The Comparative Economic Impact of Travel Tourism PDF

The Authority on World Travel & Tourism
Sponsored by:
The Comparative
Economic Impact of
Travel & Tourism
Sponsors:
American Express is a leading global payments network company founded in 1850.

The company is unique in the payments industry as an issuer of cards as well as a
worldwide network that processes millions of merchant transactions daily.
TUI Group is Europe’s leading integrated travel group, offering the complete
range of services associated with holiday and travel.
For more information please contact:
Rochelle Turner
Research Manager
[email protected]
Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 2
2. Benchmarking of Travel & Tourism to Other Sectors ............... 3
2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 3
2.2 Absolute size and growth ........................................................................... 2
2.3 Share of exports ......................................................................................... 4
2.4 Linkages to other sectors ........................................................................... 4
3. Travel & Tourism as a Force for Economic
Development ...................................................................................... 6
3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 6
3.2 Travel & Tourism drives foreign trade ........................................................ 6
3.3 Travel & Tourism encourages investment .................................................. 8
3.4 Travel & Tourism develops infrastructure and services ............................. 9
3.5 Travel & Tourism spurs broader economic development......................... 11
3.6 Section conclusions .................................................................................. 12
4. The Widespread Impacts of Travel & Tourism .......................... 14
4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 14
4.2 Measuring the regional distribution of Travel & Tourism .......................... 14
4.3 Travel & Tourism at the regional level ...................................................... 15
4.4 Detailed Findings ...................................................................................... 21
4.5 Section conclusions .................................................................................. 23
5. The Economic Returns on Destination Marketing .................... 25
5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 25
5.2 National DMO spending ........................................................................... 25
5.3 The rationale behind investing in destination promotion .......................... 29
5.4 Measuring incremental impact ................................................................. 30
5.5 Case studies of destination marketing success ....................................... 31
5.6 Investing during an economic downturn ................................................... 35
5.7 Policy implications .................................................................................... 36
6. Conclusions ..................................................................................... 38
The Economic Advantages of Travel & Tourism
November 2012
1. Introduction
The World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC) has spearheaded global analysis
of the economic importance of the sector for over 20 years. This research has
established the contribution of Travel & Tourism on an ongoing basis to over 180
countries in absolute size, share of the economy, and growth. Around the world,
WTTC research is referenced as the authoritative source of the role of Tourism
in generating GDP, income, and employment.
This new analysis builds on the WTTC research foundation to assess the role
that Travel & Tourism plays in the global economy in comparison to other key
sectors. The results of this research provide new perspectives on the relative
significance of Travel & Tourism as well as some of its unique advantages in
driving global economic growth.
Key findings of the report include:
• Travel & Tourism ranks high among sectors analysed in this

report, in terms of its contribution to GDP, employment, and
exports
• Travel & Tourism growth trends and prospects exceed that of

other key sectors
• Travel & Tourism generates substantial indirect benefits through

its linkages to other sectors
• Travel & Tourism is highly dispersed within national economies

and its benefits are widely distributed
• Travel & Tourism drives infrastructure investment that benefits

other industries
• Investments in well-designed destination marketing consistently

produce strong economic returns
2
November 2012
2. Benchmarking of Travel & Tourism to

Other Sectors
2.1 Introduction
To gain perspective on the comparative advantages of Travel & Tourism, it

is important to first understand its size and growth relative to other sectors.
This analysis benchmarks Travel & Tourism against an assortment of
other sectors for each world region. Analysis for twenty individual
countries is provided separately. These benchmarks highlight Travel &
Tourism’s importance and contribution to economic growth relative to
other industries. The regions and metrics examined in the analysis are as
follows:
Metrics Regions
• GDP (size and share of economy) • World
• Employment contribution (size and • Americas
share of economy)
• Europe
• Historic growth
• Asia Pacific
• Expected growth
• Middle East
• Export contribution
• Africa
• Strength of linkages to the rest of the
economy
• Job creation potential
The following industries were analysed and compared to Travel &

Tourism. They were selected as having a similar breadth and global
presence as Travel & Tourism.
• Mining: includes the extraction of oil, natural gas, coal, and metals
• Education: includes all levels of educational services
• Chemicals manufacturing: includes drugs & medicines, plastics,

rubber, paint, polishes, ink, perfumes, cosmetics, soap, cleaning
materials, fertilizer, pesticides, other chemicals
• Automotive manufacturing: includes motor vehicles, parts &

accessories
• Communications: includes postal services (national and private) and

telecommunications
• Financial services: includes banking, investment services, insurance
3
November 2012
The analysis examines the economic value of

industries on three levels:
• Direct: this includes only those employees

and the related value added for the relevant
sector. In the case of Travel & Tourism, we
only count the value added of the
accommodation, recreation, transportation,
and other related sectors.
• Indirect: this measures the supply chain

impact (also called inter-industry linkages) for
each sector.
• Induced: this measures the impacts of

incomes earned directly and indirectly as
they are spent in the local economy.
• The sum of direct, indirect, and induced

impacts equals the total economic impact of
a sector.
2.2 Absolute size and growth
In 2011, Travel & Tourism generated $2 trillion

in direct GDP. This contribution to global GDP
is more than double that of the automotive
industry and one-third larger than the global
chemicals industry. The Travel & Tourism
sector is three-quarters the size of the global
education, communications, and mining
sectors.
With the addition of indirect and induced

economic impacts, the total GDP impact of
Travel & Tourism was $6.3 trillion in 2011. This
impact is larger than that of some of the most
important manufacturing sectors—namely
automotive and chemicals manufacturing.
Travel & Tourism’s total economic impact
exceeds that of the mining sector and nearly
equals the global education sector.
At 9.1% of global GDP, Travel & Tourism

generates more economic output than
automotive manufacturing (7.9%), mining
(8.0%) and chemicals manufacturing (9.0%).
Travel & Tourism contributes roughly the same

share of global GDP as the global education
2
November 2012
and communications industries.
In every region of the world, the Travel &

Tourism industry directly contributes more to
GDP than automotive manufacturing. In the
Americas, Travel & Tourism GDP is three times
larger than auto manufacturing. In Europe,
Travel & Tourism GDP is twice the size of auto
manufacturing. Travel & Tourism GDP is larger
than the chemicals industry in every world
region except Asia, where it is only 9% lower.
In terms of employment, the importance of

Travel & Tourism is even more pronounced.
With 98 million people directly employed in
2011, Travel & Tourism directly employs:
• 6 times more than automotive

manufacturing
• 5 times more than the global chemicals

industry
• 4 times more than the global mining

industry
• 2 times more than the global

communications industry
• A third more than the global financial

services industry
With a total impact of 8.7% of world employment,

Travel & Tourism is one of the leading job
creators in the world. The industry sustained 255
million jobs in 2011. This exceeds the jobs
impact of auto manufacturing, chemicals
manufacturing, and mining, and is nearly on par
with education.
The Oxford Economics global industry model

projects Travel & Tourism direct industry GDP to
grow at an average of 4.2% per year over the
next decade, greater than the 3.6% average
annual growth expected for the total global
economy. Expectations are for employment to
grow 1.9% per annum over the next decade. This
is greater growth than forecast for the mining
sector as well as the total global economy, which
Oxford Economics expects to grow 1.2% per
annum through 2022.
3
November 2012
2.3 Share of exports
Travel & Tourism is an export industry when it

provides services to international visitors and draws
in spending from abroad. The industry represents a
substantial share of total exports for many countries
around the world, forming an essential component
of global trade.
Tourism generated 10% of all UAE exports

(including oil) and 15% of Turkey’s exports in 2011.
In industrialised economies such as the UK,
Australia, Italy, US, and France, Tourism still
generated more than 5% of total exports in 2011.
Visitor receipts represent a substantial share of

national service exports around the world,
generating foreign exchange and financial stability –
especially for emerging economies.
For example, more than half of all service exports

are generated by Travel & Tourism in the UAE,
Jamaica, Turkey, South Africa, Mexico, and France.
Between 25% and 50% of service exports are

generated by Travel & Tourism in the US, China,
Russia, Australia, Italy, Argentina, and Indonesia.
2.4 Linkages to other sectors
In addition to an international aspect of Travel &

