STACKS
STACKS
STACKS
TCE.M1-ME-266-101
BASIC STUDY GUIDE FOR STACKS SHEET i OF iii
STACKS
REV.NO. R0 R1 ISSUE
APD.BY RL Sd/- RL
REV.NO. R0 R1 ISSUE
APD.BY RL Sd/- RL
CONTENTS
SL. NO. TITLE SH. NO.
1.0 SCOPE 1
ISSUE
R1
REVISION STATUS
R0 00.01.13 ----
ISSUE
R1
1.0 SCOPE
This document gives guidelines for carrying out a basic study for stacks. For format,
structure and other guidelines for preparation of a basic study refer TCE.M9-PCS-
25.
2.1 STEAM GENERATOR (SG), HOT WATER BOILER AND THERMIC FLUID
HEATER (TFH)
2.1.1 Fuel firing rate for worst fuel at 100% Maximum Continuous Rating (MCR)
2.1.2 Flue gas flow rate at 100% MCR for the design fuel considering leakage in air pre-
heater (if applicable) for SG, hot water boiler or TFH
2.1.3 Flue gas temperature at stack inlet at 100% MCR for design fuel considering
leakage in air pre-heater (if applicable) for SG, hot water boiler or TFH
2.2.1 Fuel consumption at rated capacity. For HRSG this is applicable only if
supplementary firing is provided.
2.3 GENERAL
ISSUE
R1
The stack may be either of steel or RCC. Generally, consider steel stacks for
heights upto 65 M and RCC stacks for heights above 65 M. Refer IS 6533 and
consult civil engineer for general design considerations.
4.0 TYPE OF STACK
For installation having more than one SG, hot water boiler, TFH or HRSG, the
stack may be any of the following types :
(a) Individual stack for each of the units
Type of stack shall be decided based on economic comparison of the three types of
stacks. For diesel engines and DGs, manufacturers normally recommend only
individual stacks. Decide on the type of stack in consultation with the manufacturers.
List the prevalent emission regulations in the basic study. These are given in the
relevant publications of the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MOEF) and State
Pollution Control Board (PCB). Calculate height of stack based on applicable
regulations.
(c) From figure 2, obtain approximate stack height above flue gas entrance for
stack draft of 1.1 inches of WC and average stack gas temperature. This is
ISSUE
R1
the tentative stack height excluding height from foundation to flue gas
entrance.
(d) From figure 3, obtain stack exit gas temperature for the tentative stack
height obtained at (c), recommended stack diameter obtained at (a) and
stack inlet gas temperature which is the input data.
(e) Compare the “Obtained Stack Exit Gas Temperature” with “Assumed
Stack Exit Gas Temperature”.
(f) Determine revised average stack gas temperature with the “Obtained Stack
Exit Gas Temperature” and repeat the steps (c) to (e) till obtained value is
within + 5% of assumed value.
(g) Based on exit gas temperature arrived, final required stack height is
obtained. This represents the active height to which the height of any inactive
section from foundation to stack flue gas entrance shall be added.
(h) The stack flow loss shall be checked by using values for diameter, height,
average gas temperature and gas flow in equation below:
ISSUE
R1
(j) Net available draft or available induced draft at the stack entrance is the
difference between theoretical stack draft and stack flow losses. It shall be
ensured that theoretical stack draft is 10% more than stack flow losses.
While arriving at net available draft, check whether entry losses are already
considered by SG, hot water boiler, diesel engine, DG, HRSG or TFH
vendor.
(k) Height arrived at using above method shall be checked with MOEF
regulations. If height calculated using above method is less than height
calculated based on MOEF regulations, height as per latter method shall be
followed. Civil aviation authorities regulations shall also be considered
before finalising the stack height. Generally, MOEF recommended height is
more than the height as per draft calculations.
N-1: ‘Steam- Its Generation and Use’ (38th Edition) by Babcock and Wilcox
ISSUE
R1
7.1 The basic study shall include briefly the civil construction aspects of the selected
stack configuration. Also include in the basic study, the salient features of the stack
with regard to provision of lining, insulation, if any, access door, clean out door, soot
hopper, exit nozzle, rain hood, stack monitoring system, sampling points, air vents,
cap, ladder, platforms, mounting arrangements, lighting, aviation beacons, earthing
and lightning protection etc. A data sheet shall be included as part of basic study.
For single flue stacks standard format TCE.M4-126-12 may be used.
