Development of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Strand ROD
Development of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Strand ROD
Development of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Strand ROD
ROD
material. This paper will discuss the production stage begin with the instrumentation and
basic structure, and some improvement especially in material strength such as the
tensile strength. In the process, fiber content and cavity ratio test, tensile strength test,
alkali resistance test, temperature dependency test, weather resistance test, etc. is
performed. Products that satisfy the expected performance were applied to the actual
construction project. However, Carbon fiber composite materials are not included in
to apply the carbon fiber composite material in building construction in the present. An
example case on a real project, carbon fiber composite materials used in structural
1. INTRODUCTION
lightweight and sturdy material and when it is used as construction material, it will give
benefits such as in cost and construction period reduction because of it does not need
heavy equipment in the installation process. However, there are also disadvantages
such as the high material cost of carbon fiber and low fire resistance. It is also not been
recognized yet by Japanese Standards as a construction material, therefore its
with the purpose to understand the structural performance required for CFRTP. The
observed structural performance is used in the actual project, using CFRTP as material
for seismic reinforcement. Carbon fiber (CFRTP) material used in this research is
Figure 2. Tests were conducted based on the fiber content and cavity ratio test method
of carbon fiber reinforced plastic as recommended by JIS K 7075. The volume content
based on its tensile strength, standard deviation, and rigidity. The Specimen used in the
test listed in Table 1 and the test results for each specimen shown by Figure. 3 to
Figure. 6 (each Figure shows a maximum load on the top left, a histogram of rigidity on
Pmax is 62.19 kN, with standard deviation σp of 3.74, and the average of the stiffness k
is 75.1 kN / mm, with a standard deviation σk of 11.9. The number of carbon fibers is
4.8 × 105 pieces, and the cross-sectional area of the carbon fiber is 18.33 mm2 .
Standard deviation obtained from this specimen is the largest compared to others
and it probably caused by the shape of CFRTP. Bundled carbon fiber material was
manually cut and introduced into the resin, and the tip was processed into tea whisker
shape.
b) Experiment Result of Specimen No. 2 The average of the maximum load
Pmax is 40.39 kN, with standard deviation σp of 3.28, and the average of the stiffness k
is 5.93 kN / mm, with a standard deviation σk of 0.22. The number of carbon fibers is
2.4 × 105 pieces, and the cross-sectional area of the carbon fiber is 9.17 mm2 .
The Standard deviation for both of the maximum load and the rigidity resulted is
smaller than that resulted in the specimen No. 1. This is may be caused by the
manufacturing process of specimen no. 2. Unlike specimen no. 1, specimen no. 2 was
Pmax is 56.33 kN, with standard deviation σp of 1.71, and the average of the stiffness k
is 4.20 kN / mm, with a standard deviation σk of 0.16. The number of carbon fibers is
2.4 × 105 pieces, and the cross-sectional area of the carbon fiber is 9.17 mm2 .
Standard deviation resulted was the smallest among specimens no. 1, no. 2 and
no. 3 (all of three specimens are straight shaped carbon fibers). Small standard
the manufacturing process. The outer layer of carbon fibers was made from PET fiber to
glass fiber.
Pmax is 87.22kN, with standard deviation σp of 4.25, and the average of the stiffness k
is 8.81 kN / mm, with a standard deviation σk of 0.82. The number of carbon fibers is
5.04 × 105 pieces, and the cross-sectional area of the carbon fiber is 19.25 mm2 .
Standard deviation resulted was bigger than that resulted in specimen no.3. This
might be caused by the variation due to the shape of the specimen, which was
e) The evaluation value σcu of the reinforcing material tensile strength was calculated
f) The average tensile strength avσcu of only the fibers were calculated from the
g) Design standard strength dσcu was calculated from the following equation (1 d)
Comparison of the tensile strength test result between CFRTP specimens and
steel material is shown in Table 2. The maximum tensile force of specimen no. 4 (7
bundles of 24k 3 pieces) is appeared to be the same for maximum tensile force resulted
from tensile strength test of PC steel. The effective strength of the carbon fiber of
specimen 1 is 3,393 / 4900 = 0.69 and this strength arises due to the addition of
this study using specimens listed in Table 3. Prior to the test, specimens were kept for
according to Standard temperature state class 2 and standard humidity state class 2
(JIS K 7100), then stored for another 48 hours at the measurement maximum
coefficient are in accordance with the Test method of thermal expansion coefficient by
1995). From the result of the measurement of the thermal expansion coefficient,
sufficient for 12 hours. The thermal expansion coefficient of the carbon fiber strand rod
is less than 2 × 10 -6 / °C. The thermal stability of CFRTP is higher than that of steel
appearance and maximum tensile load of the specimen after dipping in an aqueous
60°C for 28 days. Test conditions conform to Alkali resistance test method for
continuous fiber reinforcement (draft) (JSCE-E 538- 1995). The test was performed
using 5 specimens listed in Table 5. Table 6 shows the results of tensile strength test,
and Figure. 7 shows a comparison of strength development. It was confirmed that the
retained to be proof stress of more than 70%. Since the glass fiber used for the outer
layer of No. 5 is a general-purpose type, it is very likely that about a 30% reduction in
strength based on the condition of the specimens. Specimens used in the test are listed
in Table 7. The test conditions are based on ASTM D 3090, where the test temperature
shall be at -20 °C, 23 °C, 50 °C, or 82 °C. The results of the tensile strength test are
shown in Table 8 and the displacement of the maximum load by the ambient
test after accelerated exposure test using specimens listed in Table 9. The test
conditions are in accordance with Promotional exposure test method for plastic building
materials (JIS A 1415) and perform an accelerated exposure test using sunshine
weather meter and metering weather meter. Tensile strength test results of the
specimens using the sunshine weather meter and metal weather meter are shown by
Table 10 and Table 11 respectively. The sunshine weather meter 2000 hours
(equivalent to 10 years), Metering ring weather meter 500 hours (equivalent to 50
years). There was almost no decrease in strength in the tensile strength test after
exposure.
strength, and concrete neutralization. Therefore, seismic retrofitting is necessary for the
first and second floors in the X direction and all floors in the Y direction. Since CFRTP is
a very high-strength material, it has a performance that can be used in seismic retrofit of
the entire building. Initially, it was considered to retrofit to building entirely using CFRTP,
4. CONCLUSIONS
In this research, CFRTP with more linear shape has been developed and used
machinery, it was possible to produce materials with the required performance, focusing
on the tensile strength development of the CFRTP material in the three-layer structure.
composite materials widely used in the future and future research in material
6. REFERENCES
[1] Maeda Yutaka: cutting edge technology of carbon fiber "Diffusion Edition",
March 2012
[6] Tomita Atsushi: Study on laminated wood incorporating carbon fiber braid
Link : https://www.geomatejournal.com/sites/default/files/articles/109-115-8127-
Mochida-May-2019-57g.pdf