0% found this document useful (0 votes)
248 views27 pages

EE247 - Lecture 2 Filters

Uploaded by

Hassan Farssi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
248 views27 pages

EE247 - Lecture 2 Filters

Uploaded by

Hassan Farssi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 27

EE247 - Lecture 2

Filters
• From last lecture:
– Dynamic range of analog circuits

• Filters:
– Nomenclature
– Specifications
• Quality factor
• Frequency characteristics
• Group delay
– Filter types
• Butterworth
• Chebyshev I & II
• Elliptic
• Bessel
– Group delay comparison example
– Biquads
EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 1

Nomenclature
Filter Types wrt Frequency Range Selectivity

Lowpass Highpass Bandpass Band-reject


(Notch)
All-pass
H ( jω )
H ( jω ) H ( jω ) H ( jω ) H ( jω )

ω ω ω ω ω

Provide frequency selectivity Phase shaping


or equalization

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 2


Filter Specifications
• Frequency characteristics (lowpass filter):
– Passband ripple (Rpass)
– Cutoff frequency or -3dB frequency
– Stopband rejection
– Passband gain
• Phase characteristics:
– Group delay
• SNR (Dynamic range)
• SNDR (Signal to Noise+Distortion ratio)
• Linearity measures: IM3 (intermodulation distortion), HD3
(harmonic distortion), IIP3 or OIP3 (Input-referred or output-
referred third order intercept point)
• Area/pole & Power/pole

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 3

Lowpass Filter Frequency Characteristics

H ( jω ) [ d B ]
Passband Ripple (Rpass) f−3dB
H (0 )
Passband 3dB
Transition
Gain H ( jω ) Band
Stopband
Rejection

H ( jω )
f
0
fc f stop
Frequency (Hz)
x 10
Stopband
Passband
Frequency

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 4


Quality Factor (Q)

• The term quality factor (Q) has different


definitions in different contexts:
– Component quality factor (inductor &
capacitor Q)
– Pole quality factor
– Bandpass filter quality factor

• Next 3 slides clarifies each

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 5

Component Quality Factor (Q)

• For any component with a transfer function:

H ( jω ) = 1
R (ω ) + jX (ω )

• Quality factor is defined as:

X (ω ) Energy Stored
Q= → p e r u n i t t i me
R (ω ) Aver age Po w er D i s s i pa t i o n

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 6


Component Quality Factor (Q)
Inductor & Capacitor Quality Factor
• Inductor Q :

YL = 1 QL = ω L
Rs + jω L Rs Rs L

• Capacitor Q :
Rp
ZC = 1 QC = ω CR p
1 + jωC
Rp C

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 7

Pole Quality Factor



• Typically filter
s-Plane
singularities include
pairs of complex
conjugate poles.
ωx ωP
• Quality factor of
complex conjugate
poles are defined as: σx σ

ωp
QP o l e =
2σ x

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 8


Bandpass Filter Quality Factor (Q)
H ( jf )
Q= fcenter /Δf


0
Magnitude [dB]



-3dB


Δf = f2 - f1



 

0.1 f1 fcenter
1 f2 Frequency
10

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 9

What is Group Delay?


• Consider a continuous time filter with s-domain transfer function G(s):
jθ(ω)
G(jω) ≡ ⏐G(jω)⏐e

• Let us apply a signal to the filter input composed of sum of two


sinewaves at slightly different frequencies (Δω<<ω):

vIN(t) = A1sin(ωt) + A2sin[(ω+Δω) t]

• The filter output is:

vOUT(t) = A1 ⏐G(jω)⏐ sin[ωt+θ(ω)] +

A2 ⏐G[ j(ω+Δω)]⏐ sin[(ω+Δω)t+ θ(ω+Δω)]

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 10


What is Group Delay?
θ(ω)
vOUT(t) = A1 ⏐G(jω)⏐ sin {ω[ t+ ω ]} +
θ(ω+Δω)
+ A2 ⏐G[ j(ω+Δω)]⏐ sin
{ (ω+Δω) [ t + ω+Δω ]}
Δω
then Δω 2
Since
ω <<1 ω [ ]
Æ0

θ(ω+Δω) dθ(ω)
ω+Δω

[ θ(ω)+

Δω
][ ω1 (1 - Δωω ) ]
θ(ω) dθ(ω) θ(ω)

ω + ( dω - ω ) Δωω
EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 11

What is Group Delay?


