Textiles Market Situation Report 2019 PDF
Textiles Market Situation Report 2019 PDF
Textiles Market Situation Report 2019 PDF
IN T RODUC T ION
Welcome to the textiles market situation
report. WRAP market situation reports
provide in-depth information on the latest
economic trends and developments
affecting the capture, re-use, and recycling
of key recovered materials.
3% 921,000
UNComtrade.
UK households continue to tonnes of used textiles ended up in As well as the wider economic The continued growth in spending
buy more clothing: spending the household residual waste in 2017 context and trends in the on clothing (with its associated
on clothing has increased by of which... fashion sector, Brexit, Extended environmental impacts) and the
3% per annum on average Producer Responsibility and quantity of textiles still going to
in the five years to 2018, adjusted increased sector scrutiny are some residual waste give a sense of
for inflation. of the factors that may be shaping challenge, but also of the economic
the future for the textiles sector. and environmental opportunity for
the sector.
620,000 336,000
tonnes of used textiles were tonnes of used clothing ended up in
collected for re-use and recycling the household residual waste in 2017.
in 2018.
CONTENTS
USED TEXTILES
TEXTILE USED TEXTILES
IN THE RESIDUAL
CONSUMPTION ARISINGS
WASTE
USED TEXTILES
COLLECTED FOR END MARKETS FOR PRICES FOR USED
RE-USE AND USED TEXTILES TEXTILES
RECYCLING
Fig 1
Most of the clothing consumed
Figure 1. UK household spending on clothing in the UK is imported, and the
% y-o-y £m
CLOTHING estimates here are based on
18% 70,000
CONSUMPTION ‘apparent consumption’ – which is
measured by looking at production
16%
60,000 WRAP estimates that the UK of clothing plus imports of clothing
14%
50,000 consumed 1.04m tonnes of minus exports of clothing5.
12%
10% 40,000 clothing in 2017. The methodology and inherent
8% 30,000 assumptions associated with
This compares with 1.09m tonnes
6% estimates based on apparent
20,000 in 2014 and 1.03m tonnes in 2010.
4% consumption mean that the data is
10,000 arguably better suited for providing
2% Preliminary data suggests
orders of magnitude, than for
0% consumption at 1.07m tonnes
tracking trends; and the implied
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2011
2012
2013
2014
2017
2018
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2015
2016
in 2018 (subject to revision).
changes over time may not fully
reflect market conditions. Caution
Source: ONS Consumer Trends, released 28 June 2019. Annual data.
is urged in the interpretation of
the data over time.
% y-o-y, chained volume measure £m adjusted for inflation
(chained volume measure)
Key
Annual level of spending on clothing: rising
Annual growth of spending on clothing: slowing down
USED T E X T ILES
or through in-store collections
(sometimes in exchange for a
SCAP
discount voucher or through cash for
USED T E X T ILES
influenced by clothing bought around A total of 921,000 tonnes of textile
three years prior. Notwithstanding products, including shoes, bags,
the caveats that apply around the belts (194,000 tonnes) and non-
RESIDUA L WA S T E
clothing found in the household in 2017, destined for landfill and
residual waste in 2017 may reflect incineration.
the delayed impact of higher clothing
consumption levels in 2014.
47%
73%
53% 72%
27%
This represents a 10% increase 28%
since 2014/201510, or around
There were 336,000 tonnes 35,000 tonnes, reversing part of the
of clothing in the household 50,000 tonnes decrease observed 182k tonnes 245k tonnes 141k tonnes
residual waste in 20179, between 2012 and 2014/15. 208k tonnes 91k tonnes 53k tonnes
destined for landfill or Total: 391k tonnes Total: 336k tonnes Total: 194k tonnes
There are several ways of interpreting
incineration. this. Given the average clothing
longevity (3.3 years), the clothing Key
discarded in any given year is arguably
Kerbside Household waste and recycling centres (HWRC)
USED T E X T ILES
COLLEC T ED F OR
RE- USE A ND
REC YCLING
IN TOTAL
An estimated 600,000 tonnes
55%
The percentage of textiles in residual
of textiles were collected waste in 2017.
for re-use and recycling
in the UK in 2017, rising to This means that, as a proportion of
620,000 tonnes in 201812. textiles consumed or ‘placed on the
market’ in that same year, around
These are not on a like-for-like basis 36% was collected for re-use and
with the previous estimate for 2014, recycling in 2017 and 55% was in
so it is not possible to conclude the residual waste.
whether the amounts collected for
re-use and recycling have increased
or decreased since then. The
estimates are compiled from a
variety of sources using several
assumptions and the estimated level
of uncertainty is +/- 30,000 tonnes
around the central estimate of
620,000 tonnes for 2018.