Tourism, the industry has domestic economic
linkages as well. By analysing input-output data
across all 20 countries, these indirect linkages
between Travel & Tourism and the rest of the
economy were identified.
This captures the ways in which the rest of the

economy benefits from the injection of tourism
dollars. The adjacent chart compares the GDP
multiplier for Tourism and the average of the entire
economy. A multiplier of 2 implies that for every new
dollar a total of 2 dollars is generated including
indirect and induced impacts.
In 18 out of the 20 economies analysed, a new

dollar in Travel & Tourism generates more total
economic output than the average new dollar in the
economy.
4
November 2012
Travel & Tourism also outperforms the majority

of the key sectors we analysed in terms of
generating GDP across the entire economy.
The industry multiplier measures the impact

across the entire economy as a share of the
direct industry impact alone. At 3.2, Travel &
Tourism’s broader impact per unit of direct GDP
exceeds that of communications, financial
services, education, agriculture, and mining. Only
chemicals and auto manufacturing have higher
multipliers across the 20 countries analysed.
Industries can also be evaluated on the basis of

how spending flows to households and to other
parts of the economy. The sectors most
supportive of economic development tend to be
those that generate the most household income
and retain a higher share of expenditure within
the local economy after accounting for imports.
For every $1 million in Travel & Tourism
spending, $701,000 in income is generated. This
exceeds the income proportions for auto,
communications, chemicals, and mining. In
terms of money retained in the local economy,
on average, 91% of each dollar spent remains,
while just 9% is leaked out as imports. The
share of spending that remains in the country
varies by country, from 70% in Jamaica to 98%
in Mexico; most countries fall within the range of
high 80s to mid-90s in terms of this share. When
all countries are aggregated, the share of
retained Tourism spending is greater than the
mining, chemicals, and auto manufacturing
sectors.
Indirect job creation from Travel & Tourism spending is also significant. In
17 out of 20 countries examined, the indirect job creation from Travel &
Tourism spending is greater than that of spending in other industries on
average. The only countries where this is not the case are ones in which
agriculture remains a significant employer (China, India, Indonesia).
5
November 2012
3. Travel & Tourism as a Force for Economic

Development
3.1 Introduction
Over the last two decades, Travel & Tourism has played an increasingly
important role in the economic growth of many countries. Various factors drive
increased travel across the globe: higher real incomes, more leisure time,
improved and highly accessible transportation systems, highly effective
communication systems that facilitate marketing, and significant numbers of
tourism services and options have been coming online in many countries.
Travel & Tourism is a particularly attractive option to stimulate development in

rural and low income countries and regions that previously relied heavily on
agriculture and natural resource extraction. Tourism development often provides
the dual advantages of generating employment and income while promoting
1
cultural heritage and traditions.
Promoting Travel & Tourism can support economic development, in part,

because the industry cuts across and is linked to many other industries in the
economy, generating additional demand in a wide range of services and
2
professions. In addition to the direct and indirect effects, Travel & Tourism also
generates valuable spinoff benefits by developing infrastructure that other
industries can use, and by boosting trade, skills, and investments in other
industries that are not directly related. This section builds on the previous one
and analyzes the wider economic impacts that are attributable to the Travel &
Tourism sector. These include:
• Improved access to international markets and increased trade

opportunities;
• Increased foreign investments;
• Investments in public and private infrastructure; and
• Local economic development.
3.2 Travel & Tourism drives foreign trade
Given the cultural, language, and time differences that exist between countries,
face-to-face meetings are integral to developing international business
relationships and a key driver of world trade. While videoconferencing and other
1
Source: Matias (2009)
2 Source: Akinbaode and Braimoh (2009)
6
November 2012
remote communication technologies have become much more popular in recent

3
years, they tend to complement business travel rather than replace it.
A recent global survey of over 2,300 business people found that 89% of
respondents rated face-to-face meetings as essential for “sealing the deal”,
while 95% agreed that in-person meetings are key to both building and
4
maintaining long-term relationships. When it comes to developing trade links
with business leaders in the fast growing emerging markets, 97% said that face-
to-face meetings are important for developing ties with new markets.
As a result, countries with a larger outbound business

travel market tend to enjoy higher exports, while faster
growth in business travel is also linked to more rapid
trade growth. Econometric modeling done by Oxford
Economics shows that higher business travel intensity
(business travel spending relative to GDP) is
associated with strong trade intensity (exports relative
to GDP). This correlation is made clear when the level
of trade is compared to the level of business travel
spending across countries; the largest exporters tend
to be those with a high degree of outbound business
5, 6
travel (see chart).
Business travel is vital contributor to the economy of

most countries, both developed and developing. Trade
generates a number of wider economic benefits which
accrue beyond the direct participants. Trade advances
economic development by lowering prices, creating economies of scale, allowing
countries to focus on areas of competitive advantage, spurring innovation and
creating competition. Business travel also allows entrepreneurs to develop
relationships with potential customers and suppliers in overseas locations.
Countries with larger
The economic prospects of many developed countries in the aftermath of the
global finical crisis depend, in part, on exploiting opportunities in the emerging
outbound business
markets of Asia and Latin America. With half of global economic growth over the travel markets tend
next 10 years predicted to occur in emerging markets, the connections provided to enjoy higher
by Travel & Tourism will be increasingly important to foster trade and investment exports and faster
links. growth in business
travel is linked to
more rapid trade
3 growth.
Oxford Economics. 2011. “Aviation: The Real World Wide Web.”
4
Harvard Business Review Analytic Services for British Airways, (2009), “Managing across distance
in today’s economic climate: The value of face-to-face communications.
5
It is important to note that a strong correlation does not imply a causal relationship.
6
WTTC. 2011. “Business Travel: A Catalyst for Economic Performance. World Travel & Tourism
Council. May 2011.
7
November 2012
3.3 Travel & Tourism encourages investment
Trade and investment follow each other. The benefits that business travel brings
to international trade also foster investment by domestic firms and by foreign
direct investors. Foreign direct investments (FDI) that result from business travel
introduces capital, technology, skills, people, know-how, demand for local
7
supplies to the domestic economy, and brings improvements in trade balances.
It can also create new products and provide opportunities for local businesses
further down the supply chain.
The competition for foreign direct investment is intense, not only between Without the
countries but also between regions within countries. Without the connectivity connectivity
provided by the Travel & Tourism sector in general, and the aviation sub-sector provided by the
in particular, regions would find it more difficult to attract foreign direct
Travel & Tourism
investment.
sector regions would
A survey of over 600 companies in five countries by the International Air find it hard to attract
Transport Association ( IATA) found that 63% of firms stated that travel networks foreign direct
are ‘vital’ or ‘very important’ to investment decisions and that 30% of firms would
8 investment.
be highly likely to invest less in a region if travel networks were constrained.
A survey of senior executives in the travel industry conducted by Oxford

Economics on behalf of the WTTC provides additional insight. Nearly 86% of the
respondents found that development of their local tourism industry had led to an
increase in local job creation through increased foreign direct investments.
Airport hubs are critical for increasing foreign direct investment by providing
Access to airport
connections to a parent company, specialist supplies, and facilitating exports. As
hubs is critical for
an illustration, foreign investments in the UK generally cluster around points of
high international connectivity. The figure below shows hot spots of foreign increase foreign
investment in the UK, indicated by orange and red colors. These areas are direct investment.
clustered to the west of Heathrow, around the Manchester airport, central
9
Scotland (due to its easy access from local airports) and Aberdeen.
7
8
IATA. 2006 “IATA Economics Briefing No 3” International Air Transport Association. The five
countries include Chile, China, the Czech Republic, France, and the U.S.
9
Northern Ireland PowerPoint.
8
November 2012
Figure 1. Hotspots of Employment in Foreign Owned Businesses
Source: Oxford Economics
3.4 Travel & Tourism develops infrastructure and services
Demand for Travel & Tourism – both international and domestic – stimulates
investment. In 2011, US$650 billion in capital investment, or 4.5 percent of total,
was driven by Travel & Tourism. While a portion of this is related to individual
investments in facilities that directly benefit tourists, such as the construction of
hotels and resorts, Travel & Tourism also drives infrastructure improvements
that collectively benefit tourists, local residents, and the wider economy.
9
November 2012
Growth in the Travel & Tourism sector typically leads to development of

restaurants, bars, cafes, retail establishments, and other tourism related
businesses. Not only are these businesses part of the direct impacts generated
by Travel & Tourism, but also they help to improve the quality of life for local
residents by expanding the choices available to them in their local community.
For example, the increase in international business and leisure travel in Abu The demand for
Dhabi has led to private investments in Saadiyat Island, a mix of residential and Travel & Tourism
leisure projects off the coast of Abu Dhabi. Once completed, the island will act stimulates
as a hub of international commerce and upscale cultural district providing a host infrastructure
of world class amenities for tourist and residents of Abu Dhabi, including access investments that
to a world class championship golf course as well as branches of the Louvre and
benefit both local
Guggenheim museums.
residents and
Travel & Tourism drives the development of collective investments in public tourists.
utilities and transportation infrastructure including roads, airports, harbours,
electricity, sewage, potable water, and communication infrastructure. These
investments are a necessary component for Travel & Tourism but provide broad
benefits to other industries and to residents.
Strengthening the urban-rural network through improvements in transportation

infrastructure (air, water, rail, and road) increases the mobility of individuals
(both tourists and residents), ensures the continued flow of goods (both into and
out of the area), raises the competiveness of the local area, and increases public
safety.
Through investments in transportation infrastructure, sparsely populated

