Methodology of Online Learning and Teaching
Hakan Tuzun
Indiana University, Bloomington
Introduction
Online learning, also known as Web-Based Instruction (WBI), and Internet-based
education, has become very popular world wide. Today, thousands of courses are
available online from different universities and for-profit institutions. These courses
include a wide range of topics ranging from basic subjects such as math and biology to
skill-based subjects such as programming languages and interpersonal skills. Many
educational and non-educational institutions offering traditional learning programs are
also beginning to exploit the Internet and World Wide Web (WWW) for reaching out to a
wider audience. This new medium gives rise to new issues and questions from the
perspectives of educators. One of the most important of these issues is the answer to this
question: what kind of methodology should be used in online learning? As educators,
should we keep on using the same methods that we use in traditional education, or should
we use more innovative methods?
What is Methodology?
In formal education system there is a curriculum (content) that needs to be learnt
by learners. The technique of learning or teaching this content is the method. Some
examples of methods are lectures, inquiry-based learning, project-based learning, and
problem-based learning. These different methods carry some inherent advantages and
disadvantages. For example, most educators use lecturing because it is practical time
wise. However, since lecturing is instructor-centered and it is usually carried one-way
(instructor to students), it becomes boring for learners and create motivational problems.
Over the years the method of teaching became more important than the content in
education, because the diffusion of communication and network technologies made a vast
amount of different content readily available to many people. As an example,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), one of the most prestigious universities in
the USA, announced in 2002 that it would make its entire curriculum freely available on
the Internet over the next ten years. In this way, the MIT showed that it was their method
of teaching, and not the content that was important in their education.
Traditional formal education is based upon a paradigm generally called
“knowledge reproduction model.” The methods used in this model are verbal lecture,
printed handouts, drill and practice sessions, structured classroom activities, and office
hours (Lightfoot, 2000). In this model, students are seen as passive learners. The purpose
of teaching is to transfer static body of knowledge from sources, like instructor and
books, to learners. On the other side, the research findings claim that all kinds of learning
are promoted when the methods of teaching favor active learning. For example, after a
literature review on this issue, Merrill (2002) identified that learning is promoted when
learners are engaged in solving real-world problems, when new knowledge is
demonstrated to the learner, and when new knowledge is applied by the learner.
Computer mediated communication and online learning in general support this
kind of active learning. According to Imel (1997) the most important distinguishing
characteristic of WBI is the emphasis on instruction and not just on information delivery.
For this reason, WBI should be designed by basing it upon the cognitive-based theories
of learning, where learners purposefully interact with the environment, solve real-world
problems, practice the knowledge, and thus become an active learner.
Active Learning Strategies in Online Learning
Multiple strategies can be used in an online course to support the active role of the
students. Among these different strategies the role of instructor, practicing the
knowledge, collaborative learning, and feedback are discussed below.
The role of instructor should be that of mentor or supporter
In online courses, instructors should not be talking heads like they used to be in
traditional courses. In this sense, presenting video clips of a lecturing instructor in an
online course as the only source of information is a bad practice. This leaves the learner
in a passive state. Such video clip resources can be utilized in a more active way. For
example, learners and instructors can participate in online chat discussions after watching
these video clip resources. In addition to facilitating online discussions, the instructors
might focus on students' learning. For example, they can send supporting e-mail
messages to encourage learner participation in course activities. The online learning
environments afford the opportunity to shift the role of instructors from “delivering” to
“listening and supporting” (Doubler, Grisham, & Paget, 2003).
Learners should practice what they learn
Bruner (1973) considers two kinds of knowledge in the learning process: knowledge as
detached, which is meaningless, and knowledge as a guide to purposeful action. Detached
knowledge is competence; when that knowledge is used for purposeful action it is
performance. For many people, knowledge is helpful when it is used in action. For
example, in an online course on basic accounting skills learners might learn basic
concepts such as planning, controlling, and decision making in business organizations;
however, their accounting skills does not improve until they use that knowledge in a
meaningful business-related project. In a similar way, Dewey (1938) advocated the
importance of experience in learning, which involves real-world participation. To
accomplish this strategy, learners might work on papers or participate in real-world
projects. These kinds of artifacts provide opportunities for learners for showing what they
have learnt in the course.
Learners should be provided collaborative learning opportunities
Recently, learning theories that emphasize collaborative learning are on the rise. For
example, the situated view gives importance to activity rather than knowing and
emphasizes the reciprocal character of the interaction through which individuals, as well
as cognition, are considered socially and culturally constructed (Barab & Plucker, 2002).
According to this view, the knowledge is distributed among people and their
environments including the objects, artifacts, tools, books, and the communities of which
they are a part. Therefore, learning depends not only on the individual but also on social
relations. Collaborative learning opportunities in online learning environments can
provide linkages among the factors of the context. Asynchronous communication modes
such as e-mail and threaded discussion groups, and synchronous communication modes
such as chat, instant messaging, and audio and video conferencing tools in an online
course can link remote participants. By using these modes, the remote learners can
participate in cooperative projects or papers.
The purpose of feedback should be to improve the learning process
Dewey (1916) points to the importance of trial and error in experiences; learners simply
do something and when they fail they do something else until it works. In traditional
learning environments, like schools, this phenomenon is not recognized and learners are
expected to perform above a standard in their first trial. Then their performances are
graded and that experience is considered to be concluded. On the contrary, an experience
that is improved over time encourages learners to come back to the learning context. The
projects or papers undertaken by students in online courses might be broken down into
several steps to facilitate this “layered” feedback mechanism.
Conclusion
The literature suggests that one of the biggest advantages of Web-based courses is
that they provide anytime and anywhere learning. It was argued in this paper that the
pedagogy of online courses should be driven by active learning strategies. Implementing
these strategies might not fit into the “anytime” and “anywhere” features of the Web-
based courses. For example, real-time collaboration of learners requires their arranging a
time and meeting in the online (or offline) space. Therefore, it is important to consider
other contextual factors of the online course along with the methodology of the course.
References
Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability,
and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning.
Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 165-182.
Bruner, J. S. (1973). The relevance of education. New York, NY: Norton.
Dewey, J. (1916/1966). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of
education. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Dewey, J. (1938/1963). Experience and education. New York, NY: The Macmillan
Publishing Company.
Doubler, S. J., Grisham, L., & Paget, K. F. (2003). Emerging faculty role: Teaching for
deep understanding online. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA.
(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 473 257)
Imel, S. (1997). Web-based training: Trends and issues alerts. (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED 414 446)
Lightfoot, J. M., (2000). Designing and implementing a “full-service” classpage on the
internet. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(1). 19-33.
Merrill, D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and
Development, 50(3), 43-59.
Biography
Hakan Tuzun received his Ph. D. in Instructional Systems Technology from
Indiana University. He also has a BA and M.S. in Computer Science, and an M.S. in
Instructional Technology.
His interests include the use of Information Technology, including computers and
the Internet, to improve human learning and performance. Towards this goal, he has been
involved with design, development, and evaluation of a number of educational products.
Recently, he is a designer, developer, and researcher in Quest Atlantis project
(http://www.QuestAtlantis.org). This is an educational computer game, which uses a 3D
multi-user virtual environment to improve learners’ motivation and learning.
His homepage is at http://mypage.iu.edu/~htuzun/ and he can be reached by e-
mail at
[email protected].