ACCAF7 CourseNotes2015 2ndhalf
ACCAF7 CourseNotes2015 2ndhalf
ACCA
Paper F7
Financial Reporting
Tutor details
J15
ii Introduction AC C A F7
Contents
Page
Introduction i
Contents iii
1 An introduction to paper F7 Financial Reporting vi
2 Exam format vi
3 Study planner vii
1 Definition of a group 1
2 Group financial statements 2
Chapter 1: Home study 11
3 Recording the investment in the subsidiary 11
4 Gain on a bargain purchase 11
1 Fair values 15
2 Intra group trading 16
3 Non-controlling interest and goodwill at full or fair value 18
4 A more detailed look at Goodwill 26
5 Mid-year acquisitions 27
1 Introduction 29
2 Mid-year acquisitions 32
3 Uneven accrual of profit 33
1 Definition of associate 35
2 Accounting treatment 35
3 Additional PUP adjustments for practice 40
1 Introduction 41
2 Question scenarios 42
3 Other aspects of interpretation 43
4 The key ratios 43
5 Specialised, not-for-profit and public sector entities 48
1 Introduction 49
2 Definitions 50
3 Pro forma statement of cash flows – indirect method 50
4 Preparing a statement of cash flows – indirect method 51
5 Direct method 59
iv Introduction AC C A F7
1 Introduction 61
2 The IASB’s Conceptual Framework 62
3 Specialised, not-for-profit and public sector entities 65
4 Regulatory framework 66
5 IAS 8: Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors 66
1 Approach to questions 89
1 Finance lease 95
2 Operating leases 98
3 Sale and leaseback 100
1 Revenue 103
2 Specific applications of IFRS 15 110
3 Inventories: IAS 2 112
1 Provisions 123
2 Contingent liabilities 126
3 Contingent assets 127
AC C A F 7 Introduction v
Chapter 1 141
Chapter 2 145
Chapter 3 147
Chapter 4 148
Chapter 5: No lecture examples 153
Chapter 6 153
Chapters 7 to 8: No lecture examples 155
Chapter 9 155
Chapter 10: No lecture examples 157
Chapter 11 157
Chapter 12 160
Chapter 13 161
Chapter 14 163
Chapter 15: No lecture examples 164
Chapter 16 164
Chapter 17 164
vi Introduction AC C A F7
2 Exam format
As with all other ACCA exams, F7 is a three-hour exam with an additional 15 minutes’ reading and
planning time. Note that the format of the exam has changed from the December 2014 sitting
onwards.
All questions are compulsory and may contain computational and discursive elements. Some
questions will adopt a scenario/case study approach.
Section A: 20 multiple choice questions of 2 marks each.
Section B: 2 × 15 mark questions and one 30 mark question.
The 30-mark question will examine the preparation of financial statements for either a single
entity or a group.
The Section A and B questions can cover any areas of the syllabus.
AC C A F 7 Introduction vii
3 Study planner
PER ref Time Question from
Chap Subject Comments (hours) question bank
1-4 Group Accounts This is a very important topic – it PO10 12 OT’s 1.1 – 1.15
may be tested in a 30 mark hours Q2 Paradigm
question. You need to work Q4 Prodigal
through these chapters very
Q7 Pedantic
carefully
Q10 Pumice
5 Reports and ratio Another core area - very PO11 4 hours OT’s 2.1, 2.8, 2.9
analysis important to learn the ratios and Q13 Quartile
practise writing reports
6 Statements of cash You should leave this chapter to PO10 4 hours OT’s 2.2 - 2.6
flows complete after Chapter 17 as it Q12 Monty
draws on knowledge of other Q16 Coaltown
chapters covered later in the
notes. You could be asked to
prepare and/or analyse a
statement of cash flows.
7 Conceptual and Not a major part of the syllabus, PO10 2 hours OT’s 3.1 – 3.15
Regulatory but contains some important Q19 Laidlaw
Framework for principles. Likely to be tested in
Financial Reporting section A.
8 Preparation of This is mostly a chapter of PO10 1 hour OT’s 5.8, 5.13,
Financial Statements proformas ─ you need to make 5.30-31, 5.44-45,
sure you learn them. 5.47-48, 5.50
9 Tangible non- An area which is examined PO10 2 hours OT’s 5.1, 5.9,
current assets regularly 5.16, 5.18-22,
5.24-29
Q41 Dearing
10 Intangible assets This is a relatively minor chapter PO10 0.5 OT’s 5.2, 5.12,
hours 5.15
11 Preparation of single This is a major chapter – there PO10 3 hours Q24 Moby
company accounts may be a 30 mark question on this Q31 Sandown
area. Before attempting questions Q32 Candel
in the Question Bank, you may
Q33 Dexon
wish to do Chapter 12 leases and
Chapter 16 Taxation first.
12 Leases Make sure you know the PO10 1.5 OT’s 5.3, 5.4,
difference between the hours 5.40, 5.52
accounting for finance leases and
operating leases
13 Revenue and A core area which takes practice PO10 1.5 OT’s 5.6, 5.7,
inventory hours 5.17, 5.23, 5.32,
5.43, 5.54-57,
5.59-65
Q22 Tunshill
14 Financial This is a difficult technical subject PO10 1.5 OT’s 5.33 – 5.36,
instruments which takes question practice to hours 5.58
master
viii Introduction AC C A F7
15 Provisions and Not a difficult topic conceptually. PO10 1 hour OT’s 5.10, 5.37 –
contingencies Likely to be tested in section A. 5.39, 5.41-42
16 Taxation Questions regularly ask you to PO10 1 hour OT 5.11, 5.14
work out the liability and expense
in the statement of profit or loss.
17 Earnings per share A very common calculation in the PO10, 1 hour OT’s 5.5, 5.46,
exam. Could be examined at the PO11 5.53
end of a section B question.
The chapter number refers to the chapter of the Course Notes. The time is a guide as to how long you
should spend per topic, to cover the chapter and related questions. Tick each session off when you
have completed it.
If you complete all the sessions before you have received the mock exam please email your tutor to
request it or check www.firstintuition.net to download it.
An introduction to Group
Accounts
1 Definition of a group
A subsidiary company is any company which is controlled by another company.
Per IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements, an investor controls an investee if and only if the
investor has all of the following elements:
Power over the investee, i.e. the investor has the ability to direct the relevant activities
Exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee
The ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of the investor's returns
“Power” comes from “rights”, normally voting rights. Therefore, in most instances in the exam,
“control” will come via owning the majority of the shares in that company.
Be careful in Objective Test Questions. Strictly, the standard doesn’t mention “shareholdings” and so
any potential answer which mentions shareholdings is likely to be incorrect.
2 1: An introduction to Group Accounts AC C A F7
Group structure
A plc
100% 75%
B Ltd C Ltd
In the above scenario, A plc (“A”) owns 100% of the shares in B Ltd (“B”) and 75% of the shares in C Ltd
(“C”). As such, A “controls” both B and C. Where such a relationship exists, we can refer to A as the
“parent” or “holding” company and B and C as A’s “subsidiary” companies.
In A’s accounts the investments in B and C will initially be shown at cost (credit cash, debit
investments). Subsequently, A can continue to carry the investments at cost. This means that over
time it is impossible for shareholders of the parent to see the performance of the subsidiaries.
Therefore, when one company controls another, it is required to produce an additional set of accounts
─ the group (or consolidated) accounts. The aim of these accounts is to present the results of the
group of companies as a single business entity.
This additional set of accounts is issued to the shareholders of the parent company.
In order to prepare group accounts, we need to add together the Statements of Financial Position of
the parent and subsidiaries and put through some additional workings.
There are a number of rules that you need to learn:
The investment in the subsidiary never appears in the consolidated set of accounts. It is
replaced by the net assets of the subsidiary and goodwill (see later).
The share capital of the consolidated accounts is that of the parent company only.
The assets and liabilities are simply added together (there will be some adjustments dealt with
in Chapter 2).
Goodwill needs to be calculated and shown as an intangible asset.
Retained earnings need to be calculated.
AC C A F 7 1 : A n i n t r o d u c t i o n t o G r o u p Ac c o u n t s 3
ILLUSTRATION 1.1
* Note how the investment in B Ltd is recorded at cost in A’s accounts. The Examiner may expect you
to know this.
The above sets of accounts are the individual accounts of A and B. They show the respective positions
of both companies.
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position of A Group as at 1 January 2014
A Group
$
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (10,000 + 700) 10,700
Goodwill (W1)
Current assets
Inventories (4,000 + 300) 4,300
Trade receivables (1,500 + 350) 1,850
Cash (700 + 200) 900
STEPS
Step 1: You need the cost of the investment. This can be given to you in the first few lines of
the question or you may have to calculate it.
Step 2: You need the net assets of the subsidiary at the acquisition date.
Step 3: You need the % of ownership. (This can be given or you may need to work it out as a %
of subsidiary’s share capital.) This will help you calculate goodwill and non-controlling interest.
(W1) Goodwill (at 1 January 2014)
$ $
Cost of combination 1,000
Less: B’s net assets at acq’n date:
Share capital 800
Retained earnings 100
900
Group share (100%) (900)
Goodwill 100
When you put the goodwill $100 and retained earnings $3,000 into the SFP you will see that the Assets
and Equity/Liabilities section of the SFP agree at $17,850.
AC C A F 7 1 : A n i n t r o d u c t i o n t o G r o u p Ac c o u n t s 5
Here are the statements of financial position of A and B two years later, on 31 December 2015.
A plc B Ltd
$ $
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 20,000 1,200
Investment in B Ltd 1,000*
Current assets
Inventories 6,000 500
Trade receivables 1,900 650
Cash 1,000 600
29,900 2,950
* note how the investment in B Ltd is still recorded at cost in A’s accounts.
Additional information:
An impairment review was carried out on the goodwill of B as at 31 December 2015.
An impairment of $30 was calculated.
Required:
Prepare the group statement of financial position as at 31 December 2015.
6 1: An introduction to Group Accounts AC C A F7
A Group
$
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Goodwill (W1)
Current assets
Inventories
Trade receivables
Cash
Current liabilities
Take the easy marks first by completing the proforma and adding together the assets and liabilities.
Then, calculate goodwill and finally retained earnings. As goodwill is similar to what we have seen
before, we have completed this for you below.
(W1) Goodwill
The original
$ $ goodwill
Cost of combination 1,000 calculation used
in Illustration 1.1
Less: % of B’s net assets at acq’n:
will still be
Share capital 800
relevant. We also
Retained earnings 100
need to
900 acknowledge
Group share (100%) (900) any impairments
Goodwill at acquisition date 100 since the date of
Cumulative impairments since acq’n (30) acquisition.
Carrying amount of goodwill 70
A B
$ $
Retained earnings at SFP date per question
Retained earnings at acquisition
Therefore, B’s post-acq’n ret. earnings
Group share of B’s post-acquisition ret. earnings
(100% × )
Less: goodwill impairment losses to date
Retained earnings
For the assets and liabilities section of the group statement of financial position, we still add together
100% of the parent and 100% of the subsidiary’s figures (be careful!), representing the fact that the
parent controls the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary.
The non-controlling interest line therefore acts a bit like a balancing figure on the statement of
financial position, showing the users of the accounts that the parent company does not own all of the
shares in the subsidiary.
Note: IFRS 3 gives companies a choice of goodwill and NCI calculation. The Examiner will show the way
he wishes you to calculate this with his choice of wording.
The proportionate / partial method (below)
The full or fair value method (see in Chapter 2)
8 1: An introduction to Group Accounts AC C A F7
Eric Ltd acquired 80% of the shares of Ernie Ltd on 1 January 2010 when Ernie’s retained earnings were
$3,000. Their respective statements of financial position as at 31 December 2012 (i.e. three years
later) were:
Eric Ltd Ernie Ltd
$ $
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 15,000 3,000
Investment in Ernie Ltd 10,000
Current assets
Inventories 4,000 2,000
Trade Receivables 1,500 3,500
Cash 400 1,500
5,900 7,000
30,900 10,000
Remember: the investment in Subsidiary figure tells us the original cost of investment is $10,000.
The group policy is to value the NCI on a proportionate / partial basis.
Impairment losses on recognised goodwill to date have amounted to $400.
Required:
Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position of Eric and its subsidiary as at 31 December
2012.
AC C A F 7 1 : A n i n t r o d u c t i o n t o G r o u p Ac c o u n t s 9
Eric Group
$
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Goodwill (W1)
Current assets
Inventories
Trade receivables
Cash
Current liabilities
(W1) Goodwill
$ $
Cost of combination
Non-controlling interest
Less: Ernie’s net assets at acq’n:
Share capital
Retained earnings
EXAM SMART
Tutor’s hints:
Note that by adding back 20% of the net assets of the subsidiary and then deducting 100%,
you are effectively deducting 80% of the net assets.
Unless you are told otherwise, assume that the subsidiary’s share capital at acquisition is the
same as its current share capital.
10 1: An introduction to Group Accounts AC C A F7
Eric Ernie
$ $
Retained earnings at SFP date per question
Retained earnings at acquisition
Therefore, Ernie’s post-acq’n ret. earnings
Group share of Ernie’s post-acq’n ret. earnings
(80% × )
Less: goodwill impairment losses to date
Retained earnings
Bono Ltd acquired 75% of the shares of Edge Ltd on 1 January 2005 when Edge’s retained earnings
were $2,500 and its revaluation surplus was $300.
Their respective Statements of financial position as at 31 December 2007 were:
Bono Ltd Edge Ltd
$ $
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 11,000 2,000
Investment in Edge Ltd 5,000
Current assets
Inventories 27,000 2,000
Trade receivables 1,800 3,500
Cash 200 4,500
45,000 12,000
Required:
Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position of Bono and its subsidiary as at 31 December
2007.
