SQA Manual Part-A
SQA Manual Part-A
Issue: 1 25.10.17
Appreciation Alignment
Awareness Action
Advancement
Contents
Page.No
Foreword 4
Quality policy 5
Environmental, Health And Safety Policy 6
Part - A
1. Introduction 9
2. Supplier selection and approval process 12
3. New part development process 16
4. Development of PFD, PFMEA, Control Plan and Operational Standards 22
5. Validation of Production aids 26
6. Calibration system 30
7. Measurement system analysis 34
8. Process capability 38
9. Management of Limit samples 42
10. Product approval process 46
11. Purchasing system 56
12. Scheduling system 60
13. Guidelines for container selection 64
14. Incoming inspection control at LTVS 68
15. Handling of rejections at LTVS & field complaints 72
16. Supplier performance – Q&D Rating 76
17. Implementation of changes 82
18. Control of LTVS supplied tools / equipment 86
19. Sub-supplier management 90
20. Supplier QMS requirements 94
21. Supplier EHSMS requirements 96
22. Supplier audits 98
23. Training and up-gradation of Operator’s skills 102
24. Records and retention periods 106
25. Traceability 108
26. P- Chart 116
Page.No
Part – B
Guidelines
a. PFMEA 147
b. Measurement System Analysis 173
c. Process Capability Study 185
d. Procedure for calculating Process Capability 189
e. Agreement of Inspection 197
f. Procedure for plotting P- Chart 203
g. X-bar – R Control Chart 203
h. Target Area Control ( TAC ) chart 213
i. Total Quality Management 215
j. Total Productive Management 225
k. Lean Manufacturing 238
l. Lucas –TVS Electrical Suppliers’ Association (LESA) 241
Date 25.10.2017
QUALITY POLICY
POLICY
We are committed to achieving ever increasing levels of Customer satisfaction through continual
improvements to the Quality of our Products and Services by adopting and continually
improving an effective Quality Management System.
It will be our endeavor to increase Customer trust and confidence in the label
“Made by Lucas-TVS”.
Revision : 3
Date : 18.10.17 JOINT MANAGING DIRECTOR
OBJECTIVES
AMENDMENT RECORD
Chapter Issue No /
S.No Date Page No Beirf description of change
Ref Rev.No
Manual released incorporating IATF
1 25.10.17 All All requirement 1/0
2.7 & Q&D rating implemented instead of
2 04.04.18 16 76 to 81 QCDS rating 1/1
Customer specific requirement added (
3. 05.3.19 32 138 to 144 WABCO) 1/2
PART - A
1. INTRODUCTION
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose
a. Communicate to all our suppliers regarding Lucas-TVS expectations and requirements for
assuring quality of parts / materials supplied .
b. Specify the procedures and documents to be followed by suppliers to achieve “Zero Defect
“ supplies, consistency in quality, on time delivery, competitive cost , timely service and
other requirements of Lucas-TVS.
1.2 Scope
Applies to all Parts, Sub- Assemblies and Raw materials Supplied to Lucas-TVS by Suppliers.
Supplier Quality Assurance requirements are described in the flow chart ( Refer page : 11 )
Objective: To explain the procedure for supplier selection and approval for a totally a new
business and adding new business to the existing suppliers.
Supplier Responsibilities :
Review of Lucas-TVS Supplier evaluation check list
Submitting filled-in Supplier evaluation check list to Lucas-TVS
Readiness for on-site assessment
Inputs :
Filled-in Supplier evaluation check list
Documents related to on-site assessment
Description :
Lucas-TVS will conduct an on-site assessment, basically intended to evaluate supplier technical
capabilities and operating system for adequacy and adherence of the above.
Evaluation criteria:
1. Management
- Organisation
- Professionalism
- Financial stability
2. Technical
- Technical strength
- Capability
- Infrastructure
1. Quality Management system
- QMS certification minimum to ISO 9001:2015 with a goal of getting certified to IATF16949
- Incoming / In process / Final Inspection control system
- Sub Supplier Control
Audit observations will be sent to the supplier and the supplier shall submit a time bound action
plan for correcting the non-conformities / opportunity for improvement points.
Follow up audit will be carried out at supplier’s site as necessary to ensure the effectiveness of
the corrective action implementation.
Decision on assessment can be:
1. Approved or 2. Restricted Approval or 3. Rejected
Suppliers scoring above 80% will be approved and included in the Approved Suppliers list of
Note: Refer Annexure - 1 for the Supplier Evaluation Check list.
Phase I
Process design & development
Prototype Samples
Phase V
Phase II
Tooled Up Samples
Supplier Responsibilities :
Shall form CFT (Cross Functional Team) for new part development and nominate representative
for interactions with Lucas-TVS.
Shall follow APQP guidelines for New Part Development. (Please refer to the APQP reference
manual of AIAG for details).
Development stages being practiced at LTVS are covered in the following 5 phases.
Inputs :
Drawings
Quality Targets
Cost Tables
Capacity requirements
Process Technology
Lesson learned
Description :
Phase I (Before submission of Prototype samples) – Prototype Phase
6. Review the activity plan based on the results of the prototype trials at LTVS.
7. Review the progress of facility / tool development and report the status of facilities / tool to LTVS
preferably with digital photographs.
Phase II (Before submission of Tooled up samples) – Sample Approval Phase
Supplier shall perform the following:
Develop detailed plan, for procuring the tools, gauges, test rigs, etc. required for mass production
based on the volume requirement indicated by LTVS.
Phase III (Before submission of samples for pilot production) – Product Approval Process
Phase
On approval of tooled up samples, the supplier shall perform the following:
1. Verification of mass production capability for quality and quantity during Quality proving stage.
2. Despatch pilot batch along with the PAP documents (submission level – 3) as agreed with
LTVS.
3. Correct all deviations observed during Quality proving and maintain records.
4. Audits may be conducted at the supplier works by LTVS during the quality proving stages.
Phase IV (Before mass production) – Mass production & Ramp up phase
LTVS should finalize the cost before commencing mass production and release regular scheduling
agreement.
1. Correct the deviations observed during mass production by initiating appropriate corrective
actions.
4. DEVELOPMENT OF PFD,
PFMEA, CONTROL PLAN &
OPERATION STANDARDS
PFD
PFMEA
Operation
Standards
Objective: To describe the procedure for the developments of PFD, PFMEA, Control Plan and
Operation Standards.
Supplier Responsibilities
Development of Process flow diagram with inputs from (preliminary process flow chart ,
approved drawings & CFT discussions.
Development of PFMEA and actions to reduce risk of failures in the process.
Development of Control Plan to build process controls to prevent failures as per IATF 16949
requirements.
Development of Operation Standards to execute the process in controlled condition and to
ensure consistency.
Inputs
Preliminary process flow / layout
Approved drawings
CFT discussions
Description
Process flow diagram maps the processes stepwise clearly defining the product characteristics and
the process characteristics relevant at each step indicating the characteristics including special
characteristics as applicable and flow sequence
Process Failure Mode Effects analysis is a technique to capture potential failure modes in each
process step and quantify risk of failures based on severity ranking, occurrence ranking and detection
ranking. The exercise is carried out by a CFT using format in annexure 12. The process risks are
prioritized based on severity ranking, occurrence ranking and detection ranking and actions are
planned by CFT to reduce defective parts. Actions could be process improvement, Poka Yoke,
process capability improvements or better process controls. PFMEA is a live document and should be
reviewed whenever changes take place in process or when major failures occur. By default, PFMEA
should be reviewed once in three months based on actual internal and external failures.
