BANAT v.

COMELEC shall be determined only after all party-list

G.R. No. 179295 ballots have been completely canvassed.
● Acting on BANAT's petition, the NBC
TOPIC: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES –
promulgated NBC Resolution No. 07-88 denying
COMPOSITION (PARTY-LIST REPRESENTATIVES
the petition for being moot and academic.
BANAT filed a petition for certiorari and
CAVEAT: This topic is procedural. The
mandamus assailing the said resolution.
procedures in the digest may suffice for
● On 9 July 2007, Bayan Muna, Abono, and
recitation but for full understanding as to how
A Teacher asked the COMELEC, acting as NBC, to
the seats of party-list representatives are
reconsider its decision to use the Veterans
determined, it is still advised to read the full
formula as stated in its NBC Resolution No. 07-60
text. Refer to table on the last few pages.
because the Veterans formula is violative of the
Constitution and of Republic Act No. 7941 (R.A.
FACTS:
No. 7941). On the same day, the COMELEC
● The 14 May 2007 elections, the
denied reconsideration during the proceedings
COMELEC counted 15,950,900 votes cast for 93
of the NBC.
parties under the Party-List System.
● On 27 June 2002, the Barangay ISSUE:
Association for National Advancement and ● Is the twenty percent allocation for
Transparency (BANAT) filed a Petition to party-list representatives provided in Section
Proclaim the Full Number of Party-List 5(2), Article VI of the Constitution mandatory or
Representatives Provided by the Constitution, is it merely a ceiling?
docketed as NBC No. 07-041 (PL) before the ● Is the three-seat limit provided in
National Board of Canvassers(NBC). BANAT filed Section 11(b) of RA 7941 constitutional?
its petition because "[t]he Chairman and the ● Is the two percent threshold and
Members of the [COMELEC] have recently been "qualifier" votes prescribed by the same Section
quoted in the national papers that the 11(b) of RA 7941 constitutional?
[COMELEC] is duty bound to and shall implement ● How shall the party-list representatives
the Veterans ruling, that is, would apply the be allocated?
Panganiban formula in allocating party-list
seats". HELD:
1. THE FOUR INVIOLABLE PARAMETERS
● On 9 July 2007, the COMELEC, sitting as
the NBC, promulgated NBC Resolution No. 07- The petitions have partial merit. We maintain
60. NBC Resolution No. 07-60 proclaimed that a Philippine-style party-list election has at
thirteen (13) parties as winners in the party-list least four inviolable parameters as clearly stated
elections. Pursuant to the said resolution, the in Veterans. For easy reference, these are:
COMELEC, acting as NBC, promulgated
First, the twenty percent allocation — the
Resolution No. 07-72 which declared three (3)
combined number of all party-list congressmen
other parties entitled to one guaranteed seat
shall not exceed twenty percent of the total
pursuant to Veterans Federation Party v.
membership of the House of Representatives,
COMELEC.
including those elected under the party list;
● Note: A ruling in Veterans Federation
Second, the two percent threshold — only those
Party versus COMELEC adopting a formula for
parties garnering a minimum of two percent of
the additional seats of each party, organization
the total valid votes cast for the party-list system
or coalition receiving more than the required
are "qualified" to have a seat in the House of
two percent (2%) votes, stating that the same
Representatives;
Third, the three-seat limit — each qualified Section 11. Number of Party-List
party, regardless of the number of votes it Representatives. — The party-list
actually obtained, is entitled to a maximum of representatives shall constitute twenty per
three seats; that is, one "qualifying" and two centum (20%) of the total number of the
additional seats; members of the House of Representatives
including those under the party-list.
Fourth, proportional representation — the
additional seats which a qualified party is xxx xxx xxx
entitled to shall be computed "in proportion to
Section 5 (1), Article VI of the
their total number of votes".
Constitution states that the "House of
2. FORMULA IN VETERANS Ruling Representatives shall be composed of not more
than two hundred and fifty members, unless
However, because the formula in
otherwise fixed by law". The House of
Veterans has flaws in its mathematical
Representatives shall be composed of district
interpretation of the term "proportional
representatives and party-list representatives.
representation", this Court is compelled to
The Constitution allows the legislature to modify
revisit the formula for the allocation of
the number of the members of the House of
additional seats to party-list
Representatives.
Number of Party-List Representatives: The
Section 5 (2), Article VI of the
Formula Mandated by the Constitution
Constitution, on the other hand, states the ratio
Section 5, Article VI of the Constitution provides: of party-list representatives to the total number
Section 5. (1) The House of of representatives. We compute the number of
Representatives shall be composed of not more seats available to party-list representatives from
than two hundred and fifty members, unless the number of legislative districts. On this point,
otherwise fixed by law, who shall be elected we do not deviate from the first formula in
from legislative districts apportioned among the Veterans, thus:
provinces, cities, and the Metropolitan Manila The Number of seats available to party-list
area in accordance with the number of their representatives equals:
respective inhabitants, and on the basis of a 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑠 𝐴𝑣𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑠
uniform and progressive ratio, and those who, as ( )
. 80
provided by law, shall be elected through a ∗ .20

