Summary Results: County Growth Trends 1950-2020
Summary Results: County Growth Trends 1950-2020
Summary Results
population, not the total population, Source: COG Round 6.2 Forecasts
which includes those residing in
group quarters. Figure 1: County Growth Trends 1950-2020
3
1997 CUS Summary Report
accounted for 120 percent of the total population growth. Since 1970, the minority
population in Montgomery County has increased nearly ten fold.
Gateway Montgomery: most new households are from outside the region
About 69,670 households, or 22.4 percent of the County’s dwellings, did not live
here five years previous to the 1997 Census Update Survey. Most new residents (i.e.,
those households that moved into the
County between 1992 and 1997) Most New Residents
come from outside the Washington, Come from Outside the Region
D.C. metropolitan area. This
percentage share at 57 percent has Percent New Residents
60%
55.3 56.9
been constant across the surveys 50%
completed since 1984. The second 40%
1987 1997
The percentage of persons born outside the United States and currently living in
Montgomery County has risen from 18.6 percent in 1990 to 21.9 percent in 1997.
Moreover, almost one-third of the County’s population lives in a household where the
head or spouse is foreign-born. Compared to the rest of the County, the population in
SUMMARY R ESULTS
5
1997 CUS Summary Report
number of householders ages 25 to 34, a natural result of the aging baby boomers and
the smaller cohort of the Generation Xers. Boomers are not only advancing in years,
they are aging in place. Between 1987 and 1997, the frequency of overall residential
turnover and mobility in the County declined as the median length of residency rose from
5 years to 6 years.
holding down the average size 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 1997
50%
1977-1987, and over 1.5 times
40%
greater, 1987-1997. Within the 44.8
30% 36.1
resident female work force, the 31.7
20%
number of participants increased
10%
by 28 percent between 1987 and
0%
1997, from 181,033 to 231,550, 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 1997
outpacing the rate for men, 16
percent, or from 199,655 to
232,525. During the early 1990’s Figure 7: Labor Force Participation of Women 1950-1997
recession, increases in female
participation surmounted the deficit of job loss among males (9,689 versus –687 jobs,
respectively) to post a positive gain at the County level (6,942). Currently, equal
numbers of men and women are in the resident workforce, approximately 232,000 each;
the gender gap rapidly narrowed from a 44,000 difference in 1977 to 18,600 in 1987.
Any additional increase in women’s work force participation rates will result in more
females than male residents employed.
Montgomery County is
prosperous and affluent, as is the
Washington, D.C. region, basking County’s Household Income Is Almost
Twice the U.S. Median
in the federal government and
robust high tech rays. In the race of 1996 Median Household Income
and vies with Howard County for Montgomery County United States
7
1997 CUS Summary Report
incomes of $100,000 or more. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the nation’s share
of households with incomes of $100,000 or more is at an all-time record high. In 1996,
8.2 percent of the United State’s households - or 1 in 12 - reported total income of at
least $100,000. In Montgomery County -- 2 out of 7 households exceed $100,000 -- a
household is three times more likely than the national norm to have such high income.
Montgomery County’s lofty household incomes are fueled by high paying jobs,
rewarding the well-educated resident work force in a variety of professional and
managerial occupations. Behind today’s record level of affluence are the dual-income
couples of the baby boom generation reaching their peak-earning years. Of the 85,200
County households with incomes of $100,000 or more, 68 percent are dual-income
couples similar, to 65 percent across the nation. The rising economic fortunes of dual-
income households should boost household income for another ten years.
