Antipolo Resistivity Report
Antipolo Resistivity Report
Antipolo Resistivity Report
Section Page
Title
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION 3
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA 4
2.1 Brief Geology 5
2.2 Climate 6
3.0 THE GEO-RESISTIVITY AND DATA INTEPRETATIONS 7
3.1 Methodology 7
3.2 Identification of Lithologic Resistivity Units 10
3.3 Descriptions of Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) points 11
3.4 Discussion of Results 13
3.4.1 Resistivity Profile A-A’ (Fig. 10) 16
3.4.2 Resistivity Profile B-B’ (Fig. 11) 17
3.4.1 Resistivity Profile C-C’ (Fig. 12) 19
3.4.1 Resistivity Profile D-D’ (Fig. 13) 21
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 22
REFERENCES 25
GLOSSARY OF TERMS 26
LIST OF TABLES
Table I . Deduced Resistivity Values at the Study Area
Table II. Summary of VES Points Descriptions, Locations and
Geographic Coordinates
Table III. Summary of the Resistivity Interpretation Made
for each VES Point
Table IV. Summary of Identified Aquifers at the Study Area
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure -1 Vicinity Map of the Study Area
Figure -2 Climatic map of the Philippines
Figure -3 Basic Resistivity Configuration
Figure -4 VES Points and Profiles Location Map
Figure -5 Graph of VES-1
Figure -6 Graph of VES-2
Figure -7 Graph of VES-3
Figure -8 Graph of VES-4
Figure -9 Resistivity Profile A-A’
Figure -10 Resistivity Profile B-B’
Figure -11 Resistivity Profile C-C’
Figure -12 Resistivity Profile D-D’
Figure -13 Preliminary Well Design
Executive Summary
Page - 2 - of 29
1.0 INTRODUCTION
To study and characterize the aquifer systems at Barangay San Roque,
Antipolo City, province of Rizal, a geo-resistivity was commissioned by A.
Guerrero Development Corporation and was subsequently conducted on
February 17-18, 2015. The study is aimed to determine if aquifer is present
at the said area for possible well drilling operation. Geo-resistivity survey is
a geophysical technique used to indirectly investigate physical
characteristics of the subsurface earth layers. This geophysical technique
provides relatively rapid and cost-effective means of obtaining subsurface
geological information, particularly the identification of permeable (aquifer)
and impermeable (clay) layers. The primary objective of the study is to
determine the subsurface lithological sequence of the study area which may
be specifically elaborated as follows:
Page - 3 - of 29
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA
The study area is located at Barangay San Roque, City of Antipolo,
province of Rizal (see Figure 1). The study area lies at about 3.7km south of
Antipolo City Proper. It is centrally disposed at geographic coordinates of
14°33’45.3” north latitude and 121°10’03.2” east longitude. It has an
elevation range of 150 to 190 meters above mean sea level.
Page - 4 - of 29
2.1 Brief Geology
The study area and its immediate vicinities are mainly underlain, based on
the unpublished MGB Geologic Map of Quezon City, by three rock
formations: the Quaternary Alluvium, Guadalupe and Kinabuan Formations.
Page - 5 - of 29
2.2 Climate
Under the Coronas Classification of Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical
and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA), the study area
belongs to Type I climate (see Figure 2). In this type of climate, there are
two pronounced seasons, dry from November to April and wet during the
rest of the year.
Page - 6 - of 29
3.0 THE GEO-RESISTIVITY SURVEY AND DATA
INTERPRETATIONS
3.1 Methodology
Resistivity survey involves the introduction of electrical current into the
ground through two pairs of electrodes. When the electric current is
introduced into the ground, the ground acts as a weak conductor. Any
variation in the subsurface conductivity due to size, shape and electrical
resistivity of underlying earth layers will alter the flow of current. If another
set of electrodes is placed close to the current electrodes, a difference in
potentials can be measured using an instrument, which can measure
extremely low voltage difference (see Figure 3). Schlumberger technique
known as vertical electrical sounding (VES) was selected as it has the
capability to explore the ground vertically from the surface.
The instrument used was OYO McOHM Mark-2 Model 2115A resistivity
instrument. It is a compact digital averaging resistivity meter that contains a
transmitter and receiver functions packed in one unit. It is designed to
Page - 7 - of 29
measure extremely weak electrical signal. Measurements at each ground
level are repeatedly stacked to eliminate ground noise and other electrical
interferences, which can hamper resistivity survey. This stacking feature
automatically cancels spontaneous potential in resistivity measurement. The
instrument can transmit up to 200mA under more or less 200V.
The Schlumberger array uses four electrodes: two of which serve as the
current electrodes and the other two for potential electrodes. The current
electrodes are represented by AB and the potential electrodes by MN.
