Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 354 views

    Concrete Pool

    Uploaded by

    jorge01
    The document provides a summary of the design of a concrete pool including input parameters, analysis, and design checks. Key parameters include a concrete strength of 4 ksi, rebar yield stress of 60 ksi, and a pool depth of 6 feet. The analysis checks the wall and slab for flexure and shear capacity under factored loads. It also checks rebar development length. All components are found to be satisfactory based on ACI 318-19 code requirements.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Concrete Pool

    Uploaded by

    jorge01
    354 views2 pages
    The document provides a summary of the design of a concrete pool including input parameters, analysis, and design checks. Key parameters include a concrete strength of 4 ksi, rebar yield stress of 60 ksi, and a pool depth of 6 feet. The analysis checks the wall and slab for flexure and shear capacity under factored loads. It also checks rebar development length. All components are found to be satisfactory based on ACI 318-19 code requirements.

    Original Description:

    5155

    Original Title

    ConcretePool

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides a summary of the design of a concrete pool including input parameters, analysis, and design checks. Key parameters include a concrete strength of 4 ksi, rebar yield stress of 60 ksi, and a pool depth of 6 feet. The analysis checks the wall and slab for flexure and shear capacity under factored loads. It also checks rebar development length. All components are found to be satisfactory based on ACI 318-19 code requirements.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    354 views2 pages

    Concrete Pool

    Uploaded by

    jorge01
    The document provides a summary of the design of a concrete pool including input parameters, analysis, and design checks. Key parameters include a concrete strength of 4 ksi, rebar yield stress of 60 ksi, and a pool depth of 6 feet. The analysis checks the wall and slab for flexure and shear capacity under factored loads. It also checks rebar development length. All components are found to be satisfactory based on ACI 318-19 code requirements.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    PROJECT : PAGE :

    CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
    JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
    Concrete Pool Design Based on ACI 318-19
    INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
    CONCRETE STRENGTH fc' = 4 ksi, (28 MPa)
    REBAR YIELD STRESS fy = 60 ksi, (414 MPa)
    LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE Pa = 45 pcf, (7.055 kN/m3)
    (equivalent fluid pressure)
    BACKFILL WEIGHT gb = 110 pcf, (1762.03 kg/m3)
    SURCHARGE WEIGHT ws = 50 psf, (2 kPa)
    SEISMIC GROUND SHAKING PE =
    20 psf / ft, (3.14 kPa / m), ASD
    (soil pressure, if no report 35SDS suggested. )
    POOL DEPTH H = 6 ft, (1.83 m)
    THICKNESS OF WALL tw = 8 in, (203 mm)
    THICKNESS OF SLAB ts = 6 in, (152 mm)
    SLAB REBARS (at middle) # 5 @ 10 in. (254 mm), o.c.
    WALL VERTICAL REBARS # 5 @ 8 in. (203 mm), o.c.
    WALL BAR LOCATION (1=at middle, 2=at each face) 1 at middle
    LAP LENGTH Ls = 36 in, (914 mm)
    SLAB THICKER DISTANCE D = 4 ft, (1.22 m) THE WALL DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

    ANALYSIS
    DESIGN CRITERIA
    1. THE CRITERICAL DESIGN, FOR REBAR AT MIDDLE OR EQUAL OF EACH FACE, IS POOL WALL AT INWARD
    SOIL PRESSURE BEFORE RESTRAINED AT TOP AND POOL FILLED.
    2. SINCE THE WALL AXIAL LOAD SMALL AND SECTIONS UNDER TENSION-CONTROLLED (ACI 318-19 21.2.2), ONLY
    CHECK WALL FLEXURAL CAPACITIES ARE ADEQUATE.
    3. SINCE THE SLAB AT FLEXURAL & AXIAL LOADS, THE COMBINED CAPACITY OF FLEXURAL & AXIAL MUST BE CHECKED.