Signal Magnitude and Phase Impairment

θ(ω)
vOUT(t) = A1 ⏐G(jω)⏐ sin { ω [t + ω ]} +
θ(ω) Δω
{ (ω+Δω) [ t + θ(ω)
dθ(ω)
+ A2 ⏐G[ j(ω+Δω)]⏐sin
ω +( dω - ω ω ) ]}
• τPD ≡ -θ(ω)/ω is called the “phase delay” and has units of time

• If the second term is zero, then the filter’s output at frequency ω+Δω and
the output at frequency ω are each delayed in time by -θ(ω)/ω

• If the second term in the phase of the 2nd sin wave is non-zero, then the
filter’s output at frequency ω+Δω is time-shifted differently than the
filter’s output at frequency ω
Æ “Phase distortion”

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 12


What is Group Delay?
Signal Magnitude and Phase Impairment

• Phase distortion is avoided only if:


dθ(ω) θ(ω)
dω - ω = 0

• Clearly, if θ(ω)=kω, k a constant, Æ no phase distortion


• This type of filter phase response is called “linear phase”
ÆPhase shift varies linearly with frequency
• τGR ≡ -dθ(ω)/dω is called the “group delay” and also has units
of time. For a linear phase filter τGR ≡ τPD =k
Æ τGR= τPD implies linear phase
• Note: Filters with θ(ω)=kω+c are also called linear phase filters, but
they’re not free of phase distortion

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 13

What is Group Delay?


Signal Magnitude and Phase Impairment

• If τGR= τPD Æ No phase distortion

[ (
vOUT(t) = A1 ⏐G(jω)⏐ sin ω t - τGR)] +
+ A ⏐G[ j(ω+Δω)]⏐ sin [ (ω+Δω) ( t - τ )]
2 GR

• If also⏐G( jω)⏐=⏐G[ j(ω+Δω)]⏐ for all input frequencies within


the signal-band, vOUT is a scaled, time-shifted replica of the
input, with no “signal magnitude distortion” :

• In most cases neither of these conditions are exactly realizable

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 14


Summary
Group Delay

• Phase delay is defined as:


τPD ≡ -θ(ω)/ω [ time]
• Group delay is defined as :
τGR ≡ -dθ(ω)/dω [time]

• If θ(ω)=kω, k a constant, Æ no phase distortion

• For a linear phase filter τGR ≡ τPD =k

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 15

Filter Types wrt Frequency Response


Lowpass Butterworth Filter
0
Magnitude (dB)

• Maximally flat amplitude -20


within the filter passband
-40
N
d H( jω )
=0 -60

Normalized Group Delay

0 5
ω =0
Phase (degrees)

-200 3

• Moderate phase distortion


-400 1
0 1 2
Normalized Frequency
Example: 5th Order Butterworth filter

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 16


Lowpass Butterworth Filter

• All poles jω

s-plane
• Number of poles equal to
filter order

• Poles located on the unit σ


circle with equal angles

pole

Example: 5th Order Butterworth Filter

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 17

Filter Types
Chebyshev I Lowpass Filter

0
Magnitude [dB]

• Chebyshev I filter
– Ripple in the passband -20

– Sharper transition band


compared to Butterworth (for -40
the same number of poles)
0 35
Normalized Group Delay
Phase [degrees]

– Poorer group delay


compared to Butterworth -200

– More ripple in passband Æ


poorer phase response -400
0
0 1 2
Normalized Frequency
Example: 5th Order Chebyshev filter

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 18


Chebyshev I Lowpass Filter Characteristics


s-plane
• All poles

• Poles located on an ellipse


inside the unit circle
σ
• Allowing more ripple in the
passband:
Narrower transition band
Sharper cut-off
Higher pole Q
Chebyshev I LPF 3dB passband ripple
Poorer phase response Chebyshev I LPF 0.1dB passband ripple
Example: 5th Order Chebyshev I Filter

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 19

Filter Types
Chebyshev II Lowpass

• Chebyshev II filter 0
Magnitude (dB)

– No ripple in passband
-20
– Nulls or notches in -40
stopband
-60
– Sharper transition band 0
compared to
-90
Phase (deg)

Butterworth
-180
– Passband phase more -270
linear compared to
-360
Chebyshev I 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Normalized Frequency

