Food Chemistry: Ângela Fernandes, Lillian Barros, Anabela Martins, Paulo Herbert, Isabel C.F.R. Ferreira
Food Chemistry: Ângela Fernandes, Lillian Barros, Anabela Martins, Paulo Herbert, Isabel C.F.R. Ferreira
Food Chemistry: Ângela Fernandes, Lillian Barros, Anabela Martins, Paulo Herbert, Isabel C.F.R. Ferreira
Food Chemistry
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodchem
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq. ex Fr.) P. Kumm. is the third most produced edible mushroom worldwide, due to
Received 1 July 2014 its ability to colonise and degrade a large variety of lignocellulosic substrates. Therefore, the objective of
Received in revised form 5 August 2014 this work was to evaluate the chemical composition of fruiting bodies of P. ostreatus grown on blank and
Accepted 7 August 2014
printed paper substrates, in comparison with samples grown on oat straw (control). The nutritional prop-
Available online 17 August 2014
erties of the control sample were similar to values reported in the literature, while the chemical compo-
sition of the samples obtained using paper scraps, either blank or printed, was highly satisfactory. The
Keywords:
results obtained validated the nutritional characteristics of the samples, highlighting a profitable means
Mushrooms production
Pleurotus ostreatus
to recycle paper.
Blank and printed paper Ó 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Oat straw
Chemical/nutritional composition
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.08.027
0308-8146/Ó 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Â. Fernandes et al. / Food Chemistry 169 (2015) 396–400 397
2. Material and methods analysed using Clarity 2.4 Software (DataApex, Prague, Czech
Republic). The chromatographic separation was achieved with a
2.1. Standards and reagents Eurospher 100-5 NH2 column (4.6 250 mm, 5 mm, Knauer) oper-
ating at 30 °C (7971 R Grace oven). The mobile phase was acetoni-
Acetonitrile 99.9%, n-hexane 95% and ethyl acetate 99.8% were trile/deionised water, 70:30 (v/v), at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The
of HPLC grade from Lab-Scan (Lisbon, Portugal). The fatty acids compounds were identified by chromatographic comparisons with
methyl ester (FAME) reference standard mixture 37 (standard authentic standards. Quantification was performed using the inter-
47885-U) was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO), as were other nal standard method and sugar contents were further expressed in
individual fatty acid isomers, tocopherol, organic acid and sugar g per 100 g of dry weight (dw).
standards. Racemic tocol, 50 mg/mL, was purchased from Matreya
(Pleasant Gap, PA). All other chemicals and solvents were of analyt- 2.3.3. Fatty acids
ical grade and purchased from common sources. Water was treated Fatty acids were determined by gas chromatography with flame
in a Milli-Q water purification system (TGI Pure Water Systems, ionisation detection (GC-FID), after the extraction and derivatiza-
Greenville, SC). tion procedures previously described (Barreira et al., 2012; Reis
et al., 2011). The analysis was carried out with a DANI model
2.2. Samples 1000 GC instrument (DANI Instruments SpA., Cologno Monzese,
Italy) equipped with a split/splitless injector, a FID at 260 °C and
The mycelium of the fungus (Pleurotus ostreatus) was a com- a Macherey–Nagel (Duren, Germany) column (50% cyanopropyl-
methyl-50% phenylmethylpolysiloxane, 30 m 0.32 mm ID
mercial strain (Biowin) purchased from BioInvitro (Arvore, Portu-
gal) and further grown on oat seeds. The substrates used were: 0.25 lm film thickness). The oven temperature program was as fol-
lows: the initial temperature of the column was 50 °C, held for
oat straw (control), blank paper scraps and printed paper scraps.
All substrates were used without any addition (pure). Each one 2 min, then a 30 °C/min ramp to 125 °C, 5 °C/min ramp to 160 °C,
20 °C/min ramp to 180 °C, 3 °C/min ramp to 200 °C, 20 °C/min
of the substrates (500 g) was poured into bags of HDPE (high-
ramp to 220 °C and held for 15 min. The carrier gas (hydrogen)
density polyethylene; Deltalab S.A., Barcelona Spain) and
flow-rate was 4.0 mL/min (0.61 bar), measured at 50 °C. Split injec-
autoclaved in a pressure cooker at about 120 °C for 30 min. The
tion (1:40) was carried out at 250 °C. Fatty acid identification was
bags were kept open during the process. Afterwards, the bags were
made by comparing the relative retention times of FAME peaks
transferred to an improvised flow chamber at 25 °C.
from samples with standards. The results were recorded and pro-
Each bag was inoculated with approximately 2% of the fungus
cessed using the CSW 1.7 Software (DataApex 1.7) and expressed
and not hermetically closed in order to allow gas exchange, being
as the relative percentage of each fatty acid.
