Regime of Martial Law in Pakistan
Regime of Martial Law in Pakistan
Regime of Martial Law in Pakistan
¿ Pakista
n
Introduction to history
All of the first we must know what martial law really is. Martial law is the imposition of
direct military control of normal civilian functions by a government, especially in response to
a temporary emergency such as invasion or major disaster, or in an occupied territory. Martial
law can also be used by governments to enforce their rule over the public. Martial law has
also been imposed during conflicts, and in cases of occupations, where the absence of any
other civil government provides for an unstable population. Typically, the imposition of
martial law accompanies curfews; the suspension of civil law, civil rights, and habeas corpus;
and the application or extension of military law or military justice to civilians. Civilians
defying martial law may be subjected to military tribunal (court-martial).Military coups in
Pakistan began in 1958 and there have been three successful attempts. There have also been
numerous unsuccessful attempts since 1951. Since its creation in 1947, Pakistan has spent
several decades under military rule (1958 – 1971, 1977 – 1988, 1999– 2008).
The army staged third coup when General Ziaul Haq overthrew the Bhutto government and
took over as CMLA on July 5, 1977. The federal and provincial governments were dismissed;
political parties were banned; National and provincial assemblies were dissolved; the
constitution was put in abeyance; civil courts continued to function as usual but fundamental
rights were suspended. On July 15, 1977, Justice Mushtaq Hussein of the Lahore High Court
was appointed chairman of a committee to formulate election procedures and laws. Two days
later, Justice Mushtaq Hussein also took over as the Chief Election Commissioner and
announced that elections would be held in the first fortnight of October 1977 under the
supervision of the armed forces and the judiciary. October 18 was fixed for the general
elections and nomination papers were invited between August 7 and 18, 1977.
On September 21, 1977, General Zia issued a 15-point code of ethics to regulate the election
campaign which started from September 18. The code prohibited all actions and deeds,
including words, symbolic representations, which were likely to prejudice the solidarity of
Pakistan and its Islamic foundations. On October 1, the elections were postponed indefinitely.
On November 10, 1977 the Supreme Court unanimously validated the imposition of martial
law, under the doctrine of necessity.
In its judgement dismissing Begum Nusrat Bhutto's petition challenging detention under
martial law of former Prime Minister Z.A. Bhutto and 10 others, the nine-member court
headed by Chief Justice Anwarul Haq observed that after massive rigging of elections
followed by complete breakdown of law and order situation bringing the country on the brink
of disaster, the imposition of martial law had become inevitable. Zia's martial law came to an
end on December 30, 1985.
4. 1999 Coup:
Pakistan came under military rule again on October 12, 1999, when General Pervez
Musharraf seized power in a bloodless coup and dissolved elected government of Nawaz
Sharif. However, no Martial law was imposed. As announced by him on July 11, 2002,
general elections were held on October 10, 2002. But before the elections, a referendum was
held on April 30, 2002 for him to be elected as the president for another five years. On
November 3, 2007, he declared the state of emergency in the country which is claimed to be
equivalent to the state of martial law as the constitution was suspended. On November 12,
2007, Musharraf issued some amendments to the Military Act, which gave the armed forces
some additional powers. Pervez Musharraf, who ruled Pakistan as Chief Executive from
1999-2002 and as president from 2001-08, resigned on August18, 2008 in the face of
impeachment. Mir Zafarullah Khan Jamali, Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain and Shaukat Aziz
served as elected prime ministers during his era.
Politics in Pakistan has been tarnished by corruption, inefficiency, domestic political
upheavals and wrong policies of the ruling elite; and alternating periods of civilian and
military rule have, so far, not been able to establish stability. Due to their unrealistic policies,
supplemented by anti-Pakistan elements, we could not maintain its integrity and their actions
resulted into the unfortunate break-up of the hard-earned country in 1971.
In Ayub’s era the increase in In Zia Era the increase in GDP Rapid growth measured. 3rd
growth rate was measured 6.27% episode of aid Better
GDP growth was measured
per annum. governance.
6.50% on average, 2nd aid episode. Devolution plans. Privatizations.
1st aid episode, Public sector enhanced its Many other infrastructural and
Resources utilization, operations. developmental achievements.
Investments in water and Good growth. Improved
power sector, agriculture. Decline in
quality of governance.
Green revolutions, Islamization.
Better quality of services.
Consequences:
Successive martial law regimes have deeply influenced society in Pakistan politically,
socially and economically. Here, we would like, very briefly, to assess the procedure and the
impact of martial law on society. The first task of this regime is to change the structure of the
state by abolishing all democratic institutions and implementing its own political system
which grants extensive powers to its head. For example, Ayub Khan introduced 'Basic
Democracies,' Yahya, after abrogating the Constitution of 1962, the Legal Framework Order,
Zia and Musharraf both distorted the Constitution of '73 by adding a number of amendments.
Their legacy continued in spite of the restoration of democracy. As both Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
and Nawaz Sharif were the product of martial law we find its tendencies in their political
careers. Frequent martial law has also changed the political culture of society. The political
parties are now dominated by dynastic rule leaving no space for the talented in the middle
class to play any role.
There is little tolerance for opposition and violence becomes a routine way to handle rival
groups. Whenever democracy returns after martial law, it carries the latter's despotic
traditions. At a certain stage, a military regime needs some legitimacy. To fulfil this
requirement, it seeks help from some politicians and forms its own political party. Ayub
Khan organised the Convention Muslim League while Musharraf relied on Muslim League-
Q. Zia sought the support of religious parties but did not form his own party, opting instead
for party-less elections. It is customary for military regimes to use religion to win the support
of the people. Ayub Khan, to counter the fundamentalist religious parties, supported the idea
of Progressive Islam, and set up the Institute of Islamic Studies under the leadership of Dr
Fazlur Rahman and encouraged Ghulam Ahmad Parvez to refute the propaganda of Islamic
extremists. Zia, on the other hand, fully supported the orthodox ulema and religious parties
and launched the process of Islamisation of society. Musharraf raised the slogan of
'Enlightened moderation' and patronised the concept of progressive Islam. All these attempts
to reform society were made without the participation of the people. While Zia's Islamisation
left a lasting impact, the policy of promoting 'progressive' Islam ended without leaving any
significant mark. As a military dictator assumes absolute power, a culture of flattery
flourishes and becomes the only way to succeed. As there is no tolerance for opposition,
dissidents are tortured, imprisoned or exiled. Military regimes are afraid of political activists
and use intelligence agencies for the surveillance of their opponents. Students, who are
politically conscious, are not allowed to form unions in educational institutions or take part in
politics. The same happens in the case of workers, whose trade unions are banned in the name
of national interest. Once political activities are banned, a political party either withdraws
from active politics or goes underground. In both cases it loses contact with the people.
Subsequently, people become depoliticised and take no interest in the country's affairs which
makes political life stagnant. After the restoration of democracy, the old leadership re-
emerges with outdated political ideas giving no chance to the new generation to play its role.
Refrences
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_law
http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-compulsory-subjects/pakistan-affairs/98181-martial-laws-
pakistan.html
Cheema.A, Khwaja, A.I., & Qadir.A (2005). Decentralization in Pakistan: Context, Content
and Causes. The Social Science Research Network, RWP05-034
Tunio. H,. (2011, July 10). Turning back the clock: Sindh reverts to bureaucracy-run system,
The Express Tribune, pages
Hassan. A,. (2011, August 16). Local Governance Reforms in Pakistan, Some Issues, The
Express Tribune, pages
https://www.dawn.com/news/563782