0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views15 pages

3 Equations With Compact Operators

The document discusses equations with compact operators. It proves three main theorems: 1. The null space of an operator T defined by a compact operator A is closed and finite dimensional. 2. The sequence of null spaces of T^n is increasing and stationary, reaching a fixed value after some number p of iterations. 3. The range space of the operator T is a closed subspace.

Uploaded by

BRAHIMITAHAR
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views15 pages

3 Equations With Compact Operators

The document discusses equations with compact operators. It proves three main theorems: 1. The null space of an operator T defined by a compact operator A is closed and finite dimensional. 2. The sequence of null spaces of T^n is increasing and stationary, reaching a fixed value after some number p of iterations. 3. The range space of the operator T is a closed subspace.

Uploaded by

BRAHIMITAHAR
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

 

 
§3. Equations with Compact Operators

Equations of the second kind


Let A be a compact operator de…ned on the normed space E into itself,
the operator T = I A where I denotes the identity operator de…nes an
operator equation called equation of the second kind, given as

T ' = (I A)' = f;

or merely

' A' = f;
where f is a given function of E and ' is the unknown function of E:

Theorem 1
The null-space N (T ) of the operator T de…ned by

N (T ) = ker T = f' 2 E; T ' = (I A)' = 0g;

is a closed and …nite dimensional subspace.

Proof
Indeed, it is known that the kernel N (T ) of a bounded operator T is a
closed subspace of E; since, for all sequence 'n in N (T ) converges to ' in
E; we obtain ' in N (T ): Really, due to the boundedness of T we have

T 'n = 0 ) lim T 'n = 0;


n!1

or still
T lim ' = 0 ) T (') = 0:
n!1 n

Hence, the null-space N (T ) is closed.


On the other hand, all functions ' 2 N (T ) must satisfy the equation

T' = ' A' = 0;

or still
A' = ':
Noting that, the restriction of the operator A to the subspace N (T )
coincides with the identity operator on N (T ): The operator A is compact

1
 

 
from E to E and therefore also compact from N (T ) to N (T ) since N (T ) is
closed. Evidently, for all bounded sequence 'n in E in particular in N (T )
the sequence A'n = 'n contains a convergent subsequence A'nk = 'nk in
the closed N (T ): Hence, the compact operator A represents the identity
operator on the subspace N (T ) and therefore the subspace N (T ) is of …nite
dimensional.

Remark 1
The null-space N (T n ) of the operator T n for all n 2 N; is a closed and
…nite dimensional subspace. Indeed, the operators T n can be written in the
form
T n = (I A)n = I An ;
where An is a compact operator as combination of compact operators given
by
Xn
n
An = ( 1)i+1 Ai
i
i=1

Theorem 2
The sequence of null-spaces sets

N (T ) ; N (T 2 ); :::; N (T n ); :::

is increasing and stationary sequence. In other words, the sequence contains


uniquely a …nite number of distinct sets, so there exists a nonnegative integer
p 2 N; such that

f0g N (T ) N T2 ::: N (T p ) = N T p+1 = :::;

the number p is called the Riesz number of the compact operator A for the
null-spaces sets N (T n ):

Proof
Indeed, the inclusion is evident, since

' 2 N (T n ) ) T n ' = 0;

and therefore

T (T n ') = T n+1 ' = 0 ) ' 2 N (T n+1 ):

Hence, the inclusion of sets

N (T n ) N (T n+1 ); for all n 2 N: (1)

2
 

 
Suppose that there is no integer p 2 N; such that the sequence N (T n ) is
stationary, that is to say

N (T m ) 6= N (T n ); for all m; n 2 N; with m < n:

In other words, we write

f0g N (T ) ::: N (T m ) N (T m+1 ) ::: N (T n 1


) N (T n ) :::