SUMMARY R ESULTS
SINGLE-
Montgomery County, MD FAMILY TOWN- GARDEN HIGH- ALL
DETACHED HOUSE APT. RISE TYPES
Household Population 490,695 147,170 135,375 50,260 823,500
% Female 51.4% 53.8% 56.3% 59.4% 53.2%
Age Distribution:
% 0-4 Years Old 7.1% 9.3% 6.1% 3.5% 7.1%
% 5-17 Years Old 20.5% 18.6% 14.4% 7.5% 18.4%
P % 18-29 Years Old 9.6% 14.6% 24.3% 15.0% 13.2%
O % 30-44 Years Old 23.8% 33.3% 31.8% 25.1% 26.9%
P % 45-64 Years Old 27.0% 18.3% 15.1% 18.2% 23.0%
U % 65-74 Years Old 7.4% 3.9% 3.8% 10.8% 6.4%
L % Over 74 Years Old 4.5% 2.0% 4.5% 19.9% 5.0%
A Average Age 36.7 31.8 33.3 47.5 35.9
T Race:
I % White 81.0% 65.5% 56.1% 62.6% 73.0%
O % Black 7.4% 17.4% 27.0% 23.5% 13.4%
N % Asian or Pacific Islander 9.9% 13.3% 12.4% 9.4% 10.9%
% Other 1.8% 3.8% 4.5% 4.5% 2.8%
% Hispanic Origin 1 6.3% 11.0% 15.0% 6.9% 8.6%
Educational Attainment:
Persons 25 Years and Older 325,630 96,955 94,815 41,620 559,020
% Less than High School Diploma 7.3% 8.2% 12.2% 9.2% 8.3%
% High School Graduate 26.4% 29.0% 31.8% 29.9% 27.9%
% Associate or Trade School 3.7% 5.6% 6.1% 4.5% 4.5%
% Bachelor's Degree 28.3% 31.4% 27.7% 26.9% 28.6%
% Grad, Professional or Doctoral 34.3% 25.8% 22.1% 29.4% 30.7%
Number of Employed Residents 2 263,625 89,355 85,505 25,590 2 464,075
% Females Who Are Employed 2 64.8% 76.9% 74.6% 49.6% 67.4%
Women with Children Under Age 6 36,015 13,810 9,620 1,950 61,395
% Employed 2 67.1% 69.5% 71.6% 61.6% 68.1%
Employer:
% Private for Profit 46.7% 53.2% 56.4% 49.6% 49.7%
% Private not for Profit 12.8% 12.5% 14.0% 17.2% 13.2%
% Self-Employed 13.9% 8.5% 6.4% 7.4% 11.3%
L % Government 26.5% 25.7% 23.2% 25.9% 25.8%
A Work Location:
B % In the County 56.8% 60.9% 61.8% 46.9% 57.9%
O % Inside the Beltway 17.2% 15.8% 22.9% 28.5% 18.4%
R % Outside the Beltway 39.6% 45.1% 38.9% 18.4% 39.5%
% Elsewhere in Maryland 9.0% 9.5% 9.5% 8.3% 9.2%
% to Washington, D.C. 25.0% 19.0% 20.4% 34.6% 23.6%
F % to Virginia 7.9% 9.0% 7.3% 8.3% 8.0%
O Work Trip:
R % Driving 83.8% 85.1% 75.5% 62.7% 81.6%
C % Alone 75.0% 75.3% 66.0% 55.2% 72.5%
E % Carpool 8.8% 9.8% 9.5% 7.5% 9.1%
% Public Transit or Rail 10.5% 11.3% 20.0% 30.0% 13.2%
% Walk/Bicycle/Other 1.5% 1.4% 2.8% 5.7% 1.9%
% Work at Home 4.2% 2.3% 1.6% 1.6% 3.3%
Access to Metrorail:
% Car 60.9% 66.7% 44.1% 14.9% 53.2%
% Ride-On/Metrobus 16.1% 19.5% 19.4% 14.0% 17.1%
% Walk/Bicycle 22.9% 13.8% 36.5% 71.0% 29.7%
* Insufficient data for reliable estimates.
1 Those of Hispanic origin may be of any race.
2
Ages 16 and older and employed full- or part-time.