The group policy is to value the NCI at its proportionate value.
Impairment losses on recognised goodwill to date have amounted to $900.
AC C A F 7 1 : A n i n t r o d u c t i o n t o G r o u p Ac c o u n t s 13
Bono
Group
$
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Goodwill (W1)
Current assets
Inventories
Trade receivables
Cash
TOTAL ASSETS
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Equity
Share capital
Revaluation surplus (W4)
Retained earnings (W2)
Non-controlling interest (W3)
Current liabilities
Trade payables
Workings
14 1: An introduction to Group Accounts AC C A F7
15
1 Fair values
A company’s value per the statement of financial position doesn’t necessarily give a fair representation
of what that company is actually worth. When preparing single company accounts, a company can
largely choose to ignore the market value or fair value of its assets and liabilities.
However, when preparing group accounts, the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary (but not the
parent) must be stated at their “fair value”, where "fair value" is the amount for which an asset could
be exchanged in an arm’s length transaction by knowledgeable and willing parties.
IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement defines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset
(or paid to transfer a liability) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. It is essentially the “market value”.
Approach:
STEPS
Step 1: For each asset that you are given that has a different book value to fair value at the
acquisition date, put the difference in the “at acquisition” column.
Step 2: For any change after the acquisition date, put that amount in the “change” column.
(e.g. depreciation of plant, disposal of land, inventory sold).
Step 3: Subtract the “change” from the “at acquisition” column to give the balance at the SFP
date.
16 2: More Group Accounts AC C A F7
ILLUSTRATION 2.1
P group has a year end of 31 December 2011. It acquired S Co on 1 January 2011. At that date, the
carrying values in S Co were different to fair values as shown below.
Carrying
amount Fair value
$000 $000
Inventory (sold 1 Nov 2011) 15 29
Land 17 20
Plant (remaining life of 5 years) 20 25
Key working needed in group accounts
At At SFP
acquisition Change date
$000 $000 $000
Inventory (sold by year end) 14 (14) nil
Land 3 – 3
Plant 5 (1) 4
22 (15) 7
Prior to consolidation, adjustments will need to be made for these in transit items. This is usually done
by pushing the transaction to its final destination – an adjustment we will make on the face of the
question paper, using the following journals:
Cash in transit
Dr Cash (Add to cash)
Cr Receivables (Deduct from receivables)
Goods in transit
Dr Inventories (Add to inventories)
Cr Payables (Add to payables)
Eliminate intra group receivables and payables
Dr Intra group payable (Deduct from payables)
Cr Intra group receivable (Deduct from receivables)
EXAM SMART
This is one of the most commonly examined adjustments in the exam and ensures that
inventories are valued at the lower of cost and NRV to the group.
When inventories are sold at a profit by one group member to another then, on consolidation, the
buying company’s inventories will be overstated to the extent of the profit still included in its year end
statement of financial position. To eliminate this “unrealised profit” from the value of inventories, we
post an adjustment to the consolidated inventory figure. We call this the “provision for unrealised
profit”, or “PUP” adjustment:
Sale by Parent (P) to Subsidiary (S)
Adjust in P's books
Dr Retained earnings of P (i.e. the seller)
Cr Consolidated inventories
Sale by Subsidiary to Parent
Adjust in S's books
Dr Retained earnings of S (i.e. the seller)
Cr Consolidated inventories
Note: if some or all of the goods transferred between the two group companies have subsequently
been sold on to third parties at the year end, then the adjustment above should only reflect the
proportion of the “unrealised profit” still left in inventories at the year end.
Important proforma:
PUP = profit on intercompany sale × % of goods still in inventories at the year end.
18 2: More Group Accounts AC C A F7
ILLUSTRATION 2.2
On 1 July 2011 P sold an item of plant to S at its agreed fair value of $12m. The plant had a book value
at that date of $7m. The estimated remaining useful life at the date of sale was five years (straight line
depreciation). Year end is 31 December 2011.
PUP = $12m – $7m = $ 5.0m
Less depreciation $5m/5 × 6/12 $(0.5)m
Net PUP $ 4.5m
ILLUSTRATION 2.3
Let’s revisit Lecture example 1.2 from Chapter 1 but without the goodwill impairment.
Eric Ltd acquired 80% of the shares of Ernie Ltd on 1 January 2009 for $10,000 when Ernie’s retained
earnings were $3,000.
Their respective equity as at 31 December 2011 (i.e. three years later) was:
Eric Ltd Ernie Ltd
$ $
Share capital 14,000 3,500
Retained earnings 13,500 4,500
27,500 8,000
AC C A F 7 2 : M o r e G r o u p Ac c o u n t s 19
The problem with the partial method and the resulting $4,800 figure is that it only represents 80% of
the subsidiary’s goodwill.
Under the full method we effectively “gross up” the goodwill figure in the group statement of financial
position so that it represents 100% of the subsidiary’s goodwill (i.e.$4,800 × 100/80 = $6,000).
In the exam, however, we won’t gross the figures up in this way, we will use the following proforma:
$
Fair value of parent’s consideration: as above 80% 10,000
Fair value of NCI’s consideration: (20/80 × 10,000) 20% 2,500
= Fair value of the business 12,500
Fair value of Ernie’s net assets (100%) (6,500)
Goodwill at acquisition 6,000
In reality (and probably in the exam too), the NCI is not going to be worth as much as the controlling
interest (CI). Normally a premium is paid to have the CI.
In the above example, the Examiner may say that the fair value of the NCI’s consideration is only
$2,000, meaning that the goodwill working would look like this:
$
Fair value of parent’s consideration 80% 10,000
Fair value of NCI’s consideration (given) 20% 2,000
= Fair value of the business 12,000
Fair value of Ernie’s net assets (6,500)
Goodwill at acquisition 5,500
Make sure you learn and practise the proforma above it WILL appear as part of your exam.
Valuing non-controlling interest at fair value at the date of acquisition
When the Examiner wants you to use the full method of goodwill, he will use the following wording.
Keep an eye open for it in your group questions:
“The parent company’s policy is to value the non-controlling interest at fair value at the date of
acquisition”
He will then either tell you what the fair value of the NCI is at the date of acquisition (e.g. the $2,000
given above) or he may ask you to calculate it.
For example, using the data from Eric and Ernie above, we know that Eric owns 80% of Ernie.
The Examiner may state that the share price of Ernie at the date of acquisition was $3 per share.
Given that Eric owns 80% of Ernie’s 3,500 shares (= 2,800 shares), this means that the NCI owns 20% (= 700
shares) worth 700 × $3 = $2,100. You would then put the $2,100 in the NCI line in the proforma above.
20 2: More Group Accounts AC C A F7
EXAM SMART
Examiner trap – beware!
In the examples we have seen so far, we have used the cost of investment figure as the first
line in the goodwill calculation. This has meant that there is no “investment in subsidiary”
figure in the final group statement of final position.
However, as well as buying shares in subsidiaries, a parent may also own shares in other
companies which they don’t control. The investments in these companies should be included
in the final group statement of financial position as an investment.
ILLUSTRATION 2.4
Ben Ltd acquired 80% of the shares of Ellie Ltd on 1 January 2009 for $5,000 when Ellie’s retained
earnings were $2,500.
Their respective statements of financial position as at 31 December 2011 were:
Ben Ltd Ellie Ltd
$ $
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 9,000 3,000
Investments be careful here 6,000
Current assets
Inventories 5,800 3,500
Cash 1,200 500
22,000 7,000
It is the group policy to value the non-controlling interest at acquisition at fair value. The fair value of
the NCI at the date of acquisition was $1,500.
An impairment review was conducted at the year end and it was decided that the goodwill on the
acquisition of Ellie was impaired by 10%.
Required:
Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position of Ben and its subsidiary as at 31 December
2011.
Tutor note: An important feature of the full method of goodwill is that the impairment of goodwill is
split between the retained earnings and NCI workings see over the page.
AC C A F 7 2 : M o r e G r o u p Ac c o u n t s 21
SOLUTION
Ben
Group
ASSETS $
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (9,000 + 3,000) 12,000
Investments in non-group companies (6,000 – 5,000 inv’t in Ellie) 1,000
Goodwill (W1) 1,800
Current assets
Inventories 9,300
Cash 1,700
TOTAL ASSETS 25,800
(W1) Goodwill
$
Fair value of parent’s consideration : 80% 5,000
Fair value of NCI’s consideration per question 20% 1,500
6,500
Fair value of the net assets acquired
Share capital 2,000
Retained earnings 2,500
(4,500)
Goodwill at acquisition 2,000
Impairment (200)
1,800
LECTURE EXAMPLE 2.1: COMPREHENSIVE EXAMPLE USING THE TECHNIQUES FROM THIS CHAPTER
On 1 January 2011, Posh Ltd acquired 75% of the shares of Becks Ltd. This was by way of an immediate
share exchange of 2 shares in Posh for every three shares in Becks. The market price of Posh’s shares
on 1 January 2011 was $5.
The transaction has yet to be recorded in the books of Posh. Becks’ retained earnings at the date of
acquisition were $800,000.
Their respective statements of financial position as at 31 December 2012 were:
Posh Ltd Becks Ltd
$000 $000
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 13,000 2,000
Investments 7,000
Current assets
Inventories 3,000 1,000
Trade receivables 1,200 2,000
Cash 1,500 200
25,700 5,200
Additional information:
(a) At acquisition, the fair value of some of Becks’ assets were greater than their book value as
follows:
$000
Inventories (sold 1 November 2012) 50
Plant (4-year life) 20
70
(b) During 2012 Becks sold goods to Posh at a selling price of $4 million. These goods had cost
Becks $2.4 million. Posh had $2.5 million (at cost to Posh) of these goods still in inventory at
31 December 2012.
(c) On the 29 December 2012 Posh sent Becks a cheque for $100,000. This had not reached Becks
by the year end. Following the adjustment for this the intercompany accounts were agreed at
$300,000.
(d) Cumulative impairment losses on recognised goodwill to date have amounted to $100,000.
(e) It is the group’s policy to value the non-controlling interest at its full or fair value at the date of
acquisition. For this purpose, the directors value this at $2.50 per share.
Required:
Prepare the consolidated Statement of Financial Position of Posh Ltd and its subsidiary as at
31 December 2012.
AC C A F 7 2 : M o r e G r o u p Ac c o u n t s 23
STEPS
Step 1: Read the requirements and then layout a proforma/blank SFP, using the one given in
the question as a guide, with additional lines for i) goodwill and ii) non-controlling interest.
Step 2: Start at the top of the question and do something with each bit of information. Put it in
a working or as an adjustment on the face of the question paper or add it to the group structure
working. This is so you do not lose or forget a vital piece of the puzzle.
Step 3: When you have reached the end of the information return to the SFP given in the
question and now add the assets and liabilities that you can and insert them into your
proforma. Also insert the share capital of the holding company.
Step 4: This should leave you with i) goodwill, ii) retained earnings and iii) non-controlling
interest. Tackle them in this order.
Consolidated statement of financial position of Posh Ltd Group at 31 December 2012
Posh Ltd
Group
$000
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Goodwill (W4)
Investments
Current assets
Inventories
Trade receivables
Cash
Posh
1/1/11 75%
(W4) Goodwill
$000 $000
Cost of combination (at fair value) – W1
Plus : NCI
Less: Beck’s net assets at acq’n (at fair value)
Share capital
Retained earnings
Fair value adjustment (W2)
Goodwill
Posh Becks
$000 $000
Retained earnings at SFP date per question
Retained earnings at acquisition
Fair value adjustment (W2)
PUP
Group share
Less: goodwill impairment losses to date
Retained earnings
4.2 Fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities and contingent
liabilities acquired
The subsidiary’s identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities are recognised when they meet
the following criteria:
(a) In the case of an asset other than an intangible asset, it is probable that associated future
economic benefits will flow to the parent, and its fair value can be measured reliably;
(b) In the case of a liability other than a contingent liability it is probable than an outflow of
resources will be required to settle the obligation, and its fair value can be measured reliably;
(c) In the case or an intangible asset or a contingent liability, its fair value can be measured reliably.
The fair value concept would also mean that certain assets that were not included on the subsidiary’s
own individual company statement of financial position could nonetheless be included in the group
statement of financial position if their fair value could be established.
For example, under IAS 38 Intangible Assets, a subsidiary may have a brand or patent which is not
recognised in its own individual accounts, following international accounting standards. However,
under group fair value rules, this brand may be included in the goodwill calculation as an asset of the
subsidiary and in the year end group statement of financial position, if:
It meets the definition of an intangible asset
its fair value can be measured reliably
This might be relevant where a parent buys a subsidiary to acquire a brand, which the group wants to
put onto its group statement of financial position.
In addition, if the acquired subsidiary has a contingent liability disclosed in its own statement of
financial position, the parent should include this as an actual provision in the statement of financial
position of the subsidiary. This would reduce the net assets of the acquired subsidiary and therefore
increase goodwill.
AC C A F 7 2 : M o r e G r o u p Ac c o u n t s 27
EXAM SMART
There are many examples of exam questions where the Examiner tries to “catch you out” on
this topic. Just because an item isn’t allowed to appear in an individual company’s accounts
doesn’t prevent it from being allowed in a set of group accounts.
Note: the brand and contingent liability will also appear in the final group SFP.
5 Mid-year acquisitions
In the real world, acquisitions occur every day of the year. The key consideration here is that the
acquisition almost certainly will not occur at a company’s year end. If an acquisition occurs midway
through a year, we will need to construct the acquired company’s statement of financial position at
that date.
In exam questions, unless told otherwise, assume that profits accrue evenly over the year.