In particular, taking N (T n 1 ) 6= N (T n ); the relation N (T n 1 ) N (T n )


between a closed subspaces involves the existence of an element 'n in N (T n );
with unit norm k'n k = 1; such that
1
'n 'n 1 > ; for all 'n 1 2 N (T n 1
):
2
Generally, for all sequence 'n 2 N (T n ) and for all m; n such that m < n;
we have the following relation

kA'n A'm k = k(I T )'n (I T )'m k


= k'n T 'n 'm + T 'm k
1
= k'n ('m T 'm + T 'n )k > : (2)
2
For, the elements of the sequence ('m T 'm + T 'n ) belong to the
subspace N (T n 1 ): Indeed, due to the relation

N (T m ) N (T n 1
) N (T n );

it comes

'm 2 N (T m ) ) 'm 2 N (T n 1
) and 'm 2 N (T n );

or still

'm 2 N (T m ) ) T m 'm = 0; T n 1
'm = 0 and T n 'm = 0:

Noting that, for 'n 2 N (T n ); we get

Tn 1
('m T 'm + T 'n ) = T n 1
'm T n 'm + T n 'n = 0:

Hence
('m T 'm + T 'n ) 2 N (T n 1
):

3
 

 
The sequence 'n is bounded, so by virtue of the compactness of the
operator A; we can extract a convergent subsequence from the sequence
A'n : Contradiction with the relation (2): Hence

N (T n 1
) = N (T n ):

It remains to demonstrate now the relation

N (T n ) = N (T n+1 ):

Indeed, for ' 2 N (T n+1 ) we get

' 2 N (T n+1 ) ) T n+1 ' = T n (T ') = 0;

it gives
T ' 2 N (T n ) = N (T n 1
);
that means

T ' 2 N (T n 1
) ) Tn 1
(T ') = T n ' = 0 ) ' 2 N (T n );
and therefore
N (T n+1 ) N (T n ):
Hence, there exists a nonnegative integer p 2 N; such that

f0g N (T ) N (T 2 ) ::: N (T p ) = N (T p+1 ) = N (T p+2 ) = :::;

where p is given by

p = minfk 2 N; such that N (T k ) = N (T k+1 )g:

Theorem 3
The range space R(T ) of the operator T de…ned by

R(T ) = Im T = T (E) = f ; 9' 2 E; T ' = g;

is a closed subspace.

Proof
It is known that, the range R(T ) of a linear operator T is a linear
subspace. Let f be an element of the closure T (E); then there exists a
sequence fn of the set T (E) such that

lim fn = f:
n!1

4
 

In other words, fn 2 T (E) there exists a sequence 'n 2 E such that

T 'n = fn ;

with the relation of convergence

lim T 'n = lim fn = f:


n!1 n!1

First case 'n bounded

Suppose that, the sequence 'n is bounded then, due to the compactness
of the operator A there exists a subsequence A'n(k) from the sequence A'n
such that, A'n(k) converges to : Hence, the convergence of the subsequence
'n(k) to an element ' in E: Say

lim 'n(k) = lim T 'n(k) + A'n(k)


k!1 k!1
= lim T 'n(k) + lim A'n(k)
k!1 k!1
= f+ = ' 2 E:

Due to the boundedness of the operator T and the convergence of the


sequence T 'n ; we get

f = lim fn = lim T 'n


n!1 n!1

= lim T 'n(k) = T lim 'n(k) = T ':


k!1 k!1

Hence f = T ' 2 T (E) = T (E):

Second case 'n unbounded

Suppose that, the sequence 'n is not bounded, then we get

1. If 'n 2 N (T )

For the sequence 'n inthe null space N (T ); we have T 'n = fn = 0

T 'n = 0 ) lim T 'n = 0 ) f = 0 2 T (E) = T (E);


n!1

as a linear subspace contains the null element.

