0% found this document useful (0 votes)
135 views27 pages

Building Block Approach To Simulated Structural Corrosion Testing

The document proposes a new building block approach to simulated structural corrosion testing. The approach involves developing test specimens made of generic structural components like skins, stiffeners, and fasteners with various corrosion protection systems. The specimens would undergo both fatigue loading and outdoor environmental exposure testing to simulate actual aircraft usage conditions. Regular inspections using visual, NDE, and complete disassembly techniques would evaluate corrosion damage accumulation. The goal is to produce test results similar to long-term aircraft corrosion in a more accelerated timeframe to help evaluate new materials and coatings for corrosion resistance.

Uploaded by

puhumight
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
135 views27 pages

Building Block Approach To Simulated Structural Corrosion Testing

The document proposes a new building block approach to simulated structural corrosion testing. The approach involves developing test specimens made of generic structural components like skins, stiffeners, and fasteners with various corrosion protection systems. The specimens would undergo both fatigue loading and outdoor environmental exposure testing to simulate actual aircraft usage conditions. Regular inspections using visual, NDE, and complete disassembly techniques would evaluate corrosion damage accumulation. The goal is to produce test results similar to long-term aircraft corrosion in a more accelerated timeframe to help evaluate new materials and coatings for corrosion resistance.

Uploaded by

puhumight
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 27

Building Block

Approach to
Simulated Structural
Corrosion Testing

29 November 2012

Steven R. Thompson
AFRL/RXS
Systems Support Division
Integrity  Service  Excellence Air Force Research Laboratory

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 1
Co-Authors
Mike Spicer (AFRL/RXSS)
Ed Hermes (AFRL/RXS)
Chad Hunter (AFRL/RXSC)
Kumar Jata (AFRL/RXCM)
Nick Jacobs (UDRI)

Acknowledgements
Larry Perkins (AFRL/RXS)
Larry Butkus (AFRL/RXSA)
Rick Reams (AFLCMC/EZFS)
Howard Garcia (AFLCMC/EZFS)
Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 2
Corrosion Gaps
Science & Technology
• DoD Corrosion Gap Analysis Meeting
– Gaps Identified by Chuck Babish (AFLCMC/EZ)
• Ability to translate top-level service life (hours and years in
service) and sustainment requirements into selection of
materials, finish systems, etc. that withstands competing
pressures during design
• Well defined and agreed-to accelerated test methods and
accept/reject criteria for corrosion evaluation for a range of
environments and service life requirements
• DoD-wide evaluation & recommendation/approval for cross-
cutting material substitutions, process changes, such as:
– Material substitutions: chromated primer, chromic acid anodize,
chrome plating, cadmium plating
– Process changes: paint removal (chemical, plastic media, laser,
etc.)

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 3
Corrosion Gaps
Metrics

• DoD-level standards to decompose system level requirements


into measurable and verifiable corrosion metrics
• Knowledge and data to enable credible & convincing business
case and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) analyses for any trade studies
involving corrosion prevention & control such as:
– Pre-coated vs. wet-installed fasteners vs. both
– Pre-coated vs. faying surface and/or edge seals
– Whether or not to top-coat in corrosion-prone internal locations
– Changes to depot induction frequency
– Changes from field to depot-level corrosion inspection & repairs

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 4
Design & Material Qualification
Today
B117

UV (5 systems)
Old New (10 systems)

6 months – 1 3-6
coupons year gloss years
Spectral
Adhesion

• Most aspects of the systems are • Accelerated laboratory (2 systems) 3-10 years
usually included: testing in controlled
− Material type/heat treatment conditions:
− Anodize − Chemical resistance
− Clad − Strip-ability
− Cleaning − Environmental degradation
− Activation − Damage tolerance
− Thickness − Etc.
− Application technique • Outdoor Exposure testing
− Etc. used to address shortfalls of
laboratory testing
Flight test limited number
Simply picks best options for conditions tested. of aircraft
Cannot predict time to failure, estimate cost,
evaluate risk, etc.
Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 5
Design & Material Qualification
Where We Want To Go
New Performance Specialty Repair/
Materials Coatings Maintenance
Cost
Life Regulations NDE Usage
Extension

Integrated
Corrosion
Damage Model Life Cycle
Design Trades
Management

Technology Needs

Integrated Computational
Materials Science &
Engineering (ICMSE)
Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 6
Objective

Need: Test protocol to assess


corrosion effects on realistic structural
details in realistic environments.

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 7
The Plan
• Development of a new test methodology
– Specimen
• Generic structural component
– Skins, stiffeners, splice plates, fasteners, etc.
• Corrosion protection systems
– Primers, top coats, anodization, sealants, corrosion preventive compounds
(CPC’s), etc.
– Simulated Usage
• Fatigue loading
• Outdoor exposure environment
– Inspections
• Visual
• NDE (radiographic and ultrasonic)
• Some specimens to be completely disassembled for thorough
evaluation
• Goal: Demonstrate that the test specimen can produce similar
results to actual aircraft usage corrosion

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 8
Specimen Design Initial Proof- Design of
Optimization of-Concept Experiments

Alloys Alloys
Loads
Modeling Fasteners Fasteners
-Fuselage
Pressurization Coating Systems Coating Systems
Hoop Stress
Loads Loads
ASTM B-117
Environments
Environment

Test Matrix Execution

Specimen
Fabrication

Loads
Application Estimated Test Durations
Proof of Concept:
Environmental ~ 12 weeks for full exposure
Exposure
Inspect every 3 weeks
Inspection
D.O.E:
~ 2 years for full exposure
Repeat? Inspect every quarter

Tech Document
Report JTP
Results
Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 9
Test Specimen Design

Skins

Stiffener

Fasteners
Splice Plate

• Other specimen configurations are possible!


