The Entropic Field
The Entropic Field
The Entropic Field
Dragos Cazacu
T H I S I S A B O O K P U B L I S H E D BY
FincoNET, Denmark
Copyright 2015 by FincoNET
First Edition
About the Author
Bibliography ………………………………………………………………. 77
Introduction
accepted Causality Degree Ranking Scale correlated with the notion (Meter
for distance, Pound for weight and so on).
As long as the Process’s Entropy and the Objective’s Causality
Degree is de facto a reference, there is no need for measurement units while
every single measure once defined (belonging to a established Entropic
Domain) and measured (using specific instruments) is expressed as a number
in the range of small to large infinitum (not a negative number and not a zero
number).
Example 1
The Field has a well defined ranking scale as part of its functional
structure where the Entropy is represented by let’s say 5 for the Velocity of a
Vehicle in movement, 9 for the Energy powering that Vehicle, 12 for the
Vehicle and 10−16 for the Consciousness of an individual human being
driving the Vehicle, and so on.
Example 2
Part One
The Cause and Effect are always the two Phases of any type Causal
Process, keeping in balance the Reference Assessment or Process’s Causal
Variables, the Entropic values of the Cause and Effect States being
permanently adjusted and changing alternatively Causality.
Causes are considered always as references (because they have a
Lower Entropy level than the Effect) as long as it is determining the
variability of the Effect Phase through the Entropy transfer or those changes
taking place at the Process’s Effect Phase.
Process’s Cause and Effect Phases are described by two Variables, the
basis of Process’s functionality, each Variable having a specific Algorithm
that correlate it with the Process’s Objective. Stage’s Algorithms are capable
20 | The Entropic Filed
to run both Causal Phases simultaneously, each one of the Phase having in
their structure all Process’s Cause and Effect States.
Each Algorithm of each Causal Phase, being either a Cause or an
Effect Phase goes through States where Entropy is changing continuously
balance determining the Causality type of the State.
Cause and Effect Phases are permanently exchanging Entropy
alternatively, the Higher Entropy State is always considered being the Effect
while the Lower Entropy State is considered being the Cause and when the
balance is changing the Cause is becoming Effect and the Effect is moving
sequentially to the next Process Cause State.
Any Causal Process has in its composition Stages, each one of them
containing Processing Algorithms or Equations, the type of Process is
mirroring a certain type of Stage combination. The Stages describing
Fundamental Causal Processes are:
Example
Random Assessment
and Measurement Outcome Stage
Stage
For a Stochastic Process, there are always two Variables, the Cause
given usually by Historical Time Series Data (as reference) and the other one
as the Effect being Process’s Performance considered from either the point of
view of Risk or the Reward as a single measurable Outcome.
One Variable is not determining the evolution of the other Variable
(Historical Time Series Data is not influencing future values of Risk –
Performance pair) the Variables being neither Synchronous nor Correlated
whatsoever and the Statistical Analytics of a pure Stochastic Process is based
only on Historical Time Series Data, not having the possibility to reproduce
exactly the Field’s conditions that generate the Historical Time Series Data
and / or correlate input Data with the Field’s Real Time Data.
Currently, Stochastic Analytics is studying the Process as being stand
alone and not being in Real Time Interaction with the Field (the other
Processes as part of the Field).
Example 1
Example 2
Example
Part Two
Objective (2) the Cause for Objective (1) or the Unexpected Result, both
Objectives being part of the same Causal Objective.
Examples
Bideterministic
Objective 1
Effect Stage
Bideterministic
Optimization
Stage
Bideterministic
Objective 2
Cause Stage
The same explanation is valid for the other Process Stages having the
same functionality and being assessed in some Higher Entropic Dimensions.
The Higher is the Entropic Dimension the Lower its Causality Degree.
As observed in Table 4 the Causal Universe of the Entropic Field is
spread over Ten Causal Dimension, seven Entropic Dimension generated by
the Causal Fundamental Processes and other three Entropic Dimensions
generated by the Causal Hybrid Processes.
Bideterministic
Objective 1
Effect Stage
Random
Bideterministic
Assessment and
Optimization
Measurement
Stage
Stage
Bideterministic
Objective 2
Cause Stage
Example
There are always Random factors that are influencing the extracted
ball to fall into a drawer and not a Deterministic controlled mechanism that
are trying to pick up a ball or the exactly desired number.