party-list system of registered national, regional,

and sectoral parties or organizations. This formula allows for the
(2) The party-list representatives shall corresponding increase in the number of seats
constitute twenty per centum of the total available for party-list representatives whenever
number of representatives including those under a legislative district is created by law. Since the
the party-list. For three consecutive terms after 14th Congress of the Philippines has 220 district
the ratification of this Constitution, one-half of representatives, there are 55 seats available to
the seats allocated to party-list representatives party-list representatives.
shall be filled, as provided by law, by selection or 220
( .80 ) ∗ .20 = 550
election from the labor, peasant, urban poor,
indigenous cultural communities, women, 3. ALLOCATION OF SEATS
youth, and such other sectors as may be
After prescribing the ratio of the number of
provided by law, except the religious sector.
party-list representatives to the total number of
The first paragraph of Section 11 of R.A. No. 7941 representatives, the Constitution left the
reads: manner of allocating the seats available to party-
list representatives to the wisdom of the Section 12. Procedure in Allocating Seats
legislature. for Party-List Representatives. — The COMELEC
shall tally all the votes for the parties,
Allocation of Seats for Party-List
organizations, or coalitions on a nationwide
Representatives: The Statutory Limits
basis, rank them according to the number of
Presented by the Two Percent Threshold and
votes received and allocate party-list
the Three-Seat Cap
representatives proportionately according to the
All parties agree on the formula to percentage
determine the maximum number of seats
of votes obtained by each party, organization, or
reserved under the Party-List System, as well as
coalition as against the total nationwide votes
on the formula to determine the guaranteed
cast for the party-list system. (Emphasis
seats to party-list candidates garnering at least
supplied)
two-percent of the total party-list votes.
However, there are numerous interpretations of We examine what R.A. No. 7941
the provisions of R.A. No. 7941 on the allocation prescribes to allocate seats for party-list
of "additional seats" under the Party-List representatives.
System. Veterans produced the First Party Rule,
Section 11 (a) of R.A. No. 7941
and Justice Vicente V. Mendoza's dissent in
prescribes the ranking of the participating
Veterans presented Germany's Niemeyer
parties from the highest to the lowest based on
formula 21 as an alternative.
the number of votes they garnered during the
The Constitution left to Congress the elections.
determination of the manner of allocating the
Table 1 – xxx
seats for party-list representatives. Congress
enacted R.A. No. 7941, paragraphs (a) and (b) of
Section 11 and Section 12 of which provide: The first clause of Section 11 (b) of R.A.
Section 11. Number of Party-List No. 7941 states that "parties, organizations,
Representatives. — . . . and coalitions receiving at least two percent
(2%) of the total votes cast for the party-list
In determining the allocation of seats for
system shall be entitled to one seat each". This
the second vote, 22 the following procedure
clause guarantees a seat to the two-percenters.
shall be observed:
In Table 2 below, we use the first 20 party-list
(a) The parties, organizations, and coalitions candidates for illustration purposes. The
shall be ranked from the highest to the lowest percentage of votes garnered by each party is
based on the number of votes they garnered arrived at by dividing the number of votes
during the elections. garnered by each party by 15,950,900, the total
number of votes cast for all party-list
(b) The parties, organizations, and coalitions
candidates.
receiving at least two percent (2%) of the total
votes cast for the party-list system shall be Table 2 – xxx
entitled to one seat each: Provided, That those
From Table 2 above, we see that only 17
garnering more than two percent (2%) of the
party-list candidates received at least 2% from
votes shall be entitled to additional seats in
the total number of votes cast for party-list
proportion to their total number of votes:
candidates. The 17 qualified party-list
Provided, finally, That each party, organization,
candidates, or the two-percenters, are the party
or coalition shall be entitled to not more than
list candidates that are "entitled to one seat
three (3) seats.
each", or the guaranteed seat. In this first round
of seat allocation, we distributed 17 guaranteed R.A. No. 7941, the following procedure shall be
seats. observed:
4. THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE 1. The parties, organizations, and coalitions
2% FOR DISTRIBUTION OF ADDITIONAL shall be ranked from the highest to the lowest
SEATS AS FOUND IN THE SECOND based on the number of votes they garnered
CLAUSE OF SECTION 11(b) OF RA 7941 IS during the elections.
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
2. The parties, organizations, and coalitions
