Quadratic Forms and Definite Matrices: Q X Ax (X ... X A X X A X
Quadratic Forms and Definite Matrices: Q X Ax (X ... X A X X A X
1.1. Definition of a quadratic form. Let A denote an n x n symmetric matrix with real entries and
let x denote an n x 1 column vector. Then Q = x’Ax is said to be a quadratic form. Note that
a11 · · · a1n
.. .. x1
Q = x´Ax = (x1 ...xn) ..
xn
a
P n1 · · · a
nn
a1ixi
.
.
= (x1, x2, · · · , xn)
P.
anixi
(1)
= a11x21 + a12x1x2 + ... + a1nx1 xn
+ a21x2 x1 + a22x22 + ... + a2nx2 xn
+ ...
+ ...
+ ...
2
+ aPn1 xn x1 + an2 xn x2 + ... + ann xn
= i ≤ j aij xi xj
1.2. Classification of the quadratic form Q = x0Ax: A quadratic form is said to be:
a: negative definite: Q < 0 when x 6= 0
b: negative semidefinite: Q ≤ 0 for all x and Q = 0 for some x 6= 0
c: positive definite: Q > 0 when x 6= 0
d: positive semidefinite: Q ≥ 0 for all x and Q = 0 for some x 6= 0
e: indefinite: Q > 0 for some x and Q < 0 for some other x
Consider as an example the 3x3 diagonal matrix D below and a general 3 element vector x.
1 0 0
D= 0 2 0
0 0 4
The general quadratic form is given by
1 0 0 x1
Q = x0A x = [x1 x2 x3] 0 2 0 x2
0 0 4 x3
x1
= [x1 2 x2 4 x3 ] x2
x3
= x21 + 2 x22 + 4 x23
Note that for any real vector x 6= 0, that Q will be positive, because the square of any number
is positive, the coefficients of the squared terms are positive and the sum of positive numbers is
always positive. Also consider the following matrix.
−2 1 0
E = 1 −2 0
0 0 −2
The general quadratic form is given by
−2 1 0 x1
Q = x0A x = [x1 x2 x3 ] 1 −2 0 x2
0 0 −2 x3
x1
= [−2 x1 + x2 x1 − 2 x2 − 2 x3] x2
x3
= −2 x21 + x1 x2 + x1 x2 − 2 x22 − 2 x23
= −2 x21 + 2 x1 x2 − 2 x22 − 2 x23
= −2 [x21 − x1 x2] − 2 x22 − 2 x23
= −2 x21 − 2[x22 − x1 x2] − 2 x23
Note that independent of the value of x3 , this will be negative if x1 and x2 are of opposite sign
or equal to one another. Now consider the case where |x1| > |x2|. Write Q as
1.3. Graphical analysis. When x has only two elements, we can graphically represent Q in 3 di-
mensions. A positive definite quadratic form will always be positive except at the point where x
= 0. This gives a nice graphical representation where the plane at x = 0 bounds the function from
below. Figure 1 shows a positive definite quadratic form.
400
Q
200
0
-10
-5
0
x1 5
10
Similarly, a negative definite quadratic form is bounded above by the plane x = 0. Figure 2 shows
a negative definite quadratic form.
4 QUADRATIC FORMS AND DEFINITE MATRICES
A positive semi-definite quadratic form is bounded below by the plane x = 0 but will touch the
plane at more than the single point (0,0), it will touch the plane along a line. Figure 3 shows a
positive semi-definite quadratic form.
A negative semi-definite quadratic form is bounded above by the plane x = 0 but will touch the
plane at more than the single point (0,0). It will touch the plane along a line. Figure 4 shows a
negative-definite quadratic form.
An indefinite quadratic form will not lie completely above or below the plane but will lie above
for some values of x and below for other values of x. Figure 5 shows an indefinite quadratic form.
1.4. Note on symmetry. The matrix associated with a quadratic form B need not be symmetric.
However, no loss of generality is obtained by assuming B is symmetric. We can always take definite
and semidefinite matrices to be symmetric since they are defined by a quadratic form. Specifically
consider a nonsymmetric matrix B and define A as 12 (B + B 0 ), A is now symmetric and x0 Ax =
x0Bx.