incubated at 23 °C for a further 20 days. After the incubation per-
iod, holes (4 per bag) of about 3 cm diameter were made in the
2.3.4. Tocopherols
sides of the bags, which were then placed in a room with indirect
Tocopherols were determined after an extraction procedure
lighting and a relative humidity of about 70%. The average temper-
previously described by the authors (Fernandes et al., 2013;
ature during the fruiting process was about 22 °C. After the first
Sarmento, Barros, Fernandes, Carvalho, & Ferreira, in press), using
fruiting, the bags were kept open until the appearance of new pri-
tocol as IS. The analysis was carried out using the HPLC system
mordia. Only the first two flushes were considered in the charac-
described above connected to a fluorescence detector (FP-2020;
terisation of the production of each substrate (for each sample, a
Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) programmed for excitation at 290 nm and
mixture of the two flushes was used in the chemical analyses).
emission at 330 nm. The chromatographic separation was achieved
Prior to analysis, all the samples (150 g each one) were lyoph-
with a Polyamide II normal-phase column (250 4.6 mm; YMC,
ilised (FreeZone 4.5 model 7750031; Labconco, Kansas City, MO),
Kyoto, Japan) operating at 30 °C. The mobile phase used was a mix-
reduced to a fine dried powder (20 mesh) and mixed to obtain
ture of n-hexane and ethyl acetate (70:30, v/v) at a flow rate of
homogenate samples.
1 mL/min. The compounds were identified by chromatographic
comparisons with authentic standards. Quantification was based
2.3. Chemical composition on the fluorescence signal response, using the internal standard
method, and tocopherols content was expressed in lg per 100 g
2.3.1. Nutritional value of dry weight (dw).
Moisture, protein, fat, carbohydrates and ash were determined
following AOAC procedures (AOAC, 1995). The crude protein 2.3.5. Organic acids
content (N 4.38) of the samples was estimated by the macro- Organic acids were determined following a procedure previ-
Kjeldahl method; the crude fat was determined by extracting a ously described by the authors (Barros, Pereira, & Ferreira, 2013;
known weight of powdered sample with petroleum ether, using Fernandes et al., 2013). Analysis was performed by ultrafast liquid
a Soxhlet apparatus; the ash content was determined by incinera- chromatograph (UFLC) coupled to photodiode array detector
tion at 600 ± 15 °C. Total carbohydrates were calculated by differ- (PDA), using a Shimadzu 20A series UFLC (Shimadzu Cooperation,
ence. Energy was calculated according to the following equation: Kyoto, Japan). Detection was carried out using a PDA, using
energy (kcal) = 4 (gprotein + gcarbohydrate) + 9 gfat. 215 nm as preferred wavelength. The organic acids were quantified
by comparison of the area of their peaks recorded at 215 nm with
2.3.2. Free sugars calibration curves obtained from commercial standards of each
Free sugars were determined by high-performance liquid chro- compound. The results were expressed in g per 100 g of dry weight
matography coupled to a refraction index detector (HPLC-RI) fol- (dw).
lowing the described extraction procedure (Barreira et al., 2012;
Reis et al., 2011), using raffinose as internal standard (IS). The 2.4. Statistical analysis
equipment consisted of an integrated system with a pump
(Knauer, Smartline system 1000; Berlin, Germany), degasser sys- For all experiments, three samples were analysed and all assays
tem (Smartline manager 5000), auto-sampler (AS-2057 Jasco, Eas- were carried out in triplicate. The results are expressed as mean
ton, MD) and an RI detector (Knauer Smartline 2300). Data were values ± standard deviation (SD). The differences between the
398 Â. Fernandes et al. / Food Chemistry 169 (2015) 396–400
post-hoc test with a = 0.05, coupled with Welch’s statistic. This Control Blank paper Printed paper
treatment was carried out using SPSS v. 22.0 program (SPSS Inc., Mannitol 2.73 ± 0.01 a
nd 0.36 ± 0.01b
Chicago, IL). Trehalose 23.5 ± 0.5a 17.6 ± 0.6b 9.09 ± 0.01c
Total (g/100 g) 26.2 ± 0.5a 17.6 ± 0.6b 9.45 ± 0.01c
3. Results and discussion Results are expressed on a dry weight basis. nd: not detected. In each row different
letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
showed the highest energetic contribution, due to its high protein 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Time (min)
levels. No significant differences were found in protein levels of the A
using paper scraps showed the highest MUFA levels, mainly due Control Blank paper Printed paper
to the contribution of oleic acid (C18:1n–9). A similar fatty acids Oxalic acid 0.30 ± 0.04 b
0.17 ± 0.03 c
0.48 ± 0.06a
profile was observed for the samples obtained with paper scraps Quinic acid 0.10 ± 0.01c 1.38 ± 0.01a 0.94 ± 0.04b
and the control (see for example Fig. 1B). Despite some differences Citric acid 2.25 ± 0.02 nd nd
in the percentage of individual fatty acids, the global percentages Fumaric acid 0.25 ± 0.01b 0.32 ± 0.02a 0.30 ± 0.01a
Total (g/100 g) 2.89 ± 0.08a 1.86 ± 0.00b 1.71 ± 0.10b
obtained for SFA, MUFA and PUFA are similar to those described
in other studies (Papaspyridi, Sinanoglou, Strati, Katapodis, & Results are expressed in a dry weight basis. nd: not detected. In each row different
Christakopoulos, 2013; Reis et al., 2012). letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
variation induced by gamma-irradiation on wild mushrooms: Comparative Patil, S. S., Ahmed, S. A., Telang, S. M., & Baig, M. M. V. (2010). The nutritional value
study through principal component analysis. Food Research International, 54, of Pleurotus ostreatus (jacq.:fr.) kumm cultivated on different lignocellulosic
18–25. agrowastes. Innovative Romanian Food Biotechnology, 7, 66–76.
