12.

00

10.00

8.00

6.00

4.00

2.00

0.00
SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18 CR-S Ratio AVERAGE
Enroll ment Rate SCORE

Enrollment Rate
Schools SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18 CR-S Ratio AVERAGE

Indicate name of School here #DIV/0!

Enrolment Rate (ER)

1 – Marginal 80%-84% ER
2 - Average 85%-89% ER
3 – High Above 90% ER or if the Clasroom Student Ratio
meets 1:45 for Regular School, 1:30 for Science
School and 1:15 for SPED School.
 12.00
12.00
10.00 10.00
8.00
8.00
6.00
4.00 6.00
2.00
4.00
0.00
SY 2015- SY 2016- SY 2017- AVERAGE 2.00
16 17 18
School Leaver Rate SCORE 0.00
SY 2015- SY 2016- SY 2017- AVERAGE
AVERAGE 16 17 18
SCORE Drop-out Rate SCORE

School Leaver Rate Drop-out Rate

SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18 AVERAGE SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18 AVERAGE
SCORE SCORE
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

School Leaver Rate (SL) /Drop-out (DR)

1 - Marginal: 4.00% - 5.99% Average
2 - Average: 2.00% - 3.99% Average
room Student Ratio 3 - High: 0.01 - 1.99% or 0 Current Year
ool, 1:30 for Science
 12.00 12.00
10.00 10.00
8.00 8.00
6.00 6.00
4.00 4.00
2.00 2.00

0.00 0.00
7- AVERAGE SY 2015- SY 2016- SY 2017- AVERAGE SY 2015- SY 2016- SY 2017- AVERAGE
16 17 18 16 17 18
SCORE Cohort Surviva l SCORE Completion Rate SCORE

Cohort Survival Completion Rate

SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18 AVERAGE SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18 AVERAGE
SCORE SCORE
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Cohort-Survival Rate (CSR)/Completion Rate (CR)/Graduation Rate (GR)

1 – Marginal 80%-84%
2 - Average 85%-89%
3 – High Above 90%
 12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18 AVERAGE
7- AVERAGE
Graduation Rate
e SCORE

Average
Graduation Rate Total
SCORE SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18 AVERAGE
SCORE Scores

#DIV/0! 0.00
NCR-FTAD-LO-MONITORING SYSTEM-Nov2017version

SCHOOL: Indicate name of School here

Revised School-Based Management Assessment Tool

(Based on Improvement of Learning Outcomes/Performance Indicators)

Indicators Rating
A. Access (60%) 1 2 3
1 Enrolment Rate (ER)
1 – Marginal 80%-84% ER

2 - Average 85%-89% ER
3 – High Above 90% ER or if the Clasroom Student Ratio meets 1:45 for Regular
School, 1:30 for Science School and 1:15 for SPED School
Total Score
Average Rating
Weighted Average Rating

Indicators Rating
B. Efficiency (40%) 1 2 3
1 School Leaver Rate (SL)
1 - Marginal: 4.00% - 5.99% Average SLR

2 - Average: 2.00% - 3.99% Average SLR

3 - High: 0 - 1.99% SLR or 0 SLR Current Year

2 Drop-out rate (DR)

1 - Marginal: 4.00% - 5.99% Average DR

2 - Average: 2.00% - 3.99% Average DR

3 - High: 0 - 1.99 % SL or 0 DR Current Year

3 Cohort-Survival Rate (CSR)

1 – Marginal 80%-84% CSR

2 - Average 85%-89% CSR

3 – High Above 90% CSR

4 Completion Rate (CR)

1 – Marginal 80%-84% CR

2 - Average 85%-89% CR

3 – High Above 90% CR

5 Graduation Rate (GR)

1 – Marginal 80%-84% GR

2 - Average 85%-89% GR

3 – High Above 90% GR

Total Score
Average Rating
Weighted Average Rating
Total Average Rating
Descriptive Best
Total Weighted Average Rating
0.55 - 1.49 = Good
1.50 - 2.49 = Better
2.50 - 3.00 = Best
Based Management Assessment Tool
f Learning Outcomes/Performance Indicators)

Rating
Score

0
0.00
0.00

Rating
Score

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Best
0
NCR-FTAD-DOD-MONITORING SYSTEM-Nov2017version

School: Indicate name of School here

Revised School-Based Management Assessment Tool

(Scoring Sheet the Validated Practices Using DOD)