Control plan is used to define process control criteria and methods of control, from incoming raw
material to receipt of part to customer. Control plan is made based on PFMEA and Process Flow
Diagram. Control plan is used by supervisors / quality inspectors / quality engineers and line
managers to control process. Control plan should be developed in accordance with IATF
requirements. (Refer annexure 8).
To control each operation "Operation Standards" (Annexure 16) are used by operators to carry
out their operation effectively. Operation standard should include “How to do” and “What to do”
during processing and “what to inspect” before sending to next process (Internal customers).
Operators' involvement are necessary in developing these documents, which brings their
ownership. Suggestions for continual improvement of operation standard shall be reviewed and
incorporated to stabilize the process outputs and improve the process capability.
5. VALIDATION OF
PRODUCTION AIDS
(TOOLS AND GAUGES)
List of Tools
List of checking aids (Gauges)
Tool Design
Checking aids (Gauges) Design
Tool manufacturing
Checking aids (Gauges) manufacturing
Yes
No
Maintain Tool
Management /
History cards
Objective: To establish manufacture of reliable tooling and checking aids (Gauges), which are
capable of producing and checking parts, conforming to drawing.
Supplier Responsibilities
Inputs
Description
The tooling and inspection aid requirement shall be in accordance with the quality, reliability and
productivity requirements of parts. Supplier should ensure that tooling and inspection aids are
amenable to quick changeover they are capable of preventing and/or detecting possible errors
during manufacturing.
Each tool and inspection aid (Gauges) development shall be tracked through a planned "Tool &
Gauges Progress Report".
Tooling and inspection aids shall be designed and reviewed by appropriate authority.
Manufacturing and inspection shall be done with respect to approved drawing.
Validation trials should be carried out before or during pilot manufacturing stage and suitable
modification shall be carried out to make it fit and easy to use by Suppliers.
Each tooling and inspection aid shall be managed for proper use, due checks after use,
maintenance, fixed location, identification with colour codes with status (OK or Not OK) through a
history card. Based on similar application experiences the tool life and replacement parts shall be
specified or shall be established through wear trend.
6. CALIBRATION SYSTEM
6. Calibration System
Calibration System
Objective: To establish system for calibration of measuring and test equipment against
standards, having National / international traceability.
Supplier Responsibilities
Ensuring calibration of gages, measuring and testing equipment needed for measurement of
product or controlling process parameters mentioned in control plan.
Ensuring calibration of measuring and testing instruments and setting standards are carried
out in controlled conditions.
Ensuring that the masters used as reference for in house calibration are duly calibrated by
accredited laboratory having traceability to National / international standards.
Ensuring visible calibration status on the equipment preferably with colour code identification
or calibration due date sticker.
Ensuring mistake proofing in system for periodic recalibration.
Inputs
Control plan
Approved drawings
The quality of measurement data is defined by the statistical properties of multiple measurements
obtained from a measurement system operating under stable conditions. The statistical properties
are the location of the data with respect to reference (Master) & the spread of the data for
repeated measurement. Calibration is focused upon the location error in the measuring device
through repeated measurements on a master or by a master.
Bias: Difference between "Reference" and the observed average of repeated measurement. (The
observed value shall follow normal distribution)
Calibration Frequency: Shall be decided based on use of the measuring devices and its
deterioration pattern or wear pattern. In the beginning frequency should be higher than normal
and depending upon successive calibration trend frequency shall be decreased.
Permitted Bias Error: is 1/10 of the permitted error for the characteristics being measured (i.e)
tolerance specified on drawing or in inspection standard whichever is less. The master used for
calibration shall be 1/10 of permitted error on the instruments. The unit of measure (Least Count)
for the selected measuring device shall also follow this 1/10 rule as a minimum.
In case 1/10 rule is not being followed due to logical constrains a waiver shall be obtained from
LTVS.
Linearity: This measures how accurate the measurements are through the expected range in
percentage. Linearity for a gauge should be close to Zero.
Stability: This measures whether the error because of bias & Linearity will remain unchanged
over the period of time. This is normally studied over a series of calibrations unless and until
measurement system is not unstable in nature. In such cases setting standards are provided to
for calibration just before use.
Calibration Environment: Controlled temperature and humidity levels are needed for the
calibration activity. Calibration area shall be free of dust and dirt.
Recall system for re-calibration shall be mistake proofed by visual reminder (colour code) of
due week / month or computerized reminder or colour code system.
On recall and calibration if the instruments are found out of calibration it shall lead to
investigation of possible shipment of· parts with wrong measurement and its consequences. If
the consequences are indicating a possibility of problem in fitment or performance, it should
be escalated to senior management of supplier, which in turn shall be escalated to LTVS
without any undue delay.
Training for All Users: shall be conducted periodically for proper use and handling of measuring
instruments along with importance of calibration and not using instruments beyond due date of
calibration, but this shall not be treated as substitute for recall system.
Storage and Use Conditions: Instruments and standards used for reference and setting purpose
shall be kept free of dirt, dust and shall be preserved to avoid any rust, dents and scratches.
Proper cleaning of working surface shall be done before use.
7. MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
ANALYSIS (MSA)
Not
Analyze the
Acceptable Guage
causes of Acceptable PPAP records for
R&R &
variation Kappa
approval
impove the value
measurement
Supplier Responsibilities
Ensuring the team is trained on the various concepts of statistical analysis for conducting
MSA.
Ensuring that Gauge R&R < 10% (Variable) or Kappa value> 0.75 (Attribute).
Inputs
Control Plan
The measuring devices are calibrated.
Sufficient number of actual product samples is available. (Minimum 10 for variable and 20
for attribute MSA studies)
Personnel doing actual measurements and master evaluator are identified.
Method of measurement shall be defined and users are trained by master evaluator.
Description
Gauge R&R analysis is a method to establish the spread of data in measurement system and make
sure that this is an ignorable fraction of total process spread for which it is used. This study has two
primary components explained below:
Repeatability: is the variation in measurements obtained with one measuring instrument when
used several times by one appraiser while measuring the identical characteristics on the same part.
Traditionally it is also referred as within equipment variation. Some established causes for high
repeatability are:
Reproducibility: is the variation in the average of the measurements made by different appraisers using
the same measuring instruments when measuring identical characteristics of the same part. Traditionally
it is also referred as within appraiser variation. Some established causes resulting in high repeatability
errors are:
The appraiser needs to be better trained in how to use and read the instrument.
Gauge dial markings are not clear.
A fixture of some sort may be needed to help appraisers to use gauge more consistently.
Note: Gauge R&R analysis values for one measuring device and for a set of persons cannot be
extended to another measuring device and/or another set of operators.
Attribute Measurement System Study: is the measure of agreement of the actual evaluations by two or
more raters, from that of the true status of the object, determined by reference evaluator. It is measured
as Kappa Value.
Reference: Latest revision of "Measurement System Analysis" by Automotive Industry Action Group
(AIAG) or Guidelines given in this manual ( Chapter 31.b )
8. PROCESS CAPABILITY
8. Process Capability
Part Drawing
PFMEA
NO Any special
Characteristics
(SC)?