Loss, E. M. S. (2009). Aproveitamento de resíduos da cadeia produtiva do milho para Pokhrel, C. P., Kalyan, N., Budathoki, U., & Yadav, R. K. P. (2013). Cultivation of
cultivo de cogumelos comestíveis. Dissertation. State University of Ponta Pleurotus sajor-caju using different agricultural residues. International Journal of
Grossa, Paraná, Brasil. Agricultural Policy and Research, 1, 019–023.
Mandeel, Q. A., Al-Laith, A. A., & Mohamed, S. A. (2005). Cultivation of oyster Rajarathnam, S., Shashireka, M. N., & Bano, Z. (1992). Biopotentialities of the
mushrooms (Pleurotus spp.) on various lignocellulosic wastes. World Journal of basidiomacromycetes. Advances in Applied Microbiology, 37, 233–361.
Microbiology & Biotechnology, 21, 601–607. Ramos, C., Sapata, M., Ferreira, A., Andrada, L., & Candeias, M. (2011). Production of
Manzi, P., Gambelli, L., Marconi, S., Vivanti, V., & Pizzoferrato, L. (1999). Nutrients in three species of Pleurotus mushrooms and quality evaluation in modified
edible mushrooms: An inter-species comparative study. Food Chemistry, 65, atmosphere. Revista de Ciências Agrárias, 34, 57–64.
477–482. Reis, F. S., Barros, L., Martins, A., & Ferreira, I. C. F. R. (2012). Chemical composition
Mehta, V., Gupta, J. K., & Kaushal, S. C. (1990). Cultivation of Pleurotus florida and nutritional value of the most widely appreciated cultivated mushrooms: An
mushroom on rice straw and biogas production from the spent straw. World inter-species comparative study. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 50, 191–197.
Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 6, 366–370. Reis, F. S., Pereira, E., Barros, L., Sousa, M. J., Martins, A., & Ferreira, I. C. F. R. (2011).
Mendez, L. A., Castro, C. A. S., Casso, R. B., & Leal, C. M. C. (2005). Effect of substrate Biomolecule profiles in inedible wild mushrooms with antioxidant value.
and harvest on the amino acid profile of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus). Molecules, 16, 4328–4338.
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 18, 447–450. Sanchez, A., Ysunza, F., Beltran-Gracia, M., & Esqueda, M. (2002). Biodegradation of
Norouzi, A., Peyvast, G., & Olfati, J. (2008). Oilseed rape straw for cultivation of viticulture wastes by Pleurotus: A source of microbial and human food and its
oyster mushroom. Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology, 2, potential use in animal feeding. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50,
502–507. 2537–2542.
Papaspyridi, L.-M., Sinanoglou, V. J., Strati, I. F., Katapodis, P., & Christakopoulos, P. Sarmento, A., Barros, L., Fernandes, Â., Carvalho. A. M., & Ferreira, I. C. F. R. (in press).
(2013). Fatty acid profile of Pleurotus ostreatus and Ganoderma australe grown Valorisation of traditional foods: Nutritional and bioactive properties of Cicer
naturally and in a batch bioreactor. Acta Alimentaria, 42, 328–337. arietinum L. and Lathyrus sativus L. pulses. Journal of the Science of Food and
Pathmashini, L., Arulnandhy, V., & Wijeratnam, R. S. W. (2008). Cultivation of oyster Agriculture. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6702.
mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) on sawdust. Ceylon Journal of Science, 37,
177–182.