28 2: More Group Accounts AC C A F7
Murray acquired 75% of the issued share capital of Henman on 30 September 2011.
Murray uses the full method of goodwill and has valued NCI at the date of acquisition at $900.
At the year end 31 December 2011, the two companies have the following statements of financial
position:
Murray Henman
$ $ $ $
Investment in Henman 3,000 –
Other assets 11,500 6,000
14,500 6,000
Required:
Calculate the goodwill at the date of acquisition.
SOLUTION
Working 1 Goodwill
$ $
Cost of combination
Plus : NCI
Less: Henman’s net assets at acq’n:
Share capital
Share premium
Retained earnings
1 Introduction
The purpose of the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income is to
show the performance of the group for an accounting period as if all of the companies in the group
were a single entity.
Just as the initial phase of the preparation of the consolidated statement of financial position is based
on adding the statements of financial position of the individual company’s accounts, the same applies
to the preparation of the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
30 3: Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensiv e income AC C A F7
Therefore, in its simplest form, the consolidated statement of profit or loss can be prepared as follows:
Statements of profit or loss for the year ending 31 December 2012
South
(an 80% Consolidated
subsidiary of Stmt of
North North) profit or loss
$000 $000 $000
Note that intercompany dividends do not appear in the final consolidated statement of profit or loss
– you can’t “earn income from yourself”.
It’s also worth noting that, with the statement of profit or loss, the figures of the subsidiary should
only be included from the date of acquisition. This means that you may have to time-apportion the
figures of the subsidiary in the group statement of profit or loss.
So, if South had been purchased exactly half-way through its financial year, then we would only
include 6/12 of its revenue, cost of sales etc.
Statement of profit or loss NCI = NCI % × S’s profit for the year
1.2 Dividends
There is a simple way to deal with dividends in the Statement of profit or loss – ignore any dividends
receivable from subsidiaries regardless of whether they have been paid or not.
For dividends paid, as required by IAS 1, we will recognise the dividend paid by the parent company in
the consolidated statement of changes in equity (i.e. through reserves).
AC C A F 7 3: Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income 31
Required:
Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 2011.
32 3: Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensiv e income AC C A F7
Bermuda Group consolidated statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 2011
$000
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Distribution costs
Administrative expenses
Profit before tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the period
Attributable to:
Owners of the parent
Non-controlling interest
Workings
2 Mid-year acquisitions
The results for any subsidiary are only included from the date of acquisition. Therefore, when
preparing the Statement of profit or loss, care needs to be taken to only include those revenues and
expenses achieved since the date of acquisition. The simplest way of doing this is to time-apportion all
of the subsidiary’s figures for the year.
Iceland acquired 90% of the issued share capital of Sweden on 30 September 2011. The statements of
profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 2011 are:
Iceland Sweden
$ $
Revenue 10,000 1,000
Cost of sales and expenses (4,000) (700)
Profit before tax 6,000 300
Income tax expense (1,400) (90)
Profit for the period 4,600 210
Notes
On 1 November 2011, Iceland sold inventories to Sweden at a price of $300, which included a
profit on transfer of $40. Half of these inventories had been sold by Sweden by the year end.
AC C A F 7 3: Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income 33
An impairment test carried out at the year end revealed impairment losses of $30 relating to
recognised goodwill.
Additional depreciation on fair value adjustments amounted to $14 in the post-acquisition
period.
Required:
Prepare the consolidated Statement of profit or loss for Iceland and its subsidiary for the year ended
31 December 2011, assuming that Iceland uses the full method of goodwill.
Iceland Group Consolidated Statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 2011
$
Revenue
Cost of sales and expenses
Profit before tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the period
Attributable to:
Owners of the parent
Non-controlling interest
(2) PUP
PUP = profit on intercompany sale × % of goods still in inventories at the year end
1 Definition of associate
According to IAS 28, an associate is “an entity over which the investor has significant influence”.
KEY TERM
Significant influence. Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and
operating policy decisions of the associate but is not control or joint control over those
policies. For examination purposes, we will assume that one company has significant
influence over another if it holds between 20% and 50% of that company’s shares.
2 Accounting treatment
2.1 The investor’s separate financial statements
We treat the investment in the associate in the parent company’s accounts in exactly the same way as
we treated the investment in the subsidiary (i.e. at cost).
Pink purchased 80% of Spears on 1 January 2000 for $7m when the retained earnings of Spears were
$4m and a 40% holding in Aguilera on 1 July 2001 for $2.5m when its retained earnings were $3m.
AC C A F 7 4 : Ac c o u n t i n g f o r a s s o c i a t e s 37
At 31 December 2011 the statements of financial position of the three companies were:
Pink Spears Aguilera
$000 $000 $000
Property, plant and equipment 15,000 7,000 3,000
Investment in Spears and Aguilera (at cost) 9,500 – –
Current assets 8,100 4,200 2,500
32,600 11,200 5,500
An impairment test conducted at the year end revealed cumulative impairment losses of $0.9m in
respect of the investment in Aguilera. The loss is not reflected in Pink’s own financial statements as
the investment is not impaired below its original cost. No impairment was found in Spears.
During the year, Aguilera sold goods to Pink for $6m at a profit margin of 25%. $2m of these goods
remained in Pink’s inventories at the year end.
Pink’s policy is to value the non-controlling interest of its subsidiaries at the date of acquisition at its
fair value. For this purpose, the directors considered a share price of $2.50 to be appropriate.
Required:
Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position of the Pink group as at 31 December 2011.
Pink Group – Consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2011
$000
Property, plant and equipment
Goodwill (W1)
Investment in associate (W4)
Current assets
Share capital
Retained earnings (W3)
Non-controlling interest (W5)
Liabilities
38 4: Accounting for associates AC C A F7
$000 $000
Cost of combination
Plus : NCI
Less: Spear’s net assets at acq’n:
Share capital
Retained earnings
$000
Cost of associate
Share of post-acquisition retained earnings
Less: impairment losses on associate to date
Investment in associate
(W5) Non-controlling interest (in subsidiary only)
$000
NCI at acq’n (from goodwill working)
+NCI% Spears’ post-acq’n retained earnings (W2): (20% × )
AC C A F 7 4 : Ac c o u n t i n g f o r a s s o c i a t e s 39
Continuing from Lecture example 4.1, the statements of profit or loss of the three companies for the
year ended 31 December 2011 are as follows:
Pink Spears Aguilera
$000 $000 $000
Revenue 30,000 15,000 4,000
Cost of sales (16,000) (6,000) (1,500)
Gross profit 14,000 9,000 2,500
Expenses (3,500) (3,000) (500)
Finance income 100 – 100
Finance costs (1,000) (500) (90)
Profit before tax 9,600 5,500 2,010
Income tax expense (1,600) (1,300) (170)
Profit for the year 8,000 4,200 1,840
Aguilera suffered an impairment loss of $0.3m during the year.
Required:
Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss for the Pink group for the year ended
31 December 2011.
Pink Group Consolidated Statement of profit or loss for year ended 31 December 2011
$000
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Expenses
Finance income
Finance costs
Share of profit of associate
Profit before tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the year
Attributable to:
Owners of the parent
Non-controlling interest
40 4: Accounting for associates AC C A F7
Interpreting financial
statements
1 Introduction
The interpretation of a set of financial statements is a key skill in this exam.
The use of ratio analysis may highlight unusual results or clarify trends, enabling various users of
accounts to make informed decisions relating to the company.
For ratios to be useful, comparisons must be made – either to another company, against budget or
year-on-year or industry standards.
or bad. Just because a company's results are better than its results in the previous financial period it
does not mean the results are good. It may be that its results in the prior year were particularly poor.
2 Question scenarios
Most questions on this topic will have information in the scenario that requires particular
consideration. A common complaint from markers is that candidates often make no reference to such
circumstances. In effect, the same answer would be given regardless of what the question said. It is
worth noting that there are many 'clues' in the question ─ ignore them at your peril.
By far the most common complaint by markers is that candidates' comments explaining the movement
or differences in reported ratios lack any depth or commercial understanding. A typical comment may
be that “receivables collection has improved from 60 days to 40 days”. Such a comment does not
constitute interpretation ─ it is a statement of fact. To say a ratio has gone up or down is not helpful or
meaningful.
What is required in a good answer are the possible reasons as to why the ratio has changed. There
may be many reasons why a ratio has changed and no-one can be certain as to exactly what has
caused the change. All that is required are plausible explanations for the changes. Even if they are not
the actual cause, marks will be awarded.
We encourage you to use words such as “this may be due to …” in your answer.
Questions often ask for answers in a report format. Your solution should therefore follow the format :
To :
From :
Date :
Subject :
Then, use a brief introduction, followed by headings such as “profitability” and “liquidity” to cover the
main movements in the scenario.
A conclusion/summary is often useful too.
AC C A F 7 5: Interpreting financial statements 43
Ratios are calculated using figures in the company’s statement of profit or loss and statement of
financial position.
44 5: Interpreting financial statements AC C A F7
The term working capital means a company’s net current assets, i.e. inventories, receivables less
payables. Generally a business is said to “manage” its working capital if it maximises cash generation
from these items, i.e. with shorter payment periods for receivables, and quick turnaround of
inventory.
We will illustrate each of these ratios using example financial statements.
ABC Ltd Statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 2008
2008 2007
$ $
Revenue 10,000 7,700
Cost of sales (4,500) (4,000)
Gross profit 5,500 3,700
Other income 300 250
Distribution costs (1,000) (900)
Administrative expenses (400) (390)
Other expenses (150) (160)
Finance cost (80) (20)
Profit before tax 4,170 2,480
Income tax expense (1,500) (1,000)
Net profit for the period 2,670 1,480
2008 2007
5,500 = 55% 3,700 = 48%
10,000 7,700
Used to make pricing decisions – increased selling price relative to direct costs will result in
increased gross profit margin.
This ratio won’t generally change dramatically from one period to the next, as a company will
normally decide at what profit margin it wishes/is able to sell its products. Gross profit margins
may fall if a company lowers selling prices in an attempt to sell more goods. Note that the
volume of goods sold won’t affect this ratio.
Falling margin may be due to increase costs or reduced prices to buy market share.
Check that policies are consistent.
Improved / reduced purchasing power.
2008 2007
4,170 + 80 = 42% 2,480 + 20 =32%
10,000 7,700
Can reflect how efficiently a business is being run, i.e. through controlled overheads or
economies of scale.
Note: you need to be careful when calculating PBIT. Most statements of profit or loss only give
PBT so you will need to add back the interest charge to arrive at PBIT.
2008 2007
10,000 = 2.0 7,700 = 2.17
(8,150–3,150) (5,640–2,085)
Measures how much turnover is generated for every $ of assets employed
When were new assets acquired?
What are new assets used for?
Are they working efficiently and or have they improved performance?
2008 2007
4,250 = 0.85 2,500 = 0.7
(8,150 – 3,150) (5,640–2,085)
Measures how much profit is generated for every $ of assets employed.
Indicates how efficiently the company uses its assets.
Different industries will have different benchmark rates as some businesses will be more capital
intensive than others, say service businesses.
46 5: Interpreting financial statements AC C A F7
ROCE is the only ratio which compared profits to the overall size of the business and is sometimes
called the primary ratio in ratio analysis.
2008 2007
1,300 = 0.41 1,140 = 0.55
3,150 2,085
Measures how easily a company can meet its current obligations.
Less than 1 means CL > CA and could be a cause for concern, e.g. how will company pay tax and
dividend?
“Correct” level depends on the industry:
– Too high indicates too much cash tied up in working capital
– Too low and we cannot meet obligations as they fall due
2008 2007
700 = 0.22 640 = 0.31
3,150 2,085
In times of crisis, businesses struggle to sell inventory quickly.
Quick ratio (or acid test) sometimes seen as better test of liquidity.
2008 2007
400 × 365 = 14.6 days 320 × 365 = 15.2 days
10,000 7,700
Shows how quickly customers settle their debts
Depends on credit policy
Competitors/ Industry average?
Quality of management or credit control team
AC C A F 7 5: Interpreting financial statements 47
2008 2007
700 × 365 = 56.8 days 715 × 365 = 65.2 days
4,500 4,000
Shows how quickly a business pays its suppliers
Is business struggling to pay suppliers?
Will this affect supply and therefore ability to fulfil orders?
Preferable to use “credit purchases” as the denominator but ok to use “COS” if this isn’t
available
2008 2007
600 × 365 = 48.7 days 500 × 365 = 45.6 days
4,500 4,000
Shows how long a business takes to sell its inventory.
Ideal inventory holding depends on nature of inventory (e.g. perishable foods v stationery).
No business wants too much inventory.
Risk of obsolete inventory.
There is a cost to holding inventory.
You may be asked for the rate of inventory turnover, which is:
COS
Inventory
In the above example this would be 4,500/600 = 7.5 times, i.e. the company would turnover its
inventory 7.5 times in 2008.
The operating, or cash, cycle
This is the total time taken from purchase of raw materials to collection of cash. It can be measured as:
Inventory days x
Plus Receivables days x
Less Payables days (x)
Operating cycle days x
The lower the cycle the better. Companies like Dell and Tesco have low debtors and hold on to the
customers’ cash before paying suppliers and with JIT processes they may have a negative operating
cycle.
4.4 Gearing
Companies may be financed by equity or borrowings, or a mixture of both.
High gearing means there is a high proportion of borrowing (loans)
Low gearing means there is a high proportion of equity (shares)
Generally, the higher the level of gearing the more risky a company is (because loans attract a fixed
rate of return and may have specified repayment dates).
Gearing ratio = Interest bearing debt (excl. overdraft, incl Pref shares)
TALCL (SF + NC Liabilities)
2008 2007
500 = 10% 125 = 3.5%
4,500 + 500 3,430 + 125
Low levels signifies low risk.