END M A RK E T S
F OR USED
T E X T ILES
Figure 4. The fate of UK used textiles collected for re-use and recycling12
Exported 60%
Most of the used textiles exported is
Re-use-sold through
thought to be for the re-use market
Most of the UK used textiles charity shops 31%
in the destination country, rather
that are collected for re-use than being recycled. WRAP is Waste 5%
and recycling are destined currently carrying out research to Recycling 3%
for the re-use market: 32% is find out what happens overseas to
textiles that may not be re-used. The Re-use-sold through
re-used in the UK, sold mostly remainder of textiles collected in the second-hand commercial
in charity shops, and around UK is recycled (3%) and around 5% outlets 2%
60% is exported. is not suitable for re-use or recycling,
and is disposed of as waste.
FIBRE-TO-FIBRE (F2F)14
Textile production is dominated There are projects underway Mechanical F2F recycling has
by cotton and polyester, but exploring the financial sustainability historically been focused on
alternatives, including recycled of fibre-to-fibre (F2F) recycling, recovering higher-value fibres such
fibres, hold the potential to help including from F2F recycling process as wool and cashmere. The current
the industry meet future demand developers and from the European emphasis is on improving processes
for clothing. This would also Clothing Action Plan (ECAP). for cotton and cotton blends – with
minimise the environmental a focus on finding ways to minimise
impacts along the supply chain, Chemical F2F recycling is thought the erosion of the length fibres
drawing on used textiles currently to be several years away from through the recycling process
destined for landfill or incineration full commercialisation, although (shorter fibres do not perform
as a source of feedstock to make commercial initiatives using pre- as well as the longer, virgin fibres
new fibres and yarns. consumer feedstock15 have already in the yarn-making process).
been deployed. The time lags to
For example, chemical fibre-to-fibre market readiness reflects the
recycling of used polycotton textiles timescales involved in getting
dissolves the fibres to recover the demonstrable outputs from pilots
synthetic fraction and make pellets. and trials and in raising funds.
These can re-enter the synthetic Scaling up to meet the levels of
yarn manufacturing process and the demand of high-capacity yarn
cellulose fraction to make dissolving mills would be the next stage
pulp, which is then used in the of development – potentially
production of viscose-like materials. another two to three years.
• Improvements in post-consumer
textiles collection and sorting
processes;
• Introduction of automation to
increase accuracy and decrease
costs in the sorting process.
Although still in development,
automation may also lower
garment preparation costs
(removal of zippers, etc.);
• Development and communication
of feedstock specifications
through collaboration between
textile merchants and F2F
recycling process developers;
• Supply chain integration and work
to foster demand (pull) from
brands, retailers and consumers;
and
• support for, and by, F2F recycling
process developers and those
in the textile merchant supply
chain, in securing finance for
process scale-up and
commercialisation.
Source: UNComtrade
Fig 6
tonne across destinations – and the
changes in the value per tonne in Figure 6. UK exports of used textiles
UK EXPORTS OF each destination over time. After two £m
USED TEXTILES years of consecutive decline in 2014 450
and 2015, UK exports of used textiles 400
In the last twenty years, the have since risen back up to reach 350
broad trend for UK exports £381m in 2018 – just 3% below the
300
previous high of £391m in 2013.
of used textiles20 has been Exports (in £) in the first five months
250
upwards: from 80,000 tonnes of 2019 were up 8%, compared with 200
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
growth has settled at 1% per annum whereas exports to the EU, notably
on average between 2008 and 2018. to Poland, and to other non-EU Source: HMRC
European countries have fallen Fig 7
After a peak at 352,000 tonnes in substantially. Figure 7. UK exports of used textiles by destination, 2008 and 2018
2014, exports of used textiles fell £m
two years running in 2015 and 2016 In value terms, this means that,
180
but have picked up since: up by 3% while exports to the EU have risen,
they have done so by much less 160
in 2017 and by 8% in 2018 to reach a
new high of 373,000 tonnes. Exports than exports to other regions. 140
PRICES F OR
One recurrent issue raised by the lower-value and higher-value
used textiles supply chain is that the destinations, impact the value per
quality of used textiles donated has tonne exported from the UK overall.