Example: 5th Order Chebyshev II filter

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 20


Filter Types
Chebyshev II Lowpass

• Poles & finite zeros
– No. of poles n
(n −> filter order) s-plane
– No. of finite zeros: n-1

• Poles located both inside


& outside of the unit circle
σ
• Complex conjugate zeros
located on jω axis

• Zeros create nulls in


Example:
stopband pole
5th Order
Chebyshev II Filter zero

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 21

Filter Types
Elliptic Lowpass Filter
0

• Elliptic filter
Magnitude (dB)

-20

-40
– Ripple in passband
-60
– Nulls in the stopband 0
Phase (degrees)

– Sharper transition band


compared to Butterworth & -200
both Chebyshevs

– Poorest phase response -400


0 1 2
Normalized Frequency
Example: 5th Order Elliptic filter

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 22


Filter Types
Elliptic Lowpass Filter

• Poles & finite zeros jω


– No. of poles: n s-plane
– No. of finite zeros: n-1

• Zeros located on jω axis


σ
• Sharp cut-off
Narrower transition
band
Pole Q higher
compared to the
previous filter types Pole
Zero
Example: 5th Order Elliptic Filter

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 23

Filter Types
Bessel Lowpass Filter

• Bessel
jω s-plane

– All poles

– Poles outside unit circle


σ
– Relatively low Q poles

– Maximally flat group delay

Pole
– Poor out-of-band attenuation
Example: 5th Order Bessel filter

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 24


Magnitude Response Behaviour
as a Function of Filter Order
Example: Bessel Filter
0
d
-10
se
rea
-20 c
In n=1
-30 er
rd
Magnitude [dB]

-40 r O
lte nÆ Filter order
-50 Fi 2
-60
3
-70
4
-80
5
6
-90
7
-100
0.1 1 10 100
Normalized Frequency

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 25

Filter Types
Comparison of Various Type LPF Magnitude Response

0
Magnitude (dB)

-20

-40

-60

0 1 2
Magnitude (dB)

Normalized Frequency

Bessel
All 5th order filters with same corner freq. Butterworth
Chebyshev I
Chebyshev II
Elliptic

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 26


Filter Types
Comparison of Various LPF Singularities

Poles Bessel
Poles Butterworth
Poles Elliptic
s-plane
Zeros Elliptic
Poles Chebyshev I 0.1dB

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 27

Comparison of Various LPF Groupdelay


5
28
Bessel Chebyshev I
0.5dB Passband Ripple

1
12
10 Butterworth

4
1

1
Ref: A. Zverev, Handbook of filter synthesis, Wiley, 1967.

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 28


Group Delay Comparison
Example

• Lowpass filter with 100kHz corner frequency

• Chebyshev I versus Bessel


– Both filters 4th order- same -3dB point

– Passband ripple of 1dB allowed for Chebyshev I

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 29

Magnitude Response
4th Order Chebyshev I versus Bessel

0
Magnitude (dB)

-20

-40

-60 4th Order Chebychev 1


4th Order Bessel
4 5 6
10 10 10
Frequency [Hz]

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 30


Phase Response
4th Order Chebyshev I versus Bessel
0

-50
Phase [degrees]
-100

-150 4th order Bessel

-200

-250
4th order Chebyshev 1
-300

-350 0 50 100 150 200


Frequency [kHz]

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 31

Group Delay
4th Order Chebyshev I versus Bessel

14

12
Group Delay [usec]

10

8 4th order
Chebyshev 1
6

4 4th order Bessel

0
10 100 1000
Frequency [kHz]

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 32


Step Response
4th Order Chebyshev I versus Bessel

1.4

1.2
4th order Bessel
1
Amplitude

0.8 4th order


Chebyshev 1
0.6

0.4

0.2

00 5 10 15 20
Time (usec)

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 33

Intersymbol Interference (ISI)


ISIÆ Broadening of pulses resulting in interference between successive transmitted
pulses
Example: Simple RC filter

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 34


Pulse Impairment
Bessel versus Chebyshev
1.5 1.5
Input
1 Output 1

0.5 0.5

0 0

-0.5 -0.5

-1 -1

-1.5 -1.5
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2
-4 -4
x 10 x 10

4th order Bessel 4th order Chebyshev I

Note that in the case of the Chebyshev filter not only the pulse has broadened but it
also has a long tail
Æ More ISI for Chebyshev compared to Bessel