No ideal: depends on industry standards and economic situation in particular countries.
Higher the gearing the more difficult it maybe to borrow in the future especially in a credit
crunch.
This ratio shows how many times the interest expense can be covered by profits. In simple terms, the
higher this figure is, the easier the company will find it to pay its interest expense.
Advantages of gearing Disadvantages of gearing
Debt cheaper than equity Harder to raise extra finance
Interest is fixed while profits grow in times Lenders unlikely to advance more funds if loans
of inflation or economic growth already exist
Interest is tax deductible Shareholders may not wish to buy shares as more
risky (dividends paid after interest)
1 Introduction
Businesses should measure cash flows in addition to profits. Profits may differ from cash flows because
certain items are charged against profit even if there is no cash effect, e.g. depreciation, sales on
credit. Cash flows are not affected by an entity’s choice of accounting policies, or by accounting
estimates.
One way to value a business is by considering its ability to generate cash.
Statements of cash flows:
Link statement of profit or loss and opening and closing statement of financial positions, i.e.
explains changes in financial position during a period
Easier to understand than statements of profit or loss
Less easy to manipulate than statement of profit or loss
Enhance comparability of financial statements
50 6: Statement of cash flows AC C A F7
2 Definitions
KEY TERMS
Cash. Cash on hand and demand deposits.
Cash equivalents. Short term, highly liquid investments, readily convertible to cash.
Operating activities. Principal revenue-producing activities.
Investing activities. Acquisition and disposal of non-current assets and other
investments not included in cash equivalents.
Financing activities. Result in changes in the size and composition of the equity capital
and borrowings of the entity
FiT Limited – Statement of cash flows (indirect method) for year ended 2011
$m $m
Cash flows from operating activities
Profit before taxation 3,390
Adjustments for:
Depreciation 450
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment 100
Investment income (500)
Interest expense 300
3,740
Increase in trade and other receivables (500)
Decrease in inventories 1,050
Decrease in trade payables (1,740)
Cash generated from operations 2,550
Interest paid (270)
Income taxes paid (900)
Net cash from operating activities 1,380
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (900)
Proceeds from sale of equipment 20
Interest received 200
Dividends received 200
Net cash used in investing activities (480)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issue of share capital 250
Proceeds from long-term borrowings 250
Payment of finance lease liabilities (90)
Dividends paid* (1,200)
Net cash used in financing activities (790)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 110
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period (Note) 120
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period (Note) 230
In the illustration above, you should be able to see the logic in the fact that if trade receivables
have gone down, then that means that, net, our customers have paid us cash inflow.
Likewise, if inventories have decreased, that means we’ve sold them cash inflow.
And finally, if trade payables have decreased then, net, we’ve paid our suppliers cash outflow.
Obviously, the opposite would apply if the figures had increased.
(b) Income taxes paid
You may be given a statement of profit or loss and this and last year’s statement of financial
position.
Income tax paid will be the figure in the statement of profit or loss adjusted for opening and
closing income tax payables.
$
Bal b/f (IT of 60 + DT 45) 105
Stmt of P or L 100
Therefore, tax paid bal (35)
Bal c/f (IT of 70 + DT of 100) 170
This technique works for interest paid and dividends paid too.
Note. If the Examiner gives information about cost and accumulated depreciation, you may
need two separate non-current asset and accumulated depreciation accounts.
If you are given information in net carrying amount terms, you will only need one “non-current
asset at NCA” account.
The following balances were extracted from the books of Fixed Ltd:
2011 2010
$ $
Plant and equipment at cost 10,000 8,000
Accumulated depreciation (2,500) (1,500)
NBV 7,500 6,500
During the year an item of plant was sold for $1,000. This had originally cost $2,500 and had a net
book value of $1,400 at the date of sale.
Required:
Show the relevant extracts from the statement of cash flows.
STEPS
Step 1: Consider the checklist. Have we been given the following?
Depreciation expense? X
Profit or loss on sale? X
Additions? X
Sale proceeds? √
54 6: Statement of cash flows AC C A F7
Step 2: Set up workings for asset at cost, accumulated depreciation and disposals to find the
three missing figures.
(W1) Plant: cost
$
b/f 8,000
Disposal at cost (2,500)
Additions (bal) 4,500
c/f 10,000
The following balances were extracted from the books of Carter Ltd:
2008 2007
$ $
Share capital ($1 NV) 1,450 1,000
Share premium 600 0
During the year there was a 1:5 bonus issue followed by an issue at full price. The bonus issue was
funded out of retained earnings.
Required:
Calculate the cash raised from share issues during the year.
STEPS
Step 1: Bonus issue
Dr Retained earnings (1/5 × $1,000) $200
Cr Share capital $200
Step 2: Cash received
Simply take the opening balances away from the closing balances so:
$1,450 – $1000+$600 – $0= $,1050
Now because the bonus issue is from retained earnings and there is no cash deduct this too. So cash
received = $ 1050 – $ 200= 850
EXAM SMART
In the exam, use the following table to get to the right numbers quickly.
Share Share
capital premium
$ $
Bal b/f 1,000 Nil
Bonus issue 200 Nil
Therefore, “another share issue” – assume for cash Balance 250 600
Bal c/f 1,450 600
Below are the statements of financial position for Patchin Ltd at 31 December 2010 and 31 December
2011 and the statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 2011.
Patchin Ltd Statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 2011
$000
Revenue 800
Cost of sales and expenses (711)
Profit before tax 89
Income tax expense (110)
Loss for the year (21)
Other comprehensive income:
Gain on property revaluation 60
39
Notes:
(1) Deferred development expenditure amortised during 2011 was $15,000.
(2) Additions to property, plant and equipment totalling $160,000 were made. Also, Patchin
purchased $61,000 of property, plant and equipment via a finance lease.
AC C A F 7 6 : St a t e m e n t o f c a s h f l o w s 57
(3) Proceeds from the sale of equipment were $60,000, giving rise to a profit of $9,000. No other
items of property, plant and equipment were disposed of during the year.
(4) Expenses include interest paid on the new 5% debentures issued on 1 January 2011.
(5) Current asset investments are deemed to be “cash equivalents”.
(6) A bonus issue of 1 for 15 ordinary shares was made on 1 January 2011 from retained earnings,
the remaining share issue during the year was made for cash.
Required:
Prepare a statement of cash flows for Patchin Ltd for the year ended 31 December 2011, in accordance
with IAS 7.
Patchin Ltd Statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 December 2011
Workings
(W1) – PPE
$000
b/f
$000
b/f
$000
b/f 278
AC C A F 7 6 : St a t e m e n t o f c a s h f l o w s 59
$000
b/f
$000
b/f
5 Direct method
The operating activities element of the statement of cash flows should be shown as follows:
$000 $000
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash receipts from customers X
Cash paid to suppliers and employees (X)
Cash generated from operations X
Interest paid (X)
Income taxes paid (X)
Net cash from operating activities X
Cash receipts from customers
This represents cash flows received during the accounting period in respect of sales and can usually be
derived from a simple trade receivables T account.
Cash paid to suppliers and employees
This represents cash flows made during the accounting period in respect of goods and services and
amounts paid to employees including the associated tax. It will, therefore comprise gross salaries and
any other benefits.
60 6: Statement of cash flows AC C A F7
Using the figures from Lecture example 1, show how the cash generated from operations would be
presented in Patchin’s statement of cash flows under the direct method.
SOLUTION
Direct method
$000
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash receipts from customers (W1) 739
Cash paid to suppliers and employees (W4) (658)
Cash generated from operations 81
Workings
(W1): Trade receivables
$000
b/f 189
Revenue 800
Cash received (bal) (739)
c/f 250
(W2): Purchases
$000
Opening inventory 370
+ “Purchases + expenses” (bal) 761
– Closing inventory (420)
= Cost of sales + expenses 711
1 Introduction
The IASB’s Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting is a set of generally accepted accounting
principles, which form the basis of all International Accounting Standards. The objective of such a
framework is to enable standard-setters to achieve a consistent and coherent set of fundamental
principles which will help users of financial statements to form more complete assessments of
companies’ performance.
The IASB Conceptual Framework assists
Preparers of financial statements in applying international standards and in dealing with topics
that have yet to form the subject of an International Financial Reporting Standard
Auditors in forming an opinion as to whether financial statements conform with IFRS
Users of financial statements in interpreting the information contained in financial statements
prepared in conformity with IFRS
Those who are interested in the work of IASB, providing them with information about its
approach to the formulation of accounting standards.
Whilst not a standard, the IASB’s Conceptual Framework serves as a guide to resolving accounting
issues that are not addressed directly in a standard. It assists accountants to assess the appropriate
treatment of an item. It is NOT intended that its principles should override a specific IFRS where the
two conflict.
62 7: The conceptual and regulatory framework for financial reporting AC C A F7
Liabilities - a present obligation of the entity arising from past events, the settlement of which is
expected to result in an economic outflow from the entity of resources embodying economic
benefits.
Equity - The residual interest in the assets of an entity after deducting all its liabilities, so
EQUITY = NET ASSETS = SHARE CAPITAL + RESERVES
Income - Increases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of inflows or
enhancements of assets or decreases of liabilities that result in increases in equity, other than
those relating to contributions from equity participants.
Expenses - Decreases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of outflows
or depletions of assets or increases of liabilities that result in decreases in equity, other than
those relating to distributions to equity participants.
The price that would be received to sell an asset or price paid to transfer a liability (exit
price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at measurement date.
IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement emphasises that fair value is a market based measurement based on
current market conditions rather than the intentions of an entity. It is assumed that an asset will be
sold in its principal or most advantageous market. The condition and location of the asset should be
taken into account, together with any restrictions on sale or use. The fair value of a non-financial asset
should take into account its highest and best use.
An entity should use the valuation technique that is appropriate for it given its circumstances. To help
this decision, the standard provides a fair value hierarchy detailing the inputs which companies should
use to help determine the fair value of an item:
A level 1 input will be a quoted price from an active market for an identical asset e.g. the share
price of a publicly traded equity investment.
A level 2 input is one which is observable directly or indirectly for the asset. E.g. the quoted
price of a similar asset in an active market.
A level 3 input is an unobservable input, based on the best information available e.g. the
estimated present value of the future cash flows relating to an item.
There is no requirement for public sector entities to use IFRSs although there are moves to promote
their use to aid the comparability of accounts across the globe.
4 Regulatory framework
4.1 Advantages of IFRS over a national framework
Since IFRSs have been produced in co-operation with other internationally renowned standard
setters, a company using IFRS may enhance its status and reputation (for example, an improved
credit rating).
Its own financial statements would be comparable with other companies that use IFRS. This
would help the company to better assess and rank prospective investments.
The use of IFRSs may make the audit fee less expensive.
If a company needs to raise finance in the future, it will find it easier to get a listing on any
security exchange.
STEPS
Step 1: Identify a subject and e stablish an advisory committee
Step 2: Issue a discussion paper setting out the possible options for a new standard, with public
comment invited (this may be issued after the exposure draft).
Step 3: Issue of Exposure Draft (again with public comment invited), being a draft of the final
standard. Any feedback on this draft or the discussion paper would be analysed.
Step 4: Issue of final IFRS
4.3 Scope
Not all businesses have to prepare financial statements. The following list summarises the requirement:
Sole traders and partnerships – No requirement.
Private limited companies – UK standards, but may apply IFRS
Small limited companies – Exempt
Listed public limited companies – IFRS
Accounting treatment
If a change in accounting policy takes place, the entity should not only adjust this year’s figures, but
should also, as far as practicable, adjust the comparative amounts for the prior period. This has the
effect of preparing the financial statements as if the new policy had always been in place
(“retrospective application”).
In the exam this may mean adjusting the current year figures and adjusting the retained earnings
brought forward in the statement of changes in equity (see Chapter 8).
This will be the case UNLESS the change in accounting policy is due to a change in the IFRS and the IFRS
states that you shouldn’t apply the change retrospectively. Therefore, a company that changes from a
cost model to a revaluation model for PPE would experience a change in accounting policy, but this
would be treated prospectively, not retrospectively; i.e. we would NOT restate last year’s figures to a
revalued amount.
Examples of change in accounting policy include:
Changing from FIFO to weighted average on inventory valuation.
Measuring assets at fair value having previously measured them at historic cost.
Key disclosures
The nature of the change in accounting policy,
The reasons why the change provides more relevant and reliable information,
The amount of the adjustment for the current and each prior period presented,
The amount of the adjustment to periods before those presented.
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables X X
Short-term borrowings X X
Current tax payable X X
Short-term provisions X X
Total current liabilities X X
Total liabilities X X
Total equity and liabilities X X
AC C A F 7 8: The preparation of financial statements 71
FiT Ltd – Statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended
31 December 2014
2014 2013
$000 $000
Revenue X X
Cost of sales (X) (X)
Gross profit X X
Other income X X
Distribution costs (X) (X)
Administrative expenses (X) (X)
Other expenses (X) (X)
Finance costs (X) (X)
Profit before tax X X
Income tax expense (X) (X)
Profit for the year 200 X
FiT Ltd – Statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 December 2014
Share Share Reval’n Retained Total
capital premium surplus earnings
$000 $000 $000 $000 $000
Balance at
31 December 2013 50 10 20 100 180
Changes in accounting – – –
policies (5) (5)
Restated balance 50 10 20 95 175
Total comprehensive
income 45 200 245
Dividends paid (125) (125)
Issue of share capital 20 5 25
Balance at
31 December 2014 70 15 65 170 320
72 8: The preparation of financial statements AC C A F7
4 Additional notes
4.1 Taxation
One of the most common mistakes made in the exam relates to the taxation figure in the statement of
profit or loss and the statement of financial position (SFP).