The second clause of Section 11 (b) of R.A. receiving at least two percent (2%) of the total
No. 7941 provides that "those garnering more votes cast for the party-list system shall be
than two percent (2%) of the votes shall be entitled to one guaranteed seat each.
entitled to additional seats in proportion to
3. Those garnering sufficient number of
their total number of votes". This is where
votes, according to the ranking in paragraph 1,
petitioners' and intervenors' problem with the
shall be entitled to additional seats in proportion
formula in Veterans lies. Veterans interprets the
to their total number of votes until all the
clause "in proportion to their total number of
additional seats are allocated.
votes" to be in proportion to the votes of the first
party. This interpretation is contrary to the 4. Each party, organization, or coalition shall
express language of R.A. No. 7941. be entitled to not more than three (3) seats.
We rule that, in computing the allocation of In computing the additional seats, the
additional seats, the continued operation of the guaranteed seats shall no longer be included
two percent threshold for the distribution of the because they have already been allocated, at
additional seats as found in the second clause of one seat each, to every two-percenter. Thus, the
Section 11 (b) of R.A. No. 7941 is remaining available seats for allocation as
unconstitutional. This Court finds that the two "additional seats" are the maximum seats
percent threshold makes it mathematically reserved under the Party List System less the
impossible to achieve the maximum number of guaranteed seats. Fractional seats are
available party list seats when the number of disregarded in the absence of a provision in R.A.
available party list seats exceeds 50. The No. 7941 allowing for a rounding off of fractional
continued operation of the two percent seats.
threshold in the distribution of the additional In declaring the two percent threshold
seats frustrates the attainment of the permissive unconstitutional, we do not limit our allocation
ceiling that 20% of the members of the House of of additional seats in
Representatives shall consist of party-list
representatives. Table 3 below to the two-percenters. The
percentage of votes garnered by each party-list
We therefore strike down the two percent candidate is arrived at by dividing the number of
threshold only in relation to the distribution of votes garnered by each party by 15,950,900, the
the additional seats as found in the second total number of votes cast for party list
clause of Section 11 (b) of R.A. No. 7941. The two candidates. There are two steps in the second
percent threshold presents an unwarranted round of seat allocation. First, the percentage is
obstacle to the full implementation of Section 5 multiplied by the remaining available seats, 38,
(2), Article VI of the Constitution and prevents which is the difference between the 55
the attainment of "the broadest possible maximum seats reserved under the Party-List
representation of party, sectoral or group System and the 17 guaranteed seats of the two-
interests in the House of Representatives" percenters. The whole integer of the product of
In determining the allocation of seats for the percentage and of the remaining available
party-list representatives under Section 11 of seats corresponds to a party's share in the
remaining available seats. Second, we assign one representative unless he is a natural born citizen
party-list seat to each of the parties next in rank of the Philippines, a registered voter, a resident
until all available seats are completely of the Philippines for a period of not less than
distributed. We distributed all of the remaining one (1) year immediately preceding the day of
38 seats in the second round of seat allocation. the elections, able to read and write, bona 􀁈de
Finally, we apply the three-seat cap to determine member of the party or organization which he
the number of seats each qualified party-list seeks to represent for at least ninety (90) days
candidate is entitled. Thus: preceding the day of the election, and is at least
twenty-five (25) years of age on the day of the
Table 3 – xxx
election.
Applying the procedure of seat allocation as
In case of a nominee of the youth sector,
illustrated in Table 3 above, there are 55 party-
he must at least be twenty-􀁈ve (25) but not more
list representatives from the 36 winning party-
than thirty (30) years of age on the day of the
list organizations. All 55 available party-list seats
election. Any youth sectoral representative who
are filled. The additional seats allocated to the
attains the age of thirty (30) during his term shall
parties with su􀁈cient number of votes for one
be allowed to continue until the expiration of his
whole seat, in no case to exceed a total of three
term.
seats for each party, are shown in column (D).
Under Section 9 of R.A. No. 7941, it is not
5. MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES NOT
necessary that the party-list organization's
ALLOWED BY MAJORITY DECISION 8-7
nominee "wallow in poverty, destitution and
The Constitutional Commission adopted infirmity" 34 as there is no financial status