• Potential for a “library” of generic configurations.
Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 10
Test Specimen Design

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 11
Test Matrix Development

• Initial proof-of-concept
– Fixed set of materials/fasteners/protection
schemes
– Intent is to ensure we can produce “failures”
– Will utilize ASTM B117 chamber for accelerated
testing, rather than outdoor exposure
– Useful for establishing an inspection procedure

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 12
Test Matrix Development

• Design of Experiments
– Skin alloys
– Stiffener alloys
– Splice plate alloys
– Fastener type
– Fastener alloy
– Corrosion protection scheme
– Loads
– Environments
– Maintenance Procedures

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 13
Test Matrix Development

• Design of Experiments 2XXX Aluminum


7XXX Aluminum
– Skin alloys
– Stiffener alloys Single Side Clad
Double Side Clad
– Splice plate alloys Unclad
– Fastener type
– Fastener alloy
– Corrosion protection scheme
– Loads
– Environments
– Maintenance Procedures

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 14
Test Matrix Development

• Design of Experiments
– Skin alloys 2XXX Aluminum
7XXX Aluminum
– Stiffener alloys
Composite
– Splice plate alloys Fiber Metal Laminate
– Fastener type
– Fastener alloy
– Corrosion protection scheme
– Loads
– Environments
– Maintenance Procedures

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 15
Test Matrix Development

• Design of Experiments
– Skin alloys
2XXX Aluminum
– Stiffener alloys 7XXX Aluminum
– Splice plate alloys Steel
Titanium
– Fastener type Composite
Fiber Metal Laminate
– Fastener alloy
– Corrosion protection scheme
– Loads
– Environments
– Maintenance Procedures

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 16
Test Matrix Development

• Design of Experiments
– Skin alloys
– Stiffener alloys
– Splice plate alloys Neat Fit
Interference Fit
– Fastener type Cold-worked Hole
Wet install
– Fastener alloy Dry install
– Corrosion protection scheme
– Loads
– Environments
– Maintenance Procedures

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 17
Test Matrix Development

• Design of Experiments
– Skin alloys
– Stiffener alloys
– Splice plate alloys
– Fastener type
Aluminum
– Fastener alloy Steel
Titanium
– Corrosion protection scheme
– Loads
– Environments
– Maintenance Procedures

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 18
Test Matrix Development

• Design of Experiments
– Skin alloys
– Stiffener alloys
– Splice plate alloys
– Fastener type
– Fastener alloy Anodization
Primer Coat
– Corrosion protection scheme Top Coat
Sealants
– Loads CPC’s
– Environments
– Maintenance Procedures

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 19
Test Matrix Development

• Design of Experiments
– Skin alloys
– Stiffener alloys
– Splice plate alloys
– Fastener type
– Fastener alloy
Constant Amplitude
– Corrosion protection scheme Spectrum
– Loads Axial
– Environments Flexural (bending)
Torsional
– Maintenance Procedures

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 20
Test Matrix Development

• Design of Experiments
– Skin alloys
– Stiffener alloys
– Splice plate alloys
– Fastener type
– Fastener alloy
– Corrosion protection scheme
– Loads Location of Outdoor Exposure
– Environments Covered
Exposed
– Maintenance Procedures

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 21
Test Matrix Development

• Design of Experiments
– Skin alloys
– Stiffener alloys
– Splice plate alloys
– Fastener type
– Fastener alloy
– Corrosion protection scheme
– Loads
– Environments
Cleaning processes
– Maintenance Procedures Depainting

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 22
Test Matrix Development

• Design of Experiments
– Skin alloys
– Stiffener alloys
Goal is to create a test
– Splice plate alloys matrix that can capture
– Fastener type sufficient elements of the
variables at left in order to
– Fastener alloy make a reasonable
– Corrosion protection scheme assessment of the
potential for corrosion.
– Loads
– Environments
– Maintenance Procedures

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 23
Process Steps

• Construct specimen using typical structures


fabrication methodologies
– Includes coating systems and sealants
• Fatigue specimens
– One “control” specimen per group will not be cycled
• Expose specimens to environment
– One fatigued specimen per group will not be exposed
• After exposure duration time has been reached,
bring back to lab for inspection
– One specimen in group will be disassembled
• After inspection/documentation of results, repeat
fatigue, exposure, and inspection steps
Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 24
Future Efforts

• If program is successful:
– Test protocol available for use across industry
– Additional test coupon designs can be created for
specific purposes
– Results of the program will be available for
verification/validation of predictive modeling tools
that are in development
– Methodology will be available for
verification/validation of accelerated testing
methods that are in development

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 25
Summary

• Program success = demonstrating that the


test specimen can produce similar results to
actual aircraft usage corrosion
• Use of outdoor exposure is most relevant
environment at this point
– Parallel in-house programs are looking at ways to
better simulate outdoor exposure
• Quantity of specimens to be tested is TBD
– Program is scheduled for 3 years initially

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 26
Questions?

Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. (88ABW-2012-6006 09 Nov 2012) 27

You might also like