Every year end, a company will estimate its tax bill for the year (of, say, $1,000) and will post the
following journal:
(1)
Dr P&L: tax expense $1,000
Cr SFP: tax liability $1,000
Often, this estimate will be revised by the tax inspector, with the actual bill being paid a few
months after the year end. For example, the actual bill might be $1,200 not $1,000 in the above
example. In this case, the following journal would be needed:
(2)
Dr SFP: tax liability $1,200
Cr Cash $1,200
Therefore, there will now be a debit balance of $200 for the tax liability in the SFP even though
the tax liability has been settled.
This $200 represents the under-provision made in last year’s financial statements. Before we
post this year’s tax charge estimate, we need to eliminate this balance with the following
journal:
(3)
Dr P&L: tax expense $200
Cr SFP: tax liability $200
This has the effect of eliminating the statement of financial position figure. We can now post
this year’s estimate of the tax bill.
In the exam, you will often be told that there is an under-provision (DEBIT) or overprovision (CREDIT)
brought forward from the previous year which needs to be eliminated before this year’s tax estimate
is put through.
Included within the net carrying amount of plant and machinery is $X in respect of assets held
under finance leases (IAS 17).
Examples
Settlement of a court case after the reporting date that confirms a present obligation at the
reporting date (if the claim was made before the year end).
Evidence received after the reporting date indicating that an asset was impaired at the
reporting date, e.g. bankruptcy of a customer or sale of inventory for less than cost (sale or
purchase made before reporting date), or determination of sale proceeds for an asset sold prior
to the year end.
Discovery of theft, fraud or accounting errors that show that the financial statements are
incorrect (fraud or error made prior to reporting date).
74 8: The preparation of financial statements AC C A F7
Examples
Decline in market value of an investment between the reporting date and the date when the
financial statements are authorised for issue (change in market conditions after the reporting
date).
Destruction of an asset, e.g. by fire, after the reporting date (fire occurred after reporting date).
Announcement of plan to close a manufacturing plant made after the reporting date
(announcement made after reporting date).
Change in the tax rate announced after the reporting date, but affecting the current tax liability.
Company X has a 31 December year end. Just after the year end, in January, company X received
notification of the bankruptcy of a customer. The balance of the trade receivable due from the
customer at the year was $23,000 and at the date of the notification it was $25,000. No payment is
expected from the bankruptcy proceedings.
SOLUTION
This is an adjusting event after the reporting period within the terms of IAS 10. $23,000 should be
written off to irrecoverable debts at the year end and the trade receivables balance correspondingly
reduced.
On 12 January after the year end, a fire completely destroyed the company's largest warehouse and
the inventory it contained. The carrying amounts of the warehouse and the inventory were $10 million
and $6 million respectively.
It appears that the company has not updated the value of its insurance cover and only expects to be
able to recover a maximum of $9 million from its insurers. The company's trading operations have
been severely disrupted since the fire and it expects large trading losses for some time to come.
SOLUTION
This is a non-adjusting event as it does not affect the valuation of property or inventory at the year
end.
However, it would be treated as adjusting if the scale of losses were judged to threaten the going
concern status of the company. It will certainly need to be disclosed in the notes to the financial
statements, disclosing separately the $16m loss and the expected insurance recovery of $9m.
AC C A F 7 8: The preparation of financial statements 75
A non-current asset is purchased for $120,000 on 1 January 2013. It has a useful life of eight years and
no residual value. On 1 January 2015, it is decided that the asset only has a remaining life of two years.
Required:
What will be the depreciation charge and carrying amount for the years ending 31 December 2013 to
2016?
An asset cost $100,000 on 1 January 2001 and had a useful life of 10 years. On 1 January 2003, the
asset was revalued to $120,000. The asset was disposed of for $190,000 on 31 December 2005.
Required:
What are the accounting entries for each of the years 2001 to 2005?
Cost/ Dep’n Acc Carrying Revaluation
Year valuation charge dep’n Amount surplus
$000 $000 $000 $000 $’000
2001 100
2002
On 1 January 2003, the asset is revalued to $120,000, thereby creating a revaluation surplus of $
Dr Cost
Dr Accumulated depreciation (to clear out all depreciation to date)
Cr Revaluation surplus
The new depreciation charge based on the revalued amount =
As this new charge is higher than the “old” charge, the company can transfer the “excess depreciation”
from the revaluation surplus to retained earnings. The company has chosen to do this. This should be
done every year for an amount of $
Cost/ Dep’n Acc Carrying Revaluation
Year valuation charge dep’n Amount surplus
$000 $000 $000 $000 $000
2003
2004
2005
The disposal takes place on 31 December 2005, leading to a profit on disposal of:
AC C A F 7 9: Tangible non-current assets 81
4.1 Disclosure
The disclosures are:
The amount of borrowing costs capitalised during period
The capitalisation rate used to determine the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation.
Dennis Ltd’s accounting policy is to capitalise borrowing costs on the construction of non-current
assets. On 1 March 2005 Dennis borrowed $8m at an interest rate of 4% to finance the construction of
a building.
Construction began on 1 March 2005 and the building was ready for occupation on 1 October 2005.
No construction took place from 1 May 2005 to 30 June 2005 due to bad weather. Dennis invested the
funds received on 1 March 2005, earning interest of $50,000 from 1 March until 30 April 2005.
Required:
What is the level of borrowing costs that can be capitalised on the cost of the building?
SOLUTION
Internal sources
Evidence of obsolescence or physical damage.
The asset is not used as much in the business as it once was
Internal evidence that the asset’s performance will be worse than expected.
OR for a CGU
Dr SPorL
Cr 1) Goodwill
Cr 2) Other assets on a pro-rata basis (ensuring no asset is written
down to an amount lower than its recoverable amount or zero)
7.4 Disclosure
Discontinued operations
On the face of the SPorL - a single amount comprising the total of:
The post-tax profit or loss of discontinued operations, and
The post-tax gain or loss recognised on the remeasurement to fair value less costs to sell or on
the disposal of assets/disposal groups comprising the discontinued operation.
On the face of the SPorL or in the notes
The revenue, expenses, and pre-tax profit or loss of discontinued operations, and the related
income tax expense;
The gain or loss recognised on the measurement to fair value less costs to sell or on the disposal
of assets/disposal groups comprising the discontinued operation and related income tax
expense;
The net cash flows attributable to the operating, investing, and financing activities of
discontinued operations.
10
Intangible assets
Amortisation
Amortisation is the term we use for the depreciation of an intangible asset. The rules are identical to
those for a tangible asset. The following points are also relevant:
The residual value is normally assumed to be zero.
Amortisation begins when the asset is available for use.
Some intangibles are considered to have an indefinite useful life. These assets are not
amortised, but have annual impairment tests.
Revaluation
If the revaluation model is followed, the revaluation must be fair value at date of revaluation by
reference to an active market.
All other assets in the same class should be revalued, unless there is no active market for them in
which case the cost model should be used for those assets.
Revaluations must be made with such regularity that the carrying amount does not differ materially
from its fair value at the end of the reporting period.
11
Preparation of
single company accounts
1 Approach to questions
There is no absolute right or wrong way to approach these styles of questions. You need to practise
them to find what technique works best for you, given your own particular strengths.
However, the following technique provides a useful guide:
STEPS
Step 1: Set up the necessary proformas:
- Statement of financial position
- Statement of profit or loss
- SOCIE
- Workings
Step 2: Mark up the relevant items in the trial balance that are going to change.
Step 3: Start at the beginning of the trial balance putting each number either in a working or in
the proforma (if you know it is going to be adjusted by additional information).
Step 4: Work your way through the additional information given, starting with those parts you
find easiest.
Step 5: Complete remaining workings and proformas.
Remember: There are no “bonus marks” for a balancing statement of financial position so don’t
worry if yours doesn’t balance.
90 11: Preparation of single company accounts AC C A F7
You must be familiar with the various accounting adjustments that were covered in F3, in particular:
Cost of sales calculations
Inventory valuation
Depreciation calculations
Accounting for share issues
FiT Co is an entity which owns a number of factories and specialises in producing lighting equipment
and selling it to large retailers. It also owns a small chain of lighting shops.
The company's list of balances as at 30 September 2012 is as follows:
$000 $000
Revenue 10,000
Cost of sales 3,330
Inventories (At 30 September 2012) 630
Goodwill ( related to lighting shops) 200
Lighting shops at cost 4150
Lighting shops depreciation 1250
Distribution costs 700
Administration costs 600
Loan interest 30
Dividend 600
Premises cost 9,000
Premises depreciation at 1 October 2011 900
Plant and equipment 1,800
Plant and equipment depreciation at 1 October 2011 600
Trade receivables 590
Trade payables 630
Bank 40
Loan Note (10%) Repayable 2016 400
Ordinary Shares (50 cents each) 1,000
Suspense account 980
Retained profits 5,910
21,670 21,670
Additional information:
(1) The lighting shops were valued at $3,000,000 by an external valuer on 1 July 2012. Shortly after
a buyer expressed an interest at that price. The sale is expected to be complete by 1 January
2013 at the valuation price. The cost of selling the shops is estimated to be $300,000.
The lighting shops are regarded as a cash generating unit.
The revenue and expenses of the lighting shops for the year ended 30 September 2012 all
included in the trial balance were as follows:
$000
Revenue 470
Cost of sales 280
Administration expenses 85
Distribution costs 120
AC C A F 7 11: Preparation of single company accounts 91
(2) Depreciation (which is charged to cost of sales) has still to be charged for the year on the
following bases:
Premises 2% of cost
Plant and equipment 20% of net book value
On the 30 September 2012, after the correct depreciation charge for the year has been applied,
the premises were valued at $9.5 million.
(3) The tax charge for the year has been estimated at $1,550,000.
(4) The dividend was paid on 1 July 2012.
(5) During the year a 1 for 2 rights issue took place at $1 per share. The only entry made with
respect to this issue was to debit cash with the proceeds of $1,000,000 net of issue expenses of
$20,000 (i.e. a net $980,000) and to credit the $980,000 to the suspense account.
(6) On the 1 April 2012 an employee was dismissed following the discovery of a fraud that resulted
in receivables being overstated. The auditors assessed that $25,000 was taken in the current
year and $45,000 from the previous year.
(7) FiT Co wishes to show the minimum information in relation to the discontinued operation.
Required:
Prepare a statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income and statement of changes in
equity for FiT Co for the year ended 30 September 2012 and a statement of financial position at that
date. Notes to the financial statements are not required.
SOLUTION
FiT Co – Statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended
30 September 2012
$000
Revenue
Cost of sales (W1)
Gross profit
Distribution costs (W1)
Administrative expenses (W1)
Finance cost
Profit before tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the year from continuing operations
Profit / (loss) for the year from discontinued operations
Profit for the year ( To the SOCIE)
Other comprehensive income
Gains on revaluation
Total comprehensive income
92 11: Preparation of single company accounts AC C A F7
Assets $000
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (W3)
Current assets
Asset held for sale (W2)
Inventories
Receivables
Cash and cash equivalents
TOTAL ASSETS
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Equity
Share capital
Share premium
Revaluation surplus
Retained earnings
Total equity
Non-current liabilities
Current liabilities
Trade payables
Income tax payable
Interest accrual
Total liabilities
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Workings
(W1) Expense categories
Dist’n Admin
Cost of Sales costs expenses
12
Leases IAS 17
1 Finance lease
A finance lease is a lease that transfers substantially all the risks and rewards relating to ownership of
an asset (to the lessee). Title may or may not be eventually transferred.
IAS 17 identifies five situations which would normally lead to a lease being classified as a finance lease:
(a) The lease transfers ownership of the asset to the lessee at the end of the lease term;
(b) The lessee has the option to purchase the asset at a price sufficiently below fair value at
exercise date, and that it is reasonably certain the option will be exercised;
(c) The lease term is for a major part of the asset’s economic life even if title is not transferred;
(d) Present value of minimum lease payments (PVMLP) amounts to substantially all of the asset’s
fair value at inception;
(e) The leased asset is so specialised that it could only be used by the lessee without major
modifications being made.
1.1 Definitions
KEY TERMS
Lease term - the non-cancellable period for which the lessee has contracted to lease the
asset together with any further terms for which the lessee has the option to continue to
lease the asset.
96 12: Leases IAS 17 AC C A F7
Minimum lease payments - the payments over the lease term that the lessee is, or can be
required to make, together with any amounts guaranteed by the lessee or related party.
Fair value - the amount for which an asset could be exchanged or a liability settled, between
knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction.
Interest rate implicit in the lease - the discount rate that, at the inception of a lease, causes
the present value of the minimum lease payments to be equal to the fair value of the leased
asset.
1.3 Depreciation
The item of PPE will be depreciated, in the normal way, over the shorter of the lease term and its
useful economic life.
If there is a reasonable certainty that the lessee will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term
(e.g. a hire purchase contract) then the asset should be depreciated over its useful life (this would
have to be indicated in the exam question).
EXAM SMART
In questions, remember to add the net carrying amount of the leased asset to PPE or if you
have a working for PPE add cost of the asset and then depreciate it in the working.
Remember also to expense the depreciation. These are easy marks.
1.4 Disclosures
The following amounts will be included in the financial statements relating to finance leases:
Non-current assets (PPE): Net carrying amount of the leased asset added to other PPE
Non-current liabilities: Finance lease liability due after more than one year
Current liabilities: Finance lease liability due within one year
Statement of profit or loss: Depreciation of leased PPE and finance costs
In the exam depreciation is often charged to cost of sales and the interest will of course go to finance
costs. Also remember to accrue any finance cost not yet paid.
