Arbitration
Arbitration
Arbitration
I. ARBITRATION
II. CONCILIATION
III. ARBITRATOR
IV. UMPIRE
V. ORDER OF REFERENCE
1. SPEED
2. LESS EXPENSIVE
3. PRIVACY
4. INFORMALITY OF PROCEEDINGS
5. CONTINUITY OF GOOD RELATIONS
6. EXPERTISE OF ARBITRATORS
7. FLEXIBILITY IN CHOICE OF MEETING
PLACE/ LOCATION
8. FINALITY OF DECISION
Source :Professional practice ;
K.G.KRISHNAMURTY; S.V RAVINDRA
Arbitration Conciliation
For arbitration, the parties shall For conciliation, a third party shall
select arbitrators. The selected play the role of a conciliator
arbitrators then shall resolve the helping the parties to
dispute and render an arbitration resolve dispute through
award which is final and negotiation.
binding.
The conciliator is not allowed to
An arbitration award is final, the directly resolve the dispute
agreement achieved and render a decision,
through conciliation is not binding but the parties of the dispute
on the parties. Therefore, if one themselves shall achieve an
party do not voluntarily agreement with the help of the
implement the agreement, the conciliator.
other can institute court or
arbitration proceedings.
Source : http://www.sblaw.vn/what-is-the-difference-between-
arbitration-and-conciliation/
P R E S I D I N G A R B I T R AT O R
Each party appoints one arbitrator and the two arbitrators shall appoint a
third arbitrator who shall act as the presiding arbitrator.
He may determine the procedure for arbitration if there is no concurrence.
Source : Professional practice ; K.G.KRISHNAMURTY; S.V RAVINDRA
Reference in case of
arbitration is an agreement
drawn up between the two
contesting parties referring
the matter for the
adjudication of the arbitral
tribunal after the actual
disputes or differences
have arisen
Source : Professional practice ;DR. ROSHAN
.H. NAMAVATI
The court can set aside the arbitral award on the following grounds
1. Incapacity of a party
2. Invalidity of Agreement
3. Want of proper notice
4. Award deals with dispute not referred to arbitration
5. Arbitral tribunal was defective in composition
6. Subject matter not capable of being settled by arbitration
7. Arbitral award being in conflict with public policy which will
encompass aspect like fraud, corruption etc.