The Assessment and Measurement Stage is part of the Fundamental
Random Process and its role in this example, is to generate randomness
through a certain order as that of a collection of numbered balls (a collection
of ordered Processes being basis for the whole Lottery Process).
The Objective of the two Processes Interaction is to try to make the
correlation between a selected and an extracted list of numbers.
As observed here, for a Bideterministic – Random Hybrid Process, the
Objective as Effect is very clearly determined but the causes that generate it
being multiple, to implement the exact desired Objective is impossible due
to above described factors.
Bideterministic
Objective 1
Stage
Stochastic Stochastic
Bideterministic
Assessment and Synchronizing
Optimization
Measurement and Correlation
Stage
Stage Stage
Bideterministic
Objective 2
Stage
Example 1
Example 2
Example
where b is the base of the logarithm used. Common values of b are 2, Euler's
number e, and 10, and the unit of entropy is Shannon for b = 2, Nat for b = e
and Hartley for b = 10.
Causal Processes are always using Nat for b = e.
When b = 2, the units of Entropy are also commonly referred to as bits.
38 | The Entropic Filed
Example
• 0.167 => a
• 0.167 => d
• 0.167 => g
• 0.167 => o
• 0.167 => r
• 0.167 => s
Gamma Function also known the Euler’s integral of the second kind
is a component used in various probability – distribution functions and as
such it is applicable in the fields of probability and statistics, as well as
combinatorics and is defined by:
∞
Γ(𝑡) = ∫ 𝑥 𝑡−1 𝑒 −𝑥 𝑑𝑥
0
Part Two. Hybrid Causal Processes | 39
where the l and u marks the Lower and the upper borders of the Entropic
Integral Domain where the Process is running to achieve its Objective with the
associated Causality Degree and t has a Time or an Entropic like structure.
In Process Causality Analytics, the Domain Boundaries calculus is
very important, making tremendous difference of how the Domain Analysis
is done and with what precision and in what conditions the Causal Process
Objective is achieved, in regard to the initial planning specifications.
The optimization of Gamma Function for Causal Processes, is used
as a Fundamental formula of the Entropic Field’s Analytics, where zero and
infinitum are not accepted as limits for any of the Causal Process’s Integral
Domain.
(HB) and (LB) being the Upper and Lower Entropic Domain,
Boundaries Values.
The Higher is the Correlation Degree between Cause and Effect the
Higher is the Entropy transferred from Cause to Effect.
42 | The Entropic Filed
𝑌𝐶 = 𝐶𝑆𝐿(𝑥𝐶 )
𝑌𝐸 = 𝐸𝑆𝐿(𝑥𝐸)
𝑂𝐶 = 𝑌𝐶 𝐶𝐵
where
𝐶𝐵 = 𝑌𝐶 ⁄𝑌𝐸
then
𝑂𝐶 = 𝑌𝐶 (𝑌𝐶 ⁄𝑌𝐸 ) = 𝑌𝐶2 /𝑌𝐸
Part Two. Hybrid Causal Processes | 43
𝑃𝑂𝐸 = 𝑌𝐸 𝐶𝐸
where
𝐶𝐸 = 𝑌𝐸 ⁄𝑌𝐶
then
𝑂𝐸 = 𝑌𝐸 (𝑌𝐸 ⁄𝑌𝐶 ) = 𝑌𝐸2 /𝑌𝐶
these basic versions of Algorithms that make possible to achieve one and
the same Causal Objective. Each Algorithm’s Collection included in the
Specification of how to reach (including where and when) the planned
Causal Objective is the basic of One Reality, simultaneously and parallel,
other versions of One Reality being possible to occur if the selection
Process is following specific criteria.
Shortly, Parallel Realities are parallel and simultaneous version of a
Current Causal Process, all of them targeting the implementing of exactly
the same Causal Objective.
Example
Parallel Realities are only virtual Realities and not usable in any
other extent, they are taken in consideration as alternatives but almost never
approached to be exploited. Once a Parallel Reality is approached and used
as version to implement the Causal Objective, this is not Parallel any longer,
becoming a current developing Reality or version of the Causal Objective
achievement.
throughout the Universe or how available (from the Time then the Space
point of view, not the SpaceTime as is it used sometimes) is a certain level
of Entropic Causality to make interacting two or more Causal Processes.