2.1. Definitions of definite and semi-definite matrices. Let A be a square matrix of order n and
let x be an n element vector. Then A is said to be positive semidefinite iff for all vectors x
QUADRATIC FORMS AND DEFINITE MATRICES 5
100
75
Q
50
25
0
-5 0 5
x1
-25
-50
Q
-75
-100
0 5
-5
x1
x0Ax ≥ 0 (2)
The matrix A is said to be positive definite if for non zero x
x0 Ax > 0 (3)
6 QUADRATIC FORMS AND DEFINITE MATRICES
50
0
Q
-50
-5 0 5
x1
Let A be a square matrix of order n. Then A is said to be negative (semi)definite iff -A is positive
(semi)definite.
aii ≥ 0, i = 1, 2, ..., m.
Proof. Let e·i be the m-element vector all of whose elements are zeros save the ith, which is unity.
For example if m = 5 and i = 2 then e. 2 = [0, 1, 0, 0, 0 ] If A is positive definite, because e·i is not
the null vector, we must have
Theorem 2. Let A be a positive definite matrix of order n. Then there exists a lower triangular matrix T
such that
A = TT0 (7)
t11 0 0 ··· 0 t11 t21 t31 ··· tn1
t21 t22 0 ··· 0 0 t22 t32 ··· tn2
t31 t32 t33 ··· 0 0 0 t33 ··· tn3
T T´ =
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
. . . . . . . . . .
tn1 tn2 tn3 ··· tnn 0 0 0 ··· tnn
t211 t11t21 t11 t31 ··· t11tn1
t21t11 t221 + t222 t21t31 + t22t32 ··· t21tn1 + t22tn2
t231 + t232 + t233
= t31t11 t31t21 + t32t22 ··· t31tn1 + t32tn2 + t33tn3 (9)
.. .. .. .. ..
. . . . .
tn1t11 tn1t21 + tn2t22 tn1 t31 + tn2 t32 + tn3 t33 ··· Σn 2
i=1 tni
A =T T´
a11 a12 a13 ··· a1n
a21 a22 a23 ··· a2n
⇒ a31 a32 a33 ··· a3n =
.. .. .. .. ..
. . . . .
an12 an2 an3 · · · ann (10)
t11 t11t21 t11t31 ··· t11tn1
t21 t11 t 2 2
21 + t22 t21t31 + t22t32 ··· t21tn1 + t22tn2
t31 t11 t31t21 + t32t22 t231 + t232 + t233 ··· t31tn1 + t32tn2 + t33tn3
.. .. .. .. ..
. . . . .
tn1 t11 tn1t21 + tn2t22 tn1t31 + tn2t32 + tn3t33 ··· Σn 2
i=1 tni
Solve the system now for each tij as functions of the aij . The system is obviously recursive
because we can solve first for t11, then t21, etc. A schematic algorithm is given below.
8 QUADRATIC FORMS AND DEFINITE MATRICES
Theorem 5. If A in the above theorem is merely positive semidefinite then r(A) < n.
Proof. Because A is positive semidefinite, we know that λi ≥ 0, i = 1,2, ..., n. The proof is based on
showing that at least one of the roots is zero. We can diagonalize A as
Q0AQ = Λ. (13)
Consequently, for any vector y,
y0 Q0AQy = Σn 2
i=1 λi yi . (14)
Now, if x is any nonnull vector, by the semidefiniteness of A we have
y = Q0 x. (16)
Because x is nonnull then y is also nonnull, because Q is orthogonal and thus non-singular.
x0 Ax = Σn 2
i=1 λi yi = 0. (18)
But this shows that
A = S 0 S.
It is positive semidefinite if and only if
r(S) < m.
Proof. (Dhrymes [1, Proposition 2.61] or Horn and Johnson [4]). If A is positive (semi)definite then,
as in the proof of theorem 56, we have the representation
A = QΛQ0.
Here Q is an orthonormal set of eigenvectors and Λ is a diagonal matrix with the eigenvalues of
A on the diagonal. Taking
S = Λ1/2Q0
we have
10 QUADRATIC FORMS AND DEFINITE MATRICES
A = S 0 S.
If A is positive definite, Λ is nonsingular and thus
r(S) = m.
If A is merely positive semidefinite then r(Λ) < m and hence
r(S) < m.
This proves the first part of the theorem.
A = S0S (20)
and S is n x m matrix (n ≥ m) of rank m. Let x be any nonnull vector and note
x0 Ax = xS 0 Sx. (21)
The right side of the equation above is a sum of squares and thus is zero if and only if
Sx = 0. (22)
If the rank of S is m, equation 22 can be satisfied only with null x. Hence A is positive definite.
