Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 168 views

    Caveat Model Draft

    Uploaded by

    Dhanvanth Kota
    1) Arun Kumar filed a caveat against Bhaskar Raju and Kamalamma regarding a property dispute over a house site. 2) Arun Kumar purchased the land and is constructing a house, but Bhaskar Raju and Kamalamma claim the previous owner promised to sell them part of the land. 3) Arun Kumar fears Bhaskar Raju and Kamalamma may seek an ex parte interim injunction in court to stop construction and harass him, so he filed this caveat asking the court to notify him of any filings and not grant ex parte orders without a hearing.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Caveat Model Draft

    Uploaded by

    Dhanvanth Kota
    168 views3 pages
    1) Arun Kumar filed a caveat against Bhaskar Raju and Kamalamma regarding a property dispute over a house site. 2) Arun Kumar purchased the land and is constructing a house, but Bhaskar Raju and Kamalamma claim the previous owner promised to sell them part of the land. 3) Arun Kumar fears Bhaskar Raju and Kamalamma may seek an ex parte interim injunction in court to stop construction and harass him, so he filed this caveat asking the court to notify him of any filings and not grant ex parte orders without a hearing.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) Arun Kumar filed a caveat against Bhaskar Raju and Kamalamma regarding a property dispute over a house site. 2) Arun Kumar purchased the land and is constructing a house, but Bhaskar Raju and Kamalamma claim the previous owner promised to sell them part of the land. 3) Arun Kumar fears Bhaskar Raju and Kamalamma may seek an ex parte interim injunction in court to stop construction and harass him, so he filed this caveat asking the court to notify him of any filings and not grant ex parte orders without a hearing.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    168 views3 pages

    Caveat Model Draft

    Uploaded by

    Dhanvanth Kota
    1) Arun Kumar filed a caveat against Bhaskar Raju and Kamalamma regarding a property dispute over a house site. 2) Arun Kumar purchased the land and is constructing a house, but Bhaskar Raju and Kamalamma claim the previous owner promised to sell them part of the land. 3) Arun Kumar fears Bhaskar Raju and Kamalamma may seek an ex parte interim injunction in court to stop construction and harass him, so he filed this caveat asking the court to notify him of any filings and not grant ex parte orders without a hearing.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    MODEL DRAFT

    IN THE HONOURABLE COURT OF DISTRICT ---------, AT --------


    Caveat No.---- /2018

    Between:

    A.Arun Kumar,
    S/o Mohan Kumar,
    Aged 35years,
    Occ. Business,
    R/o China Waltair,
    Visakhapatnam. …. Caveator

    Versus

    1.Bhaskar Raju,
    S/o Krishna Rao,
    Aged 30 years,
    Occ.RTC Driver,
    R/o Chinawaltair,
    Visakhapatnam.

    2.Smt. Kamalamma,
    W/o Bhaskar Raju,
    Aged 25 years,
    Occ. House-hold,
    R/o Chinawaltair,
    Visakhapatnam. ….Opponents

    CAVEAT FILED UNDER SECTION 148 A OF C P C


    The Caveator above named respectfully submits on oath as follows:
    1. That The caveator is the owner of the house-sie bearing no.14-2-36
    situated at china waltair, surrounded by East Gram Panchayat road, North
    Gram Panchayat Lane. South House of the opponent, West house of Prakash.
    He purchased this site from Sri Murali Krishna, s/o Radha Krishna, r/o Ashok
    Nagar, and got it registered in his name vide Registered Sale Deed
    Document No. 456/92 of the sub-Registrar, Stamps and Registration, the
    opponent No.1 was one of the attesters to the said document.

    2. That the Caveator obtained permission from the Gram Panchayat and
    started the construction of house.
    3. That the opponent Nos. 1 and 2 asked the caveator to sell the space of his
    south face (Which shall become north to the opponents) to an extent of 80
    square yards. So that their house will, get spacious vacant space on the
    north according to the vasthu. The caveator did not agree. The opponent
    claimed that the seller of the said house-site (from whom the caveator
    purchased) promised to sell that piece to them orally in 2011. The quarreled
    with the caveator and challenged how will he complete the construction.
    4. That the caveator suspects that the opponents may approach the court
    seeking for interim injunction order ex parte for stopping the work of the
    caveator and to harass him
    5. That the caveator sent the copies of this caveat application to the
    opponents by registered post and enclose herewith the postal receipts along
    with this caveat petition.

    The caveator prays the honourable court to give a notice to the caveator of
    to his advocate, if the opponent party files any proceeding/ application for an
    interim order. The caveator also prays the honourable court not to give any
    ex parte interim order to the opponent party without hearing the caveator.
    Place: Prayed.
    Date: Sd/- xxxx
    (Arun Kumar)
    Caveator.
    Name and Address of the Advocate of the caveator:

    L. Rajasekhar,
    S/o Krishan Rao,
    R/o Gurudwar,
    Visakhapatnam.

    You might also like