Adhere to control method
as per CP/QCPC YES
Ensure Gauge R&R % < 10%
Establishing X – R Control
Chart
Yes
Monitor Trends of Cpk and maintain
records
Process Capability
Objective
To calculate the process capability (Cpk) in order to meet customer requirement and enhance
satisfaction
Supplier Responsibilities
Ensuring the team is trained on SPC Concepts
Ensuring that Gauge R& R < 10%
Inputs
Part Drawings
PFMEA
Control Plan
SPC Concepts
Calibration of measuring device
Customer requirement on (Cpk > 1.67)
Description
Process capability is a measure of the ability of the process to meet design specifications .
Suppliers shall ensure that the special characters identified in the Drawing are addressed in PFMEA
and control plan (QCPC). It is more important to ensure that the process is stable and brought under
statistical control before calculating the process capability for any processes.
It is important to ensure that R&R % is less than 10% for the measuring system used for measuring
and controlling the special characters. Control charts ( X – R) are to be established and monitored for
the identified processes and Special characteristics as per the guidelines given in this manual
(Chapter 31.g)
Process capability (Cpk) is to be calculated every month as per the guidelines given in this manual
and acceptable minimum value of Cpk is > 1.67 . Suppliers shall carry out 100% inspection when
the required Cpk (> 1.67) is not achieved. Root cause analysis are to be carried out and corrective
action to be taken by suppliers. Monthly Process capability (Cpk) reports are to be submitted by
suppliers to Lucas TVS – SQ
9. MANAGEMENT OF LIMIT
SAMPLES
Control Plan
Inspection
Standards
for Part
Inspection standards for
incoming components
Workstation Vs Limit
sample matrix
Manufacture of limit
samples
LTVS approved
limit Samples
Approval of limit samples
Registration of samples
limit
Objective: To explain steps for developing limit samples and using them as Inspection Standards.
Supplier Responsibilities
Ensuring availability of limit samples for characteristics stated as "As per limit samples" in
inspection standard.
Ensuring that limit samples are produced representing current process which is capable of
meeting customer specifications and submitted to customer for approval.
Maintaining limit sample register, proper upkeep of the samples, and effective use of limit
sample by concerned in right decision making for acceptance and rejection of parts and
components.
Reviewing limit sample, in case of engineering changes and replacing it with new one if
needed.
Inputs
Control Plan
Inspection standards
Description
For subjective quality characteristics when judgment criteria cannot be described in measurable
terms in inspection standard, like texture of surface, profile, etching pattern etc; limit samples are
established to facilitate uniformity in judgment at sub supplier, suppliers and LTVS.
Supplier shall establish the requirement of limit samples for their sub suppliers and follow the
same system for their proper use and upkeep.
Limit samples represent current process status, which is expected to improve over time therefore
these should be periodically evaluated and renewed.
The limit samples may deteriorate over time or become obsolete due to process or material
changes. In such circumstances it should be replaced with new limit sample.
All the limit samples should be identified with validity date. Supplier shall maintain a limit sample
register showing the place of use and status of limit samples.
OK Evaluation Not OK
Status
Not OK
Take Corrective actions
Objective: To describe the procedure for Product Approval Process (PAP) of all complete parts &
all child parts which are in line with Lucas – TVS drawings. This procedure is applicable to all
suppliers of Lucas – TVS
10.1 General
The supplier shall submit PAP documents & samples along with duly filled in PAP Submission
checklist (Annexure - 2) in the following situations. The supplier shall obtain approval from Lucas –
TVS prior to first production shipment.
Initial Submission.
Engineering change(s)
Tooling Transfer, Replacement, refurbishment or additional.
Correction of discrepancy.
Tooling inactive for more than a year.
Change to optional construction / material.
Sub – supplier or material source change.
Change in part processing
Parts produced at changed / additional location.
Others (To be specified)
Parts for Product approval process shall be taken from a significant production run. This production
run shall be with specific production quantity to total a minimum of 30 consecutive parts or as
agreed with LTVS using the tooling, gauging, process, machines, materials and operators from the
production environment.
The supplier shall submit the parts, documentation and records only when all the specified
requirements as per drawing & specifications are met. In case of results falling outside the
specification, every effort shall be made to correct the process so that all the requirements are met.
If the supplier is unable to meet any of the drawing requirements, Lucas – TVS shall be contacted
for determination of appropriate corrective action.
A qualified laboratory shall perform inspection & testing for PAP Commercial / Independent test
laboratories used shall be accredited facilities / qualified laboratories. When a commercial
laboratory is used, the supplier shall submit the test results on the laboratory letter head, or on the
normal laboratory report format.
All tests required by the drawing or control plan and related specifications should be listed in a
convenient format along with the quantity tested and the actual results of each test. (Annexure – 5)
Note: Results for all tests required by the drawing or related specifications should be listed in an
understandable format and include the quantity tested. The Performance Test Results form in
Annexure - 6 of Supplier Quality assurance manual may be used for this purpose.
The minimum acceptable value of Ppk is 2.00 or as required by the customer of Lucas- TVS. The
minimum acceptable value of Cpk is 1.67 or as required by customer during regular production run.
Note 1: The purpose of this requirement is to determine if the production process is likely to
produce product that will meet the requirements of Lucas - TVS.
Note 2: Initial process studies are short term and will not predict the effects of time and variation in
people, materials, methods, equipment, measurement systems and environment. A short term
study should be based on a minimum of 30 readings from consecutive parts of the significant
production run. The format as per Annexure - 7 shall be used for this purpose.
Guidelines, acceptance criteria and format for conducting measurement system analysis are given
in Supplier development manual.
Acceptance Criteria :
The instrument used is acceptable if % R&R < 10.
Conditionally acceptable if % > 10 and < 30 and not acceptable if % R&R > 30.
Number of Distinct Categories (NDC) < 1 – Instrument unacceptable for estimating process
parameters and indices.
NDC 2 – 4 Generally acceptable for estimating process parameters and indices since it only
provide gross estimates.
NDC > 5 - Recommended.
For attribute characteristics Kappa value > 0.75
through ratio before and after for the changes as applicable and indicating the date and
designation.
10.2.2.10 Sample Production Parts:
The supplier shall draw sample products from the parts produced during the significant production
run and provide parts from each unique manufacturing process (e.g. cells or production lines, all
cavities, molds, patterns, dies) as per the sample production parts requirement specified in
Annexure - 10.
The supplier shall retain a master sample for the same period as the production part approval
records, or until a new master sample is produced for the same Lucas TVS part number for Lucas
TVS approval. The master sample shall be identified and shall have the customer approval date on
the sample. The Supplier shall retain a master sample for each position of a multiple cavity die,
mold, tool or pattern, or production process unless otherwise specified by Lucas TVS.
The supplier shall submit with the PAP submission any part-specific assembly or component
checking aids list & details.
The supplier shall certify that all aspects of the checking aid match with part dimensional
requirements.
The supplier shall submit the Agreement of Inspection and obtain approval from the concerned
Product Unit supplier quality team (on both Part – A: Inspection Standard & Part – B: Details of sub
– suppliers / raw material source), Part C – Packaging Standards at the time of PAP submission.
The guidelines for preparation of Agreement Of Inspection are given in the Supplier Quality
assurance manual ( Chapter 30.e )
On obtaining PAP approval from Lucas –TVS, suppliers shall submit Pre delivery inspection reports
in line with Agreement of Inspection along with each consignment at the time of bulk supplies.
