Oliveros Dont Call Them Ladies
Oliveros Dont Call Them Ladies
Oliveros Dont Call Them Ladies
y <vv'"t''"''""
a piece of music cannot, however, account for the meaning of that piece unless it
is placed in a historical continuity. By the same token a "theory" derived from him to select, to process, to combine the ~y aspects of reality, al'":a_Y~ h~aring
analysis can never legitimately he used as a tool for producing music. Attempts in mind that any significant musi~al id~~ not the result of a neo-positiVIstlc pro-
to do this betray an idea of musical language based solely on procedures for com- cedure but a system of interrelati~pShips m pr~gress. . ..
bining elements, which is, to say the least,' irrelevant to any serious discussion of A theory cannot substitute £ meaning and Idea; a discrete. an~lytiC~l tool c~n
music. never be turned to creatio y dint of polishing and perfectmg It. It 1s poetics
Such a concept of music gives rise to the well-known query which opens many which guide discovery not procedural attitudes; ~t i~ idea and. not style.
"~eoreti~al" ~cussions th~se da~s: "H~w did he get the notes?" Shuffling notes This basic fact · been missed by those who ms1st on trymg to ~reate_ a
With the tllus10n that one ts dealmg With the formation of music is like using twelve-tone uto · of "twelve-tone coherence" by forcing on us the dubmus g1ft
words like "peace" and "freedom" in speaking about Vietnam without touching of twelve-ton melodies in which, as someone has written, "the tw~lv~-tone
the underlying relationships that constitute the real and horrifYing meaning of rhythmic s cturalization is totally identical (sic) with the structurahzatiOn. of
that rotten war. · the twel tones." Alas, this industrialized twelve-tone horse, dull on the outst~e
tp
But, rather than pursue that unhappy metaphor, let me tum another, this and e pty inside, constantly being perfected and dragged to a n~w Tror m
sh ow of an ideological war long since fought and won by responsible mmds
time from linguistics. The choice is logical, with all one hears ab ' t "language of
music," "musical grammar," and such, and discussions of musi always seem to · e Schoenberg, with neither systems nor scholarship for armor!
:Iemand an eventual resort to metaphor anyway. ·
Reprinted from The Christian Science Mon_ito: (July ~5, 1968).by permission of the publisher. Copy-
Recently a major breakthrough was witnessed in the field f linguistics. At its right© 1968 by the Christian Science Pubhshmg Soc!~. All ng~ts r:-ger:_edl' ~ ~ lh ,s::-'\..J ~'1:.,.
lead was N oam Chomsky, who pointed out the need to ab don the dead end CJ~G S"i::.'e:O..y~ ~ I ~e§lr-.: ~ ........ ~.I .
>f taxonomic linguistics, which is based on segmentatio I and classification of . ~~~ ~) -b::i'-'T~~\ts.-1<1'\b
llements. These elements are found by "discovery proc ures" which are con-
:idered supremely scientific by some because they are plied only to given se-
JU~n~s of sounds without regard to the underlying ructure of the language.
fhis 1s a consequence of the notion that the sequen of sounds represents the
tructure of the sentence in some direct way.
Chomsky's insight was that one must begin, not 'th discrete units (in a loose
ense, sounds) hut with a semantically meaning£ deep structure, from which is
And Don't Call Them "Lady'' Composers