As the Temperature is equalizing its different levels in Universe, the
Entropy is doing the same flowing always from High to Low Entropy and
consequently the Information is moving in the same way too. The same
Entropy flow as that one occurring from a Cause State to an Effect State is
encountered throughout the Universe.
An Objective with a Lower Causal Entropy will always be a Cause
for an Objective with a Higher, but in range, Causal Entropy the latest
becoming the Effect State, these two Processes Interacting further one
another.
Entropy and subsequently the Information Entropy, is available
everywhere, almost instantly, as long as there is a Cause to request a certain
level of an Effect and if there is established a Causality Correlation (through
Causal Strings) between Processes.
I2 I3 I4 I1
E1 E3 E2 E4
V1 V2 V3 V4
The Field P4 P3 P2 P1
Any Fundamental Causal Process can get its Causality Degree on the
Ranking Scale only if is becoming a Hybrid Causal Process.
Initially, the Analysis is explaining how the Process’s Causality
Degree is functioning and where is, its place on a Ranking Scale.
Conclusion
Part Three
Stochastic
Stochastic Bideterministic Bideterministic
M Momentum
Momentum
Momentum Momentum MCD
Synchronization
Measurement Optimization Implementing
and Correlation
Stage Stage Stage
Stage
Stochastic
Stochastic Bideterministic Bideterministic
Position
Position Position Position
Synchronization
Measurement Optimization Implementing
X and Correlation X-CD
Stage Stage Stage
Stage
A short description of the Stages, the Study goes through for the
analyzed Process are:
𝑴𝑺𝒀
𝑴𝒊 𝑴𝒄 M
𝑿𝒊 M - States
𝑿𝒄
X X - States
𝑿𝑺𝒀 t Time
then 𝑴𝒄 is being considered the Cause for the next Position State – X.
The conclusion is, that no matter at what time the Causality Phases
(Effect and Cause or M and X) is measured, one measure is in Cause Phase
and the other one in Effect Phase and only the Effect State is measurable,
having the most Entropy to make the State stable and display the targeted
measured value. It is important to mention here too, that the State become
Cause for next State Effect only if the Entropy level reach 100% otherwise
it is still Effect for the previous Cause State or an Effect State is becoming
Part Three. Process Causality – Case Study | 61
Cause State only if the Entropy transfer from the previous Cause State
ceased.
Measuring simultaneously the exact value of both M and X is
supposing to find the adjusting Synchronicity Degree (S) for either M or X,
that added to a Cause measure for anyone of M or X, determines the future
value of the Effect for that measure.
𝑴𝑳 𝑴𝑪𝒔 -1 𝑴𝑪𝒔 𝑴𝑯
M - States
𝑿𝑳 𝑿𝑪𝒔 - 1 𝑿𝑪𝒔 𝑿𝑯
X - States
This Case Study is using a Numeric Example where the Object has
to go through five States of the two Causal Phases and the parameters
describing its movement M and X are chosen accordingly Table 5.
For the Numeric Example, the Results Tables are representing only
the State 5 Causality Study, for the previous States the computation being
the same and the aggregated results for all five States for Structure and
Causality Degree are presented in Table16 to Table 19.
MOM - M Value 31 7 13 59 73
POS - X Value 11 17 19 23 29
- 𝑋𝐶𝑠 – 1 is the Cause State for the Effect State 𝑀𝐶𝑠 – 1 then
- 𝑀𝐶𝑠 – 1 is becoming Cause State for the Effect State 𝑋𝐶𝑠 then
- 𝑋𝐶𝑠 is becoming the Cause State for the Effect State 𝑀𝐶𝑠
all of them are carrying the associated possible probability of M and X State
that may appear in one position or another.
64 | The Entropic Filed
The formulas for Current Entropic Values for 𝑀𝐸𝐶 and 𝑋𝐸𝐶 :
𝑀𝐸𝐶 = 𝑀𝑀𝐸𝐶(𝐶𝑠−1)
or:
then symmetrically:
𝑋𝐸𝐶 = 𝑋𝑀𝐸𝐶(𝐶𝑠−1)
or:
𝑋𝐸𝐶 = (𝑋𝑀𝑝𝑖(𝐶𝑠−1) )𝑙𝑛(𝑋𝑀𝑝𝑖(𝐶𝑠−1) )
MOM - M 𝑴𝑬𝑪
The Numeric Example of this Case Study is working with very high
error margins compared to a real case due to the computational capacity
done by the Excel Spread sheet. This error margin is given when choosing a
very low granularity of the studied trajectory, for both M and X and
subsequently for the low granularity of Integration Domain where M and X
is being reconstructed consequently, the Synchronicity Degree calculated.