The following documents (Submission level: 3 as per PPAP reference manual of AIAG) are to be
submitted to Lucas TVS / retained by supplier during PAP submission along with samples:
Drawing provided by Lucas – TVS / Lucas – TVS approved drawing ( to be retained by supplier)
Process Flow Diagram
Process Failure Mode And Effects Analysis (PFMEA)
Dimensional Results Report / Straight through ratio / OK ratio
Records of Material / Performance Test results / Straight through ratio / OK ratio
Initial Process capability studies for significant characteristics (SC) / before & after for changes .
Measurement System Analysis Studies
Control Plan
Parts Submission Warrant (PSW)
Sample Production Parts
Master Samples (To be retained by supplier)
Details of Checking Aids
Agreement Of Inspection (AOI)
10.2.4.1 General
The supplier shall be notified by Lucas-TVS of the disposition of the submission. After production
part approval, suppliers shall assure that future production continues to meet all the requirements.
10.2.4.2.2 Interim Approval permits shipment of material for production requirements on a limited
time or piece quantity basis. Interim Approval will only be granted when the supplier has:
- Clearly defined the root cause of the non-conformities preventing production approval.
- And prepared an interim approval action plan agreed upon by Lucas TVS. Re-submission to
obtain “ full approval “ is required.
Material covered by an interim approval that fails to meet the agreed-upon action plan either by the
expiration date or the shipment of the authorized quantity will be rejected. No additional shipments
are authorized unless an extension of the interim approval is granted.
10.2.4.2.3 Rejected means that the submission, the production lot from which it was taken, and
accompanying documentation do not meet customer requirements. Corrected product and
documentation shall be submitted and approved before production quantities may be shipped.
RFQ to Supplier
Supplier Quotation
Purchasing System
Objective : To explicitly communicate the suppliers on supply conditions with clear terms and
order conditions meeting all statutory obligations to be fulfilled by supplier and to meet 100 % on
time delivery.
Supplier Responsibilities :
Submission of Quotation and cost table along with process sequence
Inputs :
Drawing
Specification
Type of Parts / Materials
Lucas TVS Customer specific requirements
Description :
1. Lucas-TVS Shall release annual purchase orders at the beginning of the financial year or
issue an amendment for extending the validity of the existing purchase order.
2. Lucas-TVS shall issue amendment to purchase orders as and when changes take place in
the annual Purchase Order for price, payment terms, delivery terms, tax rates, agreement
conditions, freight terms, addition and deletion of parts, change of address, drawing issue
level change, etc.
3. All supplies, whether it is samples or products shipped for regular production shall be made
only against scheduling agreement.
4. Supplier shall review and commit to all the terms and conditions of the purchase order and
scheduling agreement.
5. All the invoices made to Lucas TVS shall have the valid Purchase Order number printed on it.
6. Price shall be finalized before beginning of mass production and finalized price will come into
effect once the PPAP approval is obtained.
7. Supplier shall inform us if there are any changes in the organization structure, address, and
contact number.
8. Any issues related to goods receipt / payment shall be referred to purchase to resolve within a
month of Invoice date.
9. Supplies shall be made as per latest or operating drawing issue with final inspection report for
every lot as agreed.
Scheduling System :
Objective : To enable supplier to have effective production planning to meet Lucas-TVS
delivery requirements.
Supplier responsibilities:
1. Supplier to equip with adequate facilities like phone, fax, and computer with internet
connection, barcode printer and scanner for better communication.
2. Suppliers shall look at schedules released on the RASIS (Remote Access Supplier
Information System) “www.lucastvs.co.in” at the start of the week for production planning and
supply accordingly.
3. In the case of Kanban, the schedule quantity released is only to enable the planning process
and the actual delivery of parts shall be only against the Kanban Card.
4. 4. In case of concern / likely to fail in meeting the confirmed scheduled quantity requirements,
supplier shall inform the concerned business unit (Feed back report) purchase within first
working day of week through LEAPS feedback screen.
5. Suppliers shall cascade schedules to Tier II suppliers and RM suppliers to ensure on time
delivery.
Inputs :
Delivery schedules
Internet facilities
Description :
Annual projections are given to Suppliers during annual Supplier’s meet.
In addition three months rolling projections are given through RASIS. Monthly plans are sent
Suppliers through RASIS .
Daily / Weekly / Two bin schedules to Suppliers along with Delivery Instruction ( DI ) Number are
sent through RASIS.
Suppliers shall ensure 100% on-time Delivery of Materials as per schedules to Lucas-TVS as per
agreed logistics arrangements.
Evaluation
by LTVS ?
Not
Satisfactory Satisfactory
Maintenance of Containers
( Ensure cleanliness, No
damages & replenishment )
Objective: To ensure the container selection is as per the transportation and handling
requirements of the product.
Supplier responsibilities :
Develop containers as per guidelines
Maintenance of Containers
Inputs :
Length
Width
Height
Gap to be left from the top.
Free from contamination
Description :
1. The type container shall be made as agreed by LTVS in Agreement of Inspection
(AOI) Part – C.
2. The size of the Container shall be one of the following.
Rejected
Accepted Inspection by LTVS
SQ
Supplier Responsibilities:
The following reports shall be submitted along with the supplies as per the agreed
norms:
Inputs :
Agreement of Inspection
Measuring Instruments and gauges
Quality plan.
Description :
A) Supplier final inspection reports:
1. Submit in the prescribed format (Annexure : 15) as per agreement of inspection.
2. Carry out 100% inspection for all appearance items / for visual defects.
3. Certified inspectors name & Sign.
B) Requirements on special characteristics:
Supplier shall maintain process capability reports for special characteristics once in a
month and keep records / control charts for any verification if required (As per agreement
of inspection / control plan). Acceptance norms for process capability (Cpk) of the
parameters shall be > 1.67.
In case the processes become non-capable or unstable, supplier shall introduce 100%
inspection for the parameter till the process is corrected and again becomes stable and
capable. A list of such unstable and non-capable processes shall be submitted to LTVS
Effective
Description :
1. In case LTVS determines the supplied part is non- conforming, the suppliers are notified
through Supplier Problem Quality Report (SPQR) on the web (RASIS). The supplier shall
ensure corrective actions on receipt of flash report and communicate the causes of failure.
2. Flash reports issued for non-conformance shall be replied within 24 hours through E-Mail,
Fax, courier, or in person
3. After mutual agreement on non-conformance, parts will be moved to rejection stores. Then
the parts will be sent back to the supplier.
4. As an immediate measure supplier shall indicate the following:
a. Containment activity for the parts at LTVS, at the supplier end and in transit
b. Short term / temporary countermeasure with time line
c. Method of segregation or sorting
d. Identification after segregation or sorting.
5. For all the rejections, the supplier shall submit a long-term action plan within 7 days after
receiving the SPQR. It should contain:
a. Systematic problem analysis through 8D methodology available in RASIS
b. Time-bound action plan for implementing the countermeasure
6. Short-term measures shall be continued until the permanent countermeasures are found
effective at Supplier end.
7. Improved lot shall be separately identified and submitted with prior information to LTVS.
8. Every action plan to ensure problem does not repeat.
9. The supplier shall monitor and track quality performance of individual components and
take actions towards continuous improvement.