Patagonia in southern Argentina is beginning to attract new tourists and
residents. Prior to 2001, travellers and local residents in the remote city of El
Calafate faced a 200-mile bus trip on unpaved roads to reach the nearest airport
in Rio Gallegos before a three hour flight to Buenos Aries. That year, an airport
was opened in El Calafate reducing the trip to Buenos Aries to a total of three
hours. These travel improvements led to a more than six fold increase visitors to
El Calafate and the surrounding region in less than a decade. In 1999 the area
had 60,000 visitors; less than five years after the completion of the airport, more
than 400,000 tourists visited the region. Also, the local population increased
from 5,000 in 1996 to over 20,000 in 2006. This has led to additional
investments in hotels, restaurants, shops, and other local infrastructure
improvements. The increased connectivity made available to El Calafate’s
population led to diversification of the small regional economy and helped to
10
reduce regional economic imbalances.
Modern, efficient, reliable telecommunications including broadband access is

crucial to the economic well-being of many business owners, including tourism
operators. The communications infrastructure that is developed as an essential
part of Travel & Tourism development not only improves the experience for
visitors, but also creates new economic development opportunities for the local
10
10
November 2012
economy potentially leading to additional employment and income impacts

beyond those generated by Travel & Tourism.
3.5 Travel & Tourism spurs broader economic development
Travel & Tourism has strong linkages with many other industries within national
economies. The industry is also highly geographically dispersed (discussed
more in Section 4). These aspects of Travel & Tourism can make expansion of
the industry an effective tool for broader economic development, particularly for
rural and low income regional economies.
Travel & Tourism-based businesses create jobs, bring new money into the
region and also help diversify the local economic base. Economic diversity is
critical to the success of most rural areas in both the developed and developing
11
world. More than 80% of senior executives in the industry surveyed for WTTC
by Oxford Economics responded that local businesses outside of tourism have
12
benefited indirectly from tourism development. According to the survey,
industries that benefit indirectly include agriculture, businesses services,
construction, and real estate.
Travel & Tourism provides opportunities for residents to benefit from the cultural
heritage of their local communities and develop goods and services, crafts, local
foods, music dance, storytelling and guiding services which are sought by
tourists. These activities provide additional livelihoods for households thereby
13
helping to alleviate poverty.
According to the Oxford Economics survey of industry senior executives, 22 out

of 28 respondents felt that Travel & Tourism helps to promote the cultural
heritage of local communities. For many countries, cultural tourism has become
a core component of their tourism platform which has led many countries to
actively invest in preservation activities. The promotion of their unique cultural
heritage has also become a way for countries to differentiate themselves to
compete for tourism spending.
Travel & Tourism also benefits local economies by enhancing labour mobility.
The Travel and Tourism sector makes it easier for migrants to stay in touch with
family and friends and to also return home to visit. Both the host country and the Travel & Tourism
country of origin benefit from the increased labour mobility. The remittances a benefits local
migrant sends home to family members have become an increasingly important
economies by
source of revenue for developing countries. According to the World Bank, official
remittances were twice the level of official development flows to developing
helping to enhance
labour mobility by
making it easier for
11
Goodwin, Harold. 2004. “Tourism and Local Economic Development.” International Centre for migrants to return
Responsible Tourism. home and students
12
to study abroad.
Oxford Economics survey of industry executives conducted in July and August of 2012.
13
Goodwin, Harold. 2008. “Tourism, Local Economic Development, and Poverty Reduction.” Applied
Research in Economic Development, Vol 5, No 3, 55-64.
11
November 2012
countries in 2007. There is also evidence that remittances rise during crises,
natural disasters and conflicts contributing to the stabilisation the local economy
and the reduction in the level and depth of poverty. Research suggests that each
dollar of remittance generates $2 or more of additional economic activity as the
money is spent in the local economy. Additional benefits could be generated
when the migrant returns home in the form of new skills, capital, and possibly a
14
network of business contacts.
The host economy benefits from the addition and availability of skills and labour
– such as foreign language, technology, and cultural knowledge. Increased
labour mobility allows companies access to a larger pool of skilled workers.
Travel & Tourism also makes it easier for students to travel abroad to study. In
particular there has been a large increase in the number of students from
emerging economies that have been able to study at developed world
universities. Their home countries benefit when the students take their education
back home and add to the pool of highly educated talent that is crucial for
increases in productivity and economic development. In addition, students are
likely to make many contacts that will contribute to both global social cohesion
15
and the development of trade.
3.6 Section conclusions
Travel & Tourism is a force for economic development through diverse and
powerful channels:
(1) A well-developed Travel & Tourism industry can improve access to

international markets, enhance business relationships, and increase
trade opportunities.
(2) Increased connectivity that comes with Travel & Tourism can drive
domestic and foreign direct investment, and enhance a region’s
attractiveness as a place to locate a headquarters, distribution or
manufacturing centre.
(3) Investments in public and private infrastructure, such as construction of

accommodations, retail and food services facilities, and hard
infrastructure such as roads, bridges and air transportation capacity,
provide benefits to all economic sectors as well as households.
(4) Travel & Tourism supports economic development via intense inter-
industry linkages, remittances, and cultural heritage preservation.
14
Ratha, D. & Mohapatra, S. 2007. “Increasing the Macroeconomic Impact of Remittances on
Development.” Development Prospects Group World Bank. November 2007.
15
12
November 2012
These features of the industry indicate that the benefits of expanding Travel &
Tourism extend well beyond the direct and indirect economic impacts. Travel &
Tourism can play a key role in a broader, long-term economic development
strategy.
13
November 2012
4. The Widespread Impacts of Travel & Tourism
4.1 Introduction
Travel & Tourism is an important driver of economic, social, and cultural

development in both developed and developing countries. Unlike traditional
industries (e.g. manufacturing, communications, financial services, etc.), Travel
& Tourism can be a significant economic driver in remote areas of countries far
from economic centres, as well as in the major business and administrative
centres.
This analysis finds that the benefits of Travel & Tourism, measured in terms of
employment and GDP, are more evenly distributed across regions within the
economies analysed here, compared to other industries. The only exception is
education which, as would be expected for a sector linked closely to
demographics, is the most evenly distributed industry among those
benchmarked.
The wide distribution of Travel & Tourism within countries is an important

dimension to its economic value. The industry generally does not exhibit the
clustering pattern that is found in the mining, automotive manufacturing and
chemical manufacturing industries, where activity is concentrated in few regions.
Increasing regional diversification can help to strengthen regional and national

economies. A diversified economy is less sensitive to the fluctuations of any
particular industry because risks are spread evenly across a number of
industries. When one industry is struggling, other stronger industries can help to
support the economy.
The more diversified an economy, the more resilient it is to external events and
developments. Travel & Tourism provides this diversification across a wider
geographic area than most other sectors.
This section analyzes the sub-national geographic distribution of the Travel &
Tourism sector in terms of GDP and employment, compared to five other sectors
16
across 11 of the 20 economies previously described in Section 2. Sectors
compared in the analysis include education, mining, communications, financial
services and manufacturing industries.
4.2 Measuring the regional distribution of Travel & Tourism
To compare the distribution of employment and GDP across the various regions
of each country, Oxford Economics developed an index comprised of three
17
different measures of dispersion. The dispersion scores were calculated for
16
Please see Section 4.4 for the list of 11 countries included in this part of the analysis.
17
The measures of dispersion used in the analysis include: Herfindahl score, Ogive score, and
Entropy. Additional information on the index is available in Section 4.4.
14
November 2012
each industry within a country and each industry was ranked on a scale of one
to six, with one indicating the industry that was more evenly dispersed in terms
of the distribution of employment or GDP and six representing the industry that
was more clustered/least evenly distributed. The index was calculated by taking
the average of the three rankings for each industry.
The analysis also looked at the number of regions that could be considered a
“functioning market” for each industry, where “functioning market” was defined
as having a greater than 5% share of total regional employment. For example, if
Travel & Tourism comprised 6% of the total employment of a given region, that
region was classified as having a functioning Travel & Tourism market. Due to
the broad nature of many of the industry definitions (e.g. manufacturing), only
the results of the second analysis, for which more detailed employment data was
available, are presented.
4.3 Travel & Tourism at the regional level
Travel & Tourism ranks as the second most evenly distributed industry, in terms
of employment and GDP, across the countries analysed (See Table 1). As
expected, education which, is closely linked to demographics, is the most evenly
distributed industry among those benchmarked.
Table 1. Average (Across Countries) Benchmark Industry Regional