a multi-party system that allowed all political required in the law. It is enough that the
parties to participate in the party-list elections. nominee of the sectoral
The deliberations of the Constitutional party/organization/coalition belongs to the
Commission clearly bear this out, marginalized and underrepresented sectors, 35
Read together, R.A. No. 7941 and the that is, if the nominee represents the fisherfolk,
deliberations of the Constitutional Commission he or she must be a fisherfolk, or if the nominee
state that major political parties are allowed to represents the senior citizens, he or she must be
establish, or form coalitions with, sectoral a senior citizen.
organizations for electoral or political purposes. Neither the Constitution nor R.A. No.
There should not be a problem if, for example, 7941 mandates the filling-up of the entire 20%
the Liberal Party participates in the party-list allocation of party-list representatives found in
election through the Kabataang Liberal ng the Constitution. The Constitution, in paragraph
Pilipinas (KALIPI), its sectoral youth wing. The 1, Section 5 of Article VI, left the determination
other major political parties can thus organize, or of the number of the members of the House of
a􀁈liate with, their chosen sector or sectors. To Representatives to Congress: "The House of
further illustrate, the Nacionalista Party can Representatives shall be composed of not more
establish a 􀁈sherfolk wing to participate in the than two hundred and fifty members, unless
party-list election, and this 􀁈sherfolk wing can otherwise fixed by law, . . . ." The 20% allocation
􀁈eld its 􀁈sherfolk nominees. Kabalikat ng of party-list representatives is merely a ceiling;
Malayang Pilipino (KAMPI) can do the same for party-list representatives cannot be more than
the urban poor. 20% of the members of the House of
The qualifications of party-list nominees Representatives. However, we cannot allow the
are prescribed in Section 9 of R.A. No. 7941: continued existence of a provision in the law
which will systematically prevent the
Quali􀀿cations of Party-List Nominees. — constitutionally allocated 20% party-list
No person shall be nominated as party-list
representatives from being filled. The three-seat parties which participated, the seven major
cap, as a limitation to the number of seats that a political parties 20 made it to the top 50. These
qualified party list organization may occupy, seven parties garnered an accumulated 9.54% of
remains a valid statutory device that prevents the total number of votes counted, yielding an
any party from dominating the partylist average of 1.36% each, while the remaining 155
elections. Seats for party-list representatives parties (including those whose quali􀁈cations
shall thus be allocated in accordance with the were contested) only obtained 90.45% or an
procedure used in Table 3 above. average of 0.58% each. Of these seven, three
parties 21 or 42.8% of the total number of the
However, by a vote of 8-7, the Court decided to
major parties garnered more than 2% of the total
continue the ruling in Veterans disallowing major
number of votes each, a feat that would have
political parties from participating in the party-
entitled them to seat their members as party-list
list elections, directly or indirectly. Those who
representatives. In contrast, only about 4% of
voted to continue disallowing major political
the total number of the remaining parties, or
parties from the party-list elections joined Chief
only 8 out of the 155 parties garnered more than
Justice Reynato S. Puno in his separate opinion.
2%. 22
On the formula to allocate party-list seats, the
Court is unanimous in concurring with this In sum, the evils that faced our
ponencia. marginalized and underrepresented people at
the time of the framing of the 1987 Constitution
DECISION:
still haunt them today. It is through the party-list
WHEREFORE, we PARTIALLY GRANT the petition. system that the Constitution sought to address
We SET ASIDE the Resolution of the COMELEC this systemic dilemma. In ratifying the
dated 3 August 2007 in NBC No. 07-041 (PL) as Constitution, our people recognized how the
well as the Resolution dated 9 July 2007 in NBC interests of our poor and powerless sectoral
No. 07-60. We declare unconstitutional the two groups can be frustrated by the traditional
percent threshold in the distribution of political parties who have the machinery and
additional party-list seats. The allocation of chicanery to dominate our political institutions.
additional seats under the Party-List System shall If we allow major political parties to participate
be in accordance with the procedure used in in the party-list system electoral process, we will
Table 3 of this Decision. Major political parties surely suffocate the voice of the marginalized,
are disallowed from participating in party-list frustrate their sovereignty and betray the
elections. This Decision is immediately democratic spirit of the Constitution. That
executory. No pronouncement as to costs. opinion will serve as the graveyard of the party-
‘ list system.