In addition, the standard requires the following disclosure in the notes in relation to the outstanding
capital element of the lease. It has never been examined.
AC C A F 7 12: Leases IAS 17 97
$
Within one year X
Later than one year and not later than five years X
Later than five years X
X
$
Statement of profit or loss (extract)
Depreciation (W2)
Finance costs (W1)
Using the same information, what difference does it make if the payments are in advance paid on
1 January 2014?
FL Liability
1.1.2014 Asset
1.1.2014 Instalment 1
2 Operating leases
An operating lease is defined as “a lease other than a finance lease” (!)
From this, we can deduce that an operating lease is one which does not transfer substantially all the
risks and rewards relating to ownership of an asset (to the lessee).
Twyford Ltd enters into a non-cancellable four-year operating lease costing $6,000 per annum. The
machine has a useful life of ten years.
The annual cost will be spread on a straight line basis over four years:
Dr SPorL: operating lease rentals $6,000
Cr Cash $6,000
for each of the four years of the lease term.
Twyford Ltd enters into a non-cancellable four-year operating lease, paying a $4,000 deposit followed
by an annual charge of $3,000 for four years. The machine has a useful life of ten years.
The total cost of the lease is spread over the four years i.e. $4,000 deposit + (4 × $3,000) = $16,000
over four years = $4,000 per annum:
Year 1:
Dr SPorL: Operating lease rental $4,000
Dr SFP: Prepayments $3,000
Cr Cash $7,000
Years 2, 3 & 4:
Dr SPorL: Operating lease rental $4,000
Cr Cash $3,000
Cr Prepayments $1,000
100 12: Leases IAS 17 AC C A F7
Twyford Ltd enters into a non-cancellable five-year operating lease, paying an annual charge of $3,000
for five years. As an incentive to enter the lease, Twyford was given a cash back incentive of $2,000 at
the start of the lease. The machine has a useful life of ten years.
Required:
How should the above transaction be recorded each year?
SOLUTION
ILLUSTRATION: SP < FV
ILLUSTRATION: SP > FV
13
1 Revenue
1.1 Introduction
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers establishes a comprehensive framework for
determining when to recognise revenue and how much revenue to recognise.
The core principle in this framework is that a company should recognise revenue to depict the transfer
of promised goods or services to the customer in an amount that reflects the consideration to which
the company expects to be entitled in exchange for goods and services.
On 1 January 2014, Bobby Jean sold a product for $5m and is committed to the ongoing service of the
product for three years after the sale. The value of this service has been included in the total selling
price of $5m for the year ending 31 December 2014.
When this type of servicing is supplied separately, the normal selling price is $480,000 per annum.
The normal selling price of the product (when supplied separately) is $4,560,000.
Required:
Explain how this transaction should be treated in the financial statements for the year ending
31 December 2014.
SOLUTION
The sale agreement contains two separate performance obligations (the product and the servicing), so
the total price of $5 million must be apportioned between the two parts on the basis of their normal
stand-alone prices. The total standalone price of the product plus the servicing would be $4,560 +
($480 × 3) = $6,000.
AC C A F 7 13: Revenue and Inventory 105
$000
Product (5,000 × 4,560/6,000) 3,800
Servicing (5,000 × (480 × 3)/6,000) 1,200
Total transaction price 5,000
Sales made which include revenue for ongoing servicing work must have part of the revenue deferred.
At 31 December 2014, there are two more years of servicing work, thus $0.8 million ($1.2 million ×
2/3) must be treated as deferred revenue, split equally between current and non-current liabilities.
The final revenue figure recorded for the year ending 31 December 2014 is therefore $5m ─ $0.8m =
$4.2m.
Revenue is recognised at a point in time if the criteria for recognising revenue over time are not met.
Builder had the following contracts with customers ongoing at its year end of 31 December 2009.
Performance obligations are satisfied over time for each of these contracts.
Progress towards completion on each contract is determined by comparing cost to date with
estimated total cost.
A B
$000 $000
Contract price 200 300
Cost incurred to date 120 150
Estimated cost to completion 40 100
Amounts invoiced 140 200
Cash received 115 185
Required:
Prepare the extracts for the statement of profit or loss and statement of financial position relating to
the above contracts at 31 December 2009.
Statement of profit or loss
A B Total
$000 $000 $000
Revenue
Expenses
Recognised profit
Statement of financial position
Current assets
Contract asset (W)
Trade receivables (W)
Current liabilities
Contract liability (W)
Workings
START HERE (W1)
A B
$000 $000
Costs to date
Costs to complete
% Complete
108 13: Revenue and Inventory AC C A F7
A B
$000 $000
Total contract costs incurred to date
Add: profit recognised
Less: total amounts invoiced to date
Contract asset / liability
On the 1 October 2013 Thomas entered into a four-year contract with a customer. The fixed value of
the contract is $250m. Performance obligations under this contract are satisfied over time.
Year to Year to
30 Sept 2015 30 Sept 2014
Costs incurred during the year $ 100 m $80 m
At the year-end estimated total cost to complete the project $ 20 m $ 120 m
Amounts invoiced and cash received in the year $ 90 m $ 100 m
Amounts recognised in the statement of profit or loss:
Revenue ? $100 m
Cost of sales ? $80 m
Thomas measures progress towards completion by comparing costs to date with total estimated costs.
During the year ended 30 September 2015 a mistake was made and an additional amount of $5m was
spent correcting the error. These additional costs are not included in the costs shown in the table
above and are not recoverable from the customer.
Required:
Calculate the amounts to be recorded for the above contract in Thomas’s statement of profit or loss
for the year ended 30 September 2015 and in the statement of financial position at that date. (Work to
the nearest $ million.)
Working - % complete
Costs to date
Total costs
Statement of profit or loss for the year ended 30 September 2015
Total to Total to
last y/e date
30/9/14 30/9/15 This year
40%
$m $m $m
Revenue 100
Cost of sales (80)
Mistake -
Recognised profit 20
Statement of financial position at 30 September 2015
$m
Total costs incurred to date
Total profit recognised to date
Less: amounts invoiced to date
Chateau Ltd is a wine producer. It normally holds inventories for three years before selling them.
A large quantity of one-year old wine has been sold to a finance company at its cost of $5 million. The
sales proceeds have been credited to revenue and the wine has been removed from inventory.
Chateau Ltd has an option to buy back the wine in two years' time at its original selling price of $5
million plus accrued interest of 10% per annum from the date of the sale. The market value of the
wine in 2 years’ time is expected to be $8 million.
Required:
Discuss whether the current accounting treatment is correct.
SOLUTION:
According to IFRS 15, this type of transaction should be treated as a financing arrangement. In effect,
Chateau Ltd has a loan from the finance company, secured on the wine. It is virtually certain that
Chateau Ltd will repurchase the wine in two years’ time as the repurchase price is below market value.
Chateau should remove the revenue of $5 million from the statement of profit or loss and continue to
recognise the wine in its statement of financial position at cost. It should also recognise a non-current
liability of $5m. The interest of 10% per annum should be included in the statement of profit or loss as
a finance cost and accrued in each of the two years.
2.1.4 Consignments
These arise when a seller delivers a product to another party (such as a dealer or a distributor) for sale
to end customers, but retains control of that product. Consignment inventories are common in the
motor trade and book industries. The seller should not recognise revenue upon delivery of a product
to another party if the delivered product is held on consignment.
112 13: Revenue and Inventory AC C A F7
3 Inventories: IAS 2
Inventories should be measured at the lower of:
(a) Cost
(b) Net realisable value – taking each item of inventory separately i.e. a loss-making item of
inventory cannot be “offset” against a profit-making item.
3.1 Cost
Per IAS 2, the cost of inventories shall comprise “all costs of purchase, costs of conversion and other
costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition”.
“Costs of purchase” comprise purchase price, import duties and other taxes and transport, handling
and other costs directly attributable to the acquisition of finished goods, materials and services, less
trade discounts, rebates and other similar items.
“Costs of conversion” include:
Costs which are directly related to units of production, e.g. direct labour, direct expenses and
sub-contracted work
Systematic allocation of fixed and variable production overheads incurred in converting
materials into finished goods. The allocation of fixed production overheads to units of
production is based on normal capacity. In periods of abnormally high production fixed
overhead unit allocations are reduced to avoid valuing inventories above cost.
“Other costs” can be included in the cost of inventories to the extent incurred in bringing the
inventories to their present location and condition e.g. non-production overheads of designing a
product for a specific customer.
In such circumstances, the following estimation methods are allowed under IAS 2:
FIFO (first in, first out)
The cost of inventories is calculated on the basis that the quantities in hand represent the most
recent purchases or production.
OR
Weighted average cost
The cost of inventories is calculated by using a weighted average price computed by dividing the
total cost of items by the total number of such items. The price is recalculated on a periodic
basis with the items taken out of inventory being removed at the prevailing weighted average
cost.
An entity must use the same cost formula for all inventories having a similar nature and use to the
entity. Note that LIFO (Last In First Out) is not permitted, per IAS 2.
14
Financial instruments
Therefore, redeemable preference shares are very often categorised as “liabilities” and not “equity”
(or shares).
A further complication can be added if the preference shares are “cumulative” meaning that any
dividends not paid in any year must be paid in future years. This feature means that cumulative
preference shares (both redeemable and non-redeemable) are very likely to be categorised as a
liability.
Amortised cost
Amortised cost with the effective interest method is used where:
The business intends to hold the assets in order to collect contractual cash flows as opposed to
selling the asset (“the business model test”). For exam purposes, this often means that the asset
the company is holding is not equity shares; and
The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise, on specified dates, to cash flows that are
solely payments of principal and interest (“the contractual cash flow characteristics test”).
Gav Co purchased 5% debentures in Zurich Co on 1 January 2009 (their issue date) for $500,000 as an
investment. Gav intends to hold them for six years, at which point Zurich will have to repay Gav
$560,000. Transaction costs of $5,000 were incurred on purchase. The effective rate of interest
applicable to the bond is 6.5%.
Initial measurement :
Dr Financial asset $505,000 (including the transaction costs of $5,000)
Cr Cash $505,000
Subsequent measurement:
As the financial asset passes the “business model” and “contractual cash flow” tests, it will be
measured at amortised cost :
Year end Effective interest @ Interest received
31 December Asset b/f 6.5% (@5% coupon) Asset c/f
$000 $000 $000 $000
2009 505 32.8 (25) 512.8
2010 512.8 33.3 (25) 521.1
2011 521.1 33.9 (25) 530.0
2012 530.0 34.5 (25) 539.5
2013 539.5 35.1 (25) 549.6
2014 549.6 35.7 (25) 560
Gav Co purchased 30,000 shares in Jersey Co on 1 November 2010 for $2.00 each as a short-term
investment. Transaction costs on purchase or sale are 1% purchase/sale price. The share price at the
year end, 31 December 2010, was $2.20.
Initial recording :
Dr Financial asset $60,000 (excluding. transaction cost)
Cr Cash $60,000
At the year end
The financial asset will be held at fair value ($2.20), (but potential transaction costs are ignored):
30,000 × $2.20 = $66,000
Therefore, Dr Financial asset $6,000
Cr S of P or L $6,000
118 14: Financial instruments AC C A F7
Gav Co issued a bond of $200,000 on 1.1.03 for proceeds of $157,763. Interest of 4% is payable
annually on 31 December. The bond will be redeemed on 31.12.2007 for $200,000. (i.e. at par).
The effective rate of interest applicable to the bond is 9.5%.
Initial measurement :
Dr cash $157,763
Cr Financial liability $157,763
Like most financial liabilities, it will be held at amortised cost:
Interest paid
Year Liability b/f Effective interest @ 9.5% (@4% coupon) Liability c/f
$000 $000 $000 $000
2003 157.8 15.0 (8) 164.8
2004 164.8 15.7 (8) 172.5
2005 172.5 16.4 (8) 180.9
2006 180.9 17.2 (8) 190.1
2007 190.1 18.0 (8) 200
3 Compound instruments
Compound instruments are those which show characteristics of both equity and financial liabilities.
If this is the case, then we “split” the components on the statement of financial position.
The most common example of a compound instrument is convertible debt – debt that the holder has
the option of converting into shares at some point in the future.
The accounting treatment of convertible debt follows the principle of substance over form; that is, we
pretend that the debt is a combination of debt and equity and “split” the instrument into its two
component parts.
The liability part of the instrument is valued using current market interest rates, with the equity part
being left as a residual (balance).
AC C A F 7 14: Financial instruments 119
On 1 January 2011, a company issued a $400,000 5% convertible loan note at par, with interest
payable annually in arrears.
The loan is convertible in four years’ time into equity shares on the basis of $100 of loan note for
10 equity shares or it may be redeemed at par in cash at the option of the loan note holder.
A similar loan note, without the conversion option, would have required the company to pay an
interest rate of 8%.
The present value of $1 receivable at the end of the year, based on discount rates of 5% and 8%, can
be taken as:
5% 8%
End of year 1 0.95 0.93
2 0.91 0.86
3 0.86 0.79
4 0.82 0.74
EXAM SMART
In the exam, and above, you will often be given the annuity factors at the coupon rate too
(here 5%) Ignore them - they are always a trap.
Required:
Show the initial accounting treatment of the loan note at 1 January 2011 and the balances to be
shown in the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2011.
(W1) Initial recording on 1 January 2011:
Dr Cash $400,000
Cr Financial liability
Cr Equity (balance)
120 14: Financial instruments AC C A F7
2011
2012
And so on...
Therefore, for the year ending 31 December 2011, the finance / interest cost in the statement of profit
or loss would be ……………………………………and the financial liability balance on the statement of financial
position would be ……………………………………
On 31st March 2015 Apple sold trade receivables with a book value of $15m to Factor. Apple received
an immediate payment of $12m. The terms of the arrangement are as follows:
Factor Co administers the sales ledger of Apple Co.
