Fracture Design and Stimulation - Monitori NG
Fracture Design and Stimulation - Monitori NG
Fracture Design and Stimulation - Monitori NG
Well Construction
Before the
Treatment
Well Site Rig-up
Monitoring the
Treatment
After the Frac
July ,1947 - Stanolind Oil and Gas 1st Job: Klepper No. 1
Safety meetings
Safety meetings
High pressure and low pressure
Pressure testing
Protection systems tested
Flowmeter calibration
Data acquisition computers
High pressure
Low pressure
PO 6
4
Water
1 2 3 Tanks
WH Dens 5
Treatment 7
Monitoring Van
High pressure pumps Flowmeter
Safety meeting
Post treatment inventory
Post treatment report
Well Construction
Before the Treatment
Well Site Rig-up
Monitoring the
Treatment
After the Frac
The statements made during the workshop do not represent the views or opinions of EPA. The
claims made by participants have not been verified or endorsed by EPA.
DC01:570405.2*
This abstract provides a general overview only and is applicable to a majority of the
hydraulic fracturing treatments currently being pumped. It is not intended to address all
situations/scenarios that may occur.
As the previous sections have shown there is considerable work that goes on before a fracture
treatment is pumped. Two points that bear repeating concern (1) the importance of proper well
construction and (2) the availability of information about conditions to be expected during the
treatment. It is through the well construction process that drinking water aquifers are
protected, producing formations are isolated, casing is protected from corrosive fluids, etc. In
addition, since the fracture treatment is carefully designed beforehand and expected pressures
and other parameters are established, the casing and tubulars will have been designed to
handle the treatment and subsequent well production without compromising the integrity of
the well.
There has also been discussion about what goes into the design of a hydraulic fracture
treatment, i.e., knowledge of the mechanical rock properties of the formation to be treated as
well as adjacent bounding layers, reservoir properties of the target formation, information
about the fluid systems to be used and how the formation will interact with these fluids. From
this information the operator and pumping service company can set up the hydraulic fracture
treatment and know what will be pumped, what equipment will be required, and what is to be
expected during the actual treatment.
Once the BHTP is known then an expected wellhead treating pressure (WHTP) can be calculated
by accounting for additional pressures that occur while treating a well:
In this equation Ppipe is the friction pressure resistant to flow down the wellbore during
pumping operations and is fluid and rate dependent; Pperf is the pressure drop across the
perforations; and Phyd is the hydrostatic pressure of the fluid in the wellbore and is also fluid
dependent.
Once the expected BHTP and WHTP are determined, the proper casing string or tubular
configuration can be designed to handle the pressures experienced while treating the
formation. The WHTP is also used to calculate the hydraulic horsepower (number of trucks;
HHP) required to pump the job at the desired treatment rate from the following equation:
The next step in setting up a job is to know what will be pumped, e.g., the additives required
and the rates at which the additives are to be used, proppant type and volume, etc. For some
jobs this requires pre-job testing to determine whether the fluid system intended for use in the
fracture treatment is compatible with the base fluid being supplied on location. This is an
important step since it also establishes what will be required for the fluid system to perform as
desired. Once this information is known then a final treatment design is determined and
communicated to the field location for execution. This information is then put together in
tabular form, giving the operator and service company a ready guide for setting up the job. An
example of a typical pump schedule is included in the appendix.
After all the surface equipment has been rigged up there is another safety meeting. During this
safety meeting details of the job are reviewed, including the maximum WHTP, expected WHTP,
pump rate, overall job schedule, who is responsible for what, etc. After the safety meeting all
surface piping is pressure tested to a predetermined maximum pressure. At this time the pop-
off valves on the surface lines are tested to make sure they work at the desired pressure and
the pressure kick-outs on the high-pressure pumps are also tested to insure they work properly.
In addition, the pumps used for liquid additives are bucket tested to ensure that they are
functional and are calibrated properly. The proposed pumping schedule is loaded into the on-
site computer system to assist the fracturing treatment operator in running the job as close to
design as possible. While computers are capable of actually running the treatment, at this time
most service companies still rely on a team in the treatment van to control the actual fracturing
treatment with the assistance of the computers.
There are several points on the surface where rates, pressures, and densities are monitored
and recorded during a treatment. (A simplified location schematic showing where the different
treatment monitoring occurs is provided in the appendix.) For example, highly accurate
transducers are placed at several different locations in the surface lines and equipment to
monitor real-time pressure data, a variety of different flowmeters are used (depending on the
material being metered) to record treatment rates and additive rates, and densometers are
used to measure the density of the fluid being pumped downhole. Examples of some of the
data being monitored and recorded include: WHTP, annular pressure, downhole slurry pump
rate, clean fluid rate, wellhead proppant concentration, and individual additive rates, along
with an extensive amount of mechanical information about the equipment on location. All the
information from these multiple sources is collected and displayed by state-of-the-art computer
systems located in treatment control vans. Most of the time, these data are transmitted using
hard wires connecting the computer to the monitoring device.
It is also important to note that in addition to monitoring there are also mechanical devices
which are used during a fracture treatment to provide additional safety for the wellhead. Two
of these devices are pressure pop-off valves on surface lines and pressure kick-outs on the high
pressure pumps.
While pumping the treatment both the operator and service company continually monitor the
computer screens displaying information about the treatment as it is being pumped. The main
concern is pressure. Both the operator and the service company want to make sure the
maximum WHTP is not exceeded to protect the wellbore from any possible damage. (It is
important to understand that it is inefficient to have to repair wellbores so every effort is made
to prevent them from being damaged.) Some variations in pressure are normally seen during a
fracture treatment. These variations are interpreted to determine their causes and significance;
there are constant decisions being made about what the status of the treatment is and what to
do as the treatment proceeds. An example of a treatment chart can be found in the appendix of
this abstract.
Close attention is also paid to the annulus. In many cases the annulus is monitored with a gauge
for any pressure increase in excess of normal fluid cool-down and heat-up, in other cases the
annular valve is open and any fluid flow up the annulus can be seen at the wellhead and
appropriate steps can be taken to address the fluid flow in the annulus.
Since any additive used in a hydraulic fracturing treatment serves a specific purpose, it is
important that these additives are run at their designed concentrations. As mentioned earlier
all additive rates are monitored during the treatment to insure they are run correctly. (An
example of an additive rate chart is shown in the appendix.) In addition, overall job treatment
information is displayed in the treatment control van in real-time to assist the operator and
service company in understanding how the treatment is progressing. This allows for spot checks
throughout the treatment process to compare the physical inventories of volumes of additives
pumped with those calculated to again insure the treatment is being pumped as planned.
In addition, during the pumping operation there is continual monitoring of the surface lines,
equipment, and wellhead to make sure there are no leaks. If a leak does develop, it is either
isolated if possible or the treatment is shut down and the leak fixed before pumping is
resumed.
The majority of hydraulic fracture treatments are pumped as planned or with changes that are
based on the way the treatment is proceeding. On occasion, the formation may be difficult to
fracture stimulate, resulting in a rapid pressure increase while pumping; this is called a screen-
out. Even if there is a rapid increase in pressure relative to normal increases in pressure due to
pumping, the system is still compressible so there is still time to react. As the pressure
increases, the fracture treatment operator will start bringing pumps off-line to counteract the
rapid pressure increase. In a worst case scenario, if the pressure increases too fast then the
pump kick-out will activate and shut down the treatment.
Appendix
High pressure
Low pressure
PO 6
4
1 2 3
WH Dens 5
7
Treatment
Monitoring Van
High pressure pumps Flowmeter