Supplier responsibilities:
Inputs :
Description :
Q&D rating is a composite rating of Quality and Delivery of the Supplier for the month.
Q&D Rating system covers all preferred suppliers supplying components, sub-assemblies & raw
materials to Lucas-TVS - Padi and Puducherry ,Rewari, Chakkan & Pant nagar plants. (except
imports, Consumables, Packing materials). QCDS rating shall be communicated to the supplier
through RASIS on monthly basis.
As per the rating, the Suppliers may be any one of the following categories.
Quality Rating :
SPQR RATING (Other than RSN & DRSN related) (40 Points)
No. of SPQRS= (No. of SPQRS related to In-House, Audit, Product grading & Concession
+ (No. of SPQRS related to Customer Complaint*5))
Note :- If any SPQR is raised on the supplier due to any one of the condition (a, b, c) mentioned
under Quality Status inputs, SPQR points will defaults to ZERO
Delivery Rating :
Overall Schedule adherence rating of a supplier will be the average of adherence percentage of
all DI’s raised for the month.
17. IMPLEMENTATION OF
CHANGES
No
Feasibility review by LTVS Engineering Is the change
approved?
Review the design change and send SPCR Send the "NOT APPROVED" Yes
(Annexure - 26) for LTVS proposed SPCR to supplier
changes
Prepare time bound action plan for change Send the "APPROVED" SPCR to supplier
implementation
Submit PAP documents and Parts Submit PAP documents and Parts
Submission Warrant (PSW) to Submission Warrant (PSW) to
Lucas - TVS Lucas - TVS
Obtain approval in the Parts Submission Obtain approval in the Parts Submission
Warrant (PSW) Warrant (PSW)
Implement the change as per agreed date Implement the change as per agreed date
Implementation of changes :-
Objective: To specify the procedure for implementation of design and process changes.
Supplier responsibilities :
Timely implementation of design or process changes only after approval from Lucas-TVS in
writing.
Inputs :
Revised Drawings
Issue / Revision level
Details of design changes or process changes such as Sub-supplier, raw material, die, process,
man , machine, method , location , Technology , layout etc..
Required date of implementation and Stock status of materials
Description :
Supplier shall
1. Send the Supplier Process Change Request ( Refer Annexure – 26 ) for proposed design or
process changes to Lucas-TVS purchase .
2. Review the following details before proposing the design or process changes.
a. Manufacturability of change
b. Effect on Capacity
c. Tool development / modification lead-time.
d. Associated cost effect with the detailed break up
e. Investment details for addition of facility, if any.
f. Tool and gauge modification / new tool development charges with break up
3. Obtain approval in the Supplier Process Change Request ( SPCR- Ref.Annexure-26a) for the
design or process changes
4. Prepare time bound action plan for implementation of design or process changes .
5. Compare the results of Process capability , Dimensional , Material , Straight Through Ratio / First
Time Through Ratio (FTTR) before and after the change during trials / implementation .
6. Submit PAP documents and Parts Submission Warrant ( PSW ) to Lucas-TVS purchase .
7. After sample approval, a pilot lot of 150 Nos to 200 Nos to be sent for assembly trial and approval.
(HMSI Specific requirement).
8. Obtain approval from Lucas-TVS in Parts Submission Warrant (PSW).
9. Finalise implementation date jointly with Lucas-TVS, once the PSW approval is obtained. Ensure
sufficient stock levels are built up for smooth change over.
10. Implement the design or process changes only after approval from Lucas-TVS and maintain
records of changes
NOTE: No tools and gauges can be scrapped / modified without written consent of
LTVS.
1. Daily monitoring 5M change control System (Man, Machine, Method, Materials, Measurement)
shall be recorded in the 5M register in appropriate format. Sample format enclosed in Annexure-
26b
2. Details of the change shall be recorded in the 5M change record in appropriate format. Sample
format enclosed in Annexure-26c
Customer communication:
1. Collate the change details in 5M Change control matrix before 5th of every month of every
month & communicate to Lucas-TVS Ltd. Sample format enclosed in Annexure-26d
2. If there is no change, mention in the format as “No change” & communicate to Lucas-TVS.
3. For Man change(With adequate skill), details should be mentioned in the change control matrix
and no prior approval required from Lucas-TVS.
4. If changes happen other than Man change, Lucas-TVS approval detail should be filled in the
change control matrix and a copy of approval to be enclosed
Objective: To specify the procedure for control / maintenance of LTVS supplied tools /
equipment
Supplier responsibilities:
Identification of Lucas-TVS owned Tools / Gauges and Date of introduction on the
tool
Maintenance of Master lists
Maintenance of Tools history cards
Preventive maintenance of Tools
Inputs :
Tools / Equipment supplied by Lucas-TVS
Tools life
Description :
1. Maintain master list of all items supplied by LTVS. Ex: press tools, PDC dies, plastic
moulds, machine tools, inspection equipment / instruments / Gauges
2. Maintain history card for all dies and press tools
3. Define and practice preventive maintenance schedule to achieve intended tool life and
part quality requirements.
4. Obtain approval for any Die changes from Lucas-TVS.
5. Submit copy of history card / report on usage condition, on request.
Poka Yoke Test certificate for Type approval Process & operator
each lot qualification
No Yes
Root cause
Sub
analysis supplier Recognise the sub suppliers
PPM < 100
No
Any Changes of
Sub Suppliers?
Yes
Objective:
Supplier Responsibilities :
Inputs :
Delivery requirements
Capability of Sub-Suppliers
Performance of Sub-Suppliers
Description :
Supplier shall
1. Maintain master list of all sub-suppliers with clear details of the operations carried out and
provide a copy to LTVS along with PPAP.
2. Inform and obtain the approval for any change of sub- supplier from LTVS.
3. Inform and obtain the approval for any change of operations at the sub-supplier end.
4. Carry out special processes like heat treatment, plating, painting, powder coating etc only at
the mutually approved sources.
5. Ensure sub-suppliers procure raw materials only from mutually agreed sources.
6. Monitor and improve QCDS performance of all sub-suppliers
7. Deploy supplier best practices to sub-supplier on periodic basis.
8. Maintain the data on production capacity for the parts supplied by sub-suppliers.
9. Encourage QMS certification (minimum of ISO 9001:2015) for sub-suppliers.
Supplier shall demonstrate the ability to establish, document, and implement an effective
quality system that comprises all applicable elements of ISO 9001:2015 or IATF 16949: 2016
or its latest version. Supplier shall ensure that quality policy is thoroughly distributed,
understood, maintained and that adequate levels of authority have been established to
ensure continual improvement of quality system.
LTVS expects its suppliers to get themselves not only to get accredited with ISO 9001 : 2015
/ IATF16949 immediately but also keep such accreditation valid at all times and constantly
upgrading themselves in line with the revisions to standard in order to maintain continuity of
QMS. Suppliers who do not meet this requirement should immediately forward detailed action
plan to fall inline with this requirement.
Supplier shall update certification status to LTVS during the renewal of the certificate and
during the upgradation of the certificate by forwarding the copy of the same.
The minimum qualifying requirement of certification is ISO 9001: 2015 with a goal of
transforming / getting certified to IATF 16949 : 2016 with action plan
Supplier shall demonstrate the ability to establish, document, and implement an effective
Environment, Health & Safety Management System (EHSMS) that comprises all applicable
elements of ISO 14001 or its latest versions. Supplier shall ensure that EHS policy is
thoroughly distributed, understood, maintained and that adequate levels of authority have
been established to ensure continual improvement of EHSMS system.