5
 

 
2. If 'n 2
= N (T )

Taking the subspace G of E spanned by 'n and N (T ) de…ned as

G = span f'n + N (T )g:

The subspace N (T ) is closed in G: Hence, there exists an element n 2G


with a unit norm k n k = 1 such that
1
k n nk > ; 8 n 2 N (T );
2
with the following relation

n = an 'n + n ; an 2 R; n 2 N (T ):
Noting that, there is no subsequence an(k) of the sequence an converges
to the null element. For, if we suppose there exists a such subsequence, say
lim an(k) = 0; we obtain
k!1

lim T n(k) = lim (an(k) T 'n(k) ) + lim T n(k)


k!1 k!1 k!1
= lim an(k) : lim T 'n(k) + lim T n(k)
k!1 k!1 k!1
= 0f + 0 = 0:

In other words, there exists a subsequence n(j) of the subsequence n(k)


of the bounded sequence n such that A n(j) converges to an element of E:
This implies the convergence of the subsequence n(j) to the same element
of E; for, we have

lim n(j) = lim T n(j) + lim A n(j) = :


j!1 j!1 j!1

It is clear that, T = 0: Hence 2 N (T ): Contradiction with the fact


that
1
k n nk
> ; 8 n 2 N (T ):
2
We can therefore conclude that an 1 is bounded. Say

an 1 n = 'n + an 1 n:

Then, it comes

lim T (an 1 n) = lim T 'n + lim T (an 1 n)


n!1 n!1 n!1
= lim T 'n + 0 = f:
n!1

6
 

 
The sequence an 1 n is bounded as product of two bounded sequences
1 1 1
an and n : Hence there exists a subsequence an(k) n(k) such that A(an(k) n(k) )
converges to an element a 1 of E: This implies the convergence of the sub-
1 1 of E; for, we have
sequence an(k) n(k) to the same element a

lim a 1 n(k)
1
= lim T (an(k) n(k) )
1
+ lim A(an(k) n(k) ) =a 1
2 E:
k!1 n(k) k!1 k!1

The operator T is continuous, then we write


1 1
lim T (an(k) n(k) ) = T ( lim (an(k) n(k) ))
k!1 k!1
1
= T (a ) = f 2 T (E) = T (E):

Hence, the result


T (E) = T (E):

Theorem 4
The sequence of range spaces sets

R(T ); R(T 2 ); :::; R(T n ); :::

is decreasing and stationary sequence. In other words, the sequence contains


uniquely a …nite number of distinct sets, so there exists a nonnegative integer
q 2 N; such that

::::: = R(T q+1 ) = R(T q ) :::; : R(T 2 ) R(T ) E

The number q is called the Riesz number of the compact operator A for
the range spaces sets R(T n ):

Proof
Indeed, the inclusion is evident, since

2 R(T n+1 ) ) = T n+1 (') = T n (T ') = T n '1 2 R(T n );

and therefore
= T n+1 ' ) = T n '1 :
Hence, the inclusion of sets

R(T n+1 ) R(T n ): (3)

7
 

 
Suppose that there is no integer q 2 N; such that the sequence R(T n)

is stationary, that is to say

R(T m ) 6= R(T n ); for all m; n 2 N; with n < m:

In other words, we have

::: R(T m )::: R(T n+1 ) R(T n ) ::: R(T ) E

In particular, taking R(T n+1 ) 6= R(T n ); the relation R(T n+1 ) R(T n )
between a closed subspaces involves the existence of an element n in R(T n );
with unit norm k n k = 1; such that
1
k n n+1 k> ; for all n+1 2 R(T n+1 ):
2
Generally, for all sequence n 2 R(T n ) and for all m; n such that n < m;
we have the following relation

kA n A mk = k(I T) n (I T) mk
= k n T n m +T mk
1
= k n ( m T m +T n )k > : (4)
2
For, the elements of the sequence ( m T m +T n) belong to the
subspace N (T n+1 ): Indeed, due to the relation

R(T m+1 ) R(T m ) R(T n+1 ) R(T n );

it comes
m 2 R(T m ) ) m 2 R(T n+1 );
also, we have

T m 2 R(T m+1 ) ) T m 2 R(T n+1 ):


Noting that, for n 2 R(T n ); we get

n 2 R(T n ) ) T n 2 R(T n+1 )

Hence
( m T m +T n) 2 R(T n+1 ):

8
 

 
The sequence n is bounded, so by virtue of the compactness of the
operator A; we can extract a convergent subsequence from the sequence
A n : Contradiction with the relation (4): Hence

