Scribd
Upload
207 views2 pages

Checklist STARD

This checklist summarizes the key elements that should be reported in studies of diagnostic accuracy using medical tests. It includes 30 items across 5 sections: title/abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion. The checklist provides a framework for completely and transparently reporting on the design, conduct, analysis and interpretation of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Uploaded by

MELLY RAHMAWATI
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
207 views2 pages

Checklist STARD

This checklist summarizes the key elements that should be reported in studies of diagnostic accuracy using medical tests. It includes 30 items across 5 sections: title/abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion. The checklist provides a framework for completely and transparently reporting on the design, conduct, analysis and interpretation of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Uploaded by

MELLY RAHMAWATI
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Buku Panduan Blok Trauma dan Injury 2.

5 (KBK
2016)

CEKLIST STARD 2015


Reported
Section & Topic No Item
on page #
TITLE OR
ABSTRACT
1 Identification as a study of diagnostic accuracy
using at least one measure of accuracy
(such as sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, or
AUC)
ABSTRACT
2 Structured summary of study design, methods,
results, and conclusions
(for specific guidance, see STARD for Abstracts)
INTRODUCTION
3 Scientific and clinical background, including the
intended use and clinical role of the index test
4 Study objectives and hypotheses
METHODS
Study design 5 Whether data collection was planned before the
index test and reference standard
were performed (prospective study) or after
(retrospective study)
Participants 6 Eligibility criteria
7 On what basis potentially eligible participants were
identified
(such as symptoms, results from previous tests,
inclusion in registry)
8 Where and when potentially eligible participants
were identified (setting, location and dates)
9 Whether participants formed a consecutive, random
or convenience series
Test methods 10a Index test, in sufficient detail to allow replication
10b Reference standard, in sufficient detail to allow
replication
11 Rationale for choosing the reference standard (if
alternatives exist)
12a Definition of and rationale for test positivity cut-offs
or result categories
of the index test, distinguishing pre-specified from
exploratory
12b Definition of and rationale for test positivity cut-offs
or result categories
of the reference standard, distinguishing pre-
specified from exploratory
13a Whether clinical information and reference standard
results were available
to the performers/readers of the index test
13b Whether clinical information and index test results
were available
to the assessors of the reference standard
Analysis 14 Methods for estimating or comparing measures of
diagnostic accuracy

Program Studi Kedokteran-Program Sarjana


Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Islam Indonesia [ 21 ]
Buku Panduan Blok Trauma dan Injury 2.5 (KBK
2016)

15 How indeterminate index test or reference standard


results were handled
16 How missing data on the index test and reference
standard were handled
17 Any analyses of variability in diagnostic accuracy,
distinguishing pre-specified from exploratory
18 Intended sample size and how it was determined
RESULTS
Participants 19 Flow of participants, using a diagram
20 Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of
participants
21a Distribution of severity of disease in those with the
target condition
21b Distribution of alternative diagnoses in those
without the target condition
22 Time interval and any clinical interventions between
index test and reference standard
Test results 23 Cross tabulation of the index test results (or their
distribution)
by the results of the reference standard
24 Estimates of diagnostic accuracy and their precision
(such as 95% confidence intervals)
25 Any adverse events from performing the index test
or the reference standard
DISCUSSION
26 Study limitations, including sources of potential
bias, statistical uncertainty, and generalisability
27 Implications for practice, including the intended use
and clinical role of the index test
OTHER
INFORMATION
28 Registration number and name of registry
29 Where the full study protocol can be accessed
30 Sources of funding and other support; role of
funders

Program Studi Kedokteran-Program Sarjana

[ 22 ] Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Islam Indonesia

You might also like