M&X Momentum
Current Lower Current Upper
Boundaries Boundaries
Value Value
M+ 1 MLB MUB - 1
- Both the Lower and Upper Momentum State within the Domain is
determined only by the previous Possible Position State, for the
Lower Boundaries being also the limit of the Position Domain
- The Lower Boundary cannot override the Upper Boundary and vice
versa for both X and M, otherwise there is no object movement, no
M and no X.
68 | The Entropic Filed
- Always the Lower and Upper Allowed Domain’s range for both
Causal Variables must be 1 pitch / unit (no more no less) more than
the maximum and minimum values of the two Causal Variables in
order to achieve the precise results for the Causal Indicators used
further to describe Causal Phases functionality and for a more
accurate Order Degree value.
𝑀𝐿𝐵 = 𝑀𝑇𝑠 − 3
𝑋𝐿𝐵 = 𝑋𝑇𝑠 − 2
𝑀𝐻𝐵 = 𝑀𝑇𝑠
𝑋𝐻𝐵 = 𝑋𝑇𝑠 − 1
𝑀𝑋𝐿 = 𝑀𝐿 𝑋𝐿
and
𝑀𝑋𝐻 = 𝑀𝐻 𝑋𝐻
where:
𝑀𝐿 = −(𝑀𝑝𝑖(𝐿𝐵) ) 𝑙𝑛(𝑀𝑝𝑖(𝐿𝐵) )
𝑋𝐿 = −(𝑋𝑝𝑖(𝐿𝐵) ) 𝑙𝑛(𝑋𝑝𝑖(𝐿𝐵) )
𝑀𝐻 = −(𝑀𝑝𝑖(𝐻𝐵) ) 𝑙𝑛(𝑀𝑝𝑖(𝐻𝐵) )
𝑋𝐻 = −(𝑋𝑝𝑖(𝐻𝐵) ) 𝑙𝑛(𝑋𝑝𝑖(𝐻𝐵) )
Part Three. Process Causality – Case Study | 69
Where pi, the probability for each State, both Lower and Upper M and X
is given by:
𝑀𝑝𝑖(𝐿𝐵) = 1/𝑀𝐿𝐵
𝑋𝑝𝑖(𝐿𝐵) = 1/𝑋𝐿𝐵
𝑀𝑝𝑖(𝐻𝐵) = 1/𝑀𝐻𝐵
𝑋𝑝𝑖(𝐻𝐵) = 1/𝑋𝐻𝐵
𝑋𝑀(𝑡) = 𝑋𝑆𝑌 + 𝑋𝐶
(HB) and (LB) being the Upper and Lower Entropic Domain,
Boundaries Values.
Using the already calculated values for 𝑀𝐸𝐶 and 𝑋𝐸𝐶 results are:
The Correlation Degree is the relation between the Cause and Effect
being at the same time a function of Mass – Energy. The Higher is the
Correlation Degree between Cause and Effect the Higher is the Entropy
transferred from Cause to Effect.
In conclusion the Correlation Degree for Momentum in Cause State
and the Position in Effect State is given by:
𝑌𝑀𝑋 = 𝑀𝑆𝐿
then the Correlation Degree for Position in Cause State and the Momentum
in Effect State is given by:
𝑌𝑋𝑀 = 𝑋𝑆𝐿
Part Three. Process Causality – Case Study | 73
The Higher is the Correlation Degree, the Higher is the Cause – Effect
Phase, Entropic transfer. Correlation Degree is represented by the Causal String
that is quantifying the Causality as an Entropy transfer from Cause to Effect
where the Entropy is expressed as Mass – Energy, Vibration and Information.
The Optimization Stage has the role to find the Optimum Correlation
between Cause Phase and Effect Phase with impact for any changes in
Process’s Causality Phases or in the Correlation Degree.
As a function of a Causal Interaction, the Cause Optimization
Degree 𝑂𝐶 is calculating the equilibrium between M Cause and X Effect
Phase using the Correlation Degree 𝑌𝑀𝑋 and 𝑌𝑋𝑀 Analytics:
where the aggregated Structure Degree is the sum of each single Causal
State Structure Degree:
For the aggregated Causality the sum of all Five States Causal
Values is given by Table 19.
Bibliography