R(T n+1 ) = R(T n ):

It remains to demonstrate now the relation

R(T n+2 ) = R(T n+1 ):

Indeed, the …rst inclusion R(T n+2 ) R(T n+1 ) is always true following
(3); for the second one, we get

2 R(T n+1 ) ) = T n+1 ' = T (T n ')


= T (T n+1 '1 ) = T n+2 '1 2 R(T n+2 );

or still
R(T n+1 ) R(T n+2 ):
Hence, there exists a nonnegative integer q 2 N; such that

:::: = R(T q+2 ) = R(T q+1 ) = R(T q ) :::R(T 2 ) R(T ) E

where q is given by

q = minfk 2 N; such that R(T k ) = R(T k+1 )g:


Lemma 1
The Riesz number p of the null-spaces sets N (T n ) and the Riesz number
q of the ranges spaces R(T n ) are equal. Say

p=q

Proof
Suppose that, the Riesz numbers p and q are di¤erent, say p 6= q:

1. First case p < q;

f0g N (T ) ::: N (T p ) = N (T p+1 ) = ::: = N (T q 1


) = N (T q ) = ::; (5)

9
 

 
and also

::: = R(T q+1 ) = R(T q ) R(T q 1


) ::: R(T p ) ::: R(T ) E: (6)

We can see that, there exists a function 2 R(T q 1) such that 2


=
R(T q ); that is to say

= Tq 1
' 2 R(T q 1
);
the composition by the operator T of both sides, gives us

T = T q ' 2 R(T q ) = R(T q+1 );

this relation shows that, there exists a function '1 such that

T = T q ' = T q+1 '1 ;

or still
T q+1 '1 T q ' = 0:
Hence, we obtain

T q (T '1 ') = 0 ) T '1 ' 2 N (T q ) = N (T q 1


): (7)

It is to remark that the relation (7) gives us

T ('1 ) ' 2 N (T q 1
) ) Tq 1
(T '1 ') = 0 , T q '1 = T q 1
'= ;

this implies that = T q '1 2 R(T q ); contradiction with the fact that 2
=
R(T q ):

2. Second case q < p;

f0g N (T ) ::: N (T q ) ::: N (T p 1


) N (T p ) = N (T p+1 ) = ::: (8)

and also

::: = R(T p ) = R(T p 1


) = ::: = R(T q ) R(T q 1
) ::: R(T ) E (9)

We can see that, there exists a function ' 2 N (T p ) such that ' 2
=
N (T p 1 ); that is to say

10
 

Tp 1
' 2 R(T p 1
) = R(T p ) = R(T q );
this relation shows that, there exists functions '1 and '2 such that

TP 1
' = T p '1 = T q '2 ; (10)

the composition by the operator T of both sides and the relation ' 2 N (T p )
give us
T p ' = T p+1 '1 = T q+1 '2 = 0;
this implies that
'1 2 N (T p+1 ) = N (T p ):
Hence, it comes
T p+1 '1 = T p '1 = 0:
It is to remark that the relation (10) gives us T p '1 = T p 1 ' = 0; this
implies that ' 2 N (T p 1 ); contradiction with the fact that ' 2
= N (T p 1 ):

Theorem 5
The subspaces N (T r ) and R(T r ) are supplementary. That is to say

E = ker T r Im T r = N (T r ) R(T r );

where r = p = q is the Riesz number.

Proof
For all element 2 E; we get

2 E ) Tr 2 R(T r ) = ::: = R(T 2r ):

This relation implies the existence of a function '; such that

Tr = T 2r ' ) T r ( T r ') = 0;

or still,
( T r ') = 2 N (T r ):
Therefore, we have

= + T r '; with 2 N (T r ) and T r ' 2 R(T r ):

For all element 2 N (T r ) \ R(T r ); we get

11
 

2 R(T r ) and 2 N (T r );
this relation implies T r = 0 and the existence of a function '; such that
= T r '; it comes

= T r' ) Tr = 0 = T 2r ';

or still,
' 2 N (T 2r ) = :::; ::: = N (T r ):
Therefore, we have
= T r ' = 0:
Lemma 2
The operator T = I A is injective if and only if, the operator T r is
injective for all r 2 N:

Proof
Supposing that, The operator T is injective then, for all r 2 N; we have

T r '1 = T r '2 ) T (T r 1
'1 ) = T (T r 1
'2 ) ) T r 1
'1 = T r 1
'2
r 2 r 2 r 2 r 2
) T (T '1 ) = T (T '2 ) ) T '1 = T '2
) :::T (T '1 ) = T (T '2 ) ) T '1 = T '2
) '1 = '2 :

Hence, the operator T r is injective.


