Pre-Finishing Mill Modernization On The Sterling Steel Rod Mill
Pre-Finishing Mill Modernization On The Sterling Steel Rod Mill
Pre-Finishing Mill Modernization On The Sterling Steel Rod Mill
Abstract
The most recent modernization phase of the wire rod mill at Sterling Steel involved
installation of a pre-finishing mill, using a Morgan Vee Mini-Block, a new water box
and shear with utility systems and automation. The new mill configuration adds more
stands to the mill for better drafting and is designed to improve finished product
quality by providing a more uniform entry temperature, better control of the feed
section into the No-Twist® mill as well as enhanced surface quality. The new shear
improves cut length accuracy as well as decreases the amount of trimming to reduce
yield loss. This paper explains the changes made in the mill and the features of the
new equipment and automation.
Keywords: Rod; Modernization; Quality; Productivity.
1
Rod Mill General Manager, Sterling Steel LLC, Sterling, Illinois, USA.
2
Long Rolling Sales Director, Primetals Technologies USA LLC, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
3
Sales Manager, Primetals Technologies USA LLC, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
1 INTRODUCTION
The origins of Sterling Steel can be traced back to the late 1800s and the production
of barbed wire and other products much in demand for the developing western
United States. Over the course of several decades and changes in organization, the
operations eventually became the Northwestern Steel and Wire Company in Sterling,
Illinois in 1936. The company steadily expanded capacity and improved steelmaking
from the 1940s into the 1980s. In 1983, a single strand rod mill was installed by
Morgan Construction Company, including a Morgan No-Twist® Mill finishing block,
laying head and Morgan Stelmor® controlled cooling conveyor. This rod mill
produced steadily over the next 15years with small upgrades during that time, the
most significant of which were laying head modifications in 1997 to enable speeds of
100 m/s.
Following a shutdown in 2001, the rod mill was purchased in 2002 by Leggett &Platt
of Carthage, Missouri, and reopened in early 2003 as the Sterling Steel Company,
LLC (SSC), to supply its wire drawing operations with wire rod. The new owner took
a number of steps to modernize the operations, first to increase product quality and
consistency with a a new Morgan Stelmor conveyor in 2002-2003, then changes in
the finishing block area, and new water boxes with a temperature control system in
2008. In 2010, a modernization project was undertaken with Siemens Industry, Inc.
(after Morgan Construction Company became part of Siemens) in order to improve
the coil package, reduce maintenance and reduce delays on the finishing end of the
rod mill, thereby increasing utilization and productivity. The project involved
extending the Morgan Stelmor controlled cooling conveyor and replacing the coil
reforming station to interface with a new vertical stem pallet coil handling system.
The pallet coil handling system included a new-generation vertical compactor for
consistent tying of the improved coil package. In addition, new automation was
provided to optimize the operation of all new equipment components [1]. Other
improvements in the line, such as the implementation of the SR Series® laying head
pipe technology (see [2]), have enabled significant increases in productivity.
The latest phase of modernizations was started with a 2014 decision to invest in
rolling line improvements, with improvements to be made by Primetals Technologies
USA, LLC (after Siemens Industry, Inc. became part of a joint venture between
Siemens and Mitsubishi). The main goal was to alleviate the loading in the existing
roughing mill. The roughing mill was making high reductions which were resulting in
motor overloads, high pass wear and difficulty in controlling section. The surface
quality of the finished rod product was not at a consistently satisfactory level, caused
by conditions in the roughing mill, Sterling believed. Also, the addition of a pre-
finishing mill (PFM) to the continuous mill, Sterling believed, could increase utilization
by reducing the delays in the rod block for pass changes, and improve surface
quality.
Finished coils have nominal dimensions of 1,250 mm OD and 850 mm ID, with a
nominal coil weight of 1,360 kg (3,000 lbs.). Yearly production with these three
products is approximately 472,000 tonnes (520,000 tons).
SSC typically rolls 5.5 mm (7/32”), 6.35 mm (1/4”), and up to 12.7 mm (1/2”) at
speeds of 100 m/s (19,700 ft/min) up to a maximum rolling rate of 85 t/hr (94 ton/hr).
Figure 3. New roughing mill pass design (left) compared to previous design (right).
Figure 4. New intermediate mill pass design (left) compared to previous design (right).
The block utilizes 230 mm cantilevered roll housings (see Figure 8) to provide the
required separating force capacity and roll strength needed for the new process.
Carbide rolls are used for increased pass life, thereby reducing downtime and
increasing mill efficiency. The carbide rolls also provide superior surface quality over
the life of the groove, further enhancing the quality of the finished product. The
location of the new PFM was selected to allow installation of the new equipment
during mill operation and for the installation of a second PFM in the future to
accommodate either a larger starting billet size or further replacement of the
conventional H/V rolling stands. A new set of covered delivery troughs and a new
water box before the NTM were also provided as part of the overall PFM
arrangement.
Figure 10a. Roller guides for curved trough. Figure 10b. Model of roller guide.
2.4 Installation
The new shear arrangement required consideration of several details, including
relocating the centerline of the new shear upstream by approximately 900 mm (36”)
from the centerline of the existing crop and divide shear. The new location was
within the perimeter of the existing shear foundations. This allowed re-work of the
existing foundations only versus complete new construction, which reduced the
required downtime for installation. Furthermore, Sterling Steel was able to complete
the entire installation with only 12 days of mill stoppage.
An overview of the new installation is shown in Figure 11 below and a model of the
new equipment layout is shown in Figure 12, where some covers of the curved
trough area have been removed to show the roller guides.
Figure 13. Example of pre-modification rod surface with seam defects and rolled-in scale (max. seam
depth of 2% of wire rod diameter).
3.3 Shear
The shear was tested to accurately take a 400 mm (16”) head crop. Currently
Sterling takes a 450 mm (18”) head crop to present an appropriate head end into the
NTM. This is an improvement over the previous shear that could reliably take a crop
of 135 mm (53”). This saves 889 mm (35”) of material off of the front end of almost
350,000 coils which equates to almost 556 t (613 ton) or 0.1% improvement in
material yield annually.
REFERENCES
1 Reins, K., Spencer, S., Pietra-Santa, L., Rod Mill Finishing End Modernization at
Sterling Steel, Proceedings, AISTech 2014, AIST, 2014.
2 Lashua, C, Kiefer, B., Recent Developments in Laying Head Technology for High
Speed Rod Rolling Mills, Proceedings, AISTech 2014, AIST, 2014.
No-Twist, Stelmor and SR Series are registered trademarks of Primetals Technologies USA
LLC.