Should Animals Be Kept in Zoos
Should Animals Be Kept in Zoos
Should Animals Be Kept in Zoos
The debate of whether or not confining of animals is right in zoos is a popular one that attracts both
opponents and proponents. The increased interests in science and natural history saw the
introduction of zoos in 1763, which facilitated up close animal studies and would provide a chance
for entertaining and educating the public. Nevertheless, confining the animals into small spaces in
unnatural habitats, the constant staring from people and loss of their freedom makes zoos the worst
homes for animals.
Zoos provide unnatural habitats for the animals. Animals are naturally born and bred to live and die
in wilderness habitats. However, despite the numerous efforts and good intentions by zoo
management, it is impossible to provide the perfect environment for various animals. For instance,
animals like the wilder beasts live in groups that migrate over long distances while elephants on
average walk for over 50 km a day in packs. However, zoos can only provide minimal acres of land for
the animals to walk about thereby making the environments unnatural and uncomfortable for the
animals.
Zoos are a premise of captivity for animals that makes them crazy. Imprisoning of animals in small
cages housed in poorly managed zoos that fail to meet the necessary standards, averts them from
behaving naturally. As a result, suffer from zoochosis condition, which elicits stress, strange behavior
of hurting themselves due to frustration and boredom; they become inactive and increasingly pace
around. Moreover, the animals adopt aggressive behavior that results in them lashing out and
injuring or killing people.
Zoos are not educational. Zoos operate on the premise that they provide an opportunity for the
public to learn about animals. However, this is untrue, as keeping animals in confined and unnatural
environments tend to alter their natural behavior, character, and responses. Thus, persons visiting
the zoos observe the altered behavior marred by boredom, stress, and loneliness. Moreover, keeping
animals in zoos teach people that it is okay to lock up and make animals miserable for their personal
gain. Therefore, by gaining pleasure and entertainment from making animals suffer is a horrible
lesson to learn.
Proponents of keeping animals in zoos argue that zoos offer the best forms of protection for animals.
According to them, animals receive protection from poaching and predators that are out to kill them.
Additionally, by engaging in breeding programs, zoos believe they protect various species from
becoming extinct, therefore, making them positive institutions to exist. However, this is untrue as
some zoos keep the animals in deplorable environments when they lack food and adequate medical
care. Moreover, based on research, endangered animals living in zoos are only about five species and
only a few species undergo breeding.
Proponents also believe that zoos provide the opportunity for people to see a wide array of animals
while benefiting children with lessons about the environment and animals. Nevertheless, this is not
the case as zoos only house few species of animals as compared to those an individual can observe in
the wild. Also, zoos expose animals to neglect and stress that alter their behavior hence impeding
true learning for children.
In conclusion, animals just as humans enjoy rights to freedom, protection from abuse, stress, neglect
and lack of privacy. There is no denying that zoo violates all these rights by introducing them to
unnatural habitats and caging the animals. Hence, in promoting health and happiness of the animals,
animals should not be kept in zoos.
Source: https://blog.essaybasics.com/should-animals-be-kept-in-zoos-argumentative-essay/
1. What is the possible goal of the author when writing the text?
2. What is the context (point of view) being discussed?
3. What is the main argument?
4. How does the author support the argument (supporting detail in every paragraph)?
5. Are all the arguments convincing? Explain!
6. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the discussion?