So for any x
x0 Ax = x0S 0 Sx ≥ 0,
and if S is of rank less than m, there exists at least one nonnull x such that
Sx = 0.
Consequently, there exists at least one nonnull x such that
x0 Ax = 0.
which shows that A is positive semidefinite but not positive definite.
2.7. Using naturally ordered principal minors to test for positive definiteness.
2.7.1. Definition of naturally ordered (leading) principal minors. The naturally ordered principle mi-
nors of a matrix A are defined as determinants of the matrices
a11 a12 ··· a1k
a21 a22 ··· a2k
.. .. .. k = 1, 2, ..., n. (23)
. . .
ak1 ak2 ··· akk
A principal minor is the minor of a principal submatrix of A where a principal submatrix is a
matrix formed from a square matrix A by taking a subset consisting of n rows and column elements
from the same numbered columns. The natural ordering considers only those principal minors that
fall along the main diagonal. Specifically for a matrix A, the naturally ordered principal minors are
QUADRATIC FORMS AND DEFINITE MATRICES 11
a11 a12 ··· a1n
a11
a a12 a13 a21 a22 ··· a2n
a12
a11 , 11 , a21
a22 a23 , ···
.. .. .. (24)
a21 a22 a31 . . .
a32 a33
an1 an2 ··· ann
or schematically
Theorem 7. Let A be a symmetric matrix of order m. Then A is positive definite iff its naturally ordered
principal minors are all positive.
For a proof, see Gantmacher [2, p. 306] or Hadley [3, p. 260-262].
4 2 0
G1 = 2 9 0 .
0 0 2
Element a11 = 4 > 0. Now consider the first naturally occurring principal 2x2 submatrix
4 2
= 36 − 4 = 32 > 0.
2 9
Now consider the determinant of the entire matrix
4 2 0
2 9 0 = (4)(9)(2) + (2) (0) (0) + (2) (0) (0) − (9) (0) (0) − (2) (2) (2) − (4) (0) (0) =
0 0 2
= 72 + 0 + 0 − 0 − 8 − 0 = 64 > 0
This matrix is then positive definite.
2.8. Characteristic roots of positive semi-definite matrices. Let A be a symmetric matrix of order
n. Let λi , i=1,...,n be its characteristic roots. If A is positive semi-definite then
2.9. Using principal minors to test for positive definiteness and positive semidefiniteness.
2.9.1. Definition of principal minors. A principal minor of order r is defined as the determinant of a
principal submatrix. A principal submatrix is defined as follows. If A is a matrix of order n, and
we wipe out r of the rows and the corresponding r columns as well, the resulting (n-r) x (n-r)
submatrix is called a principal submatrix of A. The determinant of this matrix is called a principal
minor of A. Another way to write a principal minor of order p is
ai1 i1 , ai1 i2 , · · · ai1 ip
ai2 i1 , ai2 i2 , · · · ai2 ip
i1 , i2 , i3 , ..., ip
A = .. (25)
i1 , i2 , i3 , ..., ip .
ai i , ai i ··· aip ip
p 1 p 2
As an example, consider the following matrix of order 3 which has 1 principal minor of order 3,
3 principal minors of order 2,
3 3! (3) (2) 6
= = = = 3
2 2! (3 − 2)! (1) (2) (1) (1) 2
and 3 principle minors of order 1 for a total of 7 principal minors.
4 2 0
G = 2 9 0 .
0 0 2
4 2 0
Order 3 2 9 0 .
0 0 2
4 2 4 0 9 0
Order 2
0 2
0 2
2 9
Order 1 4 2 9
Now consider the general 4x4 matrix A and some of its principal minors
a11 a12 a13 a14
a11 a12 a14
a21 a22 a23 a24
A = a31 a32 a33 a34
A 1 2 4 = a21 a22 a24
124
a41 a42 a44
a41 a42 a43 a44 (26)
a a13 a a24
A 13
= 11 A 24
= 22 A 3
= a33
13 a31 a33 24 a42 a44 3
2.9.2. A test for for positive definiteness and positive semidefiniteness using principle minors.
Theorem 8. A matrix A is positive semidefinite iff all the principal minors of A are non-negative.
For a proof see Gantmacher [2, p. 307].
