John Gleeson
John Gleeson
John Gleeson
Until Bosanquet came along, the off-break and leg break had been
accepted as the spin bowler’s sole means of hoodwinking the batsman,
with perhaps an occasional top spinner for variety. By producing a ball
delivered with a leg-break action which turned from the off, Bosanquet
made a remarkable contribution to that repertoire. Slow bowlers all over
the world copied his invention, among them many Australians, and
probably a lot of those who followed Bosanquet bowled it with more
control than he ever had over it.
Years later came the flipper, a bosey or wrong-un which hastens off the
pitch with top spin. Very few, probably not more than half a dozen, have
been able to bowl it and all who acquired it did so only after years of
practice. Bruce Dooland says in this book that the flipper was invented by
wrist spinner Clarrie Grimmett in Grimmett’s fortieth year. Richie
Benaud bowled it when he was in his prime, and was the only bowler in
the world then using it.
Benaud learnt the flipper from Dooland, during his term at Nottingham
frequently mesmerised English batsman with it. Nothing bowled in
English cricket at that time could so completely surprise a batsman such
as the flipper – except perhaps the “Chinaman” bowled by the Australian
Jack Walsh for Nothants. A “Chinaman”, for the uninitiated, is the left
hander’s wrong-un.
Emulating Iverson
I had my delivery – bowled with two fingers, the thumb and middle
finger, behind the ball for about ten years before I used it in a match. I
bowled it only in practice and had no idea of its value. The first time I let
it go was against a group of school kids on a paspalum wicket with a
jacaranda tree for stumps. Some bemusing performance followed
including 8 for 13 of 12 overs for Tamworth Police Boy’s Club against
Atlunga (the 13 runs include being hit for six into the dressing room!),
before I started flying to play in Sydney to further my cricket ambitions.
Even if I had never taken another wicket with it, I am convinced that the
success I have had with the grip and the success Iverson had with a
similar grip opens up the possibility of further types of spinning
deliveries being discovered some time in the future. We have far from
exhausted the possible arrangements of fingers, wrist, seam and palm
which will produce spin bowling. There is more to come.
I started using the grip on a tennis ball which I propelled for about fifteen
yards, but fairly quickly I discovered I could deliver a cricket ball the full
length with it. Perhaps it has something to do with the strong fingers I
developed milking cows on my parent’s farm when I was a kid. I have
heard that others who try the Iverson grip have trouble getting the ball up
the length of the pitch. Former Test player Peter Philpott, a keen student
of cricket trends, experimented with the Iverson grip but tore a ligament
in his middle finger and was out of cricket for a month.
The enormous advantage the bent finger Iverson type grip gives a bowler
is that if the batsman starts to detect it, he can revert to orthodox spin. His
entire range of deliveries is doubled, and this gives him more chance of
staying one step ahead of the batsman.
I have always liked Richie, a master of spin, for that indication that I had
tricked him. I tell the story not to gloat over that little success, but in the
hope that it will press home the great possibility of having an extra ball to
add to the spinner’s traditional store of wrong-un, flippers, “Chinaman”,
top-spinners, and mundane off-breaks and leg breaks. But what to call
these balls with the fingers doubled back behind the ball….Knuckle-
breaks?………Flickers?………Finger-crushers?……..None of these
terms seem adequate.
At what Speed?
With the bent finger grip, the ball does not cut down sharply onto the
pitch as the orthodox leg-break do, and so the advantages of flighting the
ball well up are partly lost. Maybe someday a bowler will learn variations
of flight with the Iverson grip. But I can get an occasional ball to hang, as
I bowl with the breeze, looking for a caught and bowled if the batsman
fail to get to the pitch of the ball.
A further difficulty is that you cannot bowl the Iverson stuff at a club,
State or even Australian practice. This would give batsman against whom
you would later bowl a wonderful chance to get used to it. So you just
bowl slow orthodox spinners at the nets and rehearse the Iverson ball at
home by yourself. If you think that hiding the delivery from the
representative sides team-mates is unnecessary, let me tell you that when
the Australian team practised at the nets before the First Test against the
West Indies in 1951, Australian’s captain Lindsay Hassett refused to
allow Iverson to bowl against Arthur Morris. This irritated Morris. “What
is this?” he called to Hassett. “An Australian team at the nets or Victoria
versus NSW?”
Nobody could blame Hassett for concealing Iverson’s main weapon – the
element of surprise – against Morris. Iverson, 6 ft. 3 in, held the ball
between the thumb and third finger, which he folded against his palm. He
got sharpish turn even on good wickets, throwing in an occasional wrong-
un. He could not turn the leg-break except on worn wickets. In 1950 he
puzzled even the most experienced English batsman when he made his
Test debut at 34, taking 15 wickets at an average of 15 runs apiece. His 6
for 27 in the Third Test virtually won the match for Australia. Hassett
took Keith Miller out of slips and fielded him at mid-on, where Miller
would have his back to Iverson, during the Brisbane Test against the
West Indies. Iverson retired later that season after N.S.W hammered him,
but the principle of concealing any advantage you have in cricket remains
a sound one.
At the moment I can bowl the top-spinners, wrong-un and leg breaks with
the finger bent back behind the ball, and an orthodox leg cutter and off-
break. I am working on acquiring an orthodox leg-spinner and wrong-un,
which would give me the full range of possibilities – and on bowling
what I have got more accurately. Unquestionably, the ball turns more and
sharply with the Iverson grip, then with orthodox spinning grips.
It will pay rich rewards for any young Australian prepared to carry on
that tradition and experiment until he finds a delivery of his own. One
day some lucky fellow will do it and I hope that the Iverson-style grip I
have used will help him in his deliberations. I also hope I am around to
see the fuss he starts with his new delivery.
Article taken from – ‘Cricket – The Australian Way” 1972 Jack Pollard
(Editor) Landsdown Press Melbourne