General Introduction of Law
General Introduction of Law
General Introduction of Law
FUNDAMENTAL LIBERTIES:
ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM:
JUDICIAL SYSTEM: The Federal Constitution provides that power is exercised by the
legislative, the executive and the judiciary. The judiciary has the power to hear and determine
civil and criminal matters.The judiciary power of Malaysia is vested in the Federal Court, the
Court of Appeal, the High Courts and subordinate courtsThe head of the judiciary is the Chief
Justice.
WRITTEN LAW:
Written law is most important source of law.it refers to the portion of the
Malaysian law which includes the following:
3. Legislation
4. Subsidy Legislation
1.THE FEDERAL AND STATE CONSTITUTION:
Art 4-The supreme law of the land;any laws passed after Merdaka Day
which inconsistent with this constitution shall to the extend of inconsistency,be void.
Laws that are enacted by the parliament after 1946 but before Malaysia’s
Independence in 1957 are called ordinance,but those made after 1957 are called Acts,on the
other hand,laws made by the State Legislative Assemblies (except Sarawak) are called
Enactments.The laws in Sarawak are called Ordinances.
SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION:
UNWRITTEN LAW:
Unwritten law is simply that portion of the Malaysian law which is not written.
i.e. Law which is not being enacted by the parliament or state assemblies and which is not
found in the written federal and state constitutions.
SHARIA LAW:
Ramah v. Laton (1927) 6 FMSLR 1278; Islamic law is not foreign law but local
law and the law of the land.
Art 3 FC- Islam is the religion of the Federation,but other religious may be
practiced in peace and harmony in any part of the Federation.
Artice 11 of the federal constitution provides that every person has the right to
profess and practice his religion.
Ramah V Laton
Fact:the respondent was
another widow of Mat Dawi who
sued the appellant for a
declaration that all
movable n immovable
property was 'Harta
Syarikat' n she is also
entitled to a one half
share in the property.
Principle:Muslim law is
not a foreign law but local
law n the law of the land.
Decision:the court held
that...the respondent is
entitled to a one half
share on the
'Harta Syarikat' according
2 Muhammadan Law.
Muslim law is not a foreign
law but local law n the law
of the land n the local law
is a
matter of which the court
must take judicial notice.
The court must propound
Ramah V Laton
Fact:the respondent was
another widow of Mat Dawi who
sued the appellant for a
declaration that all
movable n immovable
property was 'Harta
Syarikat' n she is also
entitled to a one half
share in the property.
Principle:Muslim law is
not a foreign law but local
law n the law of the land.
Decision:the court held
that...the respondent is
entitled to a one half
share on the
'Harta Syarikat' according
2 Muhammadan Law.
Muslim law is not a foreign
law but local law n the law
of the land n the local law
is a
matter of which the court
must take judicial notice.
The court must propound
The FC sets out that Islamic law in Malaysia is confined to the personal laws and
within the powers of the state.
It can be said that the jurisdiction given by the State and Sharia courts is limited.
1.FEDERAL CONSTITUTION Art 4(1) CASE STUDY:
FACT: Loh Kooi Choon v Government of Malaysia (1977) 2 MLJ 187 is a case decided in
the Federal Court of Malaysia concerning the rights and freedoms guaranteed by
the Constitution, and also involving the extent to which Parliament can amend the Constitution.
PRINCIPLE :
Before the Federal Court, Loh's counsel argued against the amendment and
its retrospective effect on the grounds that it was not permissible for the Constitution to be
amended in such a way that its "basic structure" was destroyed. Loh referred to Article 4(1),
which specifies that the Constitution is "the supreme law of the Federation", and to the Basic
Structure doctrine of Indian case law, to argue that the amendment had contravened the spirit and
basic structure of the Constitution by invalidating the right of habeas corpus.
DECISOIN:
Federal Justice Raja Azlan Shah rejected the argument of the appellant, stating that
although Article 4(1) declared that any unconstitutional law passed after independence would be
void, this did not apply to the Constitution itself, The Constitution could not be internally
inconsistent. In his judgement, he stated that law made under ordinary legislative power, and law
in the form of Constitutional amendments, were two different things, and as such constitutional
amendments were not subject to the inconsistency clause of Article 4(1).
This reasoning, in my view, is based on the premise that the Constitution as the supreme law,
unchangeable by ordinary means, is distinct from ordinary law and as such cannot be
inconsistent with itself.