1,200
10-year average
1,000
Key influencing factors include the
23-year average
global market demand for used 800
According to WRAP’s Materials textiles, the availability of used
Pricing Report, prices for textiles, their quality, the exchange 600
Depending on the degree and cost of sorting due to the cost but some
sorting required, the suitability of the restarted or extended their UK Figure 10. UK used textiles prices and value per tonne exported
textiles for the higher value markets sorting in 2018. Costs, margins, and
£
(such as sub-Saharan Africa or prospects are likely to vary greatly
Europe) or lower value markets (such across operators with many different 1,200
as Pakistan), and on the proportion types of operations (e.g. cash 4
1,000
not suitable for re-use or recycling clothes, in-store collections, different
end markets, the profitability of a degrees of sorting, etc.) and many 800
given tonne of used textiles can vary very small, often short-lived
noticeably and operators adapt their operations. 600
Q4 | 2013
Q1 | 2014
Q2 | 2014
Q3 | 2014
Q4 | 2014
Q1 | 2015
Q2 | 2015
Q3 | 2015
Q4 | 2015
Q1 | 2016
Q2 | 2016
Q3 | 2016
Q4 | 2016
Q1 | 2017
Q2 | 2013
Q3 | 2013
Q2 | 2017
Q3 | 2017
Q4 | 2017
Q1 | 2018
Q2 | 2018
Q3 | 2018
Q4 | 2018
Q1 | 2019
Q2 | 2019
represents a range of factors. make it the largest operator in the
UK, operating across UK regions and
There is not enough data available across supply chain streams: charity
on the costs of sorting and shops, textile banks and HWRCs.
processing the textiles to build a Key
clear picture of the costs. Comments Export value Charity shops Banks
from the industry suggest that costs
have increased in the last 5 years,
with some operators reporting being Comments from the Source: WRAP Materials Pricing Report, HMRC. Quarterly averages.
NB: 2019 Q2 export value based on Apr-May 2019 data.
affected by the increase in the industry suggest that costs
minimum wage and rising business have increased in the last 5
rates, as well as by rising costs to years, with some operators
tailor sorting to meet customer
requirements.
reporting being affected
by the increase in the
An industry survey12 reports that minimum wage and rising
most operators are believed to sort business rates.
to some extent in the UK. Some
companies had moved away from
LOOK ING A HE A D
“‘Extended Producer
THE PROSPECT OF Responsibility’ (EPR) is a powerful MICROFIBRES
EXTENDED environmental policy approach
The release of microfibres from is difficult. There are studies
through which a producer’s
PRODUCER responsibility for a product is textiles into the environment providing valuable insight, but the
RESPONSIBILITY extended to the post-use stage. has gained attention as a source methodological variations make
This incentivises producers to of concern for the textiles comparative analysis difficult,
Defra’s 2018 Resources and Waste design their products to make industry, with a body of evidence further impeded by the greater
Strategy identified textiles as one it easier for them to be re-used, reporting microfibres in airborne focus on synthetic fibres in existing
of five priority areas for which Defra dismantled and/or recycled at dust and as waterborne studies focusing on release from
plans to review and consult on end of life. Alongside microplastics. laundry relative to natural fibres
measures such as Extended stakeholders, we consider EPR to (driven by the greater susceptibility
Producer Responsibility by 2025 be a crucial tool in moving waste The Environmental Audit of some synthetic garments to
(by 2022 for two of the priority areas, up the hierarchy, and stimulating Committee’s February 2019 contribute to marine pollution).
