This research matrix aims to evaluate the effectiveness of immersion approaches for improving university students' English sociolinguistic competence and interaction. It will analyze the impact of immersion on students' language learning strategies and communication skills compared to traditional language-focused programs. Data will be collected through interviews, classroom observations, and speaking tests then analyzed using descriptive, qualitative, and statistical methods. Considerations around validity, reliability, and ethical issues will ensure high-quality results.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views1 page
Research Matrix 02
This research matrix aims to evaluate the effectiveness of immersion approaches for improving university students' English sociolinguistic competence and interaction. It will analyze the impact of immersion on students' language learning strategies and communication skills compared to traditional language-focused programs. Data will be collected through interviews, classroom observations, and speaking tests then analyzed using descriptive, qualitative, and statistical methods. Considerations around validity, reliability, and ethical issues will ensure high-quality results.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
RESEARCH MATRIX 02
RESEARCH DATA ETHICAL
AIM RATIONALE FOCUS QUESTIONS DATA ANALYSIS VALIDITY RELIABILITY QUESTION COLLECTION ISSUES 1. To create the • The research • Can the • What effect does 1. Interview 1. Descripti 1. Wh 1. What • What students result shown that immersion immersion have on (Pre - Post) ve Analysis at 2. How • How interaction in there are still a lot of approaches students sociolinguistics 2. Classroo 2. Qualitati 2. Ho 3. Why classroom university students improve the competence? m ve Analysis w activities in cannot speak English students’ • Do students in observation 3. Statistics 3. Wh using second after finishing study. English immersion programs 3. Speaking Analysis y language . • Students did not speaking develop different Test 1. To have a lot of chance interaction? language learning familiarize to exposure • Is the strategies from students the students language in the Immersion in more traditional. Focus dealing with target language program program? a second • Students need appropriate • Do students in language to be familiarized for University immersion program learning in dealing with English students in develop communication teaching and as a target language STKIP YPUP strategies from students learning teaching MAKASSAR in traditional language – process • To enhance the INDONESIA focus program? language policy in (Focus • What difference are English School Program) there between the errors Education (Teacher of immersion students Training collage) and those of students YPUP MAKASSAR from traditional program INDONESIA
Building Education Together (BET): decreasing dropout intension rates in English as a Foreign Language programs through enhanced collaboration and motivation towards learning