Supplier shall update EHSMS certification status to Lucas-TVS during the renewal of the
certificate and during the upgradation of the certificate by forwarding the copy of the same.
Counterme No
asure
effective?
Yes
Supplier Audits
Supplier responsibilities :
Adequate support to carryout audits at Suppliers premises
Review of Non-conformities / Observations
Timely corrective action / Improvement actions
Inputs :
Annual audit plan of Lucas-TVS
Serious Quality issues
Unacceptable Quality performance
Major changes in Manufacturing processes.
Description :
1. Lucas-TVS will carry out formal System audit on Quality Management Systems requirements as
per audit checklist (Annexure: 13) and audit frequency may be once a year or more depending
on how the supplier meets QCD performance targets.
2. In case of any major quality problem reported on supplies, Lucas-TVS shall decide to carryout
detailed audit on the manufacturing process on immediate basis as per the audit check sheet
(Annexure: 14).
3. Lucas-TVS will communicate the non-conformities, areas of concerns that require improvement
as observations.
4. Supplier shall forward time bound action plan for closure of non-conformities and observations.
5. Countermeasures will be verified during subsequent audit for effectiveness and cleared if found
effective. Otherwise returned to supplier for further improvements.
Verify the
training effectiveness
Not Effective Effective
Objective: The purpose is to ensure skilled manpower availability for each process stage.
Supplier Responsibilities :
Inputs :
Description :
Operator skill level should be identified through an evaluation process that includes reference to
his understanding of the process and his ability to produce good parts. Skill level of each
operator shall be ranked on a 4 level scale.
1.Job Performance Skills: Capability to perform the assigned job in line with customer's
requirements.
2.Technical Skill: Understanding and controlling the technical and technological aspect of the
processes, behavior and performance aspect of machines and tool used and their failure modes.
3.Skill Levels: Level 1: Requires guidance always ( Can be engaged under the close
supervision ) ; Level 2: Requires guidance occasionally ; Level 3: Can work independently
without any supervision; Level 4: Expert in operation and can train other operators on that
operation.
Below table gives the details of minimum retention period for various types of records and such
records should be made available to Lucas-TVS for verification on request. Supplier shall return
the old drawings to Lucas-TVS after receiving the latest drawings.
Minimum retention
S.no Type of Record Example
period
Inspection standards, Inspection reports,
Tooling maintenance reports, Control
chart, Material test reports, Performance
1 Quality System
test reports, Calibration records, Machine 3 Years
records
capability study reports, Audit reports,
Flash reports, Action plans, Kaizens, QC
Story
Drawings, PPAP
2 For the life of the
documents and
products + 1 Year
master samples
Purchase /
3 Purchase orders and amendments, For the life of the
transaction
quotations, purchase orders for tooling products + 1 Year
records
Inspection reports, Process controls
Traceability
reports, Tooling reports, Control chart,
4 records of 3 Years
Material test reports, Performance test
temporary
reports, Calibration records, Machine
change controls
reports, Audit reports.
25. TRACEABILITY
25. Traceability
Traceability refers to the completeness of the information about every step in a process chain.
Traceability is ability to chronologically interrelate the uniquely identifiable entities in a way that is
verifiable. It is the ability to verify the history, location, or application of an item by means of
documented recorded identification.
Traceability is closely linked with Product identification. Traceability is related to the origin of
Materials and Parts, the Product processing / manufacturing history and the distribution and
location of the product after delivery. Concept of Traceability has been linked to parts identification
recall procedure.
Why Traceability ?
Types of Traceability
1. Forward or Down Stream Traceability:
Ability to locate defective or suspected defective products in all stages of Product life
Subsequent to the stage in which defect was discovered with the aim to repair or
replace such products.
2. Backward or Upstream Traceability:
Ability to find out the History of a defective product in various stages of product life cycle
previous to the stage of discovery of defect with the aim to investigate the causes of
occurrence and to take countermeasures to improve process / Systems
What is the Customer Requirement?
“Supplier shall ensure that the products supplied can be traced back in the
manufacturing process, item by item and by their manufacturing date & shift, in order to
define the Quantity of items and period affected by the non- conformity / defect and
facilitate therefore the identification and isolation of non- conformed /defective products
As soon as Supplier identifies a problem associated with Quality, logistic or delivery schedule,
Supplier shall inform Customer and disclose all relevant information to ensure a quick solution
which shall be agreed by both parties “
Traceability Chain :
21 - 08 - 06 - 01
Shift
Day
Year
Example :
WW - YY - DD - SS
Shift
Day
Year
The Traceability coding method and System of keeping records shall be such a way that
it should be possible to know the minimum following from a Traceability code.
Traceability of changes:
26. . þ - CHARTS
26. þ - Charts
Determine the characteristics to be monitored
Refer control
charts for
Variable
characteristics
Yes
No Is the sample
size is variable?
Yes
þ - Charts
Objective: To monitor Assembly Operations having attribute characteristics ( G / NG ) .
Supplier Responsibilities :
Decide the area of application of P - charts.
Training on P-charts to the operating personnel
Establishing and monitoring the P- charts
Inputs:
Control plans
Inspection Standards
Checking aids
Assembly process with high rejections (Attribute characteristics – G / NG)
Description:
þ - Charts are used when the Quality Characteristics is represented by the number of defective
units or fraction defective when sample of varying size. Suppliers shall decide the area of
application to use the þ - chart Eg. Assembly Operations where 100% inspection is carried out
for the attribute characteristics ( G / NG ) and include in the Control plan/ QCPC.
þ - Charts are plotted as per the Guidelines given in this Manual. Out of control situations are
identified in the þ -chart and corrective actions are taken for the assignable causes resulting out
of controls conditions. ( Refer Section 31.C ).
Assembly Process shall be monitored by Suppliers using þ Charts and records are maintained.
`
Knowledge of new Motivated & Emerging
technologies empowered team customers /
Objective: To promote the use of value engineering and innovations to achieve breakthrough
improvement in quality and reduction in cost through improved design, material, processes and
technology.
Supplier Responsibilities
Measure performance through savings made through value engineering and innovations.
Value Engineering:
Suppliers shall establish structure of evaluating each elements of cost that constitutes the
total cost of the part (E.g. material, labor, cost of quality, consumables, power etc.).
Set annual cost reduction targets and apportion the target value to each element of cost.
Assign lead responsibility and appropriate cross-functional team to work towards value
engineering.
Team to focus and identify value adding activities and non value adding activities
throughout value stream and develop ideas to eliminate or compress non value activities
with technical limits as benchmark and implement them.
Innovation:
1. Change in material
2. Combining many components into one component to improve reliability and reduce
cost
5. 100% recycling
7. Performance mapping with competitive product and provide higher reliability cost
Conduct cost benefits analysis of such efforts and recognize to motivate similar activities
at an accelerated pace in the organization over time.
2) 5S.
