This flowchart summarizes the disbarment process for attorneys in the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP). It shows that a verified complaint can be filed by any person with the IBP Board of Governors or Secretary. An investigator will be assigned to investigate the complaint. If meritorious, the respondent attorney must file an answer within 15 days. The investigation must be completed within 3 months, unless extended. The respondent has opportunities to defend themselves before the investigator. If dismissed, the complainant can appeal. If upheld, the case is referred to the Supreme Court for final decision.
This flowchart summarizes the disbarment process for attorneys in the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP). It shows that a verified complaint can be filed by any person with the IBP Board of Governors or Secretary. An investigator will be assigned to investigate the complaint. If meritorious, the respondent attorney must file an answer within 15 days. The investigation must be completed within 3 months, unless extended. The respondent has opportunities to defend themselves before the investigator. If dismissed, the complainant can appeal. If upheld, the case is referred to the Supreme Court for final decision.
This flowchart summarizes the disbarment process for attorneys in the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP). It shows that a verified complaint can be filed by any person with the IBP Board of Governors or Secretary. An investigator will be assigned to investigate the complaint. If meritorious, the respondent attorney must file an answer within 15 days. The investigation must be completed within 3 months, unless extended. The respondent has opportunities to defend themselves before the investigator. If dismissed, the complainant can appeal. If upheld, the case is referred to the Supreme Court for final decision.
This flowchart summarizes the disbarment process for attorneys in the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP). It shows that a verified complaint can be filed by any person with the IBP Board of Governors or Secretary. An investigator will be assigned to investigate the complaint. If meritorious, the respondent attorney must file an answer within 15 days. The investigation must be completed within 3 months, unless extended. The respondent has opportunities to defend themselves before the investigator. If dismissed, the complainant can appeal. If upheld, the case is referred to the Supreme Court for final decision.
DISBARMENT OF ATTORNEYS FLOWCHART The Investigator
shall direct that a RULE 139 B copy thereof be served upon the Yes respondent, Board of Governors shall The National Grievance requiring him to Proceedings for The IBP Board of Six (6) copies of the appoint from among IBP Investigators shall Is it answer the same disbarment may be members an Investigator or, investigate all complaint Governors may, motu verified complaint shall meritorious within fifteen (15) when special circumstances so against members of the taken by the proprio or upon referral be filed with the warrant, a panel of three(3) Integrated Bar referred days from the Supreme Court by the Supreme Court or Secretary of the IBP or investigators to investigate the to them by the IBP date of service. motu proprio. (Sec. 1 by a Chapter Board of the Secretary of any of Proceedings in the complaint All Investigators shall Board of Governors. (Sec. 5) Officers, or at the its chapters who shall take an oath of office in the (Sec.3) Integrated bar of instance of any person, forthwith transmit the form prescribed by the Board of the Philippines Governors. A copy of the initiate and prosecute same to the IBP Board Investigator's appointment and proper charges against of Governors for oath shall be transmitted to the Proceedings for erring attorneys assignment to an Supreme Court. (Sec. 2) disbarment may be No The same may be including those in the investigator. (Sec. 1) taken by the dismissed by the government service. Integrated Bar of the Board of Governors (Sec. 1) A copy of the resolution of upon his Philippines (IBP) dismissal shall be furnished the recommendation. upon the verified complainant and the Supreme The answer shall be verified. (Sec.5) complaint of any Court which may review the The original and five (5) legible person. (Sec. 1) case motu proprio or upon copies of the answer shall be timely appeal of the filed with the Investigator, with complainant filed within 15 proof of service of a copy Upon joinder of issues or The respondent shall be given The Investigator shall days from notice of the thereof on the complainant or upon failure of the full opportunity to defend terminate the investigation dismissal of the complainant. himself, to present witnesses within three (3) months from his counsel. (Sec. 6) respondent to answer, the (Sec. 5) on his behalf and be heard by the date of its commencement All charges against Justices of the Investigator shall, with himself and counsel. However, unless extended for good Court of Tax Appeals and the deliberate speed, proceed if upon reasonable notice, the cause by the Board of Sandiganbayan, and Judges of the Willfull failure or refusal to with the investigation of respondent fails to appear, the Governors upon prior Court of Tax Appeals and lower obey a subpoena or any other the case. (Sec.8) investigation shall proceed ex application. (Sec. 8) courts, even if lawyers are jointly lawful order issued by the parte. (Sec. 8) Investigator shall be dealt with charged with them, shall be filed with as for indirect contempt of the Supreme Court; Provided, court. The corresponding further, that charges filed against charge shall be filed by the Justices and Judges before the IBP, The IBP Board of Governors may The IBP Board of Governors Not later than thirty (30) days from the Investigator before the IBP thereafter conduct hearings, if shall within like period fifteen termination of the investigation, the including those filed prior to their Board of Governors which shall necessary, in accordance with the (15) days issue a resolution Investigator shall submit a report appointment in the Judiciary, shall require the alleged contemnor procedure set forth in this Rule setting forth its findings and containing his findings of fact and immediately be forwarded to the to show cause within ten (10) for hearings before the recommendations, which `shall recommendations to the IBP Board of Supreme Court for disposition and days from notice. (Sec. 8) Investigator. Such hearing shall, forthwith be transmitted to the Governors, together with the adjudication. (Sec. 1) as far as practicable, be Supreme Court for final action stenographic notes and the transcripts Cont. next page terminated within fifteen (15) and if warranted, the thereof and all the evidence presented days from its commencement. imposition of penalty. during the investigation. (Sec. 8) (Sec. 8) (Sec. 10) Contd. Yes
Every case heard by an investigator
shall be reviewed by the IBP Board of Governors upon the record and The Supreme Court, motu evidence transmitted to it by the If the Board, by the vote of a majority of proprio, or at the instance of Investigator with his report. The its total membership, determines that the IBP Board of Governors decision of the Board upon such the respondent should be suspended upon the recommendation of review shall be in writing and shall from the practice of law or disbarred, it Notice of the the Investigator, may suspend clearly and distinctly state the facts shall issue a resolution setting forth its resolution or decision an attorney from the practice and the reasons on which it is based. Is the findings and recommendations which, of the Board shall be of his profession for any of the It shall be promulgated within a respondent together with the whole record of the given to all parties causes specified in Rule 138, period not exceeding thirty (30) days disbarred? case, shall forthwith be transmitted to through their counsel. Section 27, during the from the next meeting of the Board the Supreme Court for final action. A copy of the same pendency of the investigation following the submittal of the (Sec. 12, par. b) shall be transmitted to until such suspension is lifted Investigator's Report . the Supreme Court. by the Supreme Court. (Sec. 12, par. a) (Sec. 12, par. d) (Sec. 15) No
United States of America Ex Rel. John A. Easterling v. Walter H. Wilkins, Warden of Attica State Prison, Attica, New York, 303 F.2d 883, 2d Cir. (1962)