Interest is charged at 2% per month on uncollected debts.
Any debts not recovered after 90 days are transferred back to Apple Co for immediate cash payment.
Apple has derecognised the receivables and charged $3m to administrative expenses.
Required:
Discuss whether the current accounting treatment is correct.
AC C A F 7 14: Financial instruments 121
SOLUTION:
Apple still bears the risk of the non-payment of the receivables so the substance of this transaction is a
loan. Therefore Apple must continue to recognise the asset on its statement of financial position and
the proceeds of the ‘sale’ treated as a current liability.
The difference between the factored receivables and the loan received of $3m should be removed
from administrative expenses.
The double entry is:
$000 $000
Dr Trade receivables 15,000
Cr Administrative expenses 3,000
Cr Current liabilities 12,000
122 14: Financial instruments AC C A F7
.
123
15
1 Provisions
A provision is a liability of uncertain timing or amount. IAS 37 covers those provisions which an entity
may need to meet future payments that it is obliged to pay to third parties.
The standard does NOT apply to allowance for doubtful debts or allowances for depreciation.
1.1 Recognition
The recognition criteria are the same as those in the framework for all liabilities.
When an entity has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event;
It is probable (> 50% chance) that an outflow of economic resources will be required to settle
the obligation, and
A reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
All 3 criteria need to be met before a provision can be recognised.
The provision should be calculated each year end, with the movement being taken to the Statement of
profit or loss.
Where the effect of the time value of money is material, the provision must be discounted to the
present value of the future expenditure.
Sonny sells goods with a one year warranty. If all of the goods sold required minor repairs, the total
cost would be $1.2m. If all of the goods sold required major repairs, the total cost would be $8m.
Sonny expects that 80% of the goods will have no faults, 15% will have minor faults and 5% will have
major faults.
Required:
What provision should Sonny include in its financial statements?
SOLUTION
The expected value of the repair costs is calculated as follows:
Provision
$
No repairs needed 80% × nil cost Nil
Minor repairs needed 15% × $1.2m $180,000
Major repairs needed 5% × $8m $400,000
$580,000
On 31 December 2006, Messy Co constructed an oil rig in the North Sea. The UK Government included
a clause in the licence that Messy had to return the sea bed to its previous state at the end of the
extraction process.
The clean-up costs are estimated to be $26,532,977 in 20 years’ time. The interest rate Messy uses for
its cost of capital is 5%.
Required:
What amounts should be included in Messy’s financial statements in the years ended 31 December
2006 and 2007?
31 December 2006 Present value of $26,532,977 = 26,532,977 = $10,000,000
1.0520
Dr Non-current assets $10m
Cr Provision $10m
31 December 2007 Present value of $26,532,977 = 26,532,977 = $10,500,000
1.0519
Dr Finance cost (SPorL) $0.5m
Cr Provision $0.5m
126 15: Provisions and contingencies AC C A F7
Notice that in the years after initial recognition the difference in value created by the passage of time,
is expensed to the statement of profit or loss as a finance cost. This is sometimes referred to by the
Examiner as “unwinding of the discount”.
The $10m non-current asset needs to be depreciated over 20 years and expensed to the SOCI in the
usual way.
2 Contingent liabilities
A contingent liability is either:
(a) A possible obligation (< 50% chance) whose existence will be confirmed only by the occurrence
of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the entity; or
(b) An existing obligation that arises from past events but is not recognised because:
it is not probable that an outflow of economic benefit will be required to settle the
obligation; or
because the amount of the obligation cannot be measured with sufficient reliability.
Contingent liabilities are not recognised in an entity’s statement of financial position ─ they are merely
disclosed in the notes.
Pell Co sells wedding cakes. After a wedding in Bristol, eight people suffered from food poisoning
which has been directly linked to the wedding cake. The married couple are now suing Pell Co. Pell
Co’s solicitor advises them that there is a 40% chance that they will lose the case. If the case is lost,
damages of $200,000 will be payable.
Requirement 1:
How should this matter be dealt with in the financial statements?
Since this is a single event, the most likely outcome will dictate whether a provision is needed. Since
there is a 40% chance of losing the case, Pell Co should NOT provide for the possible damages, but may
disclose the matter as a contingent liability in the notes to its financial statements.
Requirement 2:
After the year end there have been developments in the case which suggest that there is now a 70%
chance that Pell Co will lose the case. How would this information change the financial statements?
As long as the financial statements have not been issued, this development would be sufficient to
change the contingent liability into a provision for potential damages of $200,000, i.e. this is an
adjusting event after the statement of financial position date.
AC C A F 7 15: Provisions and contingencies 127
3 Contingent assets
A contingent asset is a possible asset arising from past events whose existence will only be confirmed
by the occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the entity.
An entity should only recognise an asset on its Statement of Financial Position when the realisation of
the profit is virtually certain.
If the realisation is merely probable (> 50% chance), then we can refer to that asset as a contingent
asset and disclose it in the notes to the financial statements. A brief description of the nature of the
contingent asset and, where practicable, an estimate of the financial effect should be disclosed.
If the realisation is possible (i.e. < 50% chance), then no disclosure is required.
128 15: Provisions and contingencies AC C A F7
129
16
Taxation
1 Current tax
KEY TERM
Current tax. Current tax is the amount of income taxes payable (or recoverable) by a
company in respect of its taxable profit or loss for a period. Current tax is therefore a direct
tax.
A company will estimate how much tax is due on its profits for the year and will record this estimate
with the following journal:
Dr SPorL: Income tax expense
Cr SFP: Income tax liability
Often, the actual amount of tax paid will differ from this estimate. Any such “over-provision” or
“under-provision” is adjusted in the next financial statements.
Kavanagh estimated that the income tax payable for the year ended 31 December 2011 was $75,000.
It settled the actual tax liability in 2012, paying $79,000.
The tax estimate for the year ended 31 December 2012 is $51,000.
The tax entries for the year ending 31 December 2011 are:
Dr SPorL: Income tax expense $75,000
Cr SFP: Income tax liability $75,000
130 16: Taxation AC C A F7
For the year ending 31 December 2012, we need to acknowledge that the 2011 tax liability estimate
was too low – there was an underprovision of $4,000. This will adjusted through the 2012 accounts:
Dr SPorL: Income tax expense $4,000
Dr SFP: Income tax liability $79,000
Cr Cash $79,000
Cr SFP: Income tax liability $4,000
And then for the 2012 estimate:
Dr SPorL: Income tax expense $51,000
Cr SFP: Income tax liability $51,000
The tax note for the statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 2012 will be drawn
up:
$
Current tax 51,000
Under-provision in 2011 4,000
55,000
A business purchases a non-current asset for $100, with a 10-year useful economic life. Capital
allowances (tax depreciation) are available from the local tax authority of 100%. To calculate the
company’s taxable profit, a simple adjustment is needed to its accounting profit before tax:
$
Accounting profit (say) 100
Add: depreciation charge (non-allowable) 10
Less: tax depreciation (allowable) (100)
Taxable profit 10
Therefore, if the tax rate is 30%, the company will pay tax of $3 (30% × taxable profit of $10) and
should therefore have a provision for current tax of $3 in its accounts.
AC C A F 7 16: Taxation 131
Therefore, next year (and indeed, every year for the next nine years of the asset’s life), the company
will have to pay tax of $3, even if they don’t make an accounting profit. As this tax is unavoidable, they
should provide for it now (it meets the criteria for recognition as a liability).
Since this tax relates to the future taxable profits of the business, we simply refer to it as “deferred
tax” instead of “current tax”, but the journal is identical:
Dr SPorL: Income tax expense (9 years of $3) $27
Cr SFP: Deferred tax liability $27
EXAM SMART
In questions we will calculate the provision by working out the “temporary difference”
between the asset’s carrying value in the accounts and its “tax base” or “tax written down
value” (WDV).
Fit Co acquired non-current assets on 1 April 2010 costing $500,000. The assets qualified for
accelerated first year tax allowance at the rate of 50% for the first year. The second and subsequent
years were at a tax depreciation rate of 25% per year on the reducing balance method.
AB depreciates all non-current assets at 20% a year on the straight line basis.
The rate of corporate tax applying to Fit Co for 2010/11 and 2011/12 was 25%. Assume Fit Co has no
other qualifying non-current assets.
132 16: Taxation AC C A F7
Required:
Apply IAS 12 Income Taxes and calculate:
(a) The deferred tax balance required at 31 March 2011
(b) The deferred tax balance required at 31 March 2012
(c) The charge to the statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 March 2012
This means that the final revaluation reserve at the end of the year is $70m - $21m = $49m
AC C A F 7 16: Taxation 133
3 Tax losses
If a company makes tax losses, it will generally be allowed to carry forward those losses against any
future profits, thus reducing the tax payable in the future.
For example, if Co X has tax losses of $1,000,000 brought forward at 1 January 2014, then made a
taxable profit of $1,500,000 during 2014, it would only pay tax of $150,000
[($1,500,000 – $1,000,000) × 30%] and not $1,500,000 × 30% = $450,000.
This is a saving of $300,000. As long as Co X can foresee using these tax losses against future profits,
it would be able to include a deferred tax asset of $300,000 in the financial statements for year ended
31 December 2013.
Dr Deferred Tax asset $300,000
Cr PorL Tax expense $300,000
In addition to the tax note, the company should also disclose the difference between accounting and
taxable profits.
134 16: Taxation AC C A F7
135
17
A company has earnings of $200,000 and a year end of 31 December. On 1 October 2013 the company
issued 200,000 $1 ordinary shares at full market price. The issued share capital before the share issue
was 800,000 shares.
Weighted average number of shares
Weighted average
Date Narrative No. of shares Time no of shares
1.01.13 Opening bal 800,000 × 9/12 600,000
1.10.13 Issue @ FMP 200,000
1,000,000 × 3/12 250,000
31.12.13 850,000
$200,000
EPS = × 100 = 23.5 cents per share (cps)
850,000
A company with a 31 December year end and issued share capital of 100 $1 shares makes a 2 for 1
bonus issue on 1 July 2014 (i.e. two new shares are given away to each holder of one share).
The company’s summary results are:
2014 2013
Earnings (say) $20 $20
No of shares 300 100
EPS 6.6cps 20cps
If we only look at the EPS year on year, we might assume that the company’s performance has
deteriorated, whereas all that has happened is that the number of shares has trebled.
To make EPS comparable, we need to calculate the weighted average number of shares and restate
the 2013 figure as if it had the same share capital as 2014. To do this, we apply a “bonus fraction” to
all shareholdings prior to the bonus issue.
Weighted
No. of average no
Date Narrative shares Time Bonus fraction of shares
1.01.14 Opening bal 100 × 6/12 300/100 150
1.07.14 Bonus issue 200
300 × 6/12 150
31.12.14 300
Bonus fraction = Fair value per share immediately before exercise of rights
Theoretical ex rights price (TERP)
TERP = $30 / 4 shares = $7.50 (i.e. in theory, the new share price should fall to $7.50).
Bonus fraction = 8 / 7.50
This is then applied to the shares in issue before the issue date, as in the previous illustration.
The comparative EPS figure would be restated multiplied by the inverse fraction, i.e. 7.50 / 8.
On 1 January 2013, Gardiner Co had 2,000,000 ordinary shares in issue. On 30 June 2013 the company
made a rights issue of 1 for 5 @ $2.00. The fair value of the shares on the last day before the issue of
shares from the rights issue was $3.00.
Finally, on 31 October 2013 the company made a 1 for 10 bonus issue.
Profit for the year was $500,000. The reported EPS for year ended 31 December 2012 was 15.2c.
138 17: IAS 33: Earnings per share AC C A F7
Required:
Calculate the EPS for year ended 31 December 2013 and the restated EPS for year ended 31 December
2012.
Weighted
No. of Bonus average no
Date Narrative shares Time Fraction of shares
TERP =
Bonus fraction =
Tower Co had the same 10 million ordinary shares in issue on both 1 January 2013 and 31 December
2013. On 1 January 2013, the company issued 1,400,000 $1 units of 5% convertible loan stock. Each
unit of stock is convertible into 6 ordinary shares on 1 April 2016 at the option of the holder. The
following is an extract from Tower Co's statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December
2013:
$000
Profit from operations 620
Interest payable on 5% convertible loan stock (70)
Profit before tax 550
Income tax at 30% (165)
Profit for the year 385
Required:
Calculate the basic and diluted earnings per share figures for the year ended 31 December 2013.
Basic EPS =
Diluted EPS =
Working
Earnings: $
Net basic earnings
Add back: loan stock interest net of income tax (or preference dividends) “saved”
No. of
No of shares: shares
Basic weighted average
Add: additional shares on conversion
Diluted number of shares
140 17: IAS 33: Earnings per share AC C A F7
Happy Co has a profit of $4m for the year ended 31 October 2014 and 1.8m ordinary shares in issue.
Happy Co also had outstanding 150,000 options for the whole year with an exercise price of $10.
The average market price of one ordinary share during the period was $15.
Required:
Calculate the basic and diluted EPS.
Basic EPS =
Diluted EPS =
The technique used for share options is quite different to that for convertible debt:
STEPS
Step 1: Calculate the cash receivable on the exercise of the options Here, 150,000 × $10 =
$1,500,000.
Step 2: Calculate the number of shares that would have been issued if the cash received had
been used to buy shares at average market price for the period.
Step 3: Deduct the figure in (2) above from the actual number of shares issued – this gives you
the number of shares that have effectively been “given away”.
Step 4: Add these “free” shares to the average number of shares for the period to derive the
diluted EPS.