3) SOP
6) Tool Management
7) Poka Yoke
9) Visual Control
29. Kanban
SQA Manual
Lucas TVS /SQA
Supplier Quality Assurance
Lucas TVS Ltd Issue: 1 25.10.17
Kanban (kahn-bahn) is a Japanese word that when translated literally means “visible record” or “visible
part”. In general context, it refers to a signal of some kind. Thus, in the manufacturing environment,
kanbans are signals used to replenish the inventory of items used repetitively within a facility. The
kanban system is based on a customer of a part pulling the part from the supplier of that part. The
customer of the part can be an actual consumer of a finished product (external) or the production
personnel at the succeeding station in a manufacturing facility (internal). Likewise, the supplier could be
the person at the preceding station in a manufacturing facility. The premise of kanban is that material
will not be produced or moved until a customer sends the signal to do so.
The typical kanban signal is an empty container designed to hold a standard quantity of material or
parts. When the container is empty, the customer sends it back to the supplier. The container has
attached to it instructions for refilling the container such as the part number, description, quantity,
customer, supplier, and purchase or work order number. Some other common forms of kanban signals
are supplier replaceable cards for cardboard boxed designed to hold a standard quantity, standard
container enclosed by a painting of the outline of the container on the floor, and color coded striped golf
balls sent via pneumatic tubes from station to station.
Kanbans serve many purposes. They act as communication devices from the point of use to the previous
operation and as visual communication tools. They act as purchase orders for your suppliers and work
orders for the production departments, thereby eliminating much of the paperwork that would otherwise be
required. In addition, kanbans reinforce other manufacturing objectives such as increasing responsibility
of the machine operator and allowing for proactive action on quality defects. However, kanbans should
not be used when lot production or safety stock is required because the kanban system will not account
for these requirements.
The kanban system described is a pull system. Traditionally, a push system is and has been employed.
The push system is also more commonly known as the Materials Requirements Planning (MRP)
system. This system is based on the Planning Department setting up a long-term production schedule
which is then dissected to give a detailed schedule for making or buying parts. This detailed schedule
then pushes the production people to make a part and push it forward to the next station. The major
weakness of this system is that it relies on guessing the future customer demand to develop the
schedule that production is based on and guessing the time it takes to produce each part. Over-
estimation and under-estimation may lead to excess inventory or part shortages, respectively.
One of the major reasons kanbans are used is to eliminate or reduce the above mentioned wastes
throughout an organization due to the pull system that is employed. Waste can come from over-
production (inventory) and therefore, the need for a stockroom. This waste is eliminated. Part
shortages (under-production) are also eliminated. Costs are reduced by eliminating the need for many
of the purchasing personnel and the paperwork associated with purchasing. The planning department’s
workload is also reduced as they no longer need to produce work orders.
Types of Kanban :
1. Dual-Card Kanban :
This kanban system is more commonly referred to as the Toyota kanban system as Toyota was the first
to employ this system in full scale use. It is a more useful kanban technique in large-scale, high variety
manufacturing facilities. In this system, each part has its own special container designed to hold a
precise quantity of that part. Two cards are used: the production kanban which serves the supplier
workstation and the conveyance kanban, which serves the customer workstation. Each container cycles
from the supplier workstation to its stockpoint to the customer workstation and its stockpoint, and back
while one kanban is exchanged for another. No parts are produced unless a P-kanban authorizes it.
There is only one C-kanban and one P-kanban for each container and each container holds a standard
quantity (no more, no less).
2. Single-Card Kanban :
The single-card kanban system is a more convenient system for manufacturing facilities requiring less
variety in their parts. Essentially, the single-card kanban system is simply a dual-card kanban system
with the absence of the production kanban and designated stock points. This system is demonstrated
Initial Production control(IPC) / Initial Flow Control(IFC) is the special or extra controls
excercised in the manufacturing process during the initial phase of mass production till the process is
stabilized.
Requirements:
b. IPC Period should be agreed with Lucas-TVS. If no specific requirement given by customer, IPC
period should be 3 months / 3000 No’s Whichever is Longer after PPAP run
c. Identify the machine / line which is used for IPC should be identified with Flag / colour sticker to
bring more attention to the operators.
d. Supervisors, Operators and auditors should be trained about Significance and importance of IPC/
Ramp up and details of Products
f. Stringent In-House and Supplier PPM should be fixed for IPC period. In general half of the
rejection PPM of similar product can be fixed if no specific requirement from customer.
g. Process audit shall be conducted minimum two times during the IPC period in line with control
plan, one at beginning of the IPC (first day of start) & another one at the end before termination
h. Process capability report for Sc dimensions to be submitted to Lucas-TVS Ltd for every batch
i. Double the Sample size to be followed for incoming inspection, In Process inspection and final
inspection
k. For the non conformances noticed during inspection, immediate actions to be initiated to resolve
the Q-Issues
m. Conditions for IPC termination to be fixed and IPC should be extended if the targets are not
achieved. For Example the following conditions are to be satisfied:
1. Cpk >= 1.67 and trend to be positive
2. All problems occurred before SOP resolved?
3. All problems observed during IPC & ramp up control resolved?
4. Customer Line Rejection is Zero
5. Customer Delivery Performance 100%
6. In-house Rejection PPM < Target Fixed
7. Supplier Quality PPM < Target Fixed
n. If any one of the above conditions is not satisfied, Extend the IPC period for a month and monitor
for the above conditions of Termination. If the conditions are satisfied, IPC will be terminated.
o. Termination will be reviewed & signed off by Quality Head of the organization and
communicated to operating people.
Supplier shall comply with the following but not limited to for meeting the
applicable statutory and regulatory requirements for the supplied
parts/materials/services
2. Pollution control board certificate as per Air and Water pollution act 1981
3. Emission certificate for the vehicle used for transporting parts ( Motor Vehicles act
1988)
10 Any special controls specified by LTVS/OEMs for products with statutory and
regulatory requirements
Scope of Agreement
Scope of Agreement
This QAA sets forth the minimum requirements to be met by the quality management
system of the parties and stipulates the quality assurance terms applicable to the
products supplied by Supplier and their manufacturing process.. Supplier Agreements
5.3
apply to all potential and current WABCO sub supplier direct materials suppliers
worldwide. ( Refrence SQA WABCO clause 5.3)
Quality Management
Quality Management
This contains mandatory registration according to ISO9001, and compliance with IATF 16949,.
7.2
Supplier shall ensure to include in its quality management system any production, testing
equipment and/or packaging provided by our customer WABCO.( Refrence SQA WABCO
clause 7.12)
Continuous Training
In order to have sustainable results, CSR OF WABCO expects Supplier to use continuous
improvement methods,
to have quality management systems in place and to work on organizational improvement
projects. Supplier commits to develop its employees with the support professional institute of
Continuous Training
its choice in different relevant domains, and in particular in quality methods, - continuous
improvement - process improvement ,six sigma lean personnel development
change management.
7.3
Supplier must present during its QD reviews with LTVS its continuously updated training plan
and progress status.
Training is available to Supplier at LTVS Training center..
Suppliers shall train their operators annually. The training shall be based on the work
instructions as described in the LTVS Quality Assurance manual / CSR ,approved control
plan, During the training, past quality issues shall be reviewed with the operators. Training
records shall be made available to customer on demand. ( Reference WABCO supplier
manaual clause 7.3)
Quality management system
management
Supplier shall provide documented evidence that Supplier monitors the effectiveness
system
Quality
Clause
SL.NO. Customer Specific requirements /Remarks Ref
Process Capabilities
Wherever required by Customer in the course of the part approval procedure, statistical
evidence of process capability must be made available by Supplier.In case of Safety or
Significant Product Characteristic or additional agreed characteristics, evidence must be
provided by Supplier that process can reach a short-term process capability (ppk) ?
