Assignment On Effective Strategies of Performance Management
Assignment On Effective Strategies of Performance Management
MANAGEMENT
Assignment on Effective strategies of performance
management
Submitted To
DR. MOHAMMAD MOTAHARUL ISLAM
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
DAFFODIL INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
Submitted by
Shah Md. Sazzad Mahmud
ID: 182-14-2778
Major: HRM
Daffodil International University
Date of Submission
04-04-2020
Following these 10 strategies for effective performance management and see our team achieving
some outstanding business results, as talked about in the next section.
There have also some strategies how Effectiveness of Human Resource Management in Improving
Performance
Many factors are driving changes in organizations today including the use of technology,
globalization, changes in workforce demographics, eliminating the bureaucracies in
organizational structures, and balancing work-family issues. Understanding the potential
of an organization’s resources and optimizing the output of such resources given the
changes, provides the impetus for HR being the key source of creating the competitive
advantage for the organization.
To create value and deliver results, HR professionals must begin not by focusing on the
work activities or work of HR but by defining the deliverables of that work. HR’s roles in
building a competitive organization include management of strategic human resources,
management of transformation and change, management of firm infrastructure and
management of employee contribution (Ulrich, 1997a). Although these roles are valid and
have proven to be value-added in recent years, there is now the critical need to move
beyond the strategic business partner role to players in the business (Ulrich & Beatty,
2001). Players, according to Ulrich & Beatty, contribute to the profitability of the
organization, they deliver results and they do things to make a difference. The roles of
players are to a) coach b) design, c) construct, d) change the organization, e) creating
followers, and f) playing by the rules. Another perspective on the role of HRM suggests
that in leading-edge companies, HR professionals play four key roles: a) strategic business
partners, b) innovators, c) collaborators, and d) facilitators (Schueler & Jackson, 2000). As
a strategic business partner, HR professionals should understand the nature of the business
from strategic, operational, financial, and other aspects necessary to be part of an effective
team managing an organization. Functioning as an innovator, HR professionals are
challenged to continuously search for strategies that will create value for the organization
and not merely function in a reactionary mode. Furthermore, HR professionals will also
serve as collaborators with senior leaders and all employees to implement business
strategies forming the strategic link throughout the organization. As facilitators, HR
professionals function as the change agent providing rationale, support, and readiness for
planned changes designed to support the business strategies.
The fundamental role of HRM is essentially to maximize profitability, quality of work life
and profits through effective management of people (Casio, 2003). Given this premise, it
can be easily inferred that HR’s role is to help create value to the organization. Figure 1
illustrates some of the external challenges and changes facing organizations, their impact
on the organization, and how HR is impacted.
Even though there are several classifications or groupings of HR activities, the author uses
seven groups of activities seen as being most strategic and influential in realizing the
strategic business objectives of the organization. Today’s economy dictates that
organizations continually assess the external and internal environment and make relevant
changes in order to remain competitive. The author examines each of the clusters and
provides a description of each, its importance in achieving the business strategy, and how
it can be measured to determine its effectiveness.
➢ Strategic Planning
The role of the HR function has changed tremendously over the past 10 years where HR
functions have previously been viewed as not being an integral core of the business and
merely viewed as an administrative function to today’s economy where HR practitioners
are more frequently considered business partners. Being a business partner, the ideal
situation would be the inclusion of the HR leader in the strategic business planning
(SBP). “In the most fundamental sense, SBP involves choosing how an organization will
compete” (Rothwell, 1994).The questions of what product to produce, where should the
product be sold, how many to make available, how the products and services differ from
the competition are included as part of the business planning process. Business strategy
can also be defined as the “process by which the basic mission and objectives of the
organization are set and the process by which the organization uses its resources to achieve
the objectives”(Tichy, Fombrum, & Devanna, 1982).
➢ Acquisition of Employees
In the era of increasing globalization and the struggle to create sustainable competitive
advantages, organizations are continuously evaluating their strategies to ensure that they
have the expertise needed to help achieve the mission of the organization. The economic
challenges due to the consequences of the 9/11 terrorists attacks on the United States also
continue to affect organizations’ financial position and subsequently on recruitment and
selection strategies. Gatewood & Feild (2001) define selection as a “process of collecting
and evaluating information about an individual in order to extend an offer of employment.”
The American Society for Training & Development estimates that US organizations are
spending more than $60 billion annually on employee training and development. Given
this significant investment, it is reasonable for one to ask about the benefits of such
investments, especially since more companies are seeing a need for lifelong learning and
are integrating technology in their strategies. Swanson (1995) defined employee training
and development as the process of systematically developing expertise in individuals for
the purpose of improving performance. The argument as to whether T & D helps to create
a competitive advantage has shown that conceptually, it can be a source of competitive
advantage. Nevertheless, there still is a critical need to develop frameworks and strengthen
the argument for being aware of the actual benefits provided by this
intervention. Developing a framework for assessing the financial benefits of T &D,
Fitz-enz (2002) suggested that in addressing the results of the training process, the
following questions be answered:
Given the continuing changes in the global economy, demands of customers, preferences
and values of employees, it is a necessary component of the HR strategy to ensure that the
organization is adapting to the external and internal variables it current faces and would
likely face in the future in order to meet its stakeholders’ expectations. The pace of global,
economic, and technological development makes change an inevitable feature of
organizational life (Cummings & Worley, 2002). A growing importance and competency
expected from the HR professional, therefore, is his or her ability to plan and implement
the necessary changes for the purpose of improving performance. Swanson (1995) defined
organization development (OD) as the process of developing and implementing planned
changes in organizations for the purpose of improving performance. The opportunity for
HR through its organization development interventions is to create organizational
effectiveness at the individual, department, function, process, and organizational levels.
➢ Performance Management
“Performance management systems make clear to employees what is expected of them and
assure line managers and strategic planners that employee behaviors will be in line with
the company’s goals” (Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart, & Wright, 2003). Many organizations
still rely on the performance appraisal viewed as an annual ritual and primarily the
responsibility of the HR function. In today’s economy and the utmost of managing
performance to create a competitive advantage Noe, et al (2003) grouped performance
management into three categories of defining performance, measuring performance, and
the feedback aspect of performance.
➢ Rewards System
The starting point for any reward system design process needs to be the strategic agenda
of the organization (Lawler, 1990). By understanding where the organization is
positioning itself for various intervals in the future, an organization could design the reward
system to provide incentives specifically designed to foster behaviors, attitudes, and
outcomes among the workforce that directly correlate with the strategic agenda of the
organization. As indicated by Lawler (1990), numerous studies including (Vroom, 1964,
Lawler, 1971, and Kerr, 1975) have shown that effective rewards systems can significantly
increase the motivation of individuals to increase their performance. As inferred from
these studies, the fundamental intent of rewards in organizations is to provide incentives to
achieve individual and organizational behaviors that would enable the organization to
create competitive advantages and maximize the value of the shareholder’s investment.
Key aspect of successful leadership is the ability to understand one’s workforce, be able to
influence their behaviors, and predict their behaviors given any specific conditions. Today,
the HR function may not view this as part of their core responsibility, but in reality if is
definitely their responsibility to understand the needs of their workforce and how any given
policy or practice may affect the behaviors of the employees. McShane & Von Glinow
(2002) defined organizational behavior as the study of what people think, feel, and do in
and around organizations. The importance of focusing on organizational behavior is to
assess if the way people are thinking, feeling, and behaving correspond to the strategic
intent of the organization and produce the outcomes necessary for the attainment of the
organization’s business goals.
Conclusion