Employment and GDP Dispersion Rankings (1 = more evenly dispersed
and 6 = more clustered / less evenly dispersed)
Em ploym ent GDP
Travel & Tourism 2 2

Mining 6 5
Education 1 1
Manufacturing 3 3
Communications 4 4
Financial Services 5 6
15
November 2012
The first graph to the right plots the average

standardized GDP and employment dispersion
scores for each benchmarked industry across all
18
countries analysed. The economic contribution
of Travel & Tourism, measured in both
employment and GDP terms, is more evenly
distributed across regions within the world’s
major economies compared to the benchmark
industries; education is the only industry that is
more dispersed. The graph also shows each
industry’s relative contribution indicated by the
size of the circle. The Travel & Tourism sector, in
addition to being one of the more evenly
distributed industries, contributes a significant
portion to respective national output and
employment; only education and manufacturing
are larger.
The second chart to the right, presents the

standardized dispersion scores for each
benchmarked industry and all countries included
in the analysis. The takeaway of the chart is
similar to that of the first chart above, with
additional country detail. Again, the Travel &
Tourism industry is one of the most evenly
19
dispersed industries in each country.
18
The standardized dispersion scores range from 0 to 1, with 0 representing an industry that is
evenly dispersed across the country and with increasing scores representing a greater degree of
clustering.
19
Detailed manufacturing sector data for most countries at the sub-national regional level was
unavailable as such the analysis presented here used data for the much larger general
manufacturing sector, as opposed to the automotive and chemicals sub-sectors. Due to these data
limitations, the analysis likely over-estimates the regional dispersion of manufacturing. Data for
automotive and chemicals sub-sectors for US and UK shows that those sub-sectors are much more
concentrated than the manufacturing sector as a whole.
16
November 2012
The two most clustered industries in terms of

employment and GDP are mining and financial
services. As illustrated in the two charts to the
right, the Travel & Tourism sector is much more
dispersed and also contributes a larger percentage
of national employment (larger circles). These
results are not surprising given the fact that in most
countries mining tends to be focused in a few
regions where natural resources are available and
extracted, and the majority of financial services
employment tends to be clustered in a few large
cities which serve as domestic and international
financial centres, such as London in the UK and
New York in the U.S.
Due to data limitations at the sub-national regional

level, data for accommodation and food services
were used as a proxy for the Travel & Tourism
20
industry. More detailed data for UK and U.S.
regions were available and allowed accounting for
the other industries and sub-sectors that comprise
the wider Travel & Tourism sector, as well as the
examination of the automotive and chemical
manufacturing sub-sectors.
Including the detailed manufacturing sub-sector

data and expanded definition of the Travel &
Tourism sector does not impact the relative
ranking of the Travel & Tourism sector in the U.S.,
but does improve the ranking in the UK.
The even distribution of Travel & Tourism employment in the UK is illustrated by

the fact that the top 10% of local authorities in terms of Travel & Tourism
employment represent 33% of the total Travel & Tourism employment (See
Figure 2). This compares to the following industries, which tend to be clustered
in a small number of local authorities:
• Mining – the top 10% of local authorities in terms of employment,

represent 80% of the total mining industries’ employment;
• Automotive manufacturing – the top 10% of local authorities represent

76% of the total industry employment (See Figure 6);
• Financial services – the top 10% of local authorities represent 63% of

total industry employment.
• Chemical manufacturing – the top 10% of local authorities represent

nearly 50% of the total industry employment.
20
Additional information on the data used in the analysis is available in the Appendix
17
November 2012
Figure 2. Distribution of UK Travel & Tourism Employment
18
November 2012
Figure 3. Distribution of UK Automotive Manufacturing Employment
In addition, to examining the dispersion rankings for each industry, the analysis
also identified the number of regions that represent a functioning market for
each industry (Table 2). In the UK and the U.S. 100% and 98% of the regions
respectively represent functioning market for Travel & Tourism. This compares
to:
• Mining – none of the local authorities in the UK and only one state could
be considered a functioning market for the mining industry;
19
November 2012
• Automotive manufacturing – none of the local authorities in the UK or

any of the states in the U.S could be considered a functioning market for
the automotive manufacturing industry; and
• Chemical manufacturing – seven of the local authorities in the UK and

one state in the U.S. could be considered a functioning market for the
chemical manufacturing industry.
By contrast, in the education sector, 400 out of the 408 local authorities in the
UK and 49 of the 50 states in the U.S. could be considered a functioning market
for the education sector.
The UK and U.S. results confirm the country-wide findings that employment
impacts related to Travel & Tourism are more widely distributed than the other
industries, and are a significant economic driver across the whole country. The
industries that are more evenly dispersed, such as Travel & Tourism and
education, have more functioning markets across each country and those
industries that are more clustered, such as mining and automotive
manufacturing, have few functioning markets.
Industries that are important for regional economies, such as Travel & Tourism,
education, and retail, are likely to have more local authorities or states as
functioning markets.
Table 2. Benchmark Industry Sub-National ‘Functioning Market’

21
Concentrations (year 2011)
% of Functioning Markets UK US
Expanded Travel and Tourism 96% 98%

Mining 0% 2%
Education 98% 98%
Automotive Manufacturing 0% 0%
Chemical Manufacturing 2% 2%
Communications 13% 2%
Financial Services 12% 18%
21
The education sector data for the US represents employment classified as belonging to NAICS
code 61”Educational Services.” However, a large portion of the education related employment in the
U.S. is classified under the local and state government sectors. Due to data availability issues, this
education related employment was not able to be included in the analysis.
20
November 2012
4.4 Detailed Findings
The existing benchmarking study released by WTTC relied on national level

employment and GDP data, for which industry data is available at a fine-grain
level of detail. However, at the sub-national regional level for the wide spectrum
of countries being examined, employment and GDP data is not easily available
22
in the same level of detail as the other sectors . As a result, we have used the
employment and GDP generated by the accommodation and food services
sector as a proxy for Travel & Tourism.
While accommodation and food services are an important part of the Travel &
Tourism sector, the sector also included several other industries and sub-
23
sectors. Figure 1 compares the employment in the accommodation and food
services sector to the larger Travel & Tourism industry definition. The correlation
between the proxy measure of Travel & Tourism and the definition of Travel &
Tourism used in the benchmarking study is 0.96 which indicates that, at the
national level, our proxy measure is a good measure of the Travel & Tourism
sector.
Correlation between Actual and Proxy Measures of Travel & Tourism

Employment (2011)
Correlation between Actual and Proxy Measures of

Travel & Tourism Employment
7,000
Actual Travel & Tourism Employment
6,000
5,000
4,000
(000s Jobs)
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000
Accomodation and Food Service Employment (000's Jobs)
22
For example, Canada includes agriculture and logging in the same sector as their mining data
while the other countries do not; China is missing data for the mining, education, and communication
sectors at the sub-national regional level; and South Africa includes wholesale and retail trade with
their accommodation and food service sectors.
23
The industries and sub-sectors included in the expanded Travel & Tourism definition were based
on the “Supply Side of Tourism Report 2009” report released by the UK Office of National Statistics.
21
November 2012
In addition, we were unable to obtain detailed manufacturing sector data for

most countries at the sub-national regional level and as a result were forced to
use data for the much larger general manufacturing sector, as opposed to the
automotive and chemicals sub-sectors. This adaptation likely means that the
analysis over-estimates the regional dispersion of manufacturing – data for
automotive and chemicals sub-sectors for US and UK shows that those sub-
sectors are much more concentrated than the manufacturing sector as a whole.
The analysis used the following measures to quantify the dispersion across
industries and sub-national regions:
1). Herfindahl Index: the Herfindahl index is used to measure the degree of
concentration of a given industry in each sub-national region. Equally
dispersed employment shares all of the sub-national regions would equal an
index score of 0, while more clustered employment distribution would result
in higher values.
2). Ogive Index: the Ogive index measures deviations from an equal
distribution of employment shares across sub-national regions. Equally
dispersed employment shares all of the sub-national regions would equal an
Ogive index score of 0, while more clustered employment distribution would
result in higher Ogive values.
3). Entropy: the Entropy index is another popular measure of diversity. If

employment is concentrated in single region, then the Entropy score would
be 0 and if there is an equal distribution across regions, then the Entropy
index achieves its maximum value (which depends on the number of sub-
national regions.
Due to the fact that each measure uses a different scale, the three measures
were standardized so that each measure ranged from 0 to 1, with 0
representing evenly distributed industry and increasing scores representing
a greater degree of clustering.
22
November 2012
Table 3: Benchmark Industry Regional Employment Dispersion Rankings by Comparator Country

