3 Equations With Compact Operators
3 Equations With Compact Operators
§3. Equations with Compact Operators
T ' = (I A)' = f;
or merely
' A' = f;
where f is a given function of E and ' is the unknown function of E:
Theorem 1
The null-space N (T ) of the operator T de…ned by
Proof
Indeed, it is known that the kernel N (T ) of a bounded operator T is a
closed subspace of E; since, for all sequence 'n in N (T ) converges to ' in
E; we obtain ' in N (T ): Really, due to the boundedness of T we have
or still
T lim ' = 0 ) T (') = 0:
n!1 n
or still
A' = ':
Noting that, the restriction of the operator A to the subspace N (T )
coincides with the identity operator on N (T ): The operator A is compact
1
from E to E and therefore also compact from N (T ) to N (T ) since N (T ) is
closed. Evidently, for all bounded sequence 'n in E in particular in N (T )
the sequence A'n = 'n contains a convergent subsequence A'nk = 'nk in
the closed N (T ): Hence, the compact operator A represents the identity
operator on the subspace N (T ) and therefore the subspace N (T ) is of …nite
dimensional.
Remark 1
The null-space N (T n ) of the operator T n for all n 2 N; is a closed and
…nite dimensional subspace. Indeed, the operators T n can be written in the
form
T n = (I A)n = I An ;
where An is a compact operator as combination of compact operators given
by
Xn
n
An = ( 1)i+1 Ai
i
i=1
Theorem 2
The sequence of null-spaces sets
N (T ) ; N (T 2 ); :::; N (T n ); :::
the number p is called the Riesz number of the compact operator A for the
null-spaces sets N (T n ):
Proof
Indeed, the inclusion is evident, since
' 2 N (T n ) ) T n ' = 0;
and therefore
2
Suppose that there is no integer p 2 N; such that the sequence N (T n ) is
stationary, that is to say
N (T m ) N (T n 1
) N (T n );
it comes
'm 2 N (T m ) ) 'm 2 N (T n 1
) and 'm 2 N (T n );
or still
'm 2 N (T m ) ) T m 'm = 0; T n 1
'm = 0 and T n 'm = 0:
Tn 1
('m T 'm + T 'n ) = T n 1
'm T n 'm + T n 'n = 0:
Hence
('m T 'm + T 'n ) 2 N (T n 1
):
3
The sequence 'n is bounded, so by virtue of the compactness of the
operator A; we can extract a convergent subsequence from the sequence
A'n : Contradiction with the relation (2): Hence
N (T n 1
) = N (T n ):
N (T n ) = N (T n+1 ):
it gives
T ' 2 N (T n ) = N (T n 1
);
that means
T ' 2 N (T n 1
) ) Tn 1
(T ') = T n ' = 0 ) ' 2 N (T n );
and therefore
N (T n+1 ) N (T n ):
Hence, there exists a nonnegative integer p 2 N; such that
where p is given by
Theorem 3
The range space R(T ) of the operator T de…ned by
is a closed subspace.
Proof
It is known that, the range R(T ) of a linear operator T is a linear
subspace. Let f be an element of the closure T (E); then there exists a
sequence fn of the set T (E) such that
lim fn = f:
n!1
4
T 'n = fn ;
Suppose that, the sequence 'n is bounded then, due to the compactness
of the operator A there exists a subsequence A'n(k) from the sequence A'n
such that, A'n(k) converges to : Hence, the convergence of the subsequence
'n(k) to an element ' in E: Say
1. If 'n 2 N (T )
5
2. If 'n 2
= N (T )
n = an 'n + n ; an 2 R; n 2 N (T ):
Noting that, there is no subsequence an(k) of the sequence an converges
to the null element. For, if we suppose there exists a such subsequence, say
lim an(k) = 0; we obtain
k!1
an 1 n = 'n + an 1 n:
Then, it comes
6
The sequence an 1 n is bounded as product of two bounded sequences
1 1 1
an and n : Hence there exists a subsequence an(k) n(k) such that A(an(k) n(k) )
converges to an element a 1 of E: This implies the convergence of the sub-
1 1 of E; for, we have
sequence an(k) n(k) to the same element a
lim a 1 n(k)
1
= lim T (an(k) n(k) )
1
+ lim A(an(k) n(k) ) =a 1
2 E:
k!1 n(k) k!1 k!1
Theorem 4
The sequence of range spaces sets
The number q is called the Riesz number of the compact operator A for
the range spaces sets R(T n ):
Proof
Indeed, the inclusion is evident, since
and therefore
= T n+1 ' ) = T n '1 :
Hence, the inclusion of sets
7
Suppose that there is no integer q 2 N; such that the sequence R(T n)
In particular, taking R(T n+1 ) 6= R(T n ); the relation R(T n+1 ) R(T n )
between a closed subspaces involves the existence of an element n in R(T n );
with unit norm k n k = 1; such that
1
k n n+1 k> ; for all n+1 2 R(T n+1 ):
2