These are all positive and so we pass the 2x2 test. Now consider the determinant of the entire
matrix
14 QUADRATIC FORMS AND DEFINITE MATRICES
2 0 2
0 4 4 = (2)(4)(6) + (0) (4) (2) + (2) (4) (0) − (2) (4) (2) − (4) (4) (2) − (6) (0) (0) =
2 4 6
= 48 + 0 + 0 − 16 − 32 − 0 = 0
This determinant is zero and so the matrix is positive semidefinite but not positive definite.
2.9.3. Some characteristics of negative semidefinite matrices. The results on positive definite and posi-
tive semidefinite matrices have counterparts for negative definite and semidefinite matrices.
a: A negative semidefinite matrix is negative definite only if it is non-singular.
b: Let A be a negative definite matrix of order m. Then
aii < 0 i = 1, ..., m
c: If A is only negative semidefinite then
aii ≤ 0 i = 1, ..., m.
d: Let A be a symmetric matrix of order m. Then A is negative definite iff its naturally or-
dered (leading)principal minors alternate in sign starting with a negative number.
The naturally ordered principle minors of a matrix A are defined as determinants of
matrices
a11 a12 · · · a1k
a21 a22 · · · a2k
.. .. .. k = 1, 2, ..., m. (27)
. . .
ak1 ak2 · · · akk
As an example consider the matrix
−2 1 0
E = 1 −2 0
0 0 −2
Element a11 = -2 < 0. Now consider the first naturally occurring principal 2x2 submatrix
−2 1
1 −2 = 4 − 1 = 3 > 0.
Now consider the determinant of the entire matrix
−2 1 0
1 −2 0 = (−2)(−2)(−2) + (1) (0) (0) + (1) (0) (0) − (−2) (0) (0) − (−2) (0) (0) − (−2) (1) (1)
0 0 −2
= −8 + 0 + 0 − 0 − 0 + 2 = −6 < 0
This matrix is then negative definite.
e: Let A be a symmetric matrix of order m. A is negative semidefinite iff the following in-
equalities hold:
i , i2 , · · · , ip
(−1)p A 1 ≥0 (28)
i 1 , i2 , · · · , ip
[1 ≤ i1 ≤ i2 ≤, · · · , ≤ ip ≤ m, p = 1, 2, ..., m]
QUADRATIC FORMS AND DEFINITE MATRICES 15
Here A ( ) is the determinant of the submatrix of A with p rows and columns of A, i.e.,
it is a principle minor of A.
ai1 i1 ai1 i2 ···
i1 , i2 , ..., ip ai2 i1 ai2 i2 ···
A = . .. (29)
i1 , i2 , ..., ip .. .
ai i aip i2 ···
p 1
For a 3x3 matrix this means that all the diagonal elements are non-positive, all 2x2 prin-
cipal minors are non-negative and the determinant of the matrix is non-positive. Consider
as an example the matrix G3
−2 1 −1
G3 = 1 −2 −1 .
−1 −1 −2
The diagonal elements are all negative so the 1x1 test is passed. Now consider the
principal 2x2 minors
−2 1 −2 −1
= 4 − 1 = 3 > 0 = 4 − 1 = 3 > 0 −2 −1 = 4−1 = 3 > 0 .
1 −2 −1 −2 −1 −2
These are all positive and so we pass the 2x2 test. Now consider the determinant of the
entire matrix
−2 1 −1
|G3| = 1 −2 −1
−1 −1 −2
λi < 0 i = 1, 2, ..., m
g: Characteristic roots of negative semi-definite matrices.
Let A be a symmetric matrix of order m and let λi , i = 1,...,m be its real characteristic
roots. If A is negative semi-definite then
2.10. Example problems. Determine whether the following matrices are positive definite, positive
semidefinite,
negative definite,
negative semidefinite, or indefinite.
−2 0 −1
A = 0 −2 −1
−2 −4 −3
−2 4 −1
B= 4 −2 −1
−1 −1 −2
2 1 −1
C= 1 4 −2
−1 −2 4
2 −1 3
D = −1 5 3
3 3 9
−2 1 −1
E= 1 −3 −2
−1 −2 −5
3.1. Restatement of second order conditions for optimization problems with 2 variables.
Theorem 9. Suppose that f(x1, x2) and its first and second partial derivatives are continuous throughout a
∂f ∂f
disk centered at (a, b) and that ∂x 1
(a, b) = ∂x 2
(a, b) = 0 . Then
2 2 2
h 2 i2
a: f has a local maximum at (a, b) if ∂∂xf2 (a, b) < 0 and ∂∂xf2 ∂∂xf2 − ∂x∂1 ∂x
f
2
> 0 at (a, b).