7.2 Lining of stack may be required for one or more of the following purposes:
8.1 PAINTING
8.1.1 Paints provide barrier protection by physically covering the metal with a film. Once
the paint film gets damaged barrier protection ceases and corrosion sets in. A
corrosion allowance of 5 mm is required to be provided to compensate for the
material loss due to corrosion. In case the flue gas is very corrosive SS lining or
gunniting is provided on the inside surface.
8.1.2 The internal surface of an unlined stack shall have two (2) coats of red oxide or zinc
chromate primer and external surface shall have one (1) coat of red oxide or zinc
chromate primer. Both internal and external surfaces shall then have two (2) coats of
heat resistant aluminium finish paint.
8.1.3 Painting also requires regular maintenance. Depending on the service temperature
and corrosive gas components, the frequency of maintenance of painting varies. For
conventional thermal power plants the stack surface is required to be repainted at
least once in 2 to 3 years. For high temperature applications, like stacks of DG
power plants and bypass stacks of Combined Cycle Power Plants (CCPP), the
frequency of maintenance painting is more compared to conventional power plants.
In case of chimney of captive power plant, located in fertiliser, petrochemical or in
chemical plants, having corrosive ambient atmosphere, painting may be required
even at an interval of 1 year.
ISSUE
R1
8.2 ALUMINISING
8.2.2 The sprayed aluminium coating provides excellent oxidation resistance and
protection both against corrosion by industrial atmosphere and by hot gases.
8.2.4 Aluminising is a long term maintenance free protection of steel stacks and this
reduces the plant outage time. As per BS 5493- 1977, Sec.2:
(a) Unsealed aluminium sprayed coating has a life of 20 years before first
maintenance for corrosive atmosphere and for high temperature surfaces.
(b) Sealed aluminium spraying coating has a life of 20 years before first
maintenance for corrosive atmosphere and for high temperature surfaces,
and it is recommended for stacks requiring aesthetic, colour, inert barrier
and abrasive resistance.
(c) Sealed aluminium sprayed coating with first maintenance painting after 20
years is recommended for a very long life of more than 20 years (more than
the life of the plant). The first maintenance coating thickness shall be
minimum 75 microns with a finish coat.
(d) Sealed aluminium sprayed coating with frequent maintenance painting (no
requirement of measurable overlay of sealer, one coat is sufficient) is
recommended for indefinite life period of the stacks.
8.2.5 The corrosion allowance of 5 mm which is normally provided for painted stacks
shall be eliminated if aluminising is carried out on both interior and exterior surfaces,
since possibility of corrosion attack on the metal surface is almost nil. Corrosion
allowance of 5 mm shall be provided if only exterior surface is aluminised.
ISSUE
R1
8.2.6 Not much variation is expected in the time duration for aluminising and painting.
Approximately 150 M2 of surface area can be aluminised in a day. Hence,
aluminising is not expected to cause any delay in project implementation.
8.2.7 Following limitations are experienced in aluminising of steel stacks:
(a) Aluminising of entire internal surface of the stacks already erected has not
yet become viable. But the inside weldments at the joints can be aluminised
irrespective of the stack height.
(b) Aluminising of interior surface of the stacks of diameter less than 750 mm is
not possible even at ground level.
8.3 CONCLUSION
Aluminising is a better and economical process than painting to enhance the life of
stacks by preventing corrosion due to high temperature, acid gas and moist
environments. The cost of aluminising and maintenance painting once in 5 years is
cheaper than the cost of painting once in 2 to 3 years. For DG set exhaust gas
stacks and CCPP bypass stacks, due to the high temperature service, the frequency
of repainting may be still higher than that of conventional utility plants and hence
aluminising becomes more economical practice to enhance the life of stacks.
Aluminising of exterior surface only, shall be specified for the stacks of diameter less
than 750 mm and corrosion allowance of 5 mm shall be provided to take care of
inside corrosion.
ISSUE
R1
FIGURE 1
RECOMMENDED STACK DIAMETER
ISSUE
R1
FIGURE 2
STACK HEIGHT VERSUS STACK DRAFT
ISSUE
R1
FIGURE 3
STACK EXIT GAS TEMPERATURE
VERSUS STACK DIMENSIONS
ISSUE
R1
FIGURE 4
FRICTION FACTOR VERSUS REYNOLD’S NUMBER
ISSUE
R1
ISSUE
R1