Indicators Rating
A. Leadership and Governance (30%) 1 2 3
1. TheIn place is a development plan (e.g. SIP) developed collaboratively
by the stakeholders of the school and community.
2. TheThe development plan (e.g. SIP) is regularly reviewed by the
school community to keep it responsive and relevant to emerging
needs, challenges and opportunities.
3. Sta The school is organized by a clear stucture and work arrangements
that promote shared leadership and governance and define the roles
and responsibilities of the stakeholders.
4. TheA leadership of network facilitates communication between and
among school and community leaders for informed decision-
making and solving of school-community wide-learning problems.
5. TheA long term program is in operation that addresses the training and
development needs of school and community leaders.
6. TheThe governance practices facilitate regular information and
feedback sharing on the progress of the education development
7. Decprogram.
Decisions are consistently based on valued and respected
information sources and processes that adhere to vision, direction,
and aspirations of the community.
8. StakStakeholders demonstrate initiative, openness, and build effective
relationships to contribute to the attainment of the organization's
vision, mission, and goals.
9. TheThere is in place a development program to enhance leadership
competencies of stakeholders to face emerging opportunities and
challenges.
Total Score
Average Rating
Weighted Average Rating

B. Curriculum and Learning (30%) 1 2 3

1. TheThe curriculum provides for the development needs of all types of
learners in the school community.
2. TheThe implemented curriculum is localized to make it more
meaningful to the learners and applicable to life in the community.
3. AppA representative group of school and community stakeholders
develop the methods and materials for developing creative thinking
and problem solving.
4. TheThe learning systems are regularly and collaboratively monitored
by the community using appropriate tools to ensure the holistic
growth and development of the learners and the community.
5. MetAppropriate assessment tools for teaching and learning are
continuously reviewed and improved, and assessment results are
contextualized to the learner and local situation and the attainment
of relevent life skills.

6. LeaLearning managers and facilitators (teachers, administrators, and

community members) nurture values and environments that are
protective of all children and demonstrate behaviors consistent to
the organization's vision, mission and goals.
NCR-FTAD-DOD-MONITORING SYSTEM-Nov2017version

School: Indicate name of School here

Revised School-Based Management Assessment Tool

(Scoring Sheet the Validated Practices Using DOD)

Indicators Rating
7. LeaMethods and resources are learner and community-friendly,
enjoyable, safe, inclusive, accessible and aimed at developing self-
directed learners. Learners are equipped with essential knowledge,
skills, and values to assume responsibility and acconutability for
their own learning.

Total Score
Average Rating
Weighted Average Rating
NCR-FTAD-DOD-MONITORING SYSTEM-Nov2017version

School: Indicate name of School here

Revised School-Based Management Assessment Tool

(Scoring Sheet the Validated Practices Using DOD)

Indicators Rating
C. Accountability and Continuous Improvement (25%) 1 2 3
1. Rol Roles and responsibilities of accountable person/s and collective
body/ies are clearly defined and agreed upon by community
stakeholders.
2. AchAchievement of goals is recognized based on a collaboratively
developed performance accountability system; gaps are addressed
through appropriate action.
3. TheThe accountabilty system is owned by the community and is
continuously enhanced to ensure that management structures and
mechanisms are responsive to the emerging learning needs and
demands of the community.

4. AccAccountability assessment criteria and tools, feedback mechanisms,

and information collection and validation techniques and processes
are inclusive and collaboratively developed and agreed upon.
5. Par Participatory assessment of performance is done regularly with the
community. Assessment results and lessons learned serve as basis
for feedback, technical assistance, recognition and plan adjustment.
Total Score
Average Rating
Weighted Average Rating

D. Management of Resources (15%) 1 2 3

1. RegRegular resource inventory is collaboratively undertaken by
learning managers, learning facilitators, and community
stakeholders as basis for resource allocation and mobilization.
2. TheA regular dialogue for planning and resource programming, that is
accessible and inclusive, continuously engage stakeholders and
support implementation of community education plans.
3. TheIn place is a community-developed resource management system
that drives appropriate behaviors of the stakeholders to ensure
judicious, appropriate, and effective use of resources.
4. RegRegular monitoring, evaluation, and reporting processes of resource
management are collaboratively developed and implemented by the
learning managers, facilitaors, and community stakeholders.
5. TheThere is a system that manages the network and linkages which
strengthen and sustain partnerships for improving resource
management.
Total Score
Average Rating
Weighted Average Rating
Total Average Rating
Descriptive
Total Weighted Average Rating

0.55 - 1.49 = Good

1.50 - 2.49 = Better
2.50 - 3.00 = Best
ol-Based Management Assessment Tool
et the Validated Practices Using DOD)

Rating
Score

0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

Score
ol-Based Management Assessment Tool
et the Validated Practices Using DOD)

Rating

0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
ol-Based Management Assessment Tool
et the Validated Practices Using DOD)

Rating
Score

0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

Score

0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
NCR-FTAD-SUMARYSCORE-MONITORING SYSTEM-Nov2017version
School: Indicate name of School here

Revised School-Based Management Assessment Tool

(Sumarry of Scores of Learning Outcomes and DOD
Process)

Learning Outcomes DOD Process

Total
Weighted Total Weighted Total
Total Rating Percentage Total Rating Percentage Score Descriptive Level
0.00 0.00 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

0.55 - 1.49 = Good 0.55 - 1.49 = Level I

1.50 - 2.49 = Better 1.50 - 2.49 = Level II
2.50 - 3.00 = Best 2.50 - 3.00 = Level III
NCR-FTAD-SBM-FORM1-November 2017