1 1 2
We can also write this as f11 < 0 and f11 f22 − f122 > 0 at (a, b).
h i2
∂ 2f ∂2f ∂2f ∂2f
b: f has a local minimum at (a, b) if ∂x21
(a, b) > 0 and ∂x21 ∂x22
− ∂x1 ∂x2 > 0 at (a, b).
We can also write this as f11 > 0 and f11 f22 − f122 > 0 at (a, b).
2 2
h 2 i2
c: f has a saddle point at (a, b) if ∂∂xf2 ∂∂xf2 − ∂x∂1 ∂x
f
2
< 0 at (a, b). We can also write this as
1 2
f11 f22 − f122 < 0 at (a, b).
2 2
h 2 i2
d: The test is inconclusive at (a, b) if ∂∂xf2 ∂∂xf2 − ∂x∂1 ∂x
f
2
= 0 at (a, b). If this case we must
1 2
find some other way to determine the behavior of f at (a, b).
2 2
h 2 i2
The expression ∂∂xf2 ∂∂xf2 − ∂x∂1 ∂x
f
2
is called the discriminant of f.
1 2
3.2. Expressing the second order conditions in terms of the definiteness of the Hessian of the
objective function.
QUADRATIC FORMS AND DEFINITE MATRICES 17
3.2.1. Second order conditions for a local maximum. The Hessian of a function f is the nxn matrix of
second order partial derivatives, that is
f11 f12 · · · f1n
f21 f22 · · · f2n
|H| = . .. .. .. (30)
.. . . .
fn1 fn2 · · · fnn
We can write the discriminant condition as the determinant of the Hessian of the objective func-
tion f when there are just 2 variables in the function as
2
∂2f ∂2f ∂2f f11 f12
− = = |H| (31)
∂x21 ∂x22 ∂x1 ∂x2 f21 f22
The second order condition for a local maximum is then that
f11 f12
f11 < 0 and > 0
f21 f22
which is just the condition that H is negative definite.
3.2.2. Second order conditions for a local minimum. The second order condition for a local minimum
is that
f f12
f11 > 0 and 11 > 0
f21 f22
which is just the condition that H is positive definite.
3.2.3. Extension of condition on Hessian to more than two variables. The second order conditions, for
local maxima and minima based on the sign of f11 and the discriminant written in terms of whether
the Hessian of the objective function is positive or negative, extend to problems involving objective
functions with more than 2 variables.
4.1. Definition of concavity. Let S be a nonempty convex set in Rn.. The function f: S → R1 is said
to be concave on S if f(λx1 + (1-λ)x2) ≥ λf(x1 ) + (1-λ)(x2) for each x1 , x2 ∈ S and for each λ ∈ [0, 1].
The function f is said to be strictly concave if the above inequality holds as a strict inequality for
each distinct x1 x2 ∈ S and for each λ ∈ (0, 1).
f: Let f be twice differentiable. Then if the Hessian H(x) is negative definite for each x ∈
S, f is strictly concave. Further if f is strictly concave, then the Hessian H(x) is negative
semidefinite for each x ∈ S.
g: Every local maximum of f over a convex set W ⊆ S is a global maximum.
h: If f 0 (x̄) = 0 for a concave function then, x̄ is the global maximum of f over S.
4.3. Definition of convexity. Let S be a nonempty convex set in Rn. . The function f: S → R1 is said
to be convex on S if f ( λ x1 + (1 − λ) x2) ≤ λ f (x1 ) + (1 − λ )f ( x2 ) for each x1 , x2 ∈ S and for
each λ ∈ [0, 1]. The function f is said to be strictly convex if the above inequality holds as a strict
inequality for each distinct x1 , x2 , ∈ S and for each λ ∈ (0, 1).
5.1. Definition of a quadratic form with linear constraints. Let the quadratic form be given by
a11 · · · a1n
.. .. x1
Q = x´Ax = (x1...xn) .. (32)
xn
an1 · · · ann
x0 B = 0
b11 b12 ··· b1m 0
b21 b22 ··· b2m 0 (33)
(x1 x2 · · · xn) .. .. = ..
. . .
bn1 bn2 ··· bnm 0
QUADRATIC FORMS AND DEFINITE MATRICES 19
20
0
Q
-20
-5 5
-2.5 2.5
0 0
2.5 -2.5
5 -5
x1 x2
50
Q 0
-50
-4 4
-2 2
0 0
2 -2
4 -4
x1 x2
If we combine figure 8 with the plane divding the positive and negative orthants, the positive
definiteness of the quadratic from subject to the constraint is even more obvious as shown in figure
9.