SINGLE-
Montgomery County, MD (cont.) FAMILY TOWN- GARDEN HIGH- ALL
DETACHED HOUSE APT. RISE TYPES
Households by Structure Type 161,925 53,840 65,020 30,350 311,135
% Total Households by Structure Type 52.0% 17.3% 20.9% 9.8% 100.0%
Average Household Size 3.03 2.74 2.08 1.66 2.64
Tenure:
% Rental 6.8% 15.2% 76.1% 68.9% 28.8%
Average Monthly Costs:
Homeowners $1,379 $1,051 $800 $869 $1,244
Renters $1,099 $934 $712 $818 $804
% in Same Home 5 Years Ago 70.4% 51.5% 30.3% 42.0% 56.1%
Median Years in Same Home 10 5 2 3 6
Average Age of Household Head 52.0 44.4 42.7 55.5 49.1
% Households with Foreign Born Head
H or Spouse 22.8% 28.7% 31.8% 28.2% 26.2%
O Households by Type:
U % Family Households 87.5% 76.4% 58.0% 41.3% 74.9%
S % Married-Couple 79.1% 61.2% 41.2% 33.1% 63.6%
I % Single-Parent 7.1% 13.1% 14.1% 6.0% 9.5%
N % Nonfamily Households 12.5% 23.6% 42.0% 58.7% 25.1%
G % Householder Living Alone 10.7% 19.7% 37.4% 55.8% 22.3%
Persons in Households:
% 1 Person 10.7% 19.7% 37.4% 55.8% 22.3%
% 2 Persons 33.8% 31.1% 35.8% 31.9% 33.6%
% 3 Persons 19.5% 20.5% 14.5% 6.4% 17.3%
% 4 Persons 21.1% 17.9% 7.8% 3.7% 16.1%
% 5+ Persons 14.9% 10.9% 4.5% 2.2% 10.8%
Average Number of Cars 2.1 1.8 1.2 1.0 1.8
% of Households with Computers 75.8% 71.3% 52.5% 42.6% 67.6%
% with Internet Connection 64.5% 62.9% 58.7% 62.3% 63.2%
5
10
6
3
7 4
C o m b i n e d P l a n n in g A r e a s
1 S i l ve r S p r i n g / T a k o m a P a r k 1
2 B e th e s d a / C h e v y C h a s e
2
3 R o ck vi l l e / N . B e th e s d a
4 K e n s i n g t o n W h e a t o n / A sp e n H i l l
5 I -27 0 C o rridor
6 C o le s v i ll e
N
7 P o to m a c
8 O lne y W E
9 D a m as c us
10 P o o l e sv il le S
11
1997 CUS Summary Report
Source: 1997 Census Update Survey; Montgomery County Planning Dept, Research and Technology Center, February 2000.
13
1997 CUS Summary Report
Source: 1997 Census Update Survey; Montgomery County Planning Dept, Research and Technology Center, February 2000.
15
1997 CUS Summary Report
Source: 1997 Census Update Survey; Montgomery County Planning Dept, Research and Technology Center, February 2000.
17
1997 CUS Summary Report
Source: 1997 Census Update Survey; Montgomery County Planning Dept, Research and Technology Center, February 2000.
19
1997 CUS Summary Report
Source: 1997 Census Update Survey; Montgomery County Planning Dept, Research and Technology Center, February 2000.
21
1997 CUS Summary Report
Source: 1997 Census Update Survey; Montgomery County Planning Dept, Research and Technology Center, February 2000.
23
1997 CUS Summary Report
Source: 1997 Census Update Survey; Montgomery County Planning Dept, Research and Technology Center, February 2000.
25
1997 CUS Summary Report
Source: 1997 Census Update Survey; Montgomery County Planning Dept, Research and Technology Center, February 2000.
27
1997 CUS Summary Report
Source: 1997 Census Update Survey; Montgomery County Planning Dept, Research and Technology Center, February 2000.
29
1997 CUS Summary Report
Source: 1997 Census Update Survey; Montgomery County Planning Dept, Research and Technology Center, February 2000.
31