Electric current is introduced into the ground using AB electrodes and the
potential difference is read using the MN electrodes. Initially, lengths of AB
and MN are set to two meters and one meter, respectively. As the
measurement progresses, AB expands from the sounding center at the
spacing interval of factor of square root of two, i.e., 1, 1.4, 2, 2.8, etc.,
Page - 8 - of 29
keeping the MN constant. However, as the length AB increases, electrical
voltage drops considerably. The manufacturer of the instrument has
prescribed a minimum voltage of five millivolts when conducting resistivity
measurements. To keep voltage above the set minimum voltage, MN has to
be expanded as well. In order to detect discrepancy for the reading when
MN is expanded to new length, duplicate readings are taken for the same
AB but with different MN values.
The measurements taken from the instrument are raw resistivity data.
Actually, they are in the form of volt/current ratio, having a unit of “ohm”.
These resistivity raw data are multiplied by a geometric factor unique for
every set of AB and MN which is taken from the formula:
Geometric Factor = ( /MN) [(AB/2)2 -(MN/2) 2].
where is 3.1416.
The resulting values when the readings are multiplied by this factor will now
be the apparent resistivity. The usual field procedure is to plot the
computed apparent resistivity at logarithmic scale paper to gain initial view
of the resulting curve. This is undertaken prior to interpretation or at the
sounding site to preclude unwanted curve, which results when errors are
committed in readings and in distances set up.
Page - 9 - of 29
3.2 Identification of Lithologic Resistivity Units
The identification of the resistivity value for a certain lithology is usually
carried out along an area where the lithology in question could be positively
identified. When an outcrop is absent, particularly in flat area, borehole
lithologic data are used to make resistivity sounding identification and
calibration. If borehole data are to be used, the resistivity sounding is
usually conducted near the borehole and the resulting interpreted resistivity
value for a certain lithology can now be established if two or more
correlation can be made, provided that the same lithology in question is
present. Well data gathered at the vicinity of the study area were used for
resistivity calibration for water. After thorough resistivity calibrations and
correlations using the data gathered from the neighborhood, the geophysics
team has come up with following the deduced resistivity values:
Page - 10 - of 29
Photo No.2. Showing the dug well used for resistivity calibration for water
The VES points were designated as VES-1, VES-2 up to VES-4 (see Fig.
4). In order to investigate the area with a maximum depth of 145 meters
from the ground surface, VES points as much as possible were designed to
have AB length of 724 meters. Table II shows the summary of the VES
descriptions together as well as their geographic coordinates. Geographic
coordinates of the VES points were taken using Garmin Trex Summit Global
Positioning System (GPS).
Page - 11 - of 29
3.4 Discussion of Results
Aside from the individual plotted VES points, the interconnected VES points
that form resistivity profile is also shown in Figures 4. Each sounding was
interpreted and the resulting layers with their corresponding depths were
tabulated at the left side of each figure. Summary of VES interpretations can
be seen in Table III, which shows the layer number with corresponding
resistivity values, thicknesses and depths.
Page - 12 - of 29
Table III. Summary of the Resistivity Interpretation Made
for each VES Point
VES-1 VES-2
Layer Resistivity Thickness Depth (in Layer Resistivity Thicknes Depth
No. Value (- (in meter) meter) No. Value (- s (in (in
m) m) meter) meter)
1 57.4 2.3 0 1 31.1 0.2 0
2 137.2 25 2.3 2 85.5 0.7 0.2
3 10.8 50.5 27.2 3 9.8 10.4 0.8
4 236.8 77.7 4 4.4 17.1 11.2
5 254.5 28.3
VES-3 VES-4
Layer Resistivity Thickness Depth (in Layer Resistivity Thickness Depth
No. Value (- (in meter) meter) No. Value (- (in meter) (in
m) m) meter)
1 109.1 0.3 0 1 12.3 0.4 0
2 16.1 0.4 0.3 2 5.2 6.5 0.4
3 128.4 2 0.7 3 10.7 32.5 6.9
4 6.7 23.5 2.7 4 3189.5 39.3
5 24.9 16.8 26.2
6 41.6 42.9
Page - 13 - of 29
`
Page - 14 - of 29
`
Page - 15 - of 29
To completely visualize the subsurface earth layers of the study area, four
resistivity profiles/sections coded as Resistivity Profile A-A’, B-B’ up to D-D’
(see Figure 9-12) were prepared. The resistivity profile was prepared by
interconnecting resistivity soundings as if they are aligned in a straight line.
