Scribd
Upload
60 views8 pages

Homework - Statistics

The document contains the results of two one-way ANOVA tests. For the first test, the ANOVA results show a significant difference between the means of three groups (F(2,15)=8.515, p=0.003). Post hoc comparisons would be needed to determine which specific groups differ. For the second test, the ANOVA results do not reach statistical significance (F(2,10)=3.949, p=0.054). Therefore, there are no significant differences between the means of the three groups for the second test based on the data provided.

Uploaded by

Isra'a Abed Khader
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
60 views8 pages

Homework - Statistics

The document contains the results of two one-way ANOVA tests. For the first test, the ANOVA results show a significant difference between the means of three groups (F(2,15)=8.515, p=0.003). Post hoc comparisons would be needed to determine which specific groups differ. For the second test, the ANOVA results do not reach statistical significance (F(2,10)=3.949, p=0.054). Therefore, there are no significant differences between the means of the three groups for the second test based on the data provided.

Uploaded by

Isra'a Abed Khader
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

2-5 consider the computer output shown below:

One- sample z
Test of mu =30 vs. not = 30
The assumed standard deviation=1.2
N Mean SE Mean 95 % CI z p
16 31.200 0.3 (30.6120, 31.788) ? ?

a) Fill in the missing values in the output. What conclusion would you draw?

x́−μ 31.2−30
z= z=
σ 1.2 z=4
√n √16
b) Is this a one- sided or two- sided test?
Two- sided
c) Use the output and the normal table to find a 99 percent CI on the mean.
ý ± z α /2 S . E

31.2 ± ( 2.576 ) (0.3)


(31.20- 0.77, 31.20+ 0.77)
(30.43, 31.97)
d) What is the P-value if the alternative hypothesis is Ha: μ>3 0
P-value= 0.00003
2.8 consider the following sample data: 9.37,13.04,11.69,8.21,11.18,10.41,13.15,11.51,13.21

Skewness Kurtosis
Std.
Statistic Error Statistic Std. Error

-.584- .717 -.518- 1.400

Minimu
N Range m Maximum Std. Deviation Variance

Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic Statistic

VAR0 9 5.00 8.21 13.21 11.3078 .58182 1.74547 3.047


Valid N 9
a) Can the null hypothesis be rejected at the 0.05 level? Why?
Yes, the p-value of 0.01 is less than 0.05
b) Is this a one- sided or two- sided test?
Two- sided
c) If the hypothesis had been H 0 :μ 1−μ2=2 versus H 1 : μ 1−μ2 ≠ 2 would you reject
the null hypothesis at the 0.05 level?
Yes
d) If the hypothesis had been H 0 :μ 1−μ2=2 versus H 1 : μ 1−μ2 <2 would you reject
the null hypothesis at the 0.05 level? Can you answer this question without doing
any additional calculations? Why?

Yes, from (-2.33,-4.33)


e) Use the output and t table to find a 95 percent upper confidence bound on the
difference in mean ?
Upper c P for -3.6 in t table = -1.21
2.16 The breaking strength of a fiber is required to be at least 150 psi .past experience has
indicated that the standard deviation of breaking strength is σ =3 psi. A random sample of
four specimens is tested. The results are y 1=145 , y 2=153 , y 3=150 y 4 =147 .

a) State the hypotheses that you think should be tested in this experiment.

H 0 :μ=150 H a :μ >150

b) Test these hypotheses using α=0.05, what are your conclusions?

n=4, σ=3, ý=(145+153+150+147)/ 4 = 148.75


x́−μ 148.75−150 −1.25
z= z=
σ 3 = 3 = -0.8333
√n √4 2

z 0.05=1 .654

z 0 < z α , ca n' t reject H 0

c) Find the p-value for the test in part (b)


P= 1-[0.7967+ (2/3)(0.7995-0.7967)] = 0.2014
d) Construct a 95 percent confidence interval on the mean breaking strength.

ý ± z α /2 S . E

148.75± ( 1.96 ) (1.5)


(148.75-2.94, 148.75+2.94)
(145.81,151.69)
a) H 0 :μ 1=μ2 H 1 : μ1 ≠ μ2
b) P-value = 0.674
c)
Question #1: 1Way

Descriptive 1
variable

95% Confidence Interval for Mean


N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum

1 6 1.5917 .81266 .33177 .7388 2.4445 .75 3.00


2 6 2.5000 .89443 .36515 1.5614 3.4386 1.50 4.00
3 6 3.6667 .90921 .37118 2.7125 4.6208 2.50 5.10
Total 18 2.5861 1.19850 .28249 1.9901 3.1821 .75 5.10

ANOVA 1
variable

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 12.984 2 6.492 8.515 .003


Within Groups 11.435 15 .762
Total 24.419 17
F cal (8.515)> F tab (3.68) reject the null hypotheses

Question#2: 1Way

Descriptive 2
variable

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum

1 5 35.40 18.756 8.388 12.11 58.69 10 57


2 4 68.75 18.392 9.196 39.48 98.02 52 95
3 4 44.25 16.661 8.330 17.74 70.76 29 68
Total 13 48.38 22.032 6.111 35.07 61.70 10 95

ANOVA 2
variable

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 2570.377 2 1285.188 3.949 .054


Within Groups 3254.700 10 325.470
Total 5825.077 12
F tab 4.10 < f cal can't reject null hypotheses

You might also like