(1 = more evenly dispersed and 6 = more clustered / less evenly distributed)
Travel & Financial

Em ploym ent Mining Education Manufacturing Com m unications
Tourism Services
Australia 2 4 1 3 4 6
Brazil 2 6 3 4 4 1
France 3 5 1 2 4 6
Germany 3 6 1 5 2 4
Italy 2 5 1 6 3 4
Mexico 3 5 6 1 3 2
Russia 3 4 2 5 1 6
Turkey 3 2 1 4 4 6
UAE 5 6 1 2 4 3
UK 3 6 2 1 4 5
U.S 2 6 4 1 5 3
Avg. Rank 2.82 5.00 2.09 3.09 3.45 4.18
Table 4: Benchmark Industry Regional GDP Dispersion Rankings by Comparator Country

(1 = more evenly dispersed and 6 = more clustered / less evenly distributed)
Financial
GDP Travel & Tourism Mining Education Manufacturing Com m unications
Services
Australia 3 5 1 2 5 4
Brazil 1 5 2 3 5 4
France 3 5 1 2 4 6
Germany 3 6 2 5 1 4
Italy 2 4 1 6 3 5
Mexico 4 5 3 1 2 6
Russia 3 4 2 5 1 6
Turkey 3 2 1 4 4 6
UAE 2 6 4 1 5 3
UK 3 4 2 1 5 6
U.S. 1 6 3 2 5 4
Average 2.55 4.73 2.00 2.91 3.64 4.91
4.5 Section conclusions
This section presents a dispersion analysis examining benchmark industries for

20 major economies around the world. The analysis finds that employment and
GDP contributions of Travel & Tourism are more evenly distributed across
regions within the world’s major economies. The only exception is the education
23
November 2012
sector which is more evenly dispersed likely because it is driven by

demographics. Other benchmark industries, such as mining and financial
services, tend to be more concentrated in regional industry hubs. Mining tends
to be located near natural resources and financial services are usually based in
key cities that serve as domestic and international business centres.
Travel & Tourism is an important driver of economic, social, and cultural

development in both developed and developing countries. Unlike traditional
industries (e.g. manufacturing, communications, financial services, etc.), Travel
& Tourism can be a significant economic driver in remote areas of countries far
from economic centres, as well in the major business and administrative centres.
24
November 2012
5. The Economic Returns on Destination Marketing
5.1 Introduction
Destination marketing organizations (DMOs)—including multi-national, national,

state/provincial, and local entities—seek to generate additional visitor activity as
a driver of economic growth. These organizations are generally funded through
a combination of public and public-private sources. As public finances are
strained in many countries and the private sector has become more circumspect
about expenses, destination marketing funding has come under increased
scrutiny.
This raises a critical question: is destination promotion and marketing worth the
investment?
This section examines this question reviewing global spending on destination

promotion and presenting several case studies showing the effectiveness of
these investments and, in some cases, the effects of reduced funding.
A survey conducted by Oxford Economics on behalf of the World Travel &

Tourism Council (WTTC) and a review of previous research suggest that
destination marketing activities likely increase brand awareness, enhance
perceptions of travel destinations, and ultimately lead to increased visitation and
visitor spending. For many economies around the world, this injection of visitor
spending represents a significant contribution to GDP, business sales, income,
and tax revenues. For less developed tourism markets, tourism promotion is an
essential part of a broader economic development strategy to realize these
benefits.
5.2 National DMO spending
In many countries National Tourism Organizations (NTOs) have responsibility for

international tourism promotion, and their responsibilities are also increasingly
covering domestic tourism promotion. A survey of NTOs from 62 countries was
conducted by the UNWTO in 2010 and provides a snapshot of promotion and
24
marketing at the national level across countries . According to the survey,
responsibilities are varied and include:
• Regulation Classification and licensing

• Product development
• Infrastructure development
• Training, advice and technical support
• Financial support
• International marketing
• Domestic marketing
24
Source: UNWTO report Budgets of National Tourism Organizations, 2008-2009
25
November 2012
• Marketing for leisure and business tourism

• Customer relationship management
Countries with destination management budgets tend to be more developed and,

as expected, are more likely to have the ability to develop and implement
coordinated and strategic marketing efforts. More than half of the countries
covered in the UNWTO study are in Europe, while most less developed countries
in Africa and Asia either did not respond or have no official promotion
25
organization. However, of those less developed countries that responded to the
survey and have NTOs, their budgets have increased in recent years.
The activities carried out by NTOs are varied and reflected in budget allocations
for marketing efforts carried out through different channels of spending:
• Internet and e-marketing

• Advertising, brochures and mailings
• Fairs, trade shows and workshops
• Familiarization trips
• Support for other tourism organizations
• Research and data collection
Most marketing budgets focused on efforts to promote the home country’s culture
or place, such as specific cities or regions. Other themes included emphases on
the sun and sea, mountain or rural experiences, sports and recreation, wellness
and health, business meetings, conferences and events, and educational and
study opportunities.
An international presence is considered important by most NTOs and many

operate branches in their key market countries or emerging markets where they
expect to generate more tourism demand. The survey respondents reported
having 562 promotion and marketing branches operating abroad in 2010, and
26
these offices were staffed by more than 2,200 employees.
The UNWTO survey provides the most recent and comprehensive survey of NTO
budgets. Expenditure data for 2009 is the most complete and includes responses
from 51 countries. For the responding countries, total funding summed to $2.7
billion in 2009. Funding by country ranged from $0.7 million in Madagascar to
$173 million in Mexico. The average budget of $53.1 million was comparable to
those in Germany, Italy, and Norway. The median budget was $38.1 million.
Total funding increased in each year from 2005 to 2008, before a decrease in
27
2009. The global economic downturn affected the budgets in many countries in
2009 and 2010. In 2009, 30 out of 51 responding countries allocated fewer funds
25
Note: no additional information was available on the breakdown of those countries that did not
respond versus those with no official NTO.
26
Source: UNWTO
27
Budgets are reported in U.S. dollars and a percent change calculation would not account for
exchange rate fluctuations, and therefore not represent budget changes in the local currency
26
November 2012
to tourism promotions than a year earlier. In 2010, 17 out of 30 countries

reported smaller budgets versus the previous year.
A 2011 report completed by European Travel Commission covered NTO activity

from 2008 to 2011 for 23 European countries. The report showed that total
spending by NTOs participating in the survey decreased in 2010 and 2011, likely
due to the global economic slowdown. The average NTO budget was €31 million
in 2011, a 10.9% decrease from two years earlier. Among those included in the
analysis, the minimum budget of the reporting countries was €1.3 million and the
maximum was €153.7 million. The majority of the funding came from public
funding sources; the minimum share of public funding was 51.3%, the maximum
share was 100%, with an average share across the respondents of 72.7%.
The UNWTO and ETC surveys of NTOs provide only a partial accounting of
national tourism promotion spending. For this report, Oxford Economics
developed estimates for countries not included in the survey and for years in
which there are no data in the UNWTO survey. Estimates were generated based
on inbound spending receipts by country. Additional information was
incorporated from the European Travel Commission, the Mexico Ministry of
Tourism and the Brand USA. Total NTO spending was estimated to be $4.2
billion in 2009, and this decreased by 3.9% in 2010 before recovering in 2011
with 2.2% increase. Total spending is expected to rise 3.3% in 2012. Table 5
below shows the estimated total budgets and spending of NTOs. The table also
presents total inbound spending and the national tourism promotion budgets as a
percentage of total spending. NTO budgets increased as a share of spending
through 2009, when total budgets corresponded to 0.51% of total inbound
spending. In the 2010, this share decreased to 0.42%. This share is expected to
increase to 0.43% in 2012.
Table 5. Total Funding of National Tourism Organizations ($ million)
Region 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Europe 1,274 1,579 1,811 2,122 1,989 1,895 1,762 1,717

Americas 400 408 482 541 582 391 433 578
Mideast / N Africa 407 460 609 685 700 717 761 777
Asia Pacific 678 780 1,001 1,017 937 1,044 1,181 1,202
World Total 2,759 3,227 3,903 4,365 4,209 4,046 4,137 4,273
Percent change 17.0% 20.9% 11.9% -3.6% -3.9% 2.2% 3.3%
World Inbound Travel

