Competency Based Interviews
Competency Based Interviews
Competency-based interviews (also called structured interviews) are interviews where each
question is designed to test one or more specific skills. The answer is then matched against pre-
decided criteria and marked accordingly. For example, the interviewers may want to test the
candidate's ability to deal with stress by asking first how the candidate generally handles stress
and then asking the candidate to provide an example of a situation where he worked under
pressure.
Normal interviews (also called unstructured interviews) are essentially a conversation where
the interviewers ask a few questions that are relevant to what they are looking for but without
any specific aim in mind other than getting an overall impression of you as an individual.
Questions are fairly random and can sometimes be quite open. For example, a question such as
"What can you offer our company?" is meant to gather general information about you but does
not test any specific skill or competency. In an unstructured interview, the candidate is judged on
the general impression that he/she leaves and are therefore likely to be more subjective.
The list of skills and competencies that can be tested varies depending on the post that you are
applying for. For example, for a Personal Assistant post, skills and competencies would include
communication skills; ability to organise and prioritise; and ability to work under pressure. For a
senior manager, skills and competencies may include an ability to influence and negotiate; an
ability to cope with stress and pressure; an ability to lead; and the capacity to take calculated
risks.
Here is a non-exhaustive list of the more common skills and competencies that you may be asked
to demonstrate:
• Adaptability
• Compliance
• Communication
• Conflict management
• Creativity and
Innovation
• Decisiveness
• Delegation
• External awareness
• Flexibility
• Independence
• Influencing
• Integrity
• Leadership
• Leveraging diversity
• Organisational
awareness
• Resilience and tenacity
• Risk taking
• Sensitivity to others
• Team work
Before the interview, the interviewers will have determined which type of answers would score
positive points and which types of answers would count against the candidates. For example, for
questions such as "Describe a time when you had to deal with pressure", the positive and
negative indicators may be as follows:
In some cases, negative indicators are divided into two further sections: minor negative
indicators, i.e. those which are negative but which don’t matter so much; and decisive negative
indicators i.e. those for which they won’t forgive you e.g. not asking for help when needed.
Marks are then allocated depending on the extent to which the candidate's answer matches those
negative and positive indicators. Here is an example of a marking schedule for the table above:
If the interviewers feel that there are areas that you have failed to address, they may help you
along by probing appropriately. For example, in answering the question above “Describe an
example of a time when you had to deal with pressure”, if you focussed on how you dealt with
the practical angle of the problem but you forgot to discuss how you managed your stress during
and after the event, the interviewers may prompt you with a further question such as “How did
you handle the stress at the time?”. This would give you an opportunity to present a full picture
of your behaviour. This is where the marking can become subjective. Indeed, if an interviewer
likes you, he may be more tempted to prompt you and push you along than if he has bad vibes
about you.