0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views8 pages

Chapter 12 Practice Problems

Uploaded by

Erin Thompson
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views8 pages

Chapter 12 Practice Problems

Uploaded by

Erin Thompson
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Speed (x) MPG (Y) SUMMARY OUTPUT

55 40
60 36 Regression Statistics
65 38 Multiple R 0.776622011
70 35 R Square 0.603141748
50 42 Adjusted R Square 0.5237700976
45 41 Standard Error 1.969231338
58 42 Observations 7

ANOVA
df SS MS
Regression 1 29.46778254383 29.46778
Residual 5 19.38936031332 3.877872
Total 6 48.85714285714

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat


Intercept 54.080613577 5.469742837942 9.887231
Speed (x) -0.259464752 0.094124217337 -2.756621

#1. From the scatter diagram, it appears that the two variables have an inverse relationship.
#2. y = 54.1 - 0.26x
#3. y = 54.1 - 0.26(50) #5. Testing Significance
y = 41.1 Step 1:
HoB1 = 0
#4. Speed (x) MPG (Y) H1B1 ≠ 0
Speed (x) 1 Step 2:
MPG (Y) -0.77662201 1 Reject Ho if the p-value of the slope coefficient is < .05
Coefficient of Correlation: Do not reject the Ho if the p-value is > .05
r = -0.7766 strong inverse relationship Step 3:
Coefficient of Determination: Regression Model Above
r^2 = (-0.78)^2 Step 4:
r^2 = 0.6031 Reject Ho, Accept H1
60% of the change in
MPH is explained by the
change in speed Step 5:
There is a relationship between MPG and speed.
Speed - MPG
45

40

MPG 35

30
40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
Speed

F Significance F
7.598956868 0.03999468336

P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%Lower 95.0%Upper 95.0%


0.0001804977 40.0201919922 68.14104 40.02019 68.14104
0.0399946834 -0.5014187553 -0.017511 -0.501419 -0.017511

ope coefficient is < .05

MPG and speed.


# of Assemblers (x) # Parts Assembled (y) SUMMARY OUTPUT
2 15
4 25 Regression Statistics
1 10 Multiple R 0.9271726499
5 40 R Square 0.8596491228
3 30 Adjusted R Square 0.8128654971
Standard Error 5.1639777949
Observations 5

ANOVA
df
Regression 1
#1. From the scatter diagram, it appears that
there is a direct relationship. Residual 3
#2. Regression Line Total 4
y = 3 + 7x
#3. y = 3 + 7(6) Coefficients
y = 45 Intercept 3
# of Assemblers (x) 7

#4. # of Assemblers (x) # Parts Assembled (y) #5. Testing Significance:


# of Assemblers (x) 1 Step 1:
# Parts Assembled (y) 0.927172649945531 1 HoB1 = 0
Coefficient of Correlation: H1B1 ≠ 0
r = 0.9272 strong direct Step 2:
Coefficient of Determination: Reject Ho if the p-value of
r^2 = (0.93)^2 Do not reject the Ho if the
r^2 = .86 Step 3:
86% of the change in the # of parts assembled is explained by the change in # of assemblers. Regression Model Above
x variable explaining change in y variable Step 4:
Reject Ho, Accept H1
Step 5:
There is a relationship betw
Assemblers - Parts Assembled
# Parts Assembled 50
40
30
20
10
0
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5
# of Assemblers

SS MS F Significance F
490 490 18.375 0.023333

80 26.66667
570

Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%


Upper 95.0%
5.416026 0.553912 0.61825 -14.23621 20.23621 -14.23621 20.23621
1.632993 4.286607 0.023333 1.803087 12.19691 1.803087 12.19691

Testing Significance:

ect Ho if the p-value of the slope coefficient is < .05


not reject the Ho if the p-value is > .05

gression Model Above

ect Ho, Accept H1

ere is a relationship between the number of assemblers and parts assembled.


Distance (x) Price (Y) SUMMARY OUTPUT
17 263.1 Price (Y)
19 182.4 Regression Statistics 400
12 242.1 Multiple R 0.3470311664 350
16 213.6 R Square 0.1204306305 300
250
28 139.9 Adjusted R Square 0.111891122 200
12 245.4 Standard Error 44.391911151 150
100
15 327.2 Observations 105 50
9 271.8 0
0 5 10 15
18 221.1 ANOVA
13 266.6 df SS MS F
14 292.4 Regression 1 27791.48625474 27791.49 14.10276
8 209 Residual 103 202976.1028881 1970.642
7 270.8 Total 104 230767.5891429
18 246.1
11 194.4 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value
16 281.3 Intercept 270.16698894 13.76460435967 19.62766 1.384E-36
16 172.7 Distance (x) -3.3539933848 0.893120705378 -3.755364 0.000287
21 207.5
10 198.9 #1. From the scatter diagram, it appears that the two variables have a strong inverse relati
15 209.3 #2. Price (Y) Distance (x)
8 252.3 Price (Y) 1
14 192.9 Distance (x) -0.3470311664 1
20 209.3 Coefficient of Correlation:
9 345.3 r = -0.35 weak inverse #5. Relationship Significance
11 326.3 Coefficient of Determination: Step 1:
21 173.1 r^2 = (-0.35)^2 HoB1 = 0
26 187 r^2 = .12 H1B1 ≠ 0
9 257.2 Step 2:
14 233 #3. Regression Equation Reject Ho if the p-value of the slope coefficient is <
11 180.4 y = 270 - 3.35x Do not reject the Ho if the p-value is > .05
19 234 #4. y = 270 - 3.35(15) Step 3:
11 207.1 y = 219.75 Regression Model Above
16 247.7 Step 4:
16 166.2 Reject Ho, Accept H1
10 177.1 Step 5:
14 182.7 There is a relationship between price and distance.
19 216
7 312.1
19 199.8
16 273.2
9 206
16 232.2
19 198.3
20 205.1
24 175.6
21 307.8
8 269.2
17 224.8
16 171.6
15 216.8
14 192.6
20 236.4
23 172.4
12 251.4
7 246
12 147.4
15 176
17 228.4
19 166.5
24 189.4
13 312.1
21 289.8
11 269.9
13 154.3
9 222.1
13 209.7
18 190.9
15 254.3
10 207.5
19 209.7
13 294
17 176.3
8 294.3
6 224
18 125
17 236.8
19 164.1
12 217.8
16 192.2
28 125.9
12 220.9
15 294.5
9 244.6
18 199
13 240
14 263.2
8 188.1
7 243.7
18 221.5
11 175
16 253.2
16 155.4
21 186.7
10 179
15 188.3
8 227.1
14 173.6
20 188.3
9 310.8
11 293.7
8 179
14 188.3
20 227.1
9 173.6
11 188.3
Price (Y)

10 15 20 25 30

Significance F
0.000287

Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%


Upper 95.0%
242.8681 297.4658 242.8681 297.4658
-5.125288 -1.582699 -5.125288 -1.582699

ve a strong inverse relationship.

he slope coefficient is < .05


-value is > .05

een price and distance.

You might also like