Justice Puno Separate Opinion on not allowing IN VIEW WHEREOF, I dissent on the
Major Political Parties: ruling allowing the entry of major political
parties into the party-list system.
There is no gainsaying the fact that the
party-list parties are no match to our traditional
political parties in the political arena. This is
borne out in the party-list elections held in 2001
where major political parties were initially
allowed to campaign and be voted for. The
results con􀁈rmed the fear expressed by some
commissioners in the Constitutional Commission
19 that major political parties would 􀁈gure in the
disproportionate distribution of votes: of the 162
 Table 1

Votes
Rank Party Votes Garnered Rank Party
Garnered

1 BUHAY 1,169,234 48 KALAHI 88,868

2 BAYAN MUNA 979,039 49 APOI 79,386

3 CIBAC 755,686 50 BP 78,541

4 GABRIELA 621,171 51 AHONBAYAN 78,424

5 APEC 619,657 52 BIGKIS 77,327

6 A TEACHER 490,379 53 PMAP 75,200

7 AKBAYAN 466,112 54 AKAPIN 74,686

8 ALAGAD 423,149 55 PBA 71,544

9 COOP-NATCCO 409,883 56 GRECON 62,220

10 BUTIL 409,160 57 BTM 60,993

11 BATAS 385,810 58 A SMILE 58,717

12 ARC 374,288 59 NELFFI 57,872

13 ANAKPAWIS 370,261 60 AKSA 57,012

14 ABONO 339,990 61 BAGO 55,846

15 AMIN 338,185 62 BANDILA 54,751

16 AGAP 328,724 63 AHON 54,522

17 AN WARAY 321,503 64 ASAHAN MO 51,722

18 YACAP 310,889 65 AGBIAG! 50,837

19 FPJPM 300,923 66 SPI 50,478

20 UNI-MAD 245,382 67 BAHANDI 46,612

21 ABS 235,086 68 ADD 45,624

22 KAKUSA 228,999 69 AMANG 43,062

23 KABATAAN 228,637 70 ABAY PARAK 42,282

24 ABA-AKO 218,818 71 BABAE KA 36,512

25 ALIF 217,822 72 SB 34,835

26 SENIOR 213,058 73 ASAP 34,098

CITIZENS

27 AT 197,872 74 PEP 33,938

28 VFP 196,266 75 ABA ILONGGO 33,903

29 ANAD 188,521 76 VENDORS 33,691

30 BANAT 177,028 77 ADD-TRIBAL 32,896

31 ANG 170,531 78 ALMANA 32,255

KASANGGA
 32 BANTAY 169,801 79 AANGAT KA PILIPINO 29,130

33 ABAKADA 166,747 80 AAPS 26,271

34 1-UTAK 164,980 81 HAPI 25,781

35 TUCP 162,647 82 AAWAS 22,946

36 COCOFED 155,920 83 SM 20,744

37 AGHAM 146,032 84 AG 16,916

38 ANAK 141,817 85 AGING PINOY 16,729

39 ABANSE! PINAY 130,356 86 APO 16,421

40 PM 119,054 87 BIYAYANG BUKID 16,241

41 AVE 110,769 88 ATS 14,161

42 SUARA 110,732 89 UMDJ 9,445

43 ASSALAM 110,440 90 BUKLOD FILIPINA 8,915

44 DIWA 107,021 91 LYPAD 8,471

