Right-to-Information Book
Right-to-Information Book
Right-to-Information Book
3) Recent Developments
• Centre amended the RTI Act for the first time since 2005.
• The amendments passed by parliament empowered the central government to frame rules to
decide the tenure, salaries and terms of service of all commissioners in the country.
• Repeal of the J&K RTI Act following the reading down of Article 370
• Opening of the Chief Justice of India’s office to RTI
6) Criticism
• Denial of Information
a. Supreme Court said that Public Information Officers have evaded the general public from
getting the rightful information that they are entitled to
b. Section 4 of the Act calls for pro-active and voluntary dissemination of information, but only a
few Central and State institutions have published relevant information.
• NGOs under RTI
a. Supreme Court had declared that NGOs are not beyond the RTI Act.
b. This was based on an examination of the question whether NGOs are substantially financed by
the government.
c. Whether an NGO or body is substantially financed by the government is a question of fact which
has to be determined on the facts of each case.
d. The spotlight falls of several NGOs that have been getting public money and were not covered
under the RTI.
• Time Consumed in Replying
a. According to estimates, nearly 60-70 lakh RTI applications are filed in India every year.
b. The nation does not want a scenario where 75% of the staff of public authorities spends 75% of
their time in collecting and furnishing information to applicants instead of discharging their
regular duties.
c. The Supreme Court had ordered disclosure of the requisite information.
• Personal and Public
a. Various public authorities have denied information on cases/inquiries going on against
government officials.
• The other problem has been persisting vacancies in the State and Central Information Commissions
7) Concerns / Challenges
• Sometimes the kind of queries that were being asked were not always in public spirit and were
posed by people who had no “locus standi” in the matter regarding the queries.
• A Transparency Audit report reveiled that public authorities fared poorly with little transparency in
parameters such as organisation and functions, budget and programme, e-governance, and other
information disclosures.
9) Way Forward
• State governments must follow the Rajasthan government’s initiative of Jan Soochna portal, which
aims to make people, including the marginalised sections, a part of the governance process.
• Centre and States must expedite filling up the vacancies in the State and Central Information
Commissions.
• Public authorities must be advised to provide for greater voluntary dissemination on government
portals, which should ease their load.