Supposing that, The operator T r is injective for all r 2 N; then we have

T '1 = T '2 ) T r 1
(T '1 ) = T r 1
(T '2 ) ) T r '1 = T r '2
) '1 = '2 :

Hence, the operator T is injective. That is to say

f0g = N (T ) = N (T 2 ) = ::: = N (T r ) = :::; :::


Lemma 3
The operator T = I A is surjective if and only if, the operator T r is
surjective for all r 2 N:

Proof

12
 

 
Suppose that, the operator T is surjective then, for all r 2 N; say

8 2 E; 9'1 2 E; = T '1 ) 9'2 2 E; '1 = T '2


) = T '1 = T (T '2 ) = T 2 '2
) ::9'r 2 E; 'r 1 = T 'r
) = T '1 = T (T '2 ) = ::: = T (T r 1
'r ) = T r 'r :

Finally, we obtain

8 2 E; 9'r 2 E; = T r ':

Hence, the operator T r is surjective.

Suppose that, the operator T r is surjective for all r 2 N; say

8 2 E; 9'1 2 E; = T r '1 ;

we can also write


T r '1 = T (T r 1
'1 ) = T ';
where the functîon ' = T r 1'
1 2 E: Finally, we obtain

8 2 E; 9' = T r 1
'1 2 E; = T ':

Hence, the operator T is surjective. That is to say

E = R(T ) = R(T 2 ) = ::: = R(T r ) = :::; :::

Theorem 6
Let A be a compact operator de…ned from a Banach space E into itself
then, the operator T = I A is injective if and only if, T = I A is
surjective. Besides the inverse operator T 1 = (I A) 1 de…ned from E
into E is bounded.

Proof
It is known that, for all Riesz number r = p = q; The subspaces N (T r )
and R(T r ) are supplementary. Say

E = N (T r ) R(T r ):

13
 

 
The injection of the operator T implies the one of T r : Hence the sur-
jection of the operator T r which it assures us the surjection of the
operator T:

The surjection of the operator T implies the one of T r : Hence the


injection of the operator T r which it assures us the injection of the
operator T:

The injection of the operator T or its surjection implies the bijection


of this operator T = (I A): Hence the boundedness of its inverse
T 1 = (I A) 1 :

Theorem 7
Let A be a compact operator from a Banach space E into itself then, the
nonhomogeneous equation

T' = ' A' = f (11)

admits a unique solution ' 2 E; for all f 2 E; if and only if, the homoge-
neous equation
T ' = ' A' = 0 (12)
admits uniquely a trivial solution ' = 0:

Proof
Indeed, suppose that the equation (11) admits a solution for all f 2 E;
it wants to say that the operator T is surjective and the Riesz number r is
null. Hence the operator T is injective. In other words, the equation (12)
admits the trivial solution ' = 0:
Reciprocally, suppose that the equation (12) admits uniquely the trivial
solution ' = 0; it wants to say that the operator T is injective and the
Riesz number r is null. Hence, the operator T is surjective and therefore
this operator is bijective. In other words, the existence and the uniqueness
of the solution of the equation (11):

14
 

 
Bibliography

[1] M. NADIR. Cours d’analyse fonctionnelle, université de Msila 2004.


[2] H. WIDOM. Lectures on integral equations, university of california
1969.

Address. Prof. Dr. Mostefa NADIR


Department of Mathematics
Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics
University of Msila
28000 ALGERIA
E-mail: [email protected]

15

You might also like