FACT: The respondent was another widow of Mat Dawi who sued the appellant for a
declaration that all movable n immovable property was n she is also entitled to a one half share
in the property.
PRINCIPLE: Muslim law is not a foreign law but local law n the law of the land.
DECISION: The court held that...the respondent is entitled to a one half share on the according
2 Muhammadan Law. Muslim law is not a foreign law but local law n the law of the land n the
local law is a matter of which the court must take judicial notice. The court must propound or
consider the law..
In Malaysia, the legislative authority at the Federal level, is vested in Parliament. Parliament
Legislation is enacted by Parliament by introducing a Bill which is passed by both Dewan
Rakyat and Dewan Negara, and assented to by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.
In Malaysia, there are four types of legislation considered by Parliament. These are:
i. Public or government Bill
Public bills include bills on matters of general public interest such as national defence, public
order and taxation.
ii. Private Bills – deal with matters of Local and Personal concern. Private Bills are those
affecting limited or particular persons or group of persons, associations, organisations or bodies.
iv. Hybrid Bills may be of general application and are introduced by either a minister or
private member but they belong to that class of Bills which, in the opinion of the speaker as the
case may be appear to affect individual rights or interests adversely.
2. Parliamentary Stage
The procedure is set out in Chapter 5, Part IV of the Federal Constitution and
Standing Orders of Dewan Rakyat and Dewan Negara. The Standing Orders regulate the actual
procedure in the passage of a Bill in Parliament. These rules have been drawn up under powers
conferred by Article 62 of Constitution which empowers each House to regulate its own
procedure.
First Reading This is a mere formality and may take place even if the Bills has not been printed
and circulated.
The minister presents the Bill by having its short title read by the clerk of the Dewan. There is no
debate or amendment at this stage of the proceedings.
Second Reading
It occurs only when the bill is printed and circulated. The Second reading is
preceded by a motion to this effect:
“Mr Speaker, Sir, I beg to move that a Bill (name of the bIll) be now read a second time.”
This motion requires to be seconded. The minister outlines the main principles of the bill. A
debate on principles ensues. If the bill receives the requisite number of votes, it proceeds to
Committee Stage.
Committee Stage
At the end of the Second reading, the Bill is committed to a committee of the
whole of House. In effect, the House resolves itself into a Committee on the Bill. This is called
the Committee Stage and it is intended to allow members the opportunity to discuss details of the
Bill and to propose amendments in a less formal proceeding.
When discussion is completed in Committee, the minister moves a motion to report the Bill
under consideration to the House. If the motion is accepted, the House will resume sitting and
this brings the Committee Stage to an end.
Sometimes a Bill is not considered by the Committee of the whole House but by a Special Select
Committee. This is an ad hoc Committee appointed for a particular purpose. The size and
members to be nominated to the Committee will be determined by a Committee of Selection.
Third Reading
When the House resumes sitting, the minister reports that the Bills has been
considered and accepted by the Committee with or without amendments. He then moves a
motion that the Bill be read a third time and passed. If the motion is accepted, the Bill is
considered passed. The formal motion is as follows:
“Mr. Speaker, sir, I beg to report that (name of the Bill) has been considered in committee and
has been agreed to with (or without) amendments. Sir, I beg to move that the Bill be now read a
third time and passed.”
Other House
When a Bill has been passed in the manner described above in either House, it
is then transmitted or sent to the other House for consideration.
When the Bill has been considered by the other House in a similar fashion, it is returned to the
House from which it originated.
Royal Assent
The Yang Dipertuan Agong is an integral part of parliament. His assent is normally
required before a Bill becomes law. Clause 4 of article 66 reads:
“The Yang Dipertuan Agong shall within thirty days after a Bill is presented to him assent to the
Bill by causing the Public seal to be affixed thereto”.
This clause did not exist in the original version of the Constitution (1957 and 1963 version). It
was a later addition which was first came into force from 20 January 1984 and later further
strengthened. Where the royal assent is not affected within a time specified, the Bill becomes law
as if it had been assented. This new provision clearly took away the Royal discretion and
imposed a time frame for approval. The time frame is one month for Money Bill and twelve
months if it is not Money Bill.
CONCLUSION:
Law can be derived from the various sources.
Malaysian laws are largely influenced by the English law and Islamic law.
The application of English law throughout Malaysia is conditional.
Law can be classified in many ways: according to purpose, punishment, nature
etc.