1) Legal compensation requires that two debts be liquidated and demandable, meaning the amounts owed are clearly established and currently due.
2) There can be no legal compensation if a third party has commenced a legal controversy or retention over one of the debts.
3) An exception is that a guarantor can claim compensation for any amount their principal debtor is owed by the creditor, as an offset against their own guarantor liability.
1) Legal compensation requires that two debts be liquidated and demandable, meaning the amounts owed are clearly established and currently due.
2) There can be no legal compensation if a third party has commenced a legal controversy or retention over one of the debts.
3) An exception is that a guarantor can claim compensation for any amount their principal debtor is owed by the creditor, as an offset against their own guarantor liability.
1) Legal compensation requires that two debts be liquidated and demandable, meaning the amounts owed are clearly established and currently due.
2) There can be no legal compensation if a third party has commenced a legal controversy or retention over one of the debts.
3) An exception is that a guarantor can claim compensation for any amount their principal debtor is owed by the creditor, as an offset against their own guarantor liability.
1) Legal compensation requires that two debts be liquidated and demandable, meaning the amounts owed are clearly established and currently due.
2) There can be no legal compensation if a third party has commenced a legal controversy or retention over one of the debts.
3) An exception is that a guarantor can claim compensation for any amount their principal debtor is owed by the creditor, as an offset against their own guarantor liability.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
Article 1279.
In order that compensation may consequence of compensation carries with it
be proper, it is necessary: the accessory obligations such as guaranty. (4) That they be liquidated and demandable; Examples: (5) That over neither of them there be any (1) A owes B P500,000. C is the guarantor of A. retention or controversy, commenced by third B owes A P100,000. When B sues A and A persons and communicated in due time to the cannot pay, for how much will C be liable? debtor. Ans: C will be liable for only P400,000, because Requisites of Legal Compensation he can set up the P100,000 credit of A as the 4. The two debts are liquidated, basis for partial compensation. Example: A owes B P10,000. B owes A the share of the (2) A owes B P500,000. C is the guarantor of A. latter in a business the amount of which is still B owes C P500,000. When B sues A for the to be ascertained. P500,000, may A successfully put up the defense Compensation will not take place as the debt of of compensation in that, after all, his creditor B is not liquidated. If part of the debt of B has (B) owes C the same amount? been liquidated, compensation takes place with Ans: There can be no compensation here respect to that part without waiting for the because in the obligation which C guaranteed liquidation of the rest. for A, C is not bound in his own right. Neither is 5. No retention or controversy has been A the creditor of B. commenced by a third person. Example: A owes B P100,000, and B owes A P100,000, but A’s credit of P100,000 has been garnished by C who claims to be an unpaid creditor of A. B has been duly notified of the controversy. There can be NO compensation here. Any possible compensation is in the meantime suspended. If C wins his claim, there can be no compensation; if he loses, the controversy is resolved, and compensation can take place. Article 1280. Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding article, the guarantor may set up compensation as regards what the creditor may owe the principal debtor. Compensation benefits guarantor. This article is an exception to the general rule that only the principal debtor can set up against his creditor what the latter owes him. Although the guarantor is only subsidiarily, not principally bound, he is given the right to set up compensation. The reason is that the extinguishment of the principal obligation as a