141
Solutions to
Class lecture examples
Chapter 1
Lecture example 1.1
A Group
$
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 21,200
Goodwill (W1) 70
Current assets
Inventories 6,500
Trade receivables 2,550
Cash 1,600
31,920
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Equity
Share capital 14,000
Retained earnings (W2) 16,470
(W1) Goodwill
$ $
Cost of combination 10,000
Plus : NCI (20% × 6,500) 1,300
Less : % of Ernie’s net assets at acq’n :
Share capital 3,500
Retained earnings 3,000
(6,500)
Goodwill at acquisition date 4,800
Cumulative impairments since acq’n (400)
Carrying amount of goodwill 4,400
AC C A F 7 So l u t i o n s t o C l a s s l e c t u r e e x a m p l e s 143
Note: We split the subsidiary’s post-acquisition reserves of 1,500 into “our share” (80%) and “the NCI
share” (20%) you do this in EVERY group question.
(W1) Goodwill
$ $
Cost of combination 5,000
Plus: NCI at acquisition (25% × 4,800) 1,200
Less: % of B’s Net Assets at acq’n :
Share capital 2,000
Revaluation surplus 300
Retained earnings 2,500
(4,800)
Goodwill at acquisition date 1,400
Cumulative impairments since acq’n (900)
Carrying amount of goodwill 500
2,350
Chapter 2
Lecture example 2.1
Posh Group - Consolidated statement of financial position of Posh Ltd group as at 31 December 2012
Posh
Group
$000
Non-current assets
Property, plant & equipment (13,000 + 2,000+ 10 FV (W2)) 15,010
Goodwill (W4) 5,405
Investments (i.e. investments other than that in Becks) 7,000
Current assets
Inventories (3000+1000-1000 PUP (W3)) 3,000
Trade receivables (1,200+2,000-100 cash-in-t -300 i/co) 2,800
Cash (1,500+200+100 cash in transit) 1,800
35,015
Equity
Share capital (10,000+1500 (W1)) 11,500
Share premium (W1) 6,000
Retained earnings (W5) 12,530
Non-controlling interest (W6) 1,885
Current liabilities
Trade payables (3,200 + 200 – 300i/co) 3,100
35,015
(W4) Goodwill
$000 $000
Cost of combination (W1) 7,500
Non-controlling interest (25% × 3,000 shares = 750 shares @ $2.50 each) 1,875
Less: % of B’s net assets at acq’n (at fair value):
Share capital 3,000
Retained earnings 800
Fair value adjustment (from W2) 70
(3,870)
Goodwill at date of acquisition 5,505
Less: impairments to date : (100)
Final goodwill on consol SFP 5,405
(W5) Group retained earnings
Posh Becks
$000 $000
Per question 12,500 2,000
At acq’n date (800)
Fair value adj’t (W2) ( 60)
PUP adjt (W3) (1,000)
140
Group share (75% × 140) 105
Less : impairment in goodwill (100 × 75%)) (75)
Group Retained Earnings 12,530
Chapter 3
Lecture example 3.1
$
Revenue (20,000 + 15,000 – 5,000 w1) 30,000
Cost of sales (13,200 + 7,800 – 5,000 + 500 w2) (16,500)
Gross profit 13,500
Distribution costs (1,200 + 1,650) (2,850)
Administrative expenses (1,700 + 2,200) (3,900)
Profit before tax 6,750
Income tax expense (1,300 + 1,000) (2,300)
Profit for the period 4,450
Attributable to:
Owners of the parent (balancing figure) 4,080
Non-controlling interest (20% ×(2,350 – 500 (W2)) 370
4,450
Workings
Intercompany sale
(W1) Sale itself
Dr Group revenue $5,000,000
Cr Group COS $5,000,000
(W2) PUP
Dr COS ($2m × ¼) $500,000
Cr Inventories $500,000
In the books of the company making the sale – here, the subsidiary Bahama. This will affect the non-
controlling interest.
Attributable to:
Owners of the parent 4,587
Non-controlling interest (10% × ((3/12 × 210) - 14 FV dep’n – 30 impairment)) 1
4,588
Intercompany sale
(W1) Sale itself
Dr Group revenue $300
Cr Group COS $300
148 Solutions to Class lecture examples AC C A F7
(W2) PUP
Dr COS ($40 × ½ ) $20
Cr Inventories (SFP) $20
Chapter 4
Lecture example 4.1
Pink Group – Consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2011
$000
Property, plant and equipment 22,000
Goodwill (W1) 1,500
Investment in associate (W4) 1,800
Current assets (8,100 + 4,200 – 200 (W2)) 12,100
37,400
Workings
(W1) Goodwill in Spears
$000 $000
Cost of combination: controlling interest 7,000
Non-controlling interest (20% × 3,000 SC = 600 shares @$2.50 per share) 1,500
Less: S’s net assets at acq’n:
Share capital 3,000
Retained earnings 4,000
(7,000)
Goodwill at acquisition date 1,500
Less: impairment losses to date (nil)
1,500
(W2) PUP
PUP = profit on intercompany sale × % of goods still in stock at the year end
(25% profit margin × $6m × 2/6)
= $500,000
BUT: the sale involved an associate so we also need to take the Associate’s share of this PUP
= 40% × $500,000 = $200,000
Therefore,
Dr Group retained earnings $200,000
Cr Group inventories (as the inventories are held by Pink) $200,000
AC C A F 7 So l u t i o n s t o C l a s s l e c t u r e e x a m p l e s 149
Attributable to:
Owners of the parent 11,596
Non-controlling interest (20% × 4,200) 840
12,436
150 Solutions to Class lecture examples AC C A F7
Chapter 6
Lecture example 6.1
Patchin Ltd – Statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 December 2011
Cash flows from operating activities $000 $000
Profit before taxation 89
Adjustments for:
Depreciation (W1) 115
Amortisation (W2) 15
interest expense (5% × 140) 7
profit on disposal of equipment (9)
217
increase in trade receivables (250 – 189) (61)
increase in inventories (420 – 370) (50)
decrease in trade payables (170 – 210) (40)
increase in provisions (50 – 35) 15
Cash generated from operations 81
interest paid (7)
income taxes paid (W3) (107)
Workings
(W1) – PPE: net carrying amount
$000
b/f 397
Additions 160
New finance lease 61
Revaluation 60
Disposals (NCA) (51)
Depreciation charge (bal) (115)
C/f 512
Profit on disposal
$000
Proceeds 60
Less : NCA of assets sold Bal (51)
Profit on disposal 9
(W2) – Intangible assets : dev’t costs
$000
b/f 13
Additions (bal) 82
Amortisation charge (15)
C/f 80
Chapter 9
Lecture example 9.1
Y/e Depreciation charge NCA at year end
$000 $000
2013 120/8 = 15 120 – 15 = 105
2014 15 90
2015 45 45
2016 45 Nil
On 1 January 2015, its remaining life is revised down to two years. Therefore, the depreciation
charge = Remaining net carrying amount – residual value
Remaining useful life
= 90,000 = $45,000 per annum
2 years
Dr Cash 190
Dr Non-current assets (Accumulated depreciation) 45
Cr Non-current asset (Cost/value) 120
Cr SPorL: profit on disposal 115
As the asset is no longer on the statement of financial position, the revaluation surplus must be
eliminated. This is done by transferring any balance on that account to the retained earnings reserve:
Dr Revaluation surplus 25
Cr Retained earnings 25
Chapter 11
Lecture example 11.1
FiT Co –Statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended
30 September 2012
$000
Revenue ( 10,000 – 470) 9,530
Cost of sales (W1) (3,470)
Gross profit 6,060
Distribution costs (W1) (580)
Administrative expenses (W1) (540)
Finance cost (30 TB + 10 accrued) (40)
Profit before tax 4,900
Income tax expense (W4) (1,550)
Profit for the year from continuing operations 3,350
Loss for the year from discontinued operations (415)
Profit for the year 2,935
Other comprehensive income:
Gains on revaluation 1,580
Total comprehensive income 4,515
158 Solutions to Class lecture examples AC C A F7
Assets $000
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (W3) 10,460
Current assets
Asset held for sale (W2) 2,700
Inventories 630
Receivables (590-70) 520
Cash and cash equivalents 40
TOTAL ASSETS 14,350
Workings
(W1) Expense categories
Admin
Cost of sales Dist’n costs expenses
$000 $000 $000
Per TB 3,330 700 600
Discontinued operations (280) (120) (85)
Fraud 25
Depreciation charge (W4): 420
3,470 580 540
AC C A F 7 So l u t i o n s t o C l a s s l e c t u r e e x a m p l e s 159
Chapter 12
Lecture example 12.1
$
Statement of profit or loss (extract)
Depreciation (W2) 3,200
Finance costs (W1) 1,920
Statement of financial position (extract)
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (W2) 12,800
Non-current liabilities
Finance lease liability (W1) 11,590
Current liabilities
Finance lease liability (W1) 2,330
Working 1
FL Liability
1.1.2014 Asset 16,000
1.1.14 to 31.12.14 Interest = 16,000 × 12% 1,920
31.12.2014 Instalment 1 (4,000)
31.12.2014 Y/e liability 13,920
1.1.15 to 31.12.15 Interest = 13,920 × 12% 1,670
31.12.2015 Instalment 2 (4,000)
11,590
Working 2
Depreciation based on shorter of lease term and useful life = 5 years
Therefore, depreciation charge = $16,000 / 5 years = $3,200
Therefore, carrying amount = £16,000 - $3,200 = $12,800
FL Liability
1.1.2014 Asset 16,000
1.1.2014 Instalment 1 (4,000)
12,000
1.1.14 to 31.12.14 Interest = 12,000 × 12% 1,440
Year end 31.12.14 Liability 13,440
1.1.15 Instalment 2 (4,000)
9,440
So the differences are the: Finance costs are now 1,440
Non-current liabilities 9,440 (bal)
Current liabilities 4,000
Interest accrual 1,440
AC C A F 7 So l u t i o n s t o C l a s s l e c t u r e e x a m p l e s 161
Chapter 13
Lecture example 13.1
(W1) % complete
A B
$000 $000
Costs to date 120 150
Costs to complete 160 250
75% 60%
Profit 30 30 60
Statement of financial position
Current assets
Contract asset (W2) 10
Trade receivables (W3) 40
Current liabilities
Contract liability (W2) 20
(W2) Contract asset/liability
A B
$000 $000
Total contract costs incurred 120 150
Add: profit recognised 30 30
Less: total invoiced to date (140) (200)
Contract asset / liability 10 (20)
This is effectively how much “behind” we are in our invoicing to our customers and is shown as an
asset.
If it is a negative figure (as it is in contract B), it is effectively showing how much we’ve “over-invoiced”
our customers and is therefore a liability.
162 Solutions to Class lecture examples AC C A F7
Lecture example 13 2
Working - % complete
September 2014: 80/80 + 120 = 40% complete
September 2015: 80 + 100/80 + 100 + 20 = 90% complete
Note that the cost of the mistake of $5m is ignored in the statement of financial position as it is not
recoverable from the customer.
AC C A F 7 So l u t i o n s t o C l a s s l e c t u r e e x a m p l e s 163
Chapter 14
(W1) Initial recording on 1 January 2011:
Dr Cash $400,000
Cr Financial liability (W2) $362,400 this will be measured at amortised cost from now on
Cr Equity (balance) $37,600 this remains fixed
(W2) Fair value of equivalent non-convertible loan note
Year ended 31 Discounted
December Cash flow Discount rate cash flow
$000 $000 $000
2011 5% × $400,000 = $20,000 interest 0.93 18,600
2012 $20,000 0.86 17,200
2013 $20,000 0.79 15,800
2014 $420,000 0.74 310,800
Value of debt component 362,400
Value of equity option component ( = balance) 37,600
400,000
Chapter 16
Lecture example 16.1
CA Tax WDV Difference Deferred tax
$ $ $ $
1.4.2010 cost 500,000 500,000
Depreciation (100,000) (250,000)
31.3.2011 400,000 250,000 150,000 37,500
Depreciation (100,000) (62,500)
31.3.2012 300,000 187,500 112,500 28,125
Chapter 17
Lecture example 17.1
EPS for y/e 31.12.2013= $500,000 = 20.1c
2,486,078 (W)
Restated EPS for y/e 31.12.2012 = 15.2 c × 10/11 × 2.83/3 = 13.0c
(W1) Weighted average no of shares:
Weighted
No of average no
Date Narrative shares Time Bonus fraction of shares
1.1.13 Bal b/f 2,000,000 × 6/12 × 3/2.83 (W1) × 11/10 = 1,166,078
30.06.13 Rights Issue + 400,000
2,400,000 × 4/12 × 11/10 = 880,000
31.10.13 Bonus Issue +240,000
2,640,000 × 2/12 = 440,000
2,486,078
(W2) Rights issue:
Fair value per share immediately before exercise of rights
Bonus fraction =
Theoretical ex-rights price (TERP)
“TERP”:
$
5 shares @ $3 = 15
1 share @ $2 2
6 shares 17
$17 3
TERP = = $2.83 Bonus fraction =
6 2.83
AC C A F 7 So l u t i o n s t o C l a s s l e c t u r e e x a m p l e s 165
Example 17.3
Basic EPS = $4,000,000 = $2.22
1,800,000
Diluted EPS:
(1) Cash receivable on the exercise the options = 150,000 × $10 = $1,500,000
(2) Number of shares at market price = $1,500,000/15 = 100,000 shares
(3) Actual number of shares issued = 150,000 shares
(4) we’ve effectively “given away” 50,000 shares
Diluted EPS = $4,000,000 = $2.16
1,800,000 + 50,000
166 Solutions to Class lecture examples AC C A F7