Spending ($ mn) 659,973 718,143 824,731 910,739 822,128 883,282 986,345 998,065
Budgets as % of
Travel Spending 0.42% 0.45% 0.47% 0.48% 0.51% 0.46% 0.42% 0.43%
Sources: UNWTO, ETC, Tourism Economics
It should be noted that in the US, destination marketing is largely handled by the
states. According to the U.S. Travel Association, $398 million was allocated to
state tourism office budgets in the 2011/12 fiscal year. Of this amount, $48.3
million was designated for international sales and marketing, or 12% of the total.
27
November 2012
National Tourism Promotion Share of Tourism

This would not substantially change the relatively
Receipts
low ratio of international marketing to tourism
receipts for the Americas. 1.0%
0.9%
The Middle East and North Africa as a combined 0.8%
region spend the most on destination marketing as 0.7%
a share of tourism receipts. 0.6%

0.5%
Two observations stand out from the data. First, 0.4%
destinations spend a relatively small amount on 0.3%
0.2%
destination marketing given levels of international
0.1%
tourism spending. If domestic tourism spending
0.0%
were to be included, the share of destination Americas Europe World Avg Asia Mideast /
marketing spending would be significantly lower. Pacific N Africa
Second, the most recent economic cycle has
caused these promotional budgets to decline both Worldwide National Tourism Promotion as a
in absolute terms and as a share of tourism Share of Global Tourism Receipts
receipts. 0.6%
The graph below also shows that a positive 0.5%

relationship exists between the funding of
0.4%
destination marketing and actual tourism receipts.
Although this does not indicate a causal 0.3%
relationship in either direction (it is likely in both
directions to some degree), it is clear that 0.2%
governments with larger tourism promotion budgets 0.1%

also enjoy a higher level of international tourism
spending. 0.0%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Global Spend on National Tourism Promotion

$ billion
4.5
4.0
Asia Pacific
3.5
3.0 Mideast / N
Africa
2.5
Americas
2.0
1.5
Europe
1.0
0.5
-
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
28
November 2012
The downward trend in funding is evident as a

share of total government spending in all
regions, except the Americas where both
Mexico and the United States have seen recent
increases in funding. Tourism spending has
fluctuated as well through the course of the
downturn with similar magnitude. Of course, a
direct causal link between the two is difficult to
make, as broader economic conditions likely
play a much more important role in changes in
Travel & Tourism traffic and spending than
marketing and promotion alone. Tourism office
budgets increased in 2011 and 2012, but not as
quickly as tourism spending, resulting in a
declining share. Overall government spending
also increased in 2011 and 2012 faster than
tourism office budgets and the smaller share of
government spending is reflected in the chart
below.
5.3 The rationale behind investing in destination promotion
The case for destination promotion has two main tenets. The first is that
destinations, as an amalgamation of attractions and sectors, require an
overarching brand and marketing umbrella. Indeed, tourism is not a single
product and is comprised of companies offering a variety of goods, services, and
experiences that make up a destination. Without destination marketing, there is
no entity responsible for developing a destination message that brings these
various entities together in the mind of the consumer. The second tenet is that
competition demands it. Research cited later in this paper shows that
destinations that hold back on destination marketing tend to lose market share
over time.
Given the substantial investments made in destination marketing around the

world—approximately $4.1 billion in 2011—it is critical to understand the returns
on these investments. Specifically, the governments around the world must
answer the question, “Is destination marketing worth the investment?”
This is an important and practical economic development question because the

funding of destination marketing is sensitive to both economic cycles and
political changes.
When government budgets are tight, funding for tourism promotion is usually
squeezed as well. However, if destination marketing yields returns exceeding
the investment, then funding for tourism promotion should be preserved even
when budget resources are scarce.
29
November 2012
5.4 Measuring incremental impact
To demonstrate a return on investment in tourism promotion, a link must be

established between the promotion or marketing campaign and the incremental
visitation and spending generated by that investment. While measurement of
this incremental impact is challenging, destinations and academics have
developed a substantial body of research evaluating the effectiveness of
destination promotion. If geographic and time elements to the promotion and
visitation are clearly defined, the total return to the regional economy can be
28
measured.
Measuring return on tourism investment has become a standard practice as

public funding sources demand more accountability. This pressure has
intensified amid public sector fiscal pressures, efforts to balance budgets and
reduce public debt. Numerous studies have been completed by destinations and
academics that demonstrate robust returns on tourism investment. Controlled
conversion studies are a frequent method of evaluation of the larger NTOs,
since they generate ROI estimates. But a number of other methods are also
employed. These include:
• Assessing the number of articles generated from PR and media

familiarisation trips;
• Estimating advertising equivalent value and a formal assessment against
objective and favourability of content;
• Coupon return on print media advertising plus equivalent statistics for
response to email or telephone numbers contained within
advertisements;
• Advertising tracking studies;
• Questionnaire-based evaluation of consumer characteristics and
satisfaction;
• Questionnaire-based evaluation of trade activities covering satisfaction
with events and estimates of additional tourism revenues generated
through the event;
• Qualitative research in pre-testing advertisement effectiveness;
• Continuous monitoring of ‘macro’ statistical data.
The Destination Marketing Association International (DMAI) has developed a set

of standard practices that offer organizations guidance on how to conduct
29
tourism spending research and how to estimate a marketing ROI. The DMAI
handbook covers topics such as designing and conducting surveys, assessing
visitor motivations and spending, and how to engage consultants through an
RFP process if needed. These guidelines could help to bring consistency in
methodologies across organizations.
28
Source: Urness (2005), Best Practices for Measuring Destination Return on Investment
http://industry.visitcalifornia.com/Research/Advertising-Effectiveness-and-ROI/
29
Source: DMAI website, available at
http://www.destinationmarketing.org/images/pdf/Convention_Research_Guidelines_12_Nov_08.pdf
30
November 2012
Section 5.5 below cites several case studies and the majority employ a
conversion analysis that quantifies the incremental impact of an advertising
campaign. Visitor surveys are designed to determine: (1) if the visitor was aware
of the campaign and (2) if the campaign influenced their decision to travel to the
destination. The data for these case studies clearly show positive—though
widely diverging—returns. This likely reflects differences in research
methodology as well as differences in media, markets, messages, timing and
varying conditions in the broader regional and national economies. Several of
these case studies have been audited by independent government agencies.
For example, Hawaii’s ROI studies were audited by a state-appointed task force
of economists and academics and were approved as credible.
Success stories are no guarantee. Certainly, a poorly developed and

implemented campaign can produce minimal or even no returns. However, the
body of research confirms returns that are consistently well above the cost of
marketing investments.
5.5 Case studies of destination marketing success
The survey conducted by Oxford Economics on behalf of WTTC provides

evidence of positive returns to promotion and marketing investment. The survey
was intended to assess respondents’ perceptions of tourism as a catalyst for
economic development and included questions on marketing effectiveness and
return on investment. The survey was sent to 100 senior executives in the
tourism industry, including publicly funded tourism offices, private firms and
trade associations, and a total of 30 responses were received. Of the responding
organizations 20 were government tourism organizations, at the national or sub-
national level, and 16 reported having sales and marketing budgets. Sales and
marketing spending for these organizations ranged from 1% to 78% of annual
revenues, with most reporting a marketing budget between 50%-70% of annual
revenues. Of these that had a marketing budget, 10 responded that they
received a positive return on investment, while others did not provide a response
to this question. The estimated return on investment varied greatly and
methodologies for calculating an ROI across countries likely varied. Below select
responses are summarised:
• Visit Denmark reported a return of 16 dollars in tourism revenues for

every one dollar spent on marketing to leisure visitors, and a 12 to one
return on marketing directed toward meetings and conference
customers. Visit Denmark reports several quantitative steps to its return
on investment calculation: an estimate of the number of exposures of
the advertisement, a measure of awareness (number of views), an
estimate of any changes in travel preferences or intentions, and affected
travel decisions. A cost associated with each step is calculated:
investment per exposure, per ‘awareness’ view, per preference change,
and per affected travel decision. Any boosted visitation resulting from an
‘affected travel decision is included in the ROI calculation.
31
November 2012
• Tourism Ireland estimates its return at 10% on television advertising (in

