The respondent is objecting to the petitioner's request for Rs. 41,000 monthly interim maintenance. The respondent claims the petitioner's allegations of domestic violence, dowry demands, and assaults are vague and false. The respondent argues the petitioner is happily living apart from the respondent with her parents and does not need immediate economic assistance. The respondent wants custody of the child and denies the petitioner's allegations. The respondent requests the court to deny the interim application and require the petitioner to prove her case on merits.
The respondent is objecting to the petitioner's request for Rs. 41,000 monthly interim maintenance. The respondent claims the petitioner's allegations of domestic violence, dowry demands, and assaults are vague and false. The respondent argues the petitioner is happily living apart from the respondent with her parents and does not need immediate economic assistance. The respondent wants custody of the child and denies the petitioner's allegations. The respondent requests the court to deny the interim application and require the petitioner to prove her case on merits.
The respondent is objecting to the petitioner's request for Rs. 41,000 monthly interim maintenance. The respondent claims the petitioner's allegations of domestic violence, dowry demands, and assaults are vague and false. The respondent argues the petitioner is happily living apart from the respondent with her parents and does not need immediate economic assistance. The respondent wants custody of the child and denies the petitioner's allegations. The respondent requests the court to deny the interim application and require the petitioner to prove her case on merits.
The respondent is objecting to the petitioner's request for Rs. 41,000 monthly interim maintenance. The respondent claims the petitioner's allegations of domestic violence, dowry demands, and assaults are vague and false. The respondent argues the petitioner is happily living apart from the respondent with her parents and does not need immediate economic assistance. The respondent wants custody of the child and denies the petitioner's allegations. The respondent requests the court to deny the interim application and require the petitioner to prove her case on merits.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
[1]
IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF I ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPALITAN
MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.
DVC.No: 16/2020 BETWEEN:-
PIRANGI.YOGITHA : PETITIONER
VS
PIRANGI.DURGA VENKATA KRISHNA : RESPONDENTS
WRITTEN OBJECTION/REPLY TO THE PETITION U/S 23 r/w 20 of Cr.P.C
THE RESPONDENT MOST RESPECTFULLY SUBMITS AS FOLLOWS:
1) That the above mentioned Petitioner filed before the Hon’ble
Court to pleased to pass interim orders for maintenance of Rs.41,000/- per month.
2) The likelihood of creating further complications on
Petitioners false averments through interim order is already explained in the objections and it may be read as part and parcel of this reply objection and same to be adopted in order to avoid repetition.
3) The Respondent files detail statement and objections and deny
domestic violence and other allegations of cruelty, demand for dowry, physical assaults etc., and points out that there is no specific allegation in the complaint and all the allegations are vague. No specific dates were mentioned etc.
4) The Respondent also filed affidavit swearing to several
contents and alleges that petitioner has filed false statement of facts in her complaint and affidavit. She is the trouble maker. Now lately alleging false things wants to misuse law for unlawful gains by the abuse of process of court.
5) This meaning of domestic relationship has sense when we come
to definition of domestic violence and the purpose of the Act. The purpose of the Act is to give remedy to the aggrieved [2] Persons against domestic violence. The domestic violence can take place only when one is living in shared household with the respondent. The acts of abuses, emotional or economic, physical or sexual, verbal or nonverbal if committed when one is living in the same shared household constitute domestic violence. When both are residing separately for year’s together and mere allegation when one is living separate, cannot be covered under Domestic Violence Act.
6) If the application is allowed petitioner may drag on the
proceedings and hence for speedy justice the matter may be heard on merits after suitable enquiry.
7) If the application is allowed, grave injustice and injury will
be caused to the respondent. Since petitioner is happily living with her parents and no immediate economic assistance is needed on the grounds of her own drawbacks in the averments of her petition.
8) I deeply pray your Honour to consider all the legal aspects
either for interim order or for order on merits in the ends of justice.
9) The Respondent is not an ATM machine to provide the
maintainance to petitioner who has deserted the respondent by giving invalid,unreasonable ground for the reason best known to her.The said acts of petitioner not only harass the respondent in addition she has caused violation of every condition of marriage obligation. 10) The petitioner is a MCA graduate and can do a job. But the petitioner is intentionally not doing any job only to gain the maintenance from the Respondent. 11) The Petitioner has never showed her interest towards the respondent to Re unite by showing only false allegations against Respondent. 12) The attitude of the Petitioner towards the baby is improper and has only showed the fake love towards the baby and it is clear evident from the whatsapp messages put by the petitioner on dated 23/6/2017,24/7/2017 during her pregnancy. [3]
13) The respondent as a father does not want to allow the
child’s life to be spoiled due to the petitioner's vindictive attitude.
14) It is further submitted that the Respondent wants to take
complete handover of the baby as he has already crossed the feeding stage from mother. The respondent will be ready to join the child in a Residential English medium school so that the education of the child will be taken care. 15) It is further submitted that the Respondent would like to meet the child during every date of hearing without fail. 16) It is further submitted that the DVC case was filed after the 3 years from the date the petitioner has left the Respondent which clearly shows that the allegations are frivolous. 17) It is submitted that the Respondent’s father prays to this court to give his grandson immediately for few days to reside with him as he wants to cherish the happy moments with him. This petitioner never allowed to show him till date. 18) Wherefore in view of above facts and laid down law, this respondent humbly prays this Hon’ble court to keep pending the Interim application and direct petitioner to prove her case on merits to provide any relief as claimed for, by substantially proving her allegations in the ends of justice.
ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT SIGNATURE OF THE RESPONDENT