50
0 Q
-50
-5 5
-2.5 2.5
0 0
2.5 -2.5
5 -5
x1 x2
Now along the set of points where x1 = x2 , the function is always positive except where x1 = x2
= 0. So this function is positive definite subject to the constraint that x1 = x2 .
5.3. Definition of a bordered matrix with constraints. Define the bordered matrix HB as follows
QUADRATIC FORMS AND DEFINITE MATRICES 21
a11 a12 ··· a1n | b11 b12 ··· b1m
a21 a22 ··· a2n | b21 b22 ··· b2m
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
. . . . . . . . .
an1 an2 ··· ann | bn1 bn2 ··· bnm
..
HB = . (36)
b11 b21 ··· bn1 | 0 0 ··· 0
b12 b22 ··· bn2 | 0 0 ··· 0
. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. . . . . . . . .
b1m b2m ··· bnm | 0 0 ··· 0
On the right of the A matrix we append the columns of the B matrix. If there are three constraints,
then the matrix HB will have n + 3 columns or in general n+m columns. Below the A matrix we
append the transpose of the B matrix, one row at a time as we add constraints. So if m = 2, then HB
will have n+2 rows.
5.4.1. Constructing minors of HB . To determine the definiteness of the quadratic form in equation
32 subject to equation 33 construct the matrix HB in equation 36. The definiteness is checked by
analyzing the signs of the naturally order principal minors of HB starting with the minor that has
m+1 rows and columns of the matrix A along with the borders for those rows and columns. For
example, if m = 1, then the first minor we check is
a11 a12 | b11
a21 a22 | b21
.. (37)
.
b11 b21 | 0
Then we check
a11 a12 a13 | b11
a21 a22 a23 | b21
a31 a32 a33 | b31
(38)
..
.
b11 b21 b31 | 0
and so forth. In general we are checking the signs of minors with p + m rows, where p goes from
m+1 to n. The minors we check can be written as below when there are m constraints.
22 QUADRATIC FORMS AND DEFINITE MATRICES
a11 a12 ··· a1p | b11 b12 ··· b1m
a21 a22 ··· a2p | b21 b22 ··· b2m
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
. . . . . . . . .
ap1 ap2 ··· app | bp1 bp2 ··· bpm
..
. (39)
b11 b21 ··· bp1 | 0 0 ··· 0
b12 b22 ··· bp2 | 0 0 ··· 0
. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. . . . . . . . .
b b2m ··· bpm | 0 0 ··· 0
1m
5.4.2. If determinant of HB has the same sign as (−1)p and if these last n-m leading principal minors
alternate in sign, then the quadratic form Q is negative definite on the constraint set x0B = 0. With one
constraint, m = 1, and so p starts at 2, so that the first minor is positive, the second negative and so forth.
5.4.3. If the determinant of HB and these last n-m leading principal minors all have the same sign as (−1)m ,
then Q is positive definite on the constraint set x0B = 0. With one constraint, m = 1, so that the first
minor is negative as are all subsequent ones.
5.4.4. If both of these conditions (b) and (c) are violated by nonzero leading principal minors, then Q is
indefinite on the constraint set x0 B = 0.
5.5. Definiteness of a quadratic form subject to one linear constraint. Construct the (n+1)x(n+1)
matrix HB as in 36 where the constraint equation is now given by
b1 x1 + b2 x2 + · · · + bn xn = 0 (40)
Suppose that b1 6= 0. Then we can show that the general conditions above reduce to the follow-
ing. If the last n leading principal minors of HB have the same sign, Q is positive definite on the
constraint set. If the last n leading principal minors alternate in sign, then Q is negative definite on
the constraint (Simon [5, Section 16.3] ).
QUADRATIC FORMS AND DEFINITE MATRICES 23
R EFERENCES
[1] 3r d
Dhrymes, P.J. Mathematics for Econometrics - Edition. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2000.
[2] Gantmacher, F.R. The Theory of Matrices. Vol I. New York: Chelsea Publishing Company, 1977.
[3] Hadley, G. Linear Algebra. Reading: Addison Wesley Publishing Company, 1961.
[4] Horn, R.A. and C.R. Johnson. Matrix Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
[5] Simon, C.P., and L. Blume. Mathematics for Economists. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1994.