Iridium Platinum Alloys
Iridium Platinum Alloys
Iridium Platinum Alloys
2500
2000
1000
500
Pt ATOMIC PER C E N T I R I D I U M Ir
In order to avoid loss of iridium due to Fig. 4 Thermal e.m.f. between iridium-platinum
oxidation, heating was carried out in argon alloys and pure platinum
mgig of
I
iridium content in a similar fashion. The Wt.%) (mg/cm2) alloy content
40 per cent iridium alloy is virtually un-
10 I .35 2.8
attacked by boiling aqua regia but can be 20 13.99 29.2 14.6
slowly etched by nascent chlorine at elevated 30 58. I 0 123.6 41.2
temperatures. An alternating current process 40 89.29 186.4 46.6
utilising a saturated electrolyte of sodium I
I
perties of alloys containing up to 30 per cent to the 10 per cent rhodium alloy, but the
of iridium can be successfully employed in results were not conclusive. To avoid fracture
instrument suspensions. Over the range at I I O O O C , the applied stress, it was concluded,
O-IOO"Cthe modulus of rigidity of the 10 per should not exceed 1.5 per cent of the normal
cent iridium-platinum alloy decreases by room temperature tensile strength or 6 per
only 0.8 per cent (21). Where complete cent of the short term strength at IIOO'C.
References
I G. Masing, K. Eckhardt and K. Kloiber Z . Metallkunde, 1940, 32, (5), 122-124
2 A. Gaudin .. .. . . . . Compt. rend., 1838, ( 6 ) , 862
3 M. H. Jacobi . . .. . . .. Compt. rend., 1859, 49, 896
J. Pelouze .. .. . . , . PoZyt. J. (Dingler), 1860, 155, 118
H. Sainte-Claire Deville and H. Debray N . arch. Sci. phys. nat., 1873, 48, 45
H. Sainte-Claire Deville .. .. Compt. rend., 1875, So, 589
4 J. Nicklks .. .. .. .. Amer. J. Sci., 1860, 29, (2), 270
5 H. Morin .. . . .. .. Compt. rend., 1874, 7 8 , 1502
6 G. Matthey .. .. .. .. Proc. Roy. SOC.,1879, 28, 463
7 J. Violle .. .. .. .. Compt. rend., 1889, 108, 894
8 J. S. Stas .. .. * . . . J . phurm. chim., 1885, 12,(5), 45
9 I. Klementit . . .. .. .. Sitzbm. Akad. Ber., 1888, 97, (2), 838 (Chem. Zeit.,
1888, 12, 1080)
I0 British Association Report on Electrical Standards,
Fourth Report, 1865
I1 British Association Report on Electrical Standards,
1932,P. 417
12 0. Feussner and L. Miiller .. .. Heraeus Festschrift, Hanau (Main), 1930, pp. 14-15;
Ann. Physik, 1930, 7, 9
13 W. A. Nemilow .. .. .. Annals. Inst. Platine, (U.S.S.R.), 1929, 7, 13-20
Z. anorg. allgem. Chem., 1932, 204, 41
14 J. Weerts .. ..
.. .. Z. Metallkunde, 1932, 24, 139
15 E. Raub and G. Buss . . .. .. Z.Elektrochem., 1940, 46, (3), 195
16 0. E. Zvyagintsev, A. G. Raikhstadt Zhur. Priklad. Khim., 1944, 17, 22-30
and M. A. Vladirnirova
17 H. Le Chatelier .. .. .. Bull. SOC.Chim., 1886, 45, (2), 482
18 W. Geibel .. .. * . .. Z . anorg. allgem. Chem., 1911, 70, 249
19 L. Nowack . . .. . . .. Z . Metallkunde, 1930, 22, 140
20 E. Raub and W. Plate . . .. .. Z. Metallkunde, 1956, 47, 688493
21 Johnson Matthey Research Laboratories Unpublished data
22 W. C. Heraeus . . .. .. .. Z. Instrum. Kunde, 1891, 11, 262
23 W. C. Heraeus . . .. . . .. Z . angew. Chem., 1892, 34
24 G. K. Burgess . . .. .. . . Bull. Standards, 1908, 5, 199-225
25 W. Crookes .. .. .. .. Proc. Roy. SOC.,I 9 12, A, 86,46 1-476
26 E. Raub and W. Plate . . .. .. Z. Metallkunde, 1957, 48, 529
27 L. Holborn and L. W. Austin .. Phil. Mag., 1904, 7, (6), 388
28 L. Brewer .. .. .. .. Chemical Reviews, 1953, 52, 1-75
29 C. Barus.. .. .. .. .. Phil. Mag., 1892, 34, 376
30 W. B. Ittness and H. B. Ulsh.. .. Proc. Inst. Elec. Eng., Part B, 1957, 104,63-68
31 W. G. Pfann .. .. .. .. Proc. Inst. Elec. Erg., 1949, 68, (3), 197
32 H. E. Stauss .. .. .. .. Trans. A.I.M.E., 1943, 152,286-290