(superior or equal to) 2 for at least 50 consecutively produced parts. In series
production, Supplier shall give evidence for a long term process capability (cpk) ? 7.1.6
Process Capabilities
(superior or equal to) 1,67. Otherwise, Supplier shall proceed to a 100% Inspection with
collection of data to be allocated at least to the production batch. In the event of a
value/parameter not being achieved by Supplier, Supplier shall make a record of this
non-achievement and perform a full testing inspection until the cause of the non-
achievement has been clearly identified and resolved. supplier has to use appropriate
control chart to monitore the process.
Measurement processes used for above mentioned characteristics shall be analysed by
Supplier using a Measurement System Analysis (MSA) and Supplier shall ensure that
Repeatability & Reproducibility (R&R) results shall be below 20 and that R&R results of
measurement systems used for other characteristics shall be below 30. Supplier shall 7.1.6
also ensure that the mandatory setting of the action control limits take into
consideration measurement system capability
Suppliers shall perform a self-evaluation of each applicable special process listed below
Special process
in compliance with the Automotive industry Action Group (AIAG) Manual and provide
results to Lucas TVS upon request:
. Heat Treatment . Plating,. Coating, Welding,. Soldering,. Molding 7.1.6
Product Requalification
To verify performance and compliance to all customer requirements, Supplier shall
conduct yearly requalification test according to latest drawings and specifications for
each product group delivered to WABCO. Supplier shall present the requalification plan
to WABCO for approval and this must be integrated in the validated control plan as part
Product Requalification
Change Management
Even though m anufacturing proces s m odification and Supplier quality as s urance proces s rem ain
within Supplier’s own res pons ibility, any plans by Supplier to change or m odify thes e proces s es
Change Management
s hall be notified in writing to cus tom er and thos e changes or m odifications can only be
im plem ented after receiving prior written approval of cus tom ers ’s quality as s urance repres entative.
To that effect, the Supplier s hall provide cus tom er’s quality as s urance repres entative with the
intended proces s change/m odification and the planned date of initial delivery following s uch change
in a written form . Details refer SQManual Page 84
Any changes to the product s hall als o be s ubject to the approval procedure as des cribed Details
refer in LTVS SQA Manual Page 84. The product m ay not be delivered in s eries until WABCO
cus tom er has approved the change. ( Reference Wabco s upplier m anaual 7.2.8)
Notwithstanding the aforesaid, LUCAS TVS will examine the products during the product
receipt inspection to identify any damage in transit and check the identity and quantity
of its contents. If, however, a non-conformity/defect is detected, when a shipment is
received, or when the products received are processed further and inspected at the
plant, the Supplier shall be notified thereof by LUCAS TVS as soon as reasonably
possible and the Supplier shall at its own expense,
(i) Correct itself or through a third party the detective products on LUCAS TVS’s premises
(“Third party" can mean staff, assigned by Supplier, who is not employed by the latter
or, in exceptional
Cases, LUCAS TVS’ 3 staff.)
Or
(ii) Remove itself or through a third party the defective products from LUCAS TVS’s
premises and deliver substitute conforming parts at short notice.
In case of each quality claim reported by LUCAS TVS to Supplier, Supplier shall provide:
- Within 24 hours quick reaction with containment actions to protect LUCAS TVS
production
C l a u se
S L .NO . C u sto m e r S p e c i fi c re q u i re m e n ts / R e m a rk s Re f
C h an g e M a n a g e m e n t
E ve n th o u g h m a n u fa c tu rin g p ro c e s s m o d ific a tio n a n d S u p p lie r q u a lity a s s u ra n c e p ro c e s s re m a in
w ith in S u p p lie r’s o w n re s p o n s ib ility, a n y p la n s b y S u p p lie r to c h a n g e o r m o d ify th e s e p ro c e s s e s
Change Management
Q u a lity S ta n d a r d an d R e im b u r s e m e n t
- W i th i n te n ( 10) w o rk in g d ay s a p ro v e th at th e a cti o n s h av e b e e n i m p l e m e n te d
A fte r LU C A S TV S 's v al i d ati o n o f i m p l e m e n te d co rre cti v e acti o n s S u p p l i e r sh al l p ro v i d e
Le s so n Le arn e d C ard .
7.2.3
Th e q u al i ty p e rf o rm an ce o f th e S u p p l i e r, b ase d o n th e m e trics N u m b e r o f In ci d e n ts,
re la te d to n u m b e r o f d e l i v e ri e s, a n d N u m b e r o f D e te cti v e P ro d u cts, re la te d to n u m b e r
o f d e l i v e re d p ro d u cts, w i l l b e co n tin u o u s l y m o n i to re d b y LUC A S T V S . T h e S u p p l i e r sh a ll
al so m o n i to r i ts q u al i ty p e rf o rm a n ce at a ll ti m e s . In th e e v e n t, o n e o f th e agre e d q u a l i ty
p e rf o rm an ce l e v e ls i s n o t m e t, th e S u p p l i e r w i l l b e re q u i re d to p re se n t a co rre cti v e
acti o n p l an w h i ch i n cl u d e s th e a ll o catio n o f re sp o n si b i l i ti e s b e tw e e n th e P a rti e s an d
th e tim e sch e d u l e f o r th e ste p s to b e u n d e rta k e n . ( R e f e re n ce w ab co s u p p l i e r m an u a l
cl au s e 7.2.3)
Documentation, Traceability
The Supplier shall keep the quality documents on record for a minimum of 2 years after
delivery. Process-FMEA and Inspection / SPC-Records of Safety / Significant
Characteristics have to be kept by Supplier for a minimum of 10 years after delivery. On
special request, Lucas TVS Customer could specify a different document retention
Documentation, Traceability
Packaging, Identification
In order to prevent all types of damages and deterioration in quality, the Supplier shall
ensure that the products are delivered in proper packaging as agreed with Lucas TVS.In
terms of packaging identification, the Supplier shall meet the requirements as agreed
Packaging, Identification
with Customer. The packaging identification must, at least, contain the following
markings without this list being exhaustive: Supplier name and address, Lucas TVS site
address, Lucas TVS part number, quantity in this packaging.All Products shall also be
10.3
accompanied by a delivery note stating, among other details, the delivery number, and
product identification reference number, delivered quantity and the Order number (or
consumption report number for parts on consignment stock) and clearly identifying the
Products including reference to numbers of any parts and drawings which have been
supplied by Lucas TVS to the Supplier. The Supplier shall also include in all invoices,
shipping documents and correspondence the same details as required above.The
Supplier shall ensure that the markings on the packaging are secured during transport
and in storage.Any
Safety deviations
and Environmental from agreed methods of packaging and identification
Regulations
The Supplier shall ensure compliance with all relevant safety and environmental
Safety and Environmental
legislation and regulations in force in the country where the products are delivered. In
terms of environmental management, Supplier shall ensure conformity with the
Regulations
requirements of ISO 14001 in its latest version. In addition, Supplier shall comply with
the requirements set forth in Lucas TVS environmental policy, being available on Lucas 3.0
TVS material / process- Standard to avoid hazardous substances products and all
deliveries to Lucas TVS shallcomply with the REACH Regulation (EC)NO 1907/2006 (
Reference Wabco supplier manaual Clause 3.0)