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 35

Response to Psuedo-Random Data


Chebyshev versus Bessel
1.5

1
1111011111001010000100010111101110001001

Input Signal: 0.5

Symbol rate 1/130kHz 0

-0.5

-1

-1.5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
-4
x 10

1.5 1.5

1 1

0.5 0.5

0 1111011111001010000100010111101110001001 0
1111011111001010000100010111101110001001

-0.5 -0.5

-1 -1

-1.5 -1.5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
-4 -4
x 10 x 10
4th order Bessel 4th order Chebyshev I

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 36


Summary
Filter Types
– Filters with high signal attenuation per pole poor
phase response
– For a given signal attenuation, requirement of
preserving constant groupdelay ÆHigher order filter
• In the case of passive filters higher component count
• For integrated active filters higher chip area &
power dissipation

– In cases where filter is followed by ADC and DSP


• Possible to digitally correct for phase impairments incurred
by the analog circuitry by using digital phase equalizers &
thus reducing the required filter order

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 37

RLC Filters
R Vo
• Bandpass filter (2nd order):
Vin L C
s
Vo = RC
Vin s2 + ωo s + ωo2
Q

ωo = 1 LC
s-Plane
Q = ωo RC = R
Lω o
σ

Singularities: Pair of complex conjugate poles


Zeros @ f=0 & f=inf.

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 38


RLC Filters
Example
• Design a bandpass filter with:
R Vo
ƒ Center frequency of 1kHz
Vin C
ƒ Quality factor of 20 L

• First assume the inductor is ideal


• Next consider the case where the inductor has series R
resulting in a finite inductor Q of 40
• What is the effect of finite inductor Q on the overall filter
Q?

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 39

RLC Filters
Effect of Finite Component Q
1 Qfilt.=20 (ideal L)
= 1 + 1
Q filt Qid ea l Qin d .
filt
Qfilt. =13.3 (QL.=40)

Need to have component Q much higher


compared to desired filter Q

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 40


RLC Filters

R Vo

Vin L C

Question:
Can RLC filters be integrated on-chip?

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 41

Monolithic Inductors
Feasible Quality Factor & Value

Typically, on-chip
inductors built as
spiral structures out
of metal/s layers

QL= (ω L/R)

QL measured at
frequencies of
operation ( >1GHz)

Feasible monolithic inductor in CMOS tech. <10nH with Q <7


™Ref: “Radio Frequency Filters”, Lawrence Larson; Mead workshop presentation 1999

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 42


Integrated Filters
• Implementation of RLC filters in CMOS technologies requires
on-chip inductors
– Integrated L<10nH with Q<10
– Combined with max. cap. 20pF
ÆLC filters in the monolithic form feasible: freq>350MHz
Æ(Learn more in EE242 & RF circuit courses)

• Analog/Digital interface circuitry require fully integrated filters


with critical frequencies << 350MHz

• Hence:

Need to build active filters built without inductor

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 43

Filters
2nd Order Transfer Functions (Biquads)
• Biquadratic (2nd order) transfer function:
1
H( s ) =
s s2
1+ +
ωPQP ωP2
H ( jω ) ω =0 = 1
1
H( jω ) = H ( jω ) ω →∞ = 0
2
⎛ ω 2 ⎞ ⎛ ω ⎞2
⎜1− 2 ⎟ + ⎜ H ( jω ) ω =ω = QP
⎜ ω ⎟ ⎝ ωPQP ⎟⎠ P
⎝ P⎠

ωP ⎛ 2⎞
Bi quad pole s @: s = − ⎜ 1 ± 1 − 4QP ⎟
2QP ⎝ ⎠

Note : for QP ≤ 1 pole s are re al, c o mplex othe rwise


2

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 44


Biquad Complex Poles
QP > 1 → Complex conjugate poles:
2

ωP ⎛ S-plane
s=− 2 ⎞ jω
⎜1 ± j 4QP − 1 ⎟
2QP ⎝ ⎠
poles
d
Distance from origin in s-plane:

⎛ω ⎞
2 σ
d 2 = ⎜⎜ P ⎟⎟ (1 + 4QP2 − 1)
⎝ 2QP ⎠
= ω P2

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 45

s-Plane

radius = ω P poles
1
arccos
2QP σ

ωP
real part = - ωP ⎛
2Q P s=− 2 ⎞
⎜1 ± j 4QP − 1 ⎟
2QP ⎝ ⎠

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 46


Implementation of Biquads
• Passive RC: only real poles Æ can’t implement complex conjugate
poles

