Pile Cap Truss Analogy: 10.7 Design of Pile Caps
Pile Cap Truss Analogy: 10.7 Design of Pile Caps
Pile Cap Truss Analogy: 10.7 Design of Pile Caps
P, = 166.7 - 35.4 x 1.67 + 33.3 x 1.0 - 140.9kN P2 = 166.7 - 35.4 x 1.67 - 33.3 x 1.0 = 74.3 kN Pi
166.7 + 35.4 x 0.33 + 33.3 x 1.0 = 211.7 kN P4 = 166.7 + 35.4 x 0.33 - 33.3 x 1.0 = 145.1 kN Ps =
166.7 + 35.4 x 1.33 + 33.3 x 1.0 = 247.1 kN P6 = 166.7 +35.4 x 1.33 - 33.3 x 1.0 = 180.5 kN
When a pile group is unsymmetrieal about both co-ordinate axes it is necessary to consider the theory
of bending about the principal axes which is dealt with in most textbooks on strength of materials. In
this case the formulae for the pile loads are N
Note that eKK is the eccentricity about the XX axis, while eyy is the eccentricity about the YY axis, as
in figure 10.18.
Piled foundations are sometimes required to resist horizontal forces in addition to the vertical loads. If
the horizontal forces are small they can often be resisted by the passive pressure of the soil against
vertical piles, otherwise if the forces are not small then raking piles must be provided as shown in
figure 10.19(a).
To determine the load in each pile either a static method or an elastic method is available. The static
method is simply a graphical analysis using Bow's notation as illustrated in figure 10.19(b). This
method assumes that the piles arc pinned at their ends so that the induced loads are axial. The elastic
method lakes into account the displacements and rotations of the piles which may be considered
pinned or fixed at their ends, The pile foundation is analysed in a similar manner to a plane frame or
space frame and available computer programs are commonly used.
Figure 10.19
Two methods of design are common: design using beam theory or design using a truss analogy
approach. In the former case the pile cap is treated as an inverted beam and is designed for the usual
conditions of bending and shear. The truss analogy method is used to determine the reinforcement
requirements where the span-to-depth ratio is less than 2 such that beam theory is not appropriate.