    SERVICE LOADS
    Hb = 0.5 Pa (H + ts)2 = 0.95 kips / ft
    Hs = ws Pa (H + ts) / gb = 0.13 kips / ft
    HE = 0.5 PE (H + ts)2 = 0.42 kips / ft

    FACTORED LOADS
    gHb = 1.6 Hb = 1.52 kips / ft
    gHs = 1.6 Hs = 0.21 kips / ft
    gHE = 1.6 HE = 0.68 kips / ft

    CHECK WALL FLEXURE CAPACITY (ACI 318-19 13.2, 7.6, 7.7, 24.4.3, & 25.4.2)
    Mu = (0.5 g Hs + 0.33 g Hb + 0.67 g HE) H = 6.38 ft-kips / ft, (entire lateral loads used conservatively)
    Pu = 1.19 kips / ft, (concrete wall self weight)
    d = 4.00 in, b = 12 in, As = 0.465 in2 / ft

      AS f y  P u   = 7.68 ft-kips / ft > Mu [Satisfactory]


     M n    AS f y  d  
      1.7bf 'c  
    rProvD = 0.010 < rMAX = 0.021
    > rMIN = 0.004 [Satisfactory]

    CHECK WALL SHEAR CAPACITY (ACI 318-19 13.2.7.2, 7.4.3, & 22.5)
    Vu = g Hs + g Hb + g HE = 2.41 kips / ft, (entire lateral loads used conservatively)

    Vu
    V n  2 bd f
    '
    c
    = 4.55 kips / ft > [Satisfactory]
    (cont'd)
    CHECK SLAB COMBINED CAPACITY OF FLEXURE & AXIAL (ACI 318-19 21 & 22)
    rProvD = 0.010333 < rMAX = 0.08 (for compression, ACI 318-19 10.6.1.1) Pu = 2.41 kips / ft

    [Satisfactory] > rMIN = 0.0018 (for flexural, ACI 318-19 7.6 7.7) Mu = 1.25 ft-kips / ft

    160
           2 
    140  c  c  , for 0   s E s , for  s   ty
     e f C 2 
    '
       c o
    f Pn (k) 120 fC    o    o   , f S
     f , for  s   ty
    '  y
    100   e f C , for  c   o

    80 
    2  e f 'C  fy  ty , for compression controlled

    60 o  ,  ty  , t  
     0.003 , for tension controlled
    Ec Es  ty

    40 '
    E c  57 f C , E s  29000ksi ,  e  0.85 ,  cu  0.003
    20
    0
    -20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Note:

    -40 1. Between compression & tension controlled is


    Solid Black Line - Tension Controlled f Mn (ft-k) Transition, which the f should be by linear
    Solid Red Line - Transition interpolation. (ACI 318-19 Tab. 21.2.2 & Fig. R10.4.2.1)
    Dash Line - Compression Controlled 2. ACI 318-19 changed f (Fig.R21.2.2b) and keeps
    be (22.2.2.4.1) and ecu (Fig. R21.2.2a) the same.
    f Mn = 4.97 ft-kips @ Pu = 2.41 kips But AISC 360/341-16 has different f (0.9 only) and
    > Mu = 1.25 ft-kips [Satisfactory] be (1.0 or 0.7).

    CHECK REBAR DEVELOPMENT

     
      3   d f 
    L d  MAX 
    requird t e s b y
    , 12 in   23 db = 14 in, (ACI 318-19 25.4.2.3)
      provided '  K  
     40 f c  c b tr  
      db  
    < Ls [Satisfactory]

    where Bar size # 5 , (governing size)


    db = 0.625 in
    r required / r provided = 1 ( As,reqd / As,provd, ACI 318-19 25.4.10.1)
    yt = 1.0 (1.3 for bottom cover more than 12", ACI 318-19 25.4.2.4)
    ye = 1.0 (1.2 for epoxy-coated, ACI 318-19 25.4.2.4)
    ys = 0.8 (0.8 for # 6 or smaller, 1.0 for other)
    l = 1.0 (0.75 for light weight, ACI 318-19 25.4.2.4)
    cb = 3.3 in, min(d' , 0.5s), (ACI 318-19 25.4.2.4)
    Ktr = (Atr fyt / 1500 s n) = 0 (ACI 318-19 25.4.2.4)
    (cb + Ktr ) / db = 2.5 < 2.5 , (ACI 318-19 25.4.2.3)

    You might also like