PO3 Mark Anthony Abalos was accused of grave misconduct for the alleged evasion of Marlon Uzaraga Jensen through negligence. However, Abalos denies the charges and provides context in his 3-page answer. He explains that he was performing his regular duties as a warrant and subpoena officer, not as an investigator on the case. Furthermore, the private complainant withdrew the criminal complaint against Jensen, so there is no longer a crime or detained person. As such, Abalos requests that the administrative complaint against him be dismissed for lack of merit.
PO3 Mark Anthony Abalos was accused of grave misconduct for the alleged evasion of Marlon Uzaraga Jensen through negligence. However, Abalos denies the charges and provides context in his 3-page answer. He explains that he was performing his regular duties as a warrant and subpoena officer, not as an investigator on the case. Furthermore, the private complainant withdrew the criminal complaint against Jensen, so there is no longer a crime or detained person. As such, Abalos requests that the administrative complaint against him be dismissed for lack of merit.
PO3 Mark Anthony Abalos was accused of grave misconduct for the alleged evasion of Marlon Uzaraga Jensen through negligence. However, Abalos denies the charges and provides context in his 3-page answer. He explains that he was performing his regular duties as a warrant and subpoena officer, not as an investigator on the case. Furthermore, the private complainant withdrew the criminal complaint against Jensen, so there is no longer a crime or detained person. As such, Abalos requests that the administrative complaint against him be dismissed for lack of merit.
PO3 Mark Anthony Abalos was accused of grave misconduct for the alleged evasion of Marlon Uzaraga Jensen through negligence. However, Abalos denies the charges and provides context in his 3-page answer. He explains that he was performing his regular duties as a warrant and subpoena officer, not as an investigator on the case. Furthermore, the private complainant withdrew the criminal complaint against Jensen, so there is no longer a crime or detained person. As such, Abalos requests that the administrative complaint against him be dismissed for lack of merit.
Filipino, presently assigned at the Puerto Galera Municipal Police Station, after having been sworn to in accordance with law hereby depose and state:
1. I categorically deny the indictment against me for Grave
Misconduct under Rule 21, Section 2(c), paragraph 3(r) of NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular 2016-002 which states that “commit any act or omission that constitutes a crime punishable under the Revised Penal Code or special laws where the duration of imposable penalty is imprisonment of not lower than six (6) months and one (1) day.”
2. The incident arose when one MARLON UZARAGA
JENSEN allegedly stole P250.00 worth of softdrinks from Candava Supermarket in Puerto Galera Oriental Mindoro on 05 July 2017 at around 7:24 P.M. The following day, 06 July 2017, PO1 KRISKO DEE C. ADAME as Investigator and PO2 JOEL MADERAZO as Driver, proceeded to the Provincial Prosecutor’s Office in Calapan City to submit the person of JENSEN for inquest proceedings.
3. I proceeded with ADAME and MADERAZO not as an
investigator on case but to perform my function as a Warrant and Subpoena Officer of the Puerto Galera Municipal Police Station. As such, I proceeded with the Regional Trial Court of Calapan City and as a proof thereof I hereby attach copy of the 06 July 2017 Appearance issued by Atty. ENRICO P. MANTUANO II, Branch Clerk of Court, Regional Trial Court, Branch 40, Calapan City, as ANNEX “1.”
4. I am reiterating my 08 July 2017 Memorandum where I
stated that since I was busy working on 06 July 2017 as a Subpoena and Warrant Officer, I was NOT informed that Investigator PO1 ADAME will indorse JENSEN to me. I would like to stress that I am not responsible for the inquest of JENSEN.
5. Under the PNP Handbook, PNPM-DO-DS-3-2-13,
December 2013, the responsible officer during the inquest is the concerned police officer pertaining to the investigator, thus:
RULE 21. INQUEST PROCEDURES
21.1 Commencement of Inquest The inquest proceedings shall commence upon presentation of arrested person and witness/es by the police officer before the inquest prosecutor. The concerned police officer shall also submit the following documents: a. Affidavit of Arrest; b. Statement(s) of the complainant(s); c. Affidavit(s) of the witness(es) if any; and d. Other supporting evidence gathered by law enforcement authorities in the course of their investigation of the criminal incident involving the arrested person. 21.2 Documents to be submitted The investigator shall ensure that, as far as practicable, the following documents shall be presented during the inquest proceedings: Xxx xxx xxx d. Theft and Robbery Cases, Violation of the Anti-Piracy Law, and Anti-Highway Robbery Law, ad Violation of the Anti-Fencing Law (1) List/Inventory of the articles and items subject of the offense; and Statement of their respective value. Xxx xxx xxx
6. In any event, the administrative charge presupposes that
the crime of Evasion through negligence under Article 224 of the Revised Penal Code should have occurred in the first place in the escape of one MARLON UZARAGA JENSEN.
7. The supervening event in the instant case can no longer
qualify JENSEN as a detention prisoner considering that no less than the private complainant MELVYN CANDAVA MANONGSONG has executed her SINUMPAANG SALAYSAY withdrawing the criminal complaint she filed against JENSEN. Ms. MANONGSONG even implored the Puerto Galera Municipal Police Station to withdraw the case against JENSEN. He stated “aming ipinakikiuusap at ipinaaalam sa Kagalang-galang na Himpilan ng Pulisya dito sa Bayan ng Puerto Galera, Oriental Mindoro na huwag ng ituloy at itigil na ang pagdinig sa aming habla at reklamo.” Copy of the SINUMPAANG SALAYSAY of MANONGSONG is attached as ANNEX “2” to “2-A.”
8. Thus, to pursue the case and treat JENSEN as a
detention prisoner is an exercise in futility. There is no crime of theft to speak of considering that the private complainant herself claimed that the incident is “dulot lamang ng mga bagay bagay na aming hindi napagkasunduan.” Considering that there is no crime committed, no person could be held responsible therefor.
PRAYER
IN VIEW OF THE FOREGOING, it is respectfully prayed that
the instant administrative complaint against the undersigned BE DISMISSED for lack of merit.
Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise prayed for.
13 October 2017, Calapan City, Oriental Mindoro,
Philippines.
PO3 MARK ANTHONY ABALOS
Respondent
Copy furnished:
PSINSP TEOFILO B. AWINGAN
Philippine National Police Police Regional Office MIMAROPA Oriental Mindoro Police Provincial Office Poblacion, Puerto Galera Oriental Mindoro
VERIFICATION
I, MARK ANTHONY ABALOS, of legal age, single, Filipino,
after having been duly sworn to in accordance with law, hereby depose and state that I am the Respondent in the instant case and as such, I caused the preparation of the foregoing Answer, which I have read, and I hereby certify that the allegations therein are true and correct based on our own personal knowledge and authentic records on hand.
PO3 MARK ANTHONY ABALOS
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES)
CALAPAN CITY, OR. MINDORO ) S.S. x-----------------------x
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 13 October
2017 at Calapan City, Oriental Mindoro, Philippines affiant- respondent PO3 MARK ANTHONY ABALOS.