Module 17 Assignment
Module 17 Assignment
Contents
1. Introduction.......................................................................................................1
References.............................................................................................................7
1
Electricity
Water supply and distribution
Wastewater management
Waste management
Information and communications technology
Land reclamation and dredging
Oil and gas downstream production
Tourism
Irrigation and agricultural services
Industrial estates
Mineral resources
Health
Education
Public facilities, social infrastructure and services
Other urban, municipal and rural projects that the Government views as
priority areas for development.
1
www.pppo.gov.bd
2
4. Zone Economic Zone 4: Mongla Contract Signed.
15
8 8
6
5
4
3
Managing risks, and fostering competitiveness and innovation: The private
sector is very good at managing risk through innovation. At the same time
engaging private sector in the large scale infrastructure projects would foster
competitiveness which will as a direct result incentivize innovation in improving
implementation modality and managing risk as well.
Consultancy skill: Like the public sector projects, in PPP projects consultancy
services from local and foreign consultants are required. Often the consultants fail
to understand the local context while planning and designing PPP projects. As
such, consultancy skill is a major obstacle in realizing the successful
implementation of PPP projects. Infrastructure development is the basis for
achieving sustainable growth for Bangladesh. These kinds of major obstacles have
to be eradicated by introducing hassle-free mechanism with proper consulting
guidance from experienced consultants in the related field.
4
Fund constraints: From funding point of view infrastructure projects have two
components – (i) Technical Assistance fund (TA), and (ii) Investment fund. TA
fund is used for remunerating technical advisors and consultants as well as for
carrying out feasibility studies and investment fund is used for implementation. For
public infrastructure projects TA fund and investment fund are composite, whereas
for a private infrastructure project these funds are separated. As these two funds
are separated in PPP projects, often size of the fund becomes insufficient and fund
disbursement process fall slow. It slows down the overall implementation.
Delays and cost overruns: Delay in implementation has implication from direct
and indirect point of view. The direct implication is cost overrun and the indirect
implication is economical loss of the target beneficiaries in the form of delay in
provisioning of public goods and services. Thus, delays limit the growth potential
of the economy. Similarly, cost overruns reduce competitiveness of the economy.
5
making loans with a maximum term of 5-7 years and generally require equity of
25%- 35%.
There also exists a knowledge gap in the knowledge of PPP with both the
executing agencies and private investors. As such, the stakeholders are yet to be
made aware of commercial and legal aspects of different types of PPPs. Despite
the efforts in the past in disseminating knowledge on PPP through training and
workshops there are still quite some misconception on PPP and comprehensive
guidance is required in this regard.
The concept of PPP and its application is still unfolding in Bangladesh. In the
recent years, a number of guidelines policies, guidelines and rule came into
existence to bridge the gaps that existed during the previous years. It is expected
that, under PPP modality the partnership of public and private sectors will produce
combined expertise and create a synergy for development.
6
References
1. OECD., (2006). Interim Report on the Role of Private Participation in Major
Infrastructure Provision, Submitted to the Working Party on Territorial
Policy in Urban Areas at its 8thsession in Bilbao, Spain, June, 5-6,
GOV/TDPC/URB(2006)5, Public Governance and Territorial Development
Directorate, OECD, Paris.
2. Pablo, S., Bozeman, B., (2004). “The “Gradient Effect” in Federal
Laboratory-Industry Technology Transfer Partnerships. ”Policy Studies
Journal 32(2): pp. 235–252.
3. Park, H., (2006). “PPI System in Korea and its Policy Issues.” Seoul: Korea
Development Institute.