Britain) and on-line advertising.
• Flanders finds that, on average, every euro spent on press activities

returns €318 in advertising value equivalency. This excludes online
articles which would add to the figure.
• Visit Scotland reported a 20% return on marketing investment. In

general terms, £1 invested in VisitScotland activity generated £20 in
return. In 2009, VisitScotland’s specialised destination marketing
campaigns generated £416 million for the Scottish economy including
£248 million of additional revenue from leisure tourism activity, £94
million of additional revenue from business tourism activity, and £23
million from 100 VisitScotland Information Centres and 26 Partnership
Centres. According to VisitScotland’s analysis, travellers who visited the
information centres spent an additional £5.35 that otherwise would not
have been spent.
• Australia’s ‘A Different Light’ campaign in 2005 yielded a return of $64

per $1 spent in marketing. Current campaign assessments do not
include explicit ROI calculations, but Tourism Australia’s monitoring
activities in 14 international markets, plus the domestic market, include
measurement of ad ‘recall’ and ‘action taken.’ More qualitative
evaluation includes any reported barriers to visiting Australia,
information sought after seeing the ad, the message received from the
ad, and any reasons why a viewer would be more likely to visit.
Numerous ROI studies have been completed at the

national or sub-national level. The Canadian Tourism Table 6. Allocation of Canadian Marketing Budget
Commission (CTC) carries out controlled conversion and Corresponding ROI
studies across its major markets to evaluate the
Marketing Return on
influence of its campaigns. Country
Investment Investment
Historical CTC data indicates a weighted average ROI
US 37% $30:$1
of $38:$1 across all international markets. On average,
UK 14% $36:$1
each $1 in marketing generates $38 in visitor spending
France 10% $42:$1
across international markets. Germany 10% $30:$1
Table 7 below shows select studies completed by U.S. Australia 4% $43:$1
states in the last decade. The studies covered Japan 2% $36:$1
marketing and advertising campaigns ranging from six South Korea 4% $107:$1
to 21 months. The reported ROI figures vary from $47 China 9% $29:$1
to $305 in visitor spending per advertising dollar. A India 3% $36:$1
variation in ROI would be expected and likely depends Mexico 4% $95:$1
Brazil 3% $21:1
on the quality and length of the campaign and
Weighted Average 100% $38:$1
conditions in the regional and broader economies.
32
November 2012
Table 7. Return on Investment Studies and Findings for Select U.S. States
Estimated ROI:
State Year Summary Scope of Study Visitor Spending per
Ad Dollar
California 2009 An update in a series of annual ROI studies 305
Colorado 2008 15-month ad campaign 193
Arizona 2007 21-month advertising campaign 180
Florida 2010 Spring 2010 marketing effort 147
Oregon 2008 One year ad campaign 134
North Dakota 2007 One year ad campaign 123
Virginia 2006 One year ad campaign 71
Minnesota 2000 Six month ad campaign 52
Montana 2008 One year ad campaign in 2004 50
Michigan 2005 One year marketing initiative 48
Missouri 2009 One year ad campaign 47
Average 123
Source: Explore Minnesota
The following case studies provide additional context, more detail and
compelling evidence of the effectiveness of destination marketing as an
investment that generates tax revenues, create jobs and income, and enhances
the lifestyle of both tourists and residents. These anecdotal assessments of
tourism marketing campaigns are based on a Longwoods International report
30
The Power of Destination Marketing.
Michigan:
Michigan’s “Great Lakes, Great Times” campaign was funding by a roughly $7

million annual budget in the 1990s. The campaign was moderately successful
drawing regional tourists. However, mid-west states were struggling and
Michigan had a relatively weak image in terms of destination appeal. In 2006,
the “Pure Michigan” initiative was kicked off, the budget was increased to $15
million and to more than $30 million in 2009. The effort focused on creating a
national image of the state. The state jumped up to second place from ninth, out
31
of regional destinations that survey respondents “would really enjoy visiting.”
From 2007 to 2010, visits to the state increased by double digit percentages in
three out of four years. Visitor spending was significantly higher after the
campaign. Longwoods International attributed more than $600 million in visitor
spending in 2010 to the Pure Michigan campaign, and estimated a tax revenue
return on public investment of $4.33 per dollar invested.
Philadelphia:
Philadelphia is a large city but growth had been stagnant for decades as of the
1990s and the city had little appeal as a tourist destination. In 1997, the City
initiated a campaign called “Philadelphia: The City that Loves You Back,” clearly
30
Source: The Power of Destination Marketing, Longwoods International, 2011
31
ibid
33
November 2012
was directed as a play on the well-known symbol “I love New York” depicted with
a red heart, and that city’s reputation for toughness. In Philadelphia, the ad
sought to convey, you get something in return. The campaign is estimated to
have generated more than an additional 1.1 million visits annually from 1997 to
1999. In 2001, a second campaign “Philly Overnight” encouraged visitors to stay
overnight and spend in the city’s hotels and restaurants. The ‘Overnight’ effort
was credited with generating an additional 1.4 million visits from 2001 to 2002.
The estimated ROI for the ‘Loves You Back” campaign ranges from $55 to $80
in visitor spending per ad dollar, and the “Overnight” campaign ROI was
estimated at $116 in visitor spending per ad dollar. Additional survey research
by Longwoods International and Tourism Economics revealed a marked change
in perceptions about Philadelphia from 1997 to 2002.
Colorado:
The Colorado story is often cited to bolster support for tourism funding. Colorado
is one of the few examples of the complete cessation of destination
management and marketing. Such an example is rare because few in leadership
positions are willing to take the risk and enter into such unchartered territory:
Just what happens to the regional tourism industry without an active effort to
court visitors? The Colorado story serves as a natural experiment to examine
such a policy move.
In 1986, Colorado tourism was primarily regional and a campaign was launched,
funded by a 0.2% tax on travel-related goods and services, to enhance the
state’s draw. The effort was successful but voters struck down the tax effectively
eliminating the marketing and promotion budget. The effect of the abrupt stop to
marketing was significant and swift: Colorado lost 30% of its market share of
U.S. tourism and more than $1.4 billion annually in visitor spending. In 2000, a
new tourism agency was established, with renewed funding and a reinvigorated
effort to manage and promote the state as a destination. Longwoods
International analysis of Colorado’s marketing and return on investment show
positive results, including an improved image, increased visitation and more
visitors spending.
United States:
The U.S. Department of Commerce mounted a pilot marketing campaign in the

UK from mid-December 2004 to late February 2005. A $4.1 million media buy
included television and outdoor posters. Results of the campaign include
increased awareness, a better image as a “Dream Destination,” increased
visitation and more visitors spending, all attributable to the promotion effort. The
returns to government were also found to be substantial with $9.56 in taxes to
the federal treasury and $9.80 in state and local taxes generated for each dollar
spent
34
November 2012
California:
Visit California tracks the effectiveness and ROI

Marketing ROI for California Campaigns
of its advertising campaigns annually. Visitor spending per dollar invested
Phase 1 is conducted immediately after the Canada (2009)

conclusion of an ad run and measures (1) the Japan (2010)
reach of the campaign, (2) reactions to the Canada (2010)
Canada (2007)
creative, (3) the impact of the campaign on
Canada (2011)
changing attitudes toward California and, (4) the UK (2010)
ways in which the campaign influenced consumer Australia (2010/2011)
interest in visiting the state. UK (2008)
UK (2011)
Phase 2 of the advertising research is conducted UK (2009)
after a period of time deemed reasonable to allow Japan (2008/2009)
for travel which is related to advertising exposure. $- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250
It measures (1) Incremental travel and spending
Source: Visit California
associated with Visit California's marketing
efforts, and (2) ROI as determined by this travel
spending in relation to campaign expenditures.
The estimated ROIs for recent Visit California advertising campaigns range from
less than $25 to more than $200 in additional visitor spending for every ad dollar
spent. The studies attempt to capture just the incremental visitor spending and in
this sense claim to be conservative in their estimates. The chart to the right
displays Visit California’s findings for recent campaigns.
5.6 Investing during an economic downturn
During an economic downturn public sector revenues are usually squeezed and
destination promotion competes with many other spending priorities often
targeted for cutbacks. However, the existing research shows that destination
marketing generally produces positive returns that warrant the investment.
According to Sir Martin Sorrell of WPP Group, a cut in marketing spending can
not only reduce current business sales but also make recovery longer and
32
harder.
Marketers can be tempted to cut back on advertising during times like these, but
multiple studies have confirmed just the opposite. In the short term, it’s critical to
establish or maintain your brand and product’s relevance and keep the dialogue
going. In the long-term, studies have proven that increased ad spending during a
recession not only works, but contributes to financial performance for up to three
33
years in the future. Businesses stand to gain more during downturns than in
good times, when a majority of advertisers are increasing spending.
32
Source: Media Week, October 23, 2008
33
Source: Millward and Brown, Marketing Suring a Recession May and April 2008
35
November 2012
One study published in March 2008 by Paul Dyson of independent modelling