Profile shows the relative electro-stratigraphic section formed when the
soundings are combined. Likewise, the profile enhances and facilitates
immediate visual image of the underlying stratigraphic columns of the
lithological units. At the sounding graphs presentation, one may notice that
there are actually more layers presented than at the resistivity profile. This
is so because the first few layers are thin and not mappable. In the
presentation therefore, some of the first few layers were deliberately omitted
in the profile leaving only the most layers that stand out. Although some of
the first few layers were omitted, their thicknesses were retained so that
plotting of major layers will be on the correct vertical position.
Page - 16 - of 29
3.4.12 Resistivity Profile B-B’ (Figure 10)
Resistivity Profile B-B’ composed of VES-4 and VES-3 was prepared to
show the behavior of resistivity layers along southwestern portion of the
study area. This profile represents the lower portion of the study area. It
runs towards the east, covering a ground distance of about 110meters.
Page - 17 - of 29
There are two aquifer layers identified at this profile. The first aquifer layer
lies very shallow at VES-4. Like in profile A-A’, the resistivity value of this
aquifer is low, hence its discharge is relatively low. Here, the thickness of
the aquifer is about 32meters. This aquifer tends to thins out towards VES-3
but the resistivity value tends to be relatively high. The second aquifer layer
is only present at VES-3. It lies next to the first aquifer layer. It starts at
about 43meters from the ground surface and extends beyond the 145-m
TPD. Summary of thicknesses and depths of potential aquifer will be
tabulated at Table IV.
Page - 18 - of 29
3.4.3 Resistivity Profile C-C’ (Figure 11)
Resistivity Profile C-C’ composed of VES-4, VES-3 and VES-2 was
prepared to show the behavior of resistivity layers along the western portion
of the study area. It runs towards the northeast, covering a ground distance
of about 150meters.
Page - 19 - of 29
Generally the profile is composed of three resistivity layers. There is only
one aquifer layer identified at this profile. The aquifer is dipping towards
VES-4. Towards VES-2 the aquifer appears to be thinning out. At VES-2, an
impervious layer clay was identified lying next to aquifer. Lying next to the
aquifer layer is the very thick layer of volcanic flows that extends beyond the
145-m TPD of the survey.
Page - 20 - of 29
3.4.4 Resistivity Profile D-D’ (Figure 12)
Resistivity Profile D-D’ composed of VES-3 and VES-1 was prepared to
show the behavior of resistivity layers along the eastern portion of the study
area. It runs towards the northeast, covering a ground distance of about
140meters.
Page - 21 - of 29
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The geo-resistivity survey conducted at the study areas has identified at
least four mappable lithologic/resistivity layers including the thin topsoil
horizon. As portrayed in the resistivity profile, the resistivity layers are
discontinuous at the upper layers at some resistivity profiles. Generally,
there are two aquifer layers identified at the area. The first aquifer layer is
generally shallow and relatively thin and characterized by low resistivity
value, hence could not be expected to give high discharge. The second
aquifer layer is only present at VES-3.
During the drilling operation, cuttings must be carefully collected for every
meter of penetration or at every change of lithology. It is highly
recommended that the penetration rate be monitored so as to have
supplemental data in the evaluation of the hydraulic parameters of the
lithology encountered. To prevent the collapse of the hole during drilling
operation and to allow the electric logging prior to development of the well, a
rotary mud drilling method must be implemented. Electric logging is used to
Page - 22 - of 29
locate the exact aquifer zone(s). When the aquifer zones have been
properly located, screens should be placed thereat to have a maximum well
efficiency. To prevent the entry of finer sediment into the well, gravel
packing should be properly installed in the annular space between the final
casing/screen and the borehole. Grouting of the upper annular space of the
well must be done to preclude well contamination. The preliminary well
design of this initial test/production well is shown in Figure 13.
Finally, water rights must be secured from National Water Regulatory Board
in compliance with the government’s policy and regulation and management
of the country’s water resources.
ABRAHAM R. GATDULA
Geophysicist/Geologist
Page - 23 - of 29
`
Page - 24 - of 29
REFERENCES
Bureau of Mines and Geosciences, 1981. Geology and Mineral Resources
of the Philippines. vol. 1, MGB, Manila.
Orellana, E. and Mooney, H.M. (1966) Master Tables and Curves for
Vertical Electrical Sounding Over Layered Structures. Interciencia,
Madrid.
Page - 25 - of 29
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
AB length-The current electrode distance.
Iso-resistivity map- Map showing equal resistivity values, which serve as,
contour lines.
lithologic resistivity unit- A unit of rock identified through its true resistivity
value.
Page - 26 - of 29
between the opposite faces of a unit cube of the material.
Page - 27 - of 29
APPENDIX
Page - 28 - of 29
Photo No.3. Showing the location of VES-1 at San Roque, Antipolo City
Photo No.4. Showing the location of VES-2 at San Roque, Antipolo City
Page - 29 - of 29
Photo No.5. Showing the location of VES-3
Page - 30 - of 29