• Terminated LC
– Low power, since it is passive
– Only fundamental noise sources Æ load and source resistance
– As previously analyzed, not feasible in the monolithic form for
f <350MHz

• Active Biquads
– Many topologies can be found in filter textbooks!
– Widely used topologies:
• Single-opamp biquad: Sallen-Key
• Multi-opamp biquad: Tow-Thomas
• Integrator based biquads

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 47

Active Biquad
Sallen-Key Low-Pass Filter
G
H ( s) =
C1 s s2
1+ +
ω PQP ωP2
R1 R2
G 1
ωP =
Vin C2 Vout R1C1R2C2
ωP
QP =
1 1 1− G
+ +
• Single gain element R1C1 R2C1 R2C2
• Can be implemented both in discrete & monolithic form
• “Parasitic sensitive”
• Versions for LPF, HPF, BP, …
Æ Advantage: Only one opamp used
Æ Disadvantage: Sensitive to parasitic – all pole no zeros

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 48


Addition of Imaginary Axis Zeros
2
⎛ s ⎞
• Sharpen transition band 1+ ⎜ ⎟
• Can “notch out” interference H( s ) = K ⎝ ωZ ⎠
2
• High-pass filter (HPF) ⎛ s ⎞
s
1+ +⎜ ⎟
• Band-reject filter ωPQP ⎝ ωP ⎠
2
⎛ω ⎞
H( jω )ω →∞ = K ⎜ P ⎟
⎝ ωZ ⎠

Note: Always represent transfer functions as a product of a gain term,


poles, and zeros (pairs if complex). Then all coefficients have a
physical meaning, and readily identifiable units.

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 49

Imaginary Zeros
• Zeros substantially sharpen transition band f P = 100kHz
• At the expense of reduced stop-band attenuation at QP = 2
high frequencies
fZ = 3 fP
6
x 10
2
Pole-Zero Map
10 1.5
With zeros
No zeros 1
0
Magnitude [dB]

Imag Axis

0.5
-10
0
-20
-0.5
-30
-1
-40
-1.5
-50 -2
4 5 6 7 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
10 10 10 10
Frequency [Hz] 6
Real Axis x 10

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 50


Moving the Zeros
f P = 100kHz
QP = 2 5
x10 Pole-Zero Map
fZ = fP
6
4
20
2

Imag Axis
10
Magnitude [dB]

0 0
-10 -2
-20
-4
-30

-40
-6
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
-50 4
105 106 107
5
10
Real Axis x10
Frequency [Hz]

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 51

Tow-Thomas Active Biquad

• Parasitic insensitive
• Multiple outputs

Ref: P. E. Fleischer and J. Tow, “Design Formulas for biquad active filters using three
operational amplifiers,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 61, pp. 662-3, May 1973.

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 52


Frequency Response
Vo1 (b a − b )s + (b2a0 − b0 )
= −k2 2 1 2 1
Vin s + a1s + a0
Vo 2 b2 s 2 + b1s + b0
= 2
Vin s + a1s + a0
Vo 3 1 (b0 − b2a0 )s + (a1b0 − a0b1 )
=−
Vin k1 a0 s 2 + a1s + a0

• Vo2 implements a general biquad section with arbitrary poles and zeros

• Vo1 and Vo3 realize the same poles but are limited to at most one finite zero

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 53

Component Values
R8 given ai , bi , ki , C1 , C2 and R8
b0 =
R3 R5 R7C1C2 1
R1 =
a1C1
1 ⎛ R8 R1R8 ⎞
b1 = ⎜ − ⎟
R1C1 ⎜⎝ R6 R4 R7 ⎟⎠
k1
R2 = it follows that
a0 C2
R8
b2 = 1 1 R8
R6 R3 = ωP =
k1k2 a0 C1 R2 R3 R7C1C2
R8
a0 = 1 1 1 QP = ω P R1C1
R2 R3 R7C1C2 R4 =
1 k2 a1b2 − b1 C1
a1 =
R1C1 k1 a0
R5 =
R2 R8C2 b0C2
k1 = R8
R3 R7C1 R6 =
b2
R7
k2 = R7 = k2 R8
R8

EECS 247 Lecture 2: Filters © 2008 H.K. Page 54

You might also like