and analysis agency D2D Limited, showed that cutting advertising during a
downturn had adverse long term affects for up to three years after the recession
ended, even if that brand returned to its prerecession spending the year after the
cut.
A 50% cut in spending for one year resulted in a decrease in sales for that year
and the year after. A complete stoppage of advertising resulted in a period of
three to four years of decreased sales versus where the brand would have been
had its ad budgets been maintained. For the company to recapture pre-
recession sales levels within a year requires spending 60% more money than
the amount saved by cutting the ad budget in the first place. There is also
evidence that consumers explicitly want advertisers to advertise. In a study
conducted by OMD, a media agency under the Omnicom umbrella, 81% of
consumers surveyed said advertisers need to continue to communicate about
their products during a recession. Of course, they also offered that they would
be more responsive to messages that emphasize cost savings, discounts or
34
products that are positioned as investments during economic downturns.
5.7 Policy implications
The Travel & Tourism industry is a significant part of many national and regional
economies around the globe, and potentially an integral part of a broader
economic development strategy for developing nations. Because of the
industry’s importance, National Tourism Organizations spent more than US$4.0
billion on promotions and marketing efforts in each year since 2008. NTO
spending is only a partial picture of promotion spending since destination
marketing is conducted at the state, provincial, or city level in some countries.
The responsibilities of NTOs are varied and include regulation, product
development, training and marketing, and these efforts are being increasingly
directed towards domestic tourism in addition to international visitors.
As the public sector in many countries seeks relief from intense fiscal pressures,
decision-makers are looking for opportunities to close budget gaps and reduce
debt, and tourism promotion funding is coming under intense scrutiny.
A survey of senior tourism industry executives, case studies and previous

examinations of return on advertising investment at the national and sub-
national levels suggests that a well-designed marketing strategy and campaign
likely increases brand awareness, enhances perceptions of travel destinations,
and ultimately leads to increased visitation and visitor spending. The positive
return on investment reported by numerous studies suggests that the initial
investment in many cases results in benefits that exceed that investment. Actual
return on investment of course depends on many other factors beyond a
marketing budget, such as the timing and context of the campaign, the strategy
and implementation of the campaign, and broader economic conditions.
34
Source: Mering Carson
36
November 2012
Understanding the benefits of an effective destination marketing campaign can

help to clarify its importance and make a compelling case for reliable funding.
The need for clarifications of the benefits is especially acute during economic
downturns because of the key role public sector funding plays in tourism
promotion. It is during downturns that decision-makers are most likely to seek
opportunities to cut funding. The research suggests that doing so would likely
result in decreased market share, fewer visitors and lower levels of visitor
spending than would otherwise be the case.
37
November 2012
6. Conclusions
In comparison to other sectors, Travel & Tourism possesses distinct advantages
as a driver of economic development.
In particular:
• In terms of absolute size, growth, and share of exports, Travel &

Tourism is one of the most important industries in the world;
• Travel & Tourism has strong linkages to other industries within

national economies generating significant indirect benefits;
• Travel & Tourism is highly dispersed within national economies

and its benefits are widely distributed
• Travel & Tourism drives infrastructure investment that benefits

other industries
• Investments in well-designed destination marketing consistently

produce strong economic returns
Travel & Tourism supports economic development because the industry cuts
across and is linked to many other industries, and its benefits are widely
distributed within national economies. The industry also generates valuable
spinoff benefits by developing infrastructure that other industries can use, and by
boosting investments in other industries.
Well-designed marketing and promotion campaigns require up front investments

and tend to generate additional visitation and spending in the economy that far
outweigh the initial costs.
All of this leads to a simple and important conclusion. Governments around the
world should consider Travel & Tourism as an integral part of their economic
development strategy. Policies which foster the development of Travel &
Tourism generate a broad set of benefits that extend through the entire
economy.
38
THE WORLD TRAVEL & TOURISM COUNCIL
IS THE FORUM FOR BUSINESS LEADERS IN THE
TRAVEL & TOURISM INDUSTRY.
With the Chairs and Chief Executives of the 100 foremost Travel & Tourism companies as its members, WTTC has
a unique mandate and overview on all matters related to Travel & Tourism.
WTTC works to raise awareness of Travel & Tourism as one of the world’s largest industries, supporting some
255 million jobs and generating 9% of global GDP. WTTC advocates partnership between the public and private
sectors, delivering results that match the needs of economies, local and regional authorities and local communities
with those of business.
Oxford Economics is one of the world’s foremost independent global advisory firms, providing reports, forecasts and
analytical tools on 190 countries, 100 industrial sectors and over 2,600 cities. Our best-of-class global economic and
industry models and analytical tools give us an unparalleled ability to forecast external market trends, assess their
business, economic and social impact, and create ground-breaking thought leadership.
Headquartered in Oxford, England, with regional centers in London, New York and Singapore, Oxford Economics has
offices across the globe in Belfast, Chicago, Dubai, Miami, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Tokyo and Washington DC.
We employ over 130 full-time people, including more than 80 professional economists, industry experts and business
analysts—one of the largest teams of macro-economists in the private sector. Our global team is highly skilled in a full
range of research techniques, from econometric modelling, scenario framing, and economic impact analysis to market
surveys, case studies, expert panels, and web analytics. Oxford Economics is a key adviser to corporate, financial and
government decision-makers and thought leaders. Our worldwide client base now comprises over 700 international
organisations, including leading multinational companies and financial institutions; key government bodies and trade
associations; and top universities, consultancies and think tanks.
1-2 Queen Victoria Terrace,

Sovereign Court,
London, E1W 3HA
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 207 481 8007
Fax: +44 (0) 207 488 1008
email: [email protected]
www.wttc.org
Abbey House, 1-2 Queen Victoria Terrace,
121 St Aldates, Sovereign Court,
Oxford London E1W 3HA
OX1 1HB United Kingdom
United Kingdom Telephone: +44 (0) 20 7481 8007
Telephone: +44 (0) 1865 268 900 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7488 1008
Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]
www.oxfordeconomics.com www.wttc.org

The Comparative Economic Impact of Travel Tourism PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Comparative Economic Impact of Travel Tourism PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Comparative Economic Impact of Travel Tourism PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Authority on World Travel & Tourism

American Express is a leading global payments network company founded in 1850.

For more information please contact:

Key findings of the report include:

• Travel & Tourism ranks high among sectors analysed in this

• Travel & Tourism growth trends and prospects exceed that of

• Travel & Tourism generates substantial indirect benefits through

• Travel & Tourism is highly dispersed within national economies

• Travel & Tourism drives infrastructure investment that benefits

• Investments in well-designed destination marketing consistently

2. Benchmarking of Travel & Tourism to

To gain perspective on the comparative advantages of Travel & Tourism, it

The following industries were analysed and compared to Travel &

• Education: includes all levels of educational services

• Chemicals manufacturing: includes drugs & medicines, plastics,

• Automotive manufacturing: includes motor vehicles, parts &

• Communications: includes postal services (national and private) and

• Financial services: includes banking, investment services, insurance

The analysis examines the economic value of

• Direct: this includes only those employees

• Indirect: this measures the supply chain

• Induced: this measures the impacts of

• The sum of direct, indirect, and induced

2.2 Absolute size and growth

In 2011, Travel & Tourism generated $2 trillion

With the addition of indirect and induced

At 9.1% of global GDP, Travel & Tourism

Travel & Tourism contributes roughly the same

and communications industries.

In every region of the world, the Travel &

In terms of employment, the importance of

• 6 times more than automotive

• 5 times more than the global chemicals

• 4 times more than the global mining

• 2 times more than the global

• A third more than the global financial

With a total impact of 8.7% of world employment,

The Oxford Economics global industry model

2.3 Share of exports

Travel & Tourism is an export industry when it

Tourism generated 10% of all UAE exports

Visitor receipts represent a substantial share of

For example, more than half of all service exports

Between 25% and 50% of service exports are

2.4 Linkages to other sectors

In addition to an international aspect of Travel &

This captures the ways in which the rest of the

In 18 out of the 20 economies analysed, a new

Travel & Tourism also outperforms the majority

The industry multiplier measures the impact

Industries can also be evaluated on the basis of

3. Travel & Tourism as a Force for Economic

Travel & Tourism is a particularly attractive option to stimulate development in

Promoting Travel & Tourism can support economic development, in part,

• Improved access to international markets and increased trade

• Increased foreign investments;

• Investments in public and private infrastructure; and

• Local economic development.

3.2 Travel & Tourism drives foreign trade