Generally, for all sequence n 2 R(T n ) and for all m; n such that n < m;
we have the following relation
kA n A mk = k(I T) n (I T) mk
= k n T n m +T mk
1
= k n ( m T m +T n )k > : (4)
2
For, the elements of the sequence ( m T m +T n) belong to the
subspace N (T n+1 ): Indeed, due to the relation
it comes
m 2 R(T m ) ) m 2 R(T n+1 );
also, we have
Hence
( m T m +T n) 2 R(T n+1 ):
8
The sequence n is bounded, so by virtue of the compactness of the
operator A; we can extract a convergent subsequence from the sequence
A n : Contradiction with the relation (4): Hence
Indeed, the …rst inclusion R(T n+2 ) R(T n+1 ) is always true following
(3); for the second one, we get
or still
R(T n+1 ) R(T n+2 ):
Hence, there exists a nonnegative integer q 2 N; such that
where q is given by
p=q
Proof
Suppose that, the Riesz numbers p and q are di¤erent, say p 6= q:
9
and also
= Tq 1
' 2 R(T q 1
);
the composition by the operator T of both sides, gives us
this relation shows that, there exists a function '1 such that
or still
T q+1 '1 T q ' = 0:
Hence, we obtain
T ('1 ) ' 2 N (T q 1
) ) Tq 1
(T '1 ') = 0 , T q '1 = T q 1
'= ;
this implies that = T q '1 2 R(T q ); contradiction with the fact that 2
=
R(T q ):
and also
We can see that, there exists a function ' 2 N (T p ) such that ' 2
=
N (T p 1 ); that is to say
10
Tp 1
' 2 R(T p 1
) = R(T p ) = R(T q );
this relation shows that, there exists functions '1 and '2 such that
TP 1
' = T p '1 = T q '2 ; (10)
the composition by the operator T of both sides and the relation ' 2 N (T p )
give us
T p ' = T p+1 '1 = T q+1 '2 = 0;
this implies that
'1 2 N (T p+1 ) = N (T p ):
Hence, it comes
T p+1 '1 = T p '1 = 0:
It is to remark that the relation (10) gives us T p '1 = T p 1 ' = 0; this
implies that ' 2 N (T p 1 ); contradiction with the fact that ' 2
= N (T p 1 ):
Theorem 5
The subspaces N (T r ) and R(T r ) are supplementary. That is to say
E = ker T r Im T r = N (T r ) R(T r );
Proof
For all element 2 E; we get
Tr = T 2r ' ) T r ( T r ') = 0;
or still,
( T r ') = 2 N (T r ):
Therefore, we have
11
2 R(T r ) and 2 N (T r );
this relation implies T r = 0 and the existence of a function '; such that
= T r '; it comes
= T r' ) Tr = 0 = T 2r ';
or still,
' 2 N (T 2r ) = :::; ::: = N (T r ):
Therefore, we have
= T r ' = 0:
Lemma 2
The operator T = I A is injective if and only if, the operator T r is
injective for all r 2 N:
Proof
Supposing that, The operator T is injective then, for all r 2 N; we have
T r '1 = T r '2 ) T (T r 1
'1 ) = T (T r 1
'2 ) ) T r 1
'1 = T r 1
'2
r 2 r 2 r 2 r 2
) T (T '1 ) = T (T '2 ) ) T '1 = T '2
) :::T (T '1 ) = T (T '2 ) ) T '1 = T '2
) '1 = '2 :
T '1 = T '2 ) T r 1
(T '1 ) = T r 1
(T '2 ) ) T r '1 = T r '2
) '1 = '2 :
Proof
12
Suppose that, the operator T is surjective then, for all r 2 N; say
Finally, we obtain
8 2 E; 9'r 2 E; = T r ':
8 2 E; 9'1 2 E; = T r '1 ;
8 2 E; 9' = T r 1
'1 2 E; = T ':
Theorem 6
Let A be a compact operator de…ned from a Banach space E into itself
then, the operator T = I A is injective if and only if, T = I A is
surjective. Besides the inverse operator T 1 = (I A) 1 de…ned from E
into E is bounded.
Proof
It is known that, for all Riesz number r = p = q; The subspaces N (T r )
and R(T r ) are supplementary. Say
E = N (T r ) R(T r ):
13
The injection of the operator T implies the one of T r : Hence the sur-
jection of the operator T r which it assures us the surjection of the
operator T:
Theorem 7
Let A be a compact operator from a Banach space E into itself then, the
nonhomogeneous equation
admits a unique solution ' 2 E; for all f 2 E; if and only if, the homoge-
neous equation
T ' = ' A' = 0 (12)
admits uniquely a trivial solution ' = 0:
Proof
Indeed, suppose that the equation (11) admits a solution for all f 2 E;
it wants to say that the operator T is surjective and the Riesz number r is
null. Hence the operator T is injective. In other words, the equation (12)
admits the trivial solution ' = 0:
Reciprocally, suppose that the equation (12) admits uniquely the trivial
solution ' = 0; it wants to say that the operator T is injective and the
Riesz number r is null. Hence, the operator T is surjective and therefore
this operator is bijective. In other words, the existence and the uniqueness
of the solution of the equation (11):
14
Bibliography
15