0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views3 pages

Insulator HW Solution

1) The document discusses calculating the heat loss reduction from insulating a pipe. It derives an equation to calculate the required thermal conductivity (k') of the insulator. 2) Using the calculated k' and other constraints, it evaluates several potential insulators. Insulator C is selected as its k' is closest to the calculated value and it is the cheapest option that meets the minimum 80% heat loss reduction target. 3) Heat loss calculations confirm insulator C will achieve over 80% reduction, satisfying the target. The other options either did not meet the target or were more expensive. Therefore, insulator C is the best choice.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views3 pages

Insulator HW Solution

1) The document discusses calculating the heat loss reduction from insulating a pipe. It derives an equation to calculate the required thermal conductivity (k') of the insulator. 2) Using the calculated k' and other constraints, it evaluates several potential insulators. Insulator C is selected as its k' is closest to the calculated value and it is the cheapest option that meets the minimum 80% heat loss reduction target. 3) Heat loss calculations confirm insulator C will achieve over 80% reduction, satisfying the target. The other options either did not meet the target or were more expensive. Therefore, insulator C is the best choice.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Solution of HW

T

Ts Ts
steam steam

Q Q’
Q − Q’
 0,8
 target
Q

Q −Q' Q'
Heat loss reduction 80% (minimal): = 0.8 → 1 − = 0.8
Q Q
Q'
→ = 1 − 0.8 = 0.2 → Q ' = 0.2Q …. (1)
Q

T
Q' = with insulator..…(2)
 1 ln(Do / Di ) ln(Do' / Do ) 1 
 + + 
 h i Di L 2kL 2k L' ' D' L 
 h o o 

where k’ = insulator conductivity; Do’= outside diameter of insulator;


ho’ =convective heat transfer coefficient of insulator.

T
Q= without insulator ........(3)
 1 ln(Do / Di ) 1 
 + + 
 h i Di L 2kL h o Do L 

Combine (2) and (3) ke (1):


T T
= 0.2
 1 ln(Do / Di ) ln(Do' / Do ) 1   1 ln(Do / Di ) 1 
 + +   + + 
 h i Di L

2kL 2k L' h ' D' L 
o o   h i Di L 2kL h o Do L 

T and L cancel out then rearrange:

 1 ln(Do / Di ) ln(Do' / Do ) 1  1  1 ln(Do / Di ) 1 


 + + + =  + + 
 h i Di 2k 2k ' h 'o D'o  0.2  h i Di 2k h o Do 

1
ln(D'o / Do )  1 ln(Do / Di ) 1  1 ln(Do / Di ) 1
= 5 + + − − −
2k '  h i Di 2k h o Do  h i Di 2k h o Do'
'

ln(D'o / Do )
k' =
  1 ln(Do / Di ) 1  1 ln(Do / Di ) 1 
2 5  + + − − − 
  h i Di 2k h o Do  h i Di 2k h 'o D'o 

ln(D'o / Do )
k' =
 4 4 ln(Do / Di ) 5  1 
2  + +  − 
 h i Di 2k h o Do  h 'o D'o 

ln(0.11/ 0.07)
k' = = 0.0754
 4 4 ln(0.07 / 0.05) 5  1 
2   + + −
 50000.05 240 200.07  150.11

Based on the above k’ calculation, choose insulator with k that is close to or smaller to k’
i.e. insulator C. (smaller k’ is chosen because k’ is proportional to heat loss while we
want smaller heat loss)
But we must find cheap insulator so try heat loss calculation using cheaper insulator with
k that is not far too large than k’, i.e. insulator B. As the k for B is larger than for C we
must use thicker insulator. Use maximum allowable thickness i.e. 3 cm. Now, the
unknown variable is heat loss reduction = 1 – ‘Q/Q = 1 – x (where x = Q’/Q, ratio of
heat loss after/before insulation)
Ratio of heat loss: Q’/Q = x Q’ = x Q

Q’ = x Q

T T
=x
 1 ln(Do / Di ) ln(Do' / Do ) 1   1 ln(Do / Di ) 1 
 + +   + + 
 h i Di L

2kL 2k 'L h 'o D'o L   h i Di L 2kL h o Do L 

T and L cancel out then rearrange:

 1 ln(Do / Di ) 1 
 + + 
 h i Di 2k h o Do 
=x
 1 ln(Do / Di ) ln(Do' / Do ) 1 
 + + 
 h i Di 2k 2k ' h 'o D'o 

2
 1 ln(0.07 / 0.05) 1 
 + + 
x=  50000.05 240 200.07 
= 0.225 (22.5%)
 1 ln(0.07 / 0.05) ln(0.13 / 0.07) 1 
 + + + 
 50000.05 240 20.115 150.13 

Heat loss reduction = 1 – 0.225 = 0.775 (77.5%)


That means we cannot achieve the target (minimum 80%).

No need to try insulator A as the k is larger than k of insulator B.


Insulator D has better k but it is expensive so we will not use it.
Therefore we pick insulator C.

With insulator C (k’ = 0,070 and minimum thickness 0,02 m →Do’ = 0,11 m) therefore
the realization of Q’/Q is:

1 ln(0.07 / 0.05) 1
+ +
x= 50000.05 240 200.07 = 0.188 (18.8%)
1 ln(0.07 / 0.05) ln(0.11/ 0.07) 1
+ + +
50000.05 240 20.07 150.11

Realized heat loss reduction with insulator C = 1 – 0.188 = 0.812 (81.2%) which is better
than the target (80%).

You might also like