45 ANC 99,636 92 AA-KASOSYO 8,406

46 SANLAKAS 97,375 93 KASAPI 6,221

47 ABC 90,058 TOTAL 15,950,900

Table 2

Votes Garnered over Total

Rank Party Votes Garnered Guaranteed Seat
Votes for Party-List, in %

1 BUHAY 1,169,234 7.33% 1

2 BAYAN MUNA 979,039 6.14% 1

3 CIBAC 755,686 4.74% 1

4 GABRIELA 621,171 3.89% 1

5 APEC 619,657 3.88% 1

6 A TEACHER 490,379 3.07% 1

7 AKBAYAN 466,112 2.92% 1

8 ALAGAD 423,149 2.65% 1

9 COOP-NATCCO 409,883 2.57% 1

10 BUTIL 409,160 2.57% 1

11 BATAS29 385,810 2.42% 1

12 ARC 374,288 2.35% 1

13 ANAKPAWIS 370,261 2.32% 1

14 ABONO 339,990 2.13% 1

15 AMIN 338,185 2.12% 1

16 AGAP 328,724 2.06% 1

 17 AN WARAY 321,503 2.02% 1

Total 17

18 YACAP 310,889 1.95% 0

19 FPJPM 300,923 1.89% 0

20 UNI-MAD 245,382 1.54% 0

Table 3

Votes
Garnered over Additional (B) plus (C), Applying the
Guaranteed Seat
Votes Total Votes Seats in whole three seat
Rank Party (First Round)
Garnered for Party List, (Second Round) integers cap
(B)
in % (C) (D) (E)
(A)

1 BUHAY 1,169,234 7.33% 1 2.79 3 N.A.

2 BAYAN MUNA 979,039 6.14% 1 2.33 3 N.A.

3 CIBAC 755,686 4.74% 1 1.80 2 N.A.

4 GABRIELA 621,171 3.89% 1 1.48 2 N.A.

5 APEC 619,657 3.88% 1 1.48 2 N.A.

6 A Teacher 490,379 3.07% 1 1.17 2 N.A.

7 AKBAYAN 466,112 2.92% 1 1.11 2 N.A.

8 ALAGAD 423,149 2.65% 1 1.01 2 N.A.

931 COOP-NATCCO 409,883 2.57% 1 1 2 N.A.

10 BUTIL 409,160 2.57% 1 1 2 N.A.

11 BATAS 385,810 2.42% 1 1 2 N.A.

12 ARC 374,288 2.35% 1 1 2 N.A.

13 ANAKPAWIS 370,261 2.32% 1 1 2 N.A.

14 ABONO 339,990 2.13% 1 1 2 N.A.

15 AMIN 338,185 2.12% 1 1 2 N.A.

16 AGAP 328,724 2.06% 1 1 2 N.A.

17 AN WARAY 321,503 2.02% 1 1 2 N.A.

18 YACAP 310,889 1.95% 0 1 1 N.A.

19 FPJPM 300,923 1.89% 0 1 1 N.A.

20 UNI-MAD 245,382 1.54% 0 1 1 N.A.

21 ABS 235,086 1.47% 0 1 1 N.A.

22 KAKUSA 228,999 1.44% 0 1 1 N.A.

23 KABATAAN 228,637 1.43% 0 1 1 N.A.

24 ABA-AKO 218,818 1.37% 0 1 1 N.A.

 25 ALIF 217,822 1.37% 0 1 1 N.A.

26 SENIOR CITIZENS 213,058 1.34% 0 1 1 N.A.

27 AT 197,872 1.24% 0 1 1 N.A.

28 VFP 196,266 1.23% 0 1 1 N.A.

29 ANAD 188,521 1.18% 0 1 1 N.A.

30 BANAT 177,028 1.11% 0 1 1 N.A.

31 ANG KASANGGA 170,531 1.07% 0 1 1 N.A.

32 BANTAY 169,801 1.06% 0 1 1 N.A.

33 ABAKADA 166,747 1.05% 0 1 1 N.A.

34 1-UTAK 164,980 1.03% 0 1 1 N.A.

35 TUCP 162,647 1.02% 0 1 1 N.A.

36 COCOFED 155,920 0.98% 0 1 1 N.A.

Total 17 55