Performance Analysis of Wallace Tree Multiplier With Kogge Stone Adder Using 15-4 Compressor
Performance Analysis of Wallace Tree Multiplier With Kogge Stone Adder Using 15-4 Compressor
0904
A. 5-3 Compressor C. Final processing.
B2 ʹ = [A3.A2] (1)
B2=A0.[~(A0⊕A1)]+A2.(A0⊕A1)[A3.
(~(A0⊕A1⊕A2⊕A3))] + A4. [ A0⊕A1⊕A2⊕A3] (2)
B1=A0.[~(A0⊕A1)]+A2.(A0⊕A1)⊕[A3.
(~(A0⊕A1⊕A2⊕A3))] + A4. [ A0⊕A1⊕A2⊕A3] (3)
B0=[A0⊕A1⊕A2⊕A3⊕A4] (4)
0905
IV. SIMULATION RESULT
The design of approximate16 bit Wallace multiplier using
15-4 compressor has been done in HDL, using Xilinx ISE
14.5. Simulation results show the design of overall architecture
of Wallace tree multiplier as shown in Fig. 7. The parameters
of area are utilized by the multiplier design and power
consumption are obtained through simulation and tabulated in
Table I and Table II. The snapshot of delay obtained through Fig. 8. Delay analysis of 16×16bit Wallace tree multiplier
simulation is shown in Fig. 8. The processing delay at the end TABLE III
of addition level can be reduced by using kogge stone adder. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF MULTIPLIER
SI.NO Types of Area Power Delay
Multiplier (μm2) (μw) (ns)
1 16×16bit 5066.2 563.2 4.24
multiplier 0
using Accurate
15-4
compressor
2 16×16bit 5159.3 557.2 4.24
multiplier
using 15-4
compressor
with 4-bit
parallel adder
3 16×16bit 1570 420 3.125
multiplier
using 15-4
compressor
with kogge
stone adder
Fig. 7. Overall Architecture Of 16×16 Bit Wallace Tree Multiplier
The performance of 15-4 compressor based approximate
Table I and II describes the area utilization and power 16×16 multiplier is also compared with various adders at the
parameters of a 16-bit Wallace multiplier. It shows better final stage instead of Kogge stone adder. The comparative
result than other adder apart from that it gives less area and results in terms of reduced delay, area and power dissipation
low propagation delay. are tabulated in Table III.
TABLE I
DEVICE UTILIZATION OF 16×16 WALLACE TREE MULTIPLIER
V. CONCLUSION
The approximate 16×16bit Wallace tree multiplier using 15-
4 compressor architecture has been designed and synthesized
using on Spartan 3 XC3S100E board and simulated in Xilinx
ISE 14.5. The performance of proposed Multiplier with kogge
stone adder is compared with the same architecture of
multiplier using parallel adder. It can be inferred that 16×16
multiplier architecture using 15-4 compressor with kogge
stone adder is faster compared to multiplier with parallel
TABLE II adder. In future the performance of the proposed multiplier can
POWER ANALYSIS OF 16×16 WALLACE TREE MULTIPLIER be improved and applied in applications like video and image
processing.
REFERENCES
[1] C. S. Wallace, A Suggestion for a Fast Multiplier, IEEE Transactions on
Computers, 13, 1964,14-17.
[2] K. Bhardwaj, P. S. Mane, and J. Henkel, ‘‘Power-and area-efficient
approximate Wallace tree multiplier for error-resilient systems,’’in
Proc.15thInt. Symp. Quality Electron. Design (ISQED), Mar. 2014, pp.
263–269.
0906
[3] C.-H. Lin and I.-C. Lin, ‘‘High accuracy approximate multiplier with of approximate compressors for multiplication,” IEEE Trans. Comput.,
error correction,’’ in Proc. IEEE 31st Int. Conf. Comput. Design vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 984–994, Apr. 2015.
(ICCD), Oct. 2013, pp. 33–38 [8] Teffi Francis, Tera Joseph and Jobin K Antony., “Modified MAC Unit
[4] D. R. Gandhi, and N. N. Shah, Comparative Analysis for Hardware for low power high speed DSP application using multiplier with
Circuit Architecture of Wallace Tree Multiplier, IEEE International bypassing technique and optimized adders”, IEEE-31661, 4th ICCCNT,
Conference on Intelligent Systems and Signal Processing, Gujarat, 2013, 2013.
1-6. [9] Yezerla, Sudheer Kumar, and B. Rajendra Naik. "Design and
[5] R. Menon and D. Radhakrishnan, ‘‘High performance 5:2 compressor Estimation of delay, power and area for Parallel prefix adders." In
architectures,’’ Proc. IEE-Circuits, Devices Syst., vol. 153, no. 5, pp. Engineering and Computational Sciences (RAECS), 2014 Recent
447–452, Oct. 2006 Advances in, pp. 1-6. IEEE, 2014.
[6] R. Marimuthu, M. Pradeepkumar, D. Bansal, S. Balamurugan, and P. S. [10] Y. Choi, “Parallel Prefix Adder Design” Proc. 17th IEEE Symposium on
Mallick, ‘‘Design of high speed and low power 15-4 compressor,’’ in Computer Arithmetic, pp 90-98, 27th June 2005.
Proc. Int. Conf. Commun. Signal Process. (ICCSP), Apr. 2013, pp. 533– [11] Belle W. Y. Wei and Clark D. Thompson, “Area-Time Optimal Adder
536. Design”, IEEE transactions on Computers, vol.39, pp. 666-675,
[7] Momeni, J. Han, P. Montuschi, and F. Lombardi, “Design and analysis May1990.
0907