not yet specified). Defra refers to secondary markets. It has been report 23 highlighted the role played The actual impacts of the presence
the issues it might consider as part adopted in many countries by the choice of synthetic fibres of microfibres – for instance on
of this review and consultation around the world, across a broad and garment design. The report human health – have also not been
process. These include: the impact range of products, to deliver acknowledged the need for further fully assessed yet, although work
of fast fashion (for instance via higher collection, recycling research – whilst signalling that this has been done for instance on the
lesser clothing durability and shorter and recovery rates. The most is not a reason for delaying action impact on textile workers.
clothing lifespan) and how to support successful schemes use a range in the meantime.
re-use and closed-loop recycling to of measures to encourage more WRAP continues to investigate
reduce the environmental impacts sustainable design decisions at WRAP’s own exploratory this area and is working with
of textiles, including the impacts the production stage.” research24 has identified several funders and partners to determine
of microplastic fibres in the challenges in attempting to get a whether this area might form part
water system. Defra, 2018, Resources and sense of the scale of the issue at of future action plans for the UK
Waste Strategy each stage of the textile lifecycle, textiles sector.
by assessing the formation of
microfibres during the production,
processing, use phase and disposal
of textile products. Separating
microfibres from the rest of the
waste products or other impurities
6 Resource Futures, 2019, ‘UK 12 Oakdene Hollins, 2019, ‘A 16 Rounded to the nearest hundred.
textile consumption estimate’ quantification of used textile
ENDNOTES (unpublished research for WRAP). collections for re-use and recycling 17 Source: Charity Retail Association.
Data rounded. in the UK’ (unpublished research The 55% proportion is based on
1 Mattresses and carpets are the Sources of Stock 2017 report.
for WRAP).
not included. 7 WRAP, 2013, ‘Measuring the
active life of clothes’. 13 Other routes such as peer-to- 18 Source: UNComtrade.
2 This is an estimate in current
peer donations and sales through
prices, for 2018, from the ONS 8 WRAP, 2019, ‘National municipal 19 The Observatory of Economic
eBay are out of scope for this
data from the Consumer Trends commercial waste composition, Complexity provides data based
report and not counted in the
dataset released on 28.06.2019. England 2017’ (unpublished at on UNComtrade data and
amounts collected for re-use and
Consumer-panel-based estimates the time of writing). All figures ‘cleaned’ to harmonise the
recycling nor the end markets.
of the clothing market from rounded to the nearest thousand data on bilateral flows. The OEC
Kantar and ONS household- tonnes, so the sum of the 14 WRAP, 2019, ‘Fibre-to-fibre data ranks the UK as the third
survey based Family spending individual elements may appear recycling: an economic and largest exporter after the US
data on clothing suggest lower to not add up exactly. financial sustainability and Germany.
levels. assessment’.
9 WRAP, 2017, ‘Valuing our clothes: 20 Export data rounded to the
3 On a per capita basis, this the cost of UK fashion’. 15 In this context, ‘pre-consumer’ nearest 1,000 tonnes. Export
translates into: 13%, 8%, 4% refers to feedstock arising from value on a free on-board basis
and 2%. 10 Household-t ype textiles such as the textile supply chain prior to (FOB), i.e. including transport to
bed and table linen and leisure the clothing/textile reaching the the customs frontier but not
4 ONS, Consumer Price Index. textiles such as sleeping bags. including freight to the importing
consumer and ‘post-consumer’
refers to feedstock arising from country nor insurance costs.
5 The methodology uses a 11 WRAP, 2019, ‘National municipal clothing/textile discarded by the
combination of Her Majesty’s commercial waste composition, consumer.
Revenue and Customs data and England 2017’ (unpublished at the
Prodcom data sourced from time of writing).
Eurostat and the ONS and rests
on several implicit assumptions
for instance on stock changes.
Our mission is to accelerate the move to a sustainable resource efficient economy through reinventing how we
design, produce and sell products; re-thinking how we use and consume products; and re-defining what is
possible through re-use and recycling.
www.wrap.org.uk/marketreports
While we have tried to make sure this report is accurate, we cannot accept responsibility or be held legally responsible for any loss or damage
arising out of or in connection with this information being inaccurate, incomplete or misleading. This material is copyrighted. You can copy it
free of charge as long as the material is accurate and not used in a misleading context. You must identify the source of the material and
acknowledge our copyright. You must not use material to endorse or suggest we have endorsed a commercial product or service. For more
details please see our terms and conditions on our website at www.wrap.org.uk