Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 238 views

    Selegna Management and Development Corp. v. UCPB

    Uploaded by

    alfred chua
    The Supreme Court ruled that the petitioners were in default and the respondent bank had the right to foreclose on the mortgaged properties extrajudicially. There are three requirements for default: the obligation must be demandable and liquidated, the debtor must delay performance, and the creditor must judicially or extrajudicially require performance. The petitioners received a loan secured by real estate mortgages and were required to pay interest monthly. When they were unable to pay, the respondent bank sent a demand letter and the petitioners only made a partial payment, so the bank applied for extrajudicial foreclosure.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Selegna Management and Development Corp. v. UCPB

    Uploaded by

    alfred chua
    238 views1 page
    The Supreme Court ruled that the petitioners were in default and the respondent bank had the right to foreclose on the mortgaged properties extrajudicially. There are three requirements for default: the obligation must be demandable and liquidated, the debtor must delay performance, and the creditor must judicially or extrajudicially require performance. The petitioners received a loan secured by real estate mortgages and were required to pay interest monthly. When they were unable to pay, the respondent bank sent a demand letter and the petitioners only made a partial payment, so the bank applied for extrajudicial foreclosure.

    Original Title

    Selegna Management and Development Corp. v. UCPB,

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The Supreme Court ruled that the petitioners were in default and the respondent bank had the right to foreclose on the mortgaged properties extrajudicially. There are three requirements for default: the obligation must be demandable and liquidated, the debtor must delay performance, and the creditor must judicially or extrajudicially require performance. The petitioners received a loan secured by real estate mortgages and were required to pay interest monthly. When they were unable to pay, the respondent bank sent a demand letter and the petitioners only made a partial payment, so the bank applied for extrajudicial foreclosure.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    238 views1 page

    Selegna Management and Development Corp. v. UCPB

    Uploaded by

    alfred chua
    The Supreme Court ruled that the petitioners were in default and the respondent bank had the right to foreclose on the mortgaged properties extrajudicially. There are three requirements for default: the obligation must be demandable and liquidated, the debtor must delay performance, and the creditor must judicially or extrajudicially require performance. The petitioners received a loan secured by real estate mortgages and were required to pay interest monthly. When they were unable to pay, the respondent bank sent a demand letter and the petitioners only made a partial payment, so the bank applied for extrajudicial foreclosure.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    74.

    Selegna Management and Development Corp. v. UCPB,


    G.R. No. 165662, May 3, 2006
    PANGANIBAN, CJ:
    DOCTRINE OF LAW: There are three requisites necessary for a finding of default.
    First, the obligation is demandable and liquidated; second, the debtor delays
    performance; third, the creditor judicially or extrajudicially requires the debtor’s
    performance.
    FACTS: Petitioners were granted a credit facility in the amount of P70 million by
    Respondent, as security for this credit facility, petitioners executed real estate
    mortgages over several parcels of land. Petitioners were likewise required to execute a
    promissory note in favor of respondent every time they availed of the credit facility. As
    required in these notes, they paid the interest in monthly amortizations. The parties
    stipulated in their Credit Agreement that failure to pay "any availment of the
    accommodation or interest, or any sum due" shall constitute an event of default, which
    shall consequently allow respondent bank to "declare as immediately due and payable
    all outstanding availments of the accommodation together with accrued interest and any
    other sum payable."
    Petitioner unable to pay their dues, respondent send a demand letter, In
    response, petitioners paid respondent the amount of P10,199,473.96 as partial payment
    of the accrued interests. Apparently unsatisfied, UCPB applied for extrajudicial
    foreclosure of petitioners’ mortgaged properties.

    ISSUE: Whether petitioners are in default hence respondent has right to foreclose the
    mortgaged properties extrajudicially

    RULING: Yes, It is a settled rule of law that foreclosure is proper when the debtors are
    in default of the payment of their obligation. In fact, the parties stipulated in their credit
    agreements, mortgage contracts and promissory notes that respondent was authorized
    to foreclose on the mortgages, in case of a default by petitioners. That this authority was
    granted is not disputed.

    You might also like