systems. This
book discusses different approaches for regulation loops.
It also shows the applying of Smith Predictor model in
process control [4].
Srinivas mentions the disadvantages of the
applying the classical PID controller regulation and
tuning. The paper shows examples how to improve
system regulation with Smith Predictor. This control
method allows avoids decreasing of regulator gain factor
as result the system regulation performance increases
[5].
Despite the large number of valuable research
work describing different types of management, there is
no management system, which could increase the
effectiveness in existing buildings by using predictions.
Control algorithms are developed for such research,
described below, based on Smith's predictor, which are
designed and used in building management system.
2
E3S Web of Conferences 111, 0 6016 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/2019111060 16
CLIMA 2019
3
E3S Web of Conferences 111, 0 6016 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/2019111060 16
CLIMA 2019
appears there. Due to this prediction the delay factor is Simulation and laboratory conditions can differ highly,
excluded from the model, which allows predicting the therefore, we have to try this adjustment method in
behaviour of an object before the moment when signal practice and a real object was used for this, PLC
appears at the exit. controller is shown in Figure 5.
Further, to make a prediction, it is necessary to use The predicted value τ goes to Q(c), controller,
the model of object’s control that consists of fractional which adjusts the controlling influence of AO.
− sτ
rational part M 0 and delay e . Here, the R –
− sτ
common PID regulator, P0 e - additional
characteristic of the control objects (see Figure 3).
4
E3S Web of Conferences 111, 0 6016 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/2019111060 16
CLIMA 2019
7 Future works
In future work is planned to address all above-mentioned
problems within the framework of research by providing
following solutions:
Matlab machine learning toolbox could solve the
problem of optimizing the Building Management System
algorithm by analyzing weather forecast for the next day
and sing Finite Difference Method in self-learning
model. The automation of the home or the building has a
Fig. 7. Average results for valve heating control with outdoor
great potential in reducing the cost and energy
temperature -8°C from PID regulator and PID with Smith's
consumption using, machine learning for intelligent
predictor.
control.
It is necessary to study new class of regulators,
It is important that comparing to the PID, the curve
which are based on indistinct logic, genetic algorithms
of adjustment is approximately by 25% less. The time of
and neural networks.
adjustments also decreased. Such effect was obtained by
Next research of our control model will include a
using Smith Predictor.
human occupancy in the building. New control methods
Table 1. Comparison of responses using machine learning and buildings new data will
upgrade our model results.
Characteristics
Model Max. Acknowledgements
Rise Peak Settling
Peak
time(s) time(s) time(s)
(%) The research received funding from the ERAF
PID 25 420 480 840 Post-doctoral Research Support Program project Nr.
1.1.1.2/16/I/001 Research application “Wireless sensor
PID networks for a building’s energy efficiency evaluation
Smith's 2 118 32 360 and data exchange with the building’s management
predictor systems” Nr. 1.1.1.2./VIAA/1/16/228.
5
E3S Web of Conferences 111, 0 6016 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/2019111060 16
CLIMA 2019
(Online), Proceedings of the World Congress on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet
Engineering and Computer Science 2011, vol. I Commerce, 28-30 Nov. Vol. 1. P. 702-707 (2005)
WCECS, pp. 106-111 (October 2011) 15. Xiaojing Zhang, Georg Schildbach, David
3. P. Roengruen, V. Tipsuwanporn, P. Puawade and A. Sturzenegger, and Manfred Morari. Scenario based
Numsomran, Smith Predictor Design by CDM for MPC for energy-efficient building climate control
Temperature Control System, International Journal under weather and occupancy uncertainty. In
of Electrical and Computer Engineering Control Conference (ECC), 2013 European, pages
ISSN:1307:6892, vol.3, No.11, pp.2538-2542 1029–1034. IEEE, (2013)
(2009) 16. N. Bogdanovs, A. Krūmiņš, R. Beļinskis,
4. W. Altmann, D. Macdonald, S. Mackay, “Practical V.Afoņičevs, V. Jeralovičs, A. Ipatovs, Intelligence
Process Control for Engineers and Technicians,” System of Building Management System for Energy
Pactical Handbook, Elsevier, Oxford, Efficiency in the Test Facility. In: 2018 Advances in
ISBN:0750664002 (2005) Wireless and Optical Communications (RTUWO
5. P. Srinivas, P. Raj, S. Rajesh, Modeling and 2018): Proceedings, Latvia, Riga, 15-16 November
Simulation of Respiratory Controller Using 2018. Piscataway: IEEE, 2018, pp.100-105. ISBN
Labview, International Journal of Control Theory 978-1-5386-5559-7. e-ISBN 978-1-5386-5558-0.
and Computer Modelling (IJCTCM), ISSN:1865- 17. N. Bogdanovs, A. Ipatovs, R. Beļinskis, V.
0929, Vol.2,No.4 pp.212-219, (2012) Jeralovičs, A. Krūmiņš, V. Afoņičevs, Impact of
6. M. King, “Process Control: A Practical Approach,” Intelligence System of Building Management
Hanbook. Wiley, ISBN: 0470976661 (2010) System for Energy Efficiency in the Test Facility.
In: ISCSIC '18 [online] : Proceedings of the 2nd
7. J. Siroky, F. Oldewurtel, J. Cigler, and S. Prívara,
International Symposium on Computer Science and
Experimental analysis of model predictive control
Intelligent Control. ACM International Conference
for an energy efficient building heating system,
Proceeding Series, Switzerland, Stockholm, 21-23
Applied Energy 88 (9), pp. 3079-3087 (2011)
September, 2018. New York: Association for
8. Dr. B Prabhakara Rao, Deepak Voleti, A Novel Computing Machinery, 2018, pp.100-105. ISBN
Approach of Designing Fuzzy Logic based 978-145036628-1.
Controller for Water Temperature of Heat
Exchanger Process Control, International Journal of
Advanced Engineering Sciences and Technologies
Vol. 11, issue 1, p. 172 – 176 (2011)
9. A. Tala, B. Daxini, Identification of Heating Process
and Controlusing Dahlin PID with Smith Predictor,
International Journal of Engineering Research &
Technology (IJERT), Vol. 4 Issue 05, pp. 131–135
(2015)
10. P.García, and P. Albertos, "Robust tuning of a
generalized predictor-based controller for
integrating and unstable systems with long
timedelay," J. Process Contr., pp.1205-1216 (2013)
11. D. Shi, G. Peng, and T. Li, "Gray predictive
adaptive Smith-PID control and its application,"
Proceedings of International Conference on
Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 4, pp.1980
– 1984 (2008)
12. M. Dulău, S. Oltean, A. Duka, A. Gligor,
Behavioural study of a thermal process control
under uncertainties, 2010 IEEE International
Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing
Robotics (AQTR2010), Vol. I, p.198-201 (2010)
13. C. Hao, Z. Zouaoui, and C. Zheng. A neuro-fuzzy
compensator based Smith predictive control for
FOPLDT process. Proceedings of International
Conference on Mechatronics and Automation
(ICMA), pp. 1833 – 1838 (2011)
14. M.Kato M, T. Yamamoto, Fujisawa S. A skill-based
PID controller using artificial neural networks //
Computational Intelligence for Modeling, Control
and Automation and International Conference on