Schools Division Office:

REPORT ON SCHOOL - BASED

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY OF SCORES AND
LEVEL FOR CALENDAR YEAR

60%
Enrollment Rate

No. District Schools SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18

CR-S Ratio AVERAGE SCORE Weighted %
1 Indicate name of School here 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Descriptive: Enrolment Rate (ER)

0.55 - 1.49 = Good 1 – Marginal 80%-84% ER
1.50 - 2.49 = Better 2 - Average 85%-89% ER
2.50 - 3.00 = Best 3 – High Above 90% ER or if the Clasroom Student Ratio
meets 1:45 for Regular School, 1:30 for Science
Level of Practice School and 1:15 for SPED School.
0.55 - 1.49 = I
1.50 - 2.49 = II
2.50 - 3.00 = III
NCR-FTAD-SBM-FORM1-November 2017

Schools Division Office:

REPORT ON SCHOOL - BASED

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY OF SCORES AND
LEVEL FOR CALENDAR YEAR

School Leaver Rate Drop-out Rate

No. District Schools SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18

AVERAGE SCORE SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18
AVERAGE

1 Indicate name of School here 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Descriptive: School Leaver Rate (SL) /Drop-out (DR)

0.55 - 1.49 = Good 1 - Marginal: 4.00% - 5.99% Average
1.50 - 2.49 = Better 2 - Average: 2.00% - 3.99% Average
2.50 - 3.00 = Best 3 - High: 0.01 - 1.99% or 0 Current Year

Level of Practice
0.55 - 1.49 = I
1.50 - 2.49 = II
2.50 - 3.00 = III
NCR-FTAD-SBM-FORM1-November 2017

Schools Division Office:

REPORT ON SCHOOL - BASED

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY OF SCORES AND
LEVEL FOR CALENDAR YEAR

No. District Schools SCORE

1 Indicate name of School here 0.00

Descriptive:
0.55 - 1.49 = Good
1.50 - 2.49 = Better
2.50 - 3.00 = Best

Level of Practice
0.55 - 1.49 = I
1.50 - 2.49 = II
2.50 - 3.00 = III
NCR-FTAD-SBM-FORM1-November 2017

Schools Division Office:

REPORT ON SCHOOL - BASED

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY OF SCORES AND
LEVEL FOR CALENDAR YEAR

Cohort Survival Completion Rate

No. District Schools SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18

AVERAGE SCORE SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18
AVERAGE

1 Indicate name of School here 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Descriptive: Cohort-Survival Rate (CSR)/Completion Rate (CR)/Graduation Rate (GR)

0.55 - 1.49 = Good 1 – Marginal 80%-84%
1.50 - 2.49 = Better 2 - Average 85%-89%
2.50 - 3.00 = Best 3 – High Above 90%

Level of Practice
0.55 - 1.49 = I
1.50 - 2.49 = II
2.50 - 3.00 = III
NCR-FTAD-SBM-FORM1-November 2017

Schools Division Office:

REPORT ON SCHOOL - BASED

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY OF SCORES AND
LEVEL FOR CALENDAR YEAR

Average 40%
Graduation Rate
Total
Total
No. District Schools SCORE SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17 SY 2017-18
AVERAGE SCORE Scores Weighted % Score
1 Indicate name of School here 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Descriptive:
0.55 - 1.49 = Good
1.50 - 2.49 = Better
2.50 - 3.00 = Best

Level of Practice
0.55 - 1.49 = I
1.50 - 2.49 = II
2.50 - 3.00 = III
NCR-FTAD-SBM-FORM1-November 2017

Schools Division Office:

REPORT ON SCHOOL - BASED

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY OF SCORES AND
LEVEL FOR CALENDAR YEAR

Descriptive LEVEL
No. District Schools
1 Indicate name of School here

Descriptive:
0.55 - 1.49 = Good
1.50 - 2.49 = Better
2.50 - 3.00 = Best

Level of Practice
0.55 - 1.49 = I
1.50 - 2.49 = II
2.50 - 3.00 = III
NCR-FTAD-SBM-FORM2-November 2017

Schools Division Office:_____________________________________

REPORT ON SCHOOL - BASED MANAGEMENT SUMMARY OF SCORES AND LEVEL FOR CALENDAR YEAR _____________

Ex.

40% Learning Outcomes 60%

Observation/Discussion
60% 40%
No. District Schools I II III IV Sub Total Weighted % ACCESS EFFIECIENCY Sub Total Weighted %
1 I Indicate name of School here #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Descriptive:
0.55 - 1.49 = Good
1.50 - 2.49 = Better
2.50 - 3.00 = Best

Level of Practice
0.55 - 1.49 = I
1.50 - 2.49 = II
2.50 - 3.00 